Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Manning To The Titans? [Merge]


Recommended Posts

If they do sign Manning, hopefully they release Locker. That's not fair to him to have to sit for 5 years just because Bud Adams is going to die soon and is cashing in all his chips.

Jaric

Never say 'cashing in all his chips' to an older person.... :eyebrow:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 247
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Peyton will NOT go to the Titans. He's classier than that, trust me. He just needed to give them their due diligence and passify Bud Adams.

I don't really think he'll go to Tennessee either, just because he's an honorable guy. Nor will he be going to Arizona. Much as I would LOVE it if he DID go to Tenn I think it will be Denver or miami.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why blame Peyton? If Irsay was a real man of his word, Peyton would be in Indy and retire from the field to our front office...but since Irsay wasnt being honest the whole time, now he will have to just deal with Peyton being somewhere he feels wanted.

Irsay said that Peyton could be a Colt if he wanted to be. Everyone else, it seems, has leaped to the conclusion that Irsay ran him out of town. For all we know, Peyton may have asked to be released or refused to sign a new deal. My point is that you can't be a "Colt for life" then work toward sticking it to the Colts for life. If Manning closes his playing career in Tennessee, I won't like it, but I'll deal with it. I cannot accept him, however, taking a leadership role with the Titans afterwards and working to kick our butts for the rest of his natural life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where did I say it affects the Colts? I just said I would be interested to know as in curious, I used "I". "I" do not speak for the Colts, just for myself. "I" am curious because it will tell me how the team signing him views his value. This is in NFL General, isn't it, and not the Colts section?

It is fine if you dont care, but I do care.

The actual word that you used was "concerned". I don't understand why a Colts fan would be "concerned" as to how much another team paid Manning. I do understand why any sports fan would find it interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he's healthy next year, and plays for our rivals, and whoops us, we need to take it like men. If that wasn't a possibility we were willing to face then we should never have released him.

Saying things like we could never forgive him if he goes to the Titans.

We're lucky if he ever forgives us for running him out of town.

How would you feel if your employer terminated your contract over a workplace injury, then your coworkers chastised you for their competitor believing in you and wanting to give you a job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The actual word that you used was "concerned". I don't understand why a Colts fan would be "concerned" as to how much another team paid Manning. I do understand why any sports fan would find it interesting.

But I did make clear later that I was way more curious than concerned, so it was obviously a case of faulty semantics used :). Does that make it clear now? :)

Plus, should I be "concerned" that I have to explain myself every time on this forum whenever I use faulty semantics? (j/k). This time, the "concerned" is "concerned" in the true sense. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Peyton goes to the Titans I still wish him well. no I do not like it but I did not like it when the colts let him go either. So ye I believe he has the right to land a job where ever he thinks is the best for him. If you do not want him to go somewhere else offer him a contract. When i seen on Colts.com Reggie a colt for life and the big deal made of it. I could not help but think of Peyton saying he wanted to be a colt for life. any way he is no longer a colt so he gets to go wherever he wants.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bud Adarns is giving Peyton a % of the team. People in Denver are furious about this

Knew was a lifetime offer, thought was in FO after retires, a % of team wow, either way thats some offer, I cant hold him to blame for taking it if he feels its best for him & his family, do I want him in our division, NO , but if its its something he cant get eslwhere, I do understand it

No hate from me to him on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

It don't matter, Adams will be dead before Manning's playing contract is over and then whoever takes over can take a sigh of relief and will be able to get out from under any such crazy agreements that Adams made.

If it is a guaranteed salary for x years, and it is written into the contract, such that it survives Bud's death, the league can easily present-value it into the cap.

If it is not guaranteed as such, it isn't real.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Knew was a lifetime offer, thought was in FO after retires, a % of team wow, either way thats some offer, I cant hold him to blame for taking it if he feels its best for him & his family, do I want him in our division, NO , but if its its something he cant get eslwhere, I do understand it

No hate from me to him on this

I doubt it will be any meaningful percentage of the team, because that value will be counted against their cap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But I did make clear later that I was way more curious than concerned, so it was obviously a case of faulty semantics used :). Does that make it clear now? :)

Plus, should I be "concerned" that I have to explain myself every time on this forum whenever I use faulty semantics? (j/k). This time, the "concerned" is "concerned" in the true sense. :)

I was commenting on your initial post. Don't know how you expect me to comment on your future posts, and I don't care enough to comment further. I stand by my initial post, and you can stand by your initial post if you choose.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt it will be any meaningful percentage of the team, because that value will be counted against their cap.

interesting point, wonder if its auto increased after retires from playing , then what happens with cap ,

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact is we really dont know exactly why he was released. Irsay obviously loves the guy who saved his franchise or his mural woulda been taken down. the only logical explanation i have is our team was obviously in need of change and irsqy knew that. So we went into rebuilding mode which is something peyton doesnt deserve to be part of late in his career when he wants to win n we want him to win as well. That logically adds up to him being released n us moving forward with presumably Luck and wishing him the best. Dont blame irsay if/when peyton starts excelling again, thank him for peyton because its exactly what was the wanted outcome.

I cant tell you How to grieve, or how to take the whole parting ways thing, but what i said is the only logical explanation i can come up with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me ask you a question. Peyton is a rich man and is a fierce competitor. He wants to play wherever he has the best chance of winning a Super Bowl. Since money is not an issue, if he believed his best chance of winning a championship was here in Indy, don't you think he would have restructured and stayed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me ask you a question. Peyton is a rich man and is a fierce competitor. He wants to play wherever he has the best chance of winning a Super Bowl. Since money is not an issue, if he believed his best chance of winning a championship was here in Indy, don't you think he would have restructured and stayed?

We don't know that he wasn't willing to restructure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me ask you a question. Peyton is a rich man and is a fierce competitor. He wants to play wherever he has the best chance of winning a Super Bowl. Since money is not an issue, if he believed his best chance of winning a championship was here in Indy, don't you think he would have restructured and stayed?

I am sure it was said that Irsay didn't even discuss restructuring with Peyton out of respect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me ask you a question. Peyton is a rich man and is a fierce competitor. He wants to play wherever he has the best chance of winning a Super Bowl. Since money is not an issue, if he believed his best chance of winning a championship was here in Indy, don't you think he would have restructured and stayed?

I think it was more wanting to draft Luck and starting a new era than a cap issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it was more wanting to draft Luck and starting a new era than a cap issue.

yes you are correct but those two issues, drafting Luck and cap issue, are interrated . .. you can't tied up so much money at one position when only one of those players can play at a given time . . . it doesnt make a lot of sense, and since you have a limited amount of cash to spend (i.e. cap issue), you better to allocate those funs to a different position, then to have those funds gathering dust on the sidelines . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I stated on another thread, this "contract for life", just what is this about? The Angels had this in Pujols contract, meaning that when he goes into the HOF he will go in as an Angel, Pujols will have no choice. Are the Titans trying to pull off the same deal, don't know if NFL players have the choice of team or does this contract make the decision for PM? Would not want to see PM in the HOF as a Titan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh I know. I am talking about performance level if he comes back.    Peters' injury was in March...and he actually tore it twice I think. 
    • Is that to give him an extra day to rip his achilles?!
    • If, for some reason, he can't go, do you think the Colts might have a 'split' contract (amount) on his P5 salary written in?  I expect he will be on the active/PUP pre-season, and very possibly to start the regular season on reserve/PUP list (missing the first 6 games.  But that just me and my expectations.  I want to be more optimistic, but a Mid August return in football shape is way to rosy for me.         I do not trust Rapoport (nor his source) on this projection on Fishers return status. I caution those that do, do not be upset and angry if he isn't 'ready' by mid August.     Keep an eye out for active (summer/training camp) and possibly later, the reserve (reg. season), PUP lists.     Hopefully he can and will be 100%. Will make Colts fans very happy. But mark me down as he might be ready mid-late October, and will be at 75-80%.  Even with a great surgeon, perfect operation, and of the charts rehab, you can't rush biology. IE:, the low blood supply necessary for healing, the muscle atrophy that occurs, etc...   My feeling is he might be end up being 'cleared for full activity' in/by end of July, but it may take as long as another 3 months or more (ask @TomDiggs) of football drills/practice just to get somewhat back into playing shape by 9 months. And I feel that even that may be still too early and could be a contributing reason why football players that do return also have notably decreased performance during the year following their return. Cleared for activity and cleared to play are two totally separate things.   Ran across this, to go with all of the other studies discussed in another { Left Tackle(Leno,Fisher,Okung?)/Sam Tevi at LT (MERGE) }  thread-   “Seventy-eight Achilles tendon ruptures were identified in professional football players during the 2010-2015 NFL seasons. 58% of these injuries occurred during the preseason. Of those that suffered an Achilles tendon rupture, 26% did not ever return to play in the NFL. Players who did return to play in the NFL took an average of 9 months to recover after the date of injury. Across all positions, there was a net decrease in power ratings by 22% and a net decrease in approximate value by 23% over 3 years following player return after Achilles tendon rupture. Across all positions, running backs saw the biggest decrease in production with a 78% decrease over 3 years post-injury in both power ratings and approximate value.”   The fact they signed him gives hope he will contribute, at some point. When and how ell are the questions.            
  • Members

    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 297

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LJpalmbeacher2

      LJpalmbeacher2 2,106

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 2,576

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 632

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mackrel829

      Mackrel829 197

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 5,604

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Wentzszn

      Wentzszn 10,446

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Horshoekid1986

      Horshoekid1986 7

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dw49

      dw49 739

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 7,188

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...