Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Slightly OT - Most Vulgar NFL Fan Bases


zibby43

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, pgt_rob said:

This is just on Reddit? Anyone can post of those just like here, so how does one calculate this survey. Could be a fan, could be an opposing fan. 

 

Average number of profane words per 10 subscribers on each team's subreddit. 

 

That's how it's calculated.  It's just a bit of fun, not a peer-reviewed study.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, zibby43 said:

 

Average number of profane words per 10 subscribers on each team's subreddit. 

 

That's how it's calculated.  It's just a bit of fun, not a peer-reviewed study.  

Interesting.  They should include us, we have no profanity :)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Nadine said:

Interesting.  They should include us, we have no profanity :)

 

 

I was going to say, if they were basing this off of official team boards like this one, the Colts would win.

 

There may be a few eccentric folks here, but there is absolutely no colorful language, and I think that is very classy and a reflection of the awesome administrators and moderators on the staff.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
On 7/31/2019 at 7:45 PM, King Colt said:

Not surprised to see Jets fans near the bottom. Jets fans have never had a reason to be vulgar and New Yorkers in general are noted for their sweet dispositions.

They're not near the bottom. The list shows only the most vulgar teams. Half the league is missing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • would of been nice in hindsight, no doubt.   I was on the fence during offseason, but once it became clear we would lose $30m+ in cap space due to covid, was most definitely the move to make in my opinion.     When I say $30m+, I mean the drop of $22m coupled with the cap expectation to go up another $10m.   $32m+ swing. Would love to have all that money going into next year for sure. This thread wouldn't be needed. Lol.
    • Definitely, but the top of the top FAs, teams will be wanting to secure their services. So teams will come out with good deals for them.     Should be fun, no doubt. Like you said earlier, glad we have Ballard, because we could be setting in real bad shape like some of those other teams if he wasnt so diligent with the cap.(again, not that we are in great shape, but no one is).   Jags are in decent shape though.   We have higher expectations going into next season though, Im sure a lot of those teams wont even worry about being to competitive.
    • Yep.   this is where cutting or trading JB would have been a good move after signing rivers. We could have rolled that extra 16 mil on top of the 10 million and been able to take that with us in the tightening cap. 
    • Ive never read they knew about it last week, earliest I could find was Saturday (Hope it is true but couldnt find it anywhere) and no report the contacted anyone to put in protocol that I have seen (Again sure hope I am wrong, hoping for M King).
    • Given the sheer number of players and teams this will affect, you’re not going to see the mega contracts like you did the last two or three years. It’s going to force players to either get out or sign lower priced deals. Period.    espn had an article earlier this week, I’ll see if I can find it, basically when it comes to options, pretty much any team over the cap more than 15-20 million, which is roughly 6-7 teams, will have very few options. The worst two, Saints and Eagles have basically two options realistically, cut players or convert those salaries to cash, when equates to roughly 100 million out of the pockets of the owners. I think the latter option is going to be hard to swallow. That’s a lot of money even for billionaire team owners to fork over all at once.    there’s likely to be more vets cut, good Vets than in years past. But then some dead money will roll over to future years. Will be interesting indeed
  • Members

    • ar7

      ar7 450

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 11,081

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheLegend87

      TheLegend87 3,861

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 445

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PrincetonTiger

      PrincetonTiger 12,390

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfan77

      coltsfan77 118

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 1,437

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 2,786

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 2,971

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • VaAllDay757

      VaAllDay757 645

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...