Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoosiers

Fantasy Football Advise 2019 Edition Ask Here

Recommended Posts

Mayfield didn't go anything, but my RB's David Johnson and Dalvin Cook scored points for me. I also had the Ravens' defense. I ended up doing quite well because of them. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

Marquis Brown's snaps were far less than Malcolm Brown, I'd place more on Malcolm Brown than Marquis Brown, based on that. I just don't have an idea how the money aspect works within your limits.

But look what he did in 14 snaps. That role will increase and he could be one to snag early. I've got 15 and 13 respectively. It's probably going to be too high (in a sense no-one else spend that high), so if I get them I probably could have gotten them for half that knowing my league. Its a big chunk to spend week one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Start/Sit advice.

 

Team 1: 1pt ppr

RB: Elliot, Cook, J. Jacobs, M. Brown**/D. Henderson, Penny, J. Jackson

 

WR: Watkins, Gallup, Golladay, D. Moore, C. Kirk, M Brown**/Pettis

 

 

Team 2: half ppr

RB: Cook, D. WilliamsMixon*, M  J. Jackson, M. Brown**/D. Henderson

 

WR: M. Thomas, Kupp, Diggs*, C. Samuel, MVS, M. Brown**/Pettis

 

* injured, questionable

** pending waiver bid and drop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Narcosys said:

Start/Sit advice.

 

Team 1: 1pt ppr

RB: Elliot, Cook, J. Jacobs, M. Brown, Penny, J. Jackson

 

WR: Watkins, Gallup, Golladay, D. Moore, C. Kirk, M Brown

 

 

Team 2: half ppr

RB: Cook, D. WilliamsMixon*, M  J. Jackson, C. Thompson

 

WR: M. Thomas, Kupp, Diggs*, C. Samuel, MVS, J. Ross

 

* injured, questionable

 

Didn't get either for Team 2, so I updated my start sit.

 

Picked up Chris Thompson and dropped D. Henderson.  I had a backup bid on John Ross so I got him, but Amendola, Metcalf, Moncrief, and T. McLaurin are both available on waivers. I'm not tied to John Ross, so I'm thinking either Amendola or Mclaurin would be better, especially down the line.

 

@chad72, @Jared Cisneros

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Narcosys said:

Didn't get either for Team 2, so I updated my start sit.

 

Picked up Chris Thompson and dropped D. Henderson.  I had a backup bid on John Ross so I got him, but Amendola, Metcalf, Moncrief, and T. McLaurin are both available on waivers. I'm not tied to John Ross, so I'm thinking either Amendola or Mclaurin would be better, especially down the line.

 

@chad72, @Jared Cisneros

 

McLaurin for sure for the long term.

 

I'd roll with M. Brown over Gallup on Team 1 vs Cardinals who are more stout vs the run. Rest looks good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

McLaurin for sure for the long term.

 

I'd roll with M. Brown over Gallup on Team 1 vs Cardinals who are more stout vs the run. Rest looks good.

So who would you flex on Team 2. If Diggs and Mixon can't play. Right now I have Thompson, but have picked up McLaurin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Narcosys said:

So who would you flex on Team 2. If Diggs and Mixon can't play. Right now I have Thompson, but have picked up McLaurin.

 

I'd play Ross vs 49ers, better matchup than McLaurin vs Cowboys. Bengals are at home and they started 5-2 last year before putting a whole bunch of players on IR. Bengals typically start fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Need a running back and a flex between

 

D. Cook, J. Jacobs, Marquise Brown.

 

Right now I've got Jacobs with cook as flex, but that Arizona matchup looks amazing for Brown while the packers concern me for cook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Narcosys said:

Need a running back and a flex between

 

D. Cook, J. Jacobs, Marquise Brown.

 

Right now I've got Jacobs with cook as flex, but that Arizona matchup looks amazing for Brown while the packers concern me for cook.

 

Go with your gut, still early in the season. But then, you have to know that Cousins can throw it better than Trubisky, and that opens the Vikings run game better, so I won’t read into Packers’ D too much right now till things play out a few weeks. But hey, this is the time to take a chance.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

Go with your gut, still early in the season. But then, you have to know that Cousins can throw it better than Trubisky, and that opens the Vikings run game better, so I won’t read into Packers’ D too much right now till things play out a few weeks. But hey, this is the time to take a chance.

I could flex Dalvin and just swap Brown and Gallup. Gallup may likely have a drop this week against the Redskins cause Norman may not shadow Cooper. 

 

On second thought, I'll just keep what I have and give Brown another week. But dang that Arizona matchup.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jared Cisneros @Narcosys

 

Mark Ingram at home vs Arizona

or

Leonard Fournette this weekend at Houston

 

I am leaning towards Fournette in this one. Mainly because I feel the Cardinals are more stout on run D and I feel the Jaguars' best chance to stay in the game is help Minshew with the run game, which is what I feel they will do. Plus, Houston looked more porous on run D without Clowney, just my opinion of course.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, chad72 said:

@Jared Cisneros @Narcosys

 

Mark Ingram at home vs Arizona

or

Leonard Fournette this weekend at Houston

 

I am leaning towards Fournette in this one. Mainly because I feel the Cardinals are more stout on run D and I feel the Jaguars' best chance to stay in the game is help Minshew with the run game, which is what I feel they will do. Plus, Houston looked more porous on run D without Clowney, just my opinion of course.

Very tough choice. I think the Ravens will run up the score and Ingram will get his. The Texans lost Clowney and his elite run-defending skills. I would go with Ingram because I expect him to get his touches and a score or two. Fournette could get something like 20 carries for 60 yards and that's likely with him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is anyone starting Antonio Brown this week? He is eligible to play, but there is no news if he will actually be on the field. I don't know what the Patriots have in mind, so I wasn't planning on starting him until I see what is going on. Things should be clearer in the next few weeks. 

 

I plan on staring Brady in one of my leagues, and will go with Edelman as one of my WR's . I'll also be using their defense. I don't care about the Patriots as a team, but in fantasy I'll use almost anyone who can get me points. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/13/2019 at 9:03 PM, teganslaw said:

Is anyone starting Antonio Brown this week? He is eligible to play, but there is no news if he will actually be on the field. I don't know what the Patriots have in mind, so I wasn't planning on starting him until I see what is going on. Things should be clearer in the next few weeks. 

 

I plan on staring Brady in one of my leagues, and will go with Edelman as one of my WR's . I'll also be using their defense. I don't care about the Patriots as a team, but in fantasy I'll use almost anyone who can get me points. 

I would monitor pre-game, but yes on AB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Week 2 line-up.

Full PPR

RBElliot, J. Jacobs, Cook, M. Brown, R. Penny, J. Jackson

WR: Watkins, Gallup, Golladay, Kirk, M. Brown, D. J. Moore

 

Half PPR

RB: Cook, D. Williams, Mixon, J. Jackson, C. Thompson

WR: M. Thomas, Kupp, Diggs, C. Samuels, MVS, T. Mclaurin

 

For full ppr, I'm considering swapping kirk in place if Gallup as Norman may not shadow Cooper and Arizona's up-tempo, he could see a lot of targets.

 

For half ppr, now that guice is out, I can see Thompson getting lots of snaps in the passing game as they will be playing from behind, which has me thinking of flexing him instead of Diggs. But not as much as I'm thinking of my full ppr league. I'm feeling pretty good about my RB situation in this league.

 

@Jared Cisneros @chad72

 

And anyone else who wants to chime in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/13/2019 at 8:23 PM, Jared Cisneros said:

Very tough choice. I think the Ravens will run up the score and Ingram will get his. The Texans lost Clowney and his elite run-defending skills. I would go with Ingram because I expect him to get his touches and a score or two. Fournette could get something like 20 carries for 60 yards and that's likely with him.

Idk, I think it may turn into a passing game with the tempo Arizona wants to play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/13/2019 at 3:23 PM, Jared Cisneros said:

Very tough choice. I think the Ravens will run up the score and Ingram will get his. The Texans lost Clowney and his elite run-defending skills. I would go with Ingram because I expect him to get his touches and a score or two. Fournette could get something like 20 carries for 60 yards and that's likely with him.

 

I went with Fournette, turned out to be the right choice in a standard league though not by a mile, just a few extra points.

 

I was surprised how little the passing game did for the Jaguars, it is Doug Marrone and Tom Coughlin at their best, always played it safe with a run game and defense, felt like the Jaguars could have done more, especially with how inefficient the Texans were on offense.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dalvin cook for mccaffrey. Who wins that trade? Mccaffrey is the better receiving back, but the panthers offense is not nearly as good as the Vikings. And the Vikings could heavily rely on Dalvin cook this year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Luck 4 president said:

Dalvin cook for mccaffrey. Who wins that trade? Mccaffrey is the better receiving back, but the panthers offense is not nearly as good as the Vikings. And the Vikings could heavily rely on Dalvin cook this year. 

PPR?

 

CmC is no slouch in the run game either. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jared Cisneros @Narcosys - in a half-PPR league where I can play 4 RBs, or 4 WRs (essentially 2 FLEX positions of the WR/RB/TE kind), my RBs are Carson, Ekeler, Ingram, Peterson and Duke Johnson Jr.

 

My WRs/TEs are Michael Thomas, JuJu, Emmanuel Sanders, Evan Engram, T.J.Hockenson

 

Can I safely drop Duke Johnson Jr. with my league configuration and above roster? He has been seriously underachieving and needs rushing to be productive with the numerous receiving options in Houston but Carlos Hyde is doing all the rushing. Or do I stand pat to see if a injury happens or if Melvin Gordon comes back squashing Ekeler's value?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, chad72 said:

@Jared Cisneros @Narcosys - in a half-PPR league where I can play 4 RBs, or 4 WRs (essentially 2 FLEX positions of the WR/RB/TE kind), my RBs are Carson, Ekeler, Ingram, Peterson and Duke Johnson Jr.

 

My WRs/TEs are Michael Thomas, JuJu, Emmanuel Sanders, Evan Engram, T.J.Hockenson

 

Can I safely drop Duke Johnson Jr. with my league configuration and above roster? He has been seriously underachieving and needs rushing to be productive with the numerous receiving options in Houston but Carlos Hyde is doing all the rushing. Or do I stand pat to see if a injury happens or if Melvin Gordon comes back squashing Ekeler's value?

 

 

I believe Gordon will come back by weeks 6-8 or he won't be eligible for FA. It's somewhat of a risk there. I would probably drop Duke. Even in 1/2 point PPR, he's not doing enough, and your lineup is fine how it is now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, chad72 said:

@Jared Cisneros @Narcosys - in a half-PPR league where I can play 4 RBs, or 4 WRs (essentially 2 FLEX positions of the WR/RB/TE kind), my RBs are Carson, Ekeler, Ingram, Peterson and Duke Johnson Jr.

 

My WRs/TEs are Michael Thomas, JuJu, Emmanuel Sanders, Evan Engram, T.J.Hockenson

 

Can I safely drop Duke Johnson Jr. with my league configuration and above roster? He has been seriously underachieving and needs rushing to be productive with the numerous receiving options in Houston but Carlos Hyde is doing all the rushing. Or do I stand pat to see if a injury happens or if Melvin Gordon comes back squashing Ekeler's value?

 

 

Even if Gordon comes back, ekeler is still going to get his. As long as there are others to pick up like C. Thompson or R. Mostert (prefer Mostert in this case). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WR Trade thoughts:

 

My current WR Roster:

Kenny G., Watkins, M. Brown, Gallup, Kirk, D.J. Moore

 

Opposing Teams WR Roster:

OBJ, T. Boyd, R. Anderson, Westbrook, G. Allison

 

They have their RBs locked up with DJ, Freeman, and D. Henry. As well as TEs with Walker and Howard.

 

I am targeting OBJ.  Would offering Watkins and Moore be too much, fair, or not enough?  Should I offer Watkins and Kirk?  

 

@chad72 @Jared Cisneros

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Narcosys said:

WR Trade thoughts:

 

My current WR Roster:

Kenny G., Watkins, M. Brown, Gallup, Kirk, D.J. Moore

 

Opposing Teams WR Roster:

OBJ, T. Boyd, R. Anderson, Westbrook, G. Allison

 

They have their RBs locked up with DJ, Freeman, and D. Henry. As well as TEs with Walker and Howard.

 

I am targeting OBJ.  Would offering Watkins and Moore be too much, fair, or not enough?  Should I offer Watkins and Kirk?  

 

@chad72 @Jared Cisneros

Probably somewhere between fair and not enough. Make both offers and see if he accepts either one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Probably somewhere between fair and not enough. Make both offers and see if he accepts either one.

Would Watkins and Golladay be considered too much?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Narcosys said:

Would Watkins and Golladay be considered too much?

To me yes. Watkins will get lots of yards and TDs without Hill, and I love Golladay personally. Wouldn't do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Narcosys said:

Even if Gordon comes back, ekeler is still going to get his. As long as there are others to pick up like C. Thompson or R. Mostert (prefer Mostert in this case). 

 

I just kept Duke Johnson and dropped Philip Rivers instead to pick up Deebo Samuel, with my primary QB being Carson Wentz. In 1 QB leagues, I can always find a QB.

 

Mostert is available, do I drop Duke Johnson and pick him up? His value will go down once Coleman comes back but Duke Johnson is still #2 for what it is worth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Narcosys said:

Would Watkins and Golladay be considered too much?

 

Yes, that would be too much.

 

Watkins and Moore would mean 2 #1 WRs that the other is getting for OBJ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Yes, that would be too much.

 

Watkins and Moore would mean 2 #1 WRs that the other is getting for OBJ.

That's what I thought, but with their RBs they only need odb and boyd. So it would hurt them really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

I just kept Duke Johnson and dropped Philip Rivers instead to pick up Deebo Samuel, with my primary QB being Carson Wentz. In 1 QB leagues, I can always find a QB.

 

Mostert is available, do I drop Duke Johnson and pick him up? His value will go down once Coleman comes back but Duke Johnson is still #2 for what it is worth.

Mosterts schedule is most easy doing the time Coleman will be out. Could at least be a trade bait that you use after week 6.

 

I wouldn't think anyone its going to pick up duke even if you drop him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Narcosys said:

Start one

Jimmy G vs Pit (5th)

Famous Jameis vs NYG (3rd)

You like that Cousins vs Oak (8th)

 

Jimmy G, he seems to be getting his groove.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Jimmy G, he seems to be getting his groove.

Grabbed him and dropped Carr.

 

Someone dropped Cam, should I grab him and drop Cousins?

 

I'm pretty much streaming QBs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Narcosys said:

Grabbed him and dropped Carr.

 

Someone dropped Cam, should I grab him and drop Cousins?

 

I'm pretty much streaming QBs.

 

If you think Jimmy G will last you a few games till Cam improves accuracy and gets healthy, yes!!! The upside with Cam is good

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.5 PPR

 

RB: Cook, Gore, Mixon, D. Williams, J. Jackson

WR: Thomas, Kupp Diggs, C. Samuel, T. McLaurin, MVS

 

If Singletary is out, starting Gore would be the way to go. It's either flex Diggs or Mixon and I think Diggs has the better matchup. 

 

Also thinking of dropping MVS and grabbing Tate before his suspension ends. However I've only got one move left and Penny is there for free, so grab him instead and drop Jackson, then grabbing Tate next week.

 

@chad72 @Jared Cisneros

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Narcosys said:

.5 PPR

 

RB: Cook, Gore, Mixon, D. Williams, J. Jackson

WR: Thomas, Kupp Diggs, C. Samuel, T. McLaurin, MVS

 

If Singletary is out, starting Gore would be the way to go. It's either flex Diggs or Mixon and I think Diggs has the better matchup. 

 

Also thinking of dropping MVS and grabbing Tate before his suspension ends. However I've only got one move left and Penny is there for free, so grab him instead and drop Jackson, then grabbing Tate next week.

 

@chad72 @Jared Cisneros

 

Don't rush it. Packers played 2 good Ds, and MVS' receptions and yards will only go up with time. 

 

I'd stand put. Your lineup above is just fine. If it is a full PPR league, I'd say yes to Tate but I'd see how well Daniel Jones distributes the ball before dropping MVS.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

Don't rush it. Packers played 2 good Ds, and MVS' receptions and yards will only go up with time. 

 

I'd stand put. Your lineup above is just fine. If it is a full PPR league, I'd say yes to Tate but I'd see how well Daniel Jones distributes the ball before dropping MVS.

There's no-one else I'd drop but him. 

 

I'll tell you what though, I've never felt like I've struggled more than I have already this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Narcosys said:

There's no-one else I'd drop but him. 

 

I'll tell you what though, I've never felt like I've struggled more than I have already this year.

 

Here is a question for you:

 

Choose 6 out of these (2 RBs, 2 WRs, 2 FLEX (WR/RB/TE)):

 

Chris Carson, Austin Ekeler, Michael Thomas, JuJu, Mark Ingram, Evan Engram, Emmanuel Sanders, Adrian Peterson, Deebo Samuel

 

The ones in bold are my current choices. I don't know what to make of the Chiefs' improved run defense but hard to sit Ingram when the Ravens will try to keep Mahomes off the field with Lamar's and Ingram's legs with the run game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Glad what we’ve been seeing for years is finally being brought to the forefront, especially since not all QBs benefited from the special treatment. Luck used to get constantly  murdered back there and barely ever got the officials “protection.”   Brady said too many flags...  
    • I expect  Brissett  to be much better eventually.  Luck was brought  along just as slow the beginning  of last year and every one was like where are the deep balls? Eventually  Cain, Campbell,  or Roger's will get more involved  with offense.   
    • To me, we would know his progression, not ceiling. I’ll bet the playbook is still not fully installed yet, nor fully grasped by all of the player.  Some are further along than others as well.  I believe we can thank the CBA (with its very much reduced coach/player/team activities in the off season) at least in part for the less than stellar offensive creativity and brilliance in execution.   JB is a Works In Progress. I don’t feel that 4 weeks will determine his final destination. Unless, he really isn’t going to be more than average.  I’m watching the full year.  That should be a good indicator for what the team should plan to do next off season/training camp,
    • For a second, based on the link title, I thought that someone pulled an Aaron Hernandez.
    • Yep.   And nothing you’re going to type will move me from that position.   I appreciate what he did when was here. But that appreciation is only for what he did prior to his little show this year. 
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 22,629

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IrishColt

      IrishColt 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rebel

      Rebel 58

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltspamela

      coltspamela 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Stephen

      Stephen 1,619

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blindside

      Blindside 22

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • COLTS7

      COLTS7 283

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Beizy317

      Beizy317 19

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 35

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...