Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Behle

Colts and a player holdout?

Recommended Posts

What would Colts management do if one of the players were to holdout?  Players currently are taking a cue from the NBA and forcing teams to pay them, and in Gordon’s case, possibly  trade them .  I think management would not negotiate if a player were to do so. Seems that the Colts may try to avoid that scenario by taking care of players before that happens. That though remains to be seen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now with the culture of this team I have a hard time picturing anyone holding out. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing guys who would hold out are not the type of guys that Ballard drafts.

 

Don't get me wrong, no one is expected to play for a discount.  But you play out your contract in terms of showing up to camp and playing in the games.  If your contract ends you hit free agency and all 32 teams can make offers to you.

 

This holdout thing is people trying to get more money while they are still under contract.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

I'm guessing guys who would hold out are not the type of guys that Ballard drafts.

 

Don't get me wrong, no one is expected to play for a discount.  But you play out your contract in terms of showing up to camp and playing in the games.  If your contract ends you hit free agency and all 32 teams can make offers to you.

 

This holdout thing is people trying to get more money while they are still under contract.  

 

I think the belief that the Colts don’t have players who would hold out is naive as can be. Of course they do - they just don’t have guys who are at the right point of their contract. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

 

I think the belief that the Colts don’t have players who would hold out is naive as can be. Of course they do - they just don’t have guys who are at the right point of their contract. 

You dont think AC is at the point to hold out? What about Ebron and Doyle. They are all in the last year and could easily do that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jskinnz said:

 

I think the belief that the Colts don’t have players who would hold out is naive as can be. Of course they do - they just don’t have guys who are at the right point of their contract. 

I totally agree and its very naive and we would all do the same if put in that position especially football where careers are usually very short and it can end on one play. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Melvin Gordon is holding out because he’s a running back on a rookie deal. Castonzo has already gotten his second contract so there’s no reason for him to hold out in a contract year. Ebron is also in a contract year and while he may have outplayed what he made last year, he’s not exactly a prototypical every down TE. He played like 50% of offensive snaps. He was given the opportunity of a lifetime by Reich and Ballard and was put in a position to succeed. Neither guy is in a spot where they would benefit from a holdout. 

 

Now let’s say Darius balls out this year and next the way he did his rookie year and isn’t given a new contract going in to year four, that would be a situation where we could see a holdout. I don’t think Ballard would allow that. The way that he rewarded Moore and to a lesser degree Desir and Hunt, I just don’t see him letting it get to that point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Peytonator said:

Melvin Gordon is holding out because he’s a running back on a rookie deal. Castonzo has already gotten his second contract so there’s no reason for him to hold out in a contract year. Ebron is also in a contract year and while he may have outplayed what he made last year, he’s not exactly a prototypical every down TE. He played like 50% of offensive snaps. He was given the opportunity of a lifetime by Reich and Ballard and was put in a position to succeed. Neither guy is in a spot where they would benefit from a holdout. 

 

Now let’s say Darius balls out this year and next the way he did his rookie year and isn’t given a new contract going in to year four, that would be a situation where we could see a holdout. I don’t think Ballard would allow that. The way that he rewarded Moore and to a lesser degree Desir and Hunt, I just don’t see him letting it get to that point. 

That is one reason you won’t see a colt hold out. Ballard is smart and would never let it get that far.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

You dont think AC is at the point to hold out? What about Ebron and Doyle. They are all in the last year and could easily do that.

 

Weak. Those are bad examples. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, The Peytonator said:

Melvin Gordon is holding out because he’s a running back on a rookie deal. Castonzo has already gotten his second contract so there’s no reason for him to hold out in a contract year. Ebron is also in a contract year and while he may have outplayed what he made last year, he’s not exactly a prototypical every down TE. He played like 50% of offensive snaps. He was given the opportunity of a lifetime by Reich and Ballard and was put in a position to succeed. Neither guy is in a spot where they would benefit from a holdout. 

 

Now let’s say Darius balls out this year and next the way he did his rookie year and isn’t given a new contract going in to year four, that would be a situation where we could see a holdout. I don’t think Ballard would allow that. The way that he rewarded Moore and to a lesser degree Desir and Hunt, I just don’t see him letting it get to that point. 

Agree, seems he might be keeping his cap space available for those situations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Behle said:

What would Colts management do if one of the players were to holdout?  Players currently are taking a cue from the NBA and forcing teams to pay them, and in Gordon’s case, possibly  trade them .  I think management would not negotiate if a player were to do so. Seems that the Colts may try to avoid that scenario by taking care of players before that happens. That though remains to be seen. 

The Colts have some kind of system in place that deals pretty well with that issue. I've been watching the Colts since 2001 and can't recall barely a single player holdout. I'm sure I'm missing someone but overall it's been very minimal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, The Peytonator said:

Now let’s say Darius balls out this year and next the way he did his rookie year and isn’t given a new contract going in to year four, that would be a situation where we could see a holdout

 

I was ready to put the one to watch is DL. Bobby Wagner just got a 3 year- 54 mil extension with 40 guaranteed... meaning Mr. Leonard sees what is coming in the next couple years. If he has two more good years, and negotiations heading into his 4th year are stalling over a top tiered contract, I could absolutely see him holding out. He has a family and came from very little. I wouldn't blame him. That's a lot of guaranteed money to have wiped out because of an untimely injury. 

 

Ballard is smart and will likely jump at the chance to lock his stars down. It's why our cap situation is important. We are going to have a tight cap one of these days, and that's a damn good problem to have if your guys are worth it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Darius has two more seasons before he is even eligible for a extension. If he plays the way he played last year you don’t think Ballard will make him the highest paid LB. Everyone seems to think Ballard’s approach is the same with his own players that it is in FA. It’s not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/26/2019 at 4:19 PM, Behle said:

What would Colts management do if one of the players were to holdout?

 

First of all, I get the players who holdout, as they just want to secure their future and get as much money in the bank as they can, before they cant play anymore. 

 

Second, in two years ( the 2021 season - please correct me if im wrong) there will be NO games played due to negotiations for a new CBA, where the NFL and NFLPA will have to find a solution, that won't be solved right away, and as for what I have read and understood, that will be an ugly fight and players want guaranteed contracts and much more money and power, like in the NBA, MLB, which the NFL owners will try to avoid. 

My point is, those players who holdout now, want as much money before the 2021 season, as some of them know, they might miss a full season. 

 

Im not for holding out, but I understand the players, as this sport is much tougher and in many ways like open field boxing, where players  can get concussions on every play, which in the long run can lead to severe injuries and ruin the lives of players after retirement. 

 

You all know the movie Concussion with Will Smith, about CTE... I dont care how much the NFL says they have done to avoid players getting concussions, they can't do anything about it, as players still get concussions and blows to their head on every down, which is part of the game and something you just cant do anything about, unless they cant touch each other.

 

But the colts and Chris Ballard are smart and the players they have on their roster, all knows that, if they perform for the colts, they will get paid. 

Ballard have created a culture, where the players believe in him and trust him.

 

Had we had Grigson, I would say it would be a whole different story, as players hated Grigson and the culture was poisoned and in no way as it is right now.

 

So if a player would hold out, Ballard would just let the player hold out, and replace the player with the next man up, and the player would never play for the colts again, as he wouldn't fit the culture or into the locker room.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard has said to our guys “If you play, I’ll play” I would find it really hard to see one of our players holding out. Especially with the money we have and how Ballard has managed it. We can do contract extensions and new team friendly deals easily. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, a06cc said:

Ballard has said to our guys “If you play, I’ll play” I would find it really hard to see one of our players holding out. Especially with the money we have and how Ballard has managed it. We can do contract extensions and new team friendly deals easily. 

 

Today it is easy.  In 2-3 more years when some of these picks that they've hit on come due for a 2nd contract and Luck is in line for a raise, it will be a much bigger challenge.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, jskinnz said:

 

Today it is easy.  In 2-3 more years when some of these picks that they've hit on come due for a 2nd contract and Luck is in line for a raise, it will be a much bigger challenge.   

 

Yup. Primary reason they have a good cap situation right now is that Grigson blew three straight drafts. I think we only have one player remaining from the 2013-2015 drafts. 

 

Simply having better drafts from 2016-2018 is going to change the cap math, and soon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think RB are the one position that get screwed with the rookie contacts and pay scale. The shelf life for a RB is so short so teams don’t want to give them a second contact. They would rather start with another rookie running back. Especially hurts if your a RB who becomes great and  you were a fourth rd pick like Mack. He could get a extension after this season. Going to be interesting if he gets it early.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Players should hold out for every penny they can get when that is their only leverage. Melvin Gordon and Leveon Bell are prime examples of owners working the system to their benefit.  Which I agree with.  Use the rules and tools available to maximize your position. For players that is holding out for a contract or trade and owners that is the franchise tag, slotted rookie deals and unguaranteed contracts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think RB are the one position that get screwed with the rookie contacts and pay scale. The shelf life for a RB is so short so teams don’t want to give them a second contact. They would rather start with another rookie running back. Especially hurts if your a RB who becomes great and  you were a fourth rd pick like Mack. He could get a extension after this season. Going to be interesting if he gets it early.

 

RB's get screwed in other ways too.  There is also the sheer fact that it seems to work just fine to just have a rotation of 3 different RB's based on situation rather than 1 bell cow back.   So a lot of teams arn't even close to interested in them for the money they want.

 

Honestly if you ask me I think the value of the top RB's is inflated as it is.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/28/2019 at 10:30 AM, jskinnz said:

 

Today it is easy.  In 2-3 more years when some of these picks that they've hit on come due for a 2nd contract and Luck is in line for a raise, it will be a much bigger challenge.   

That’s part of the reason why I’m sure Ballard hasn’t selected any big names in free agency. He and Irsay have prepared for the future for signing our guys. I don’t think it will be a problem in the future. That’s why we’re saving the money we have now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Brady has played within and exceptional system the majority of his career (and sure, they may have been caught cheating, but I imagine every coach in the NFL is trying to do something every week to get a leg up on the opponent).   My biggest argument on why I take Peyton over Brady is look what happened the year Peyton missed -- we went from being projected to win the AFC South, potential SB contenders, 10+ wins, etc... and we became the laughing stock of the league going 2-14.  It exposed how bad our team really was without Peyton at the helm.     When Brady missed significant time, Matt Cassell led them to 11 wins.  Matt Cassel backed up Matt Barkley and ButtFumble Sanchez in college and never had a snap in a real game, yet could win double digits in NE.  Cassel got paid like a #1 QB after that, and has had maybe 1 decent year and otherwise is a major disappointment and essentially a journeyman back-up QB -- yet, he could win very regularly in NE under Belichek.   To me, that just says Peyton was a more valuable player to his team than Brady.  It's evidenced by Peyton's regular season MVP awards.  Unfortunately, I don't think Peyton ever had as good a team around him (including defense) as Brady has had since he's been a starter in the NFL.  Also unfortunate, the problem on relying on one guy in the playoffs is that the playoffs usually require all 3 phases of a team to be playing pretty flawless once you're through the wildcard rounds.  Brady always had a D he could count on, always had a run game, and has had a lot of very reliable WRs throughout his career.  He rarely was asked to do as much for his team to get W's as Peyton was asked to do in Indy (or his first year in Denver).       I think Belichek is the best coach in NFL history and at this point, I think it's almost hands down (I think the argument that he is the best is a far easier one to make than any individual QB, or really any individual player, considered the best all time).  If Matt Cassel could win 11 games with Belichek, I'm pretty sure there are at least 15 QBs in the league who could post winning records with that system (Cassel is far inferior to guys like Peyton, Brees, Rodgers, Big Ben, Stafford, and a whole slew of other QBs who have played QB in this league).     Brady is a clutch player and he plays in a very solid system on a very solid team year in and year out.  That said, in their primes, I think a guy like Peyton could go to a 2-14 team and turn it around quicker than Brady could.  It's impossible to say, but if Peyton played 20 years with Belichek, I'd have to think he'd have as much or more SBs than Brady -- whereas, I don't think Brady could elevate a team like Indy the same way Peyton did over the course of his career.
    • Just finished watching the Pack/Lions to ight and the officials cost the Lions the game. Two calls against the Lions DE #90 for hands to the face showed clearly his hands were on the opponents pads. So obvious were both calls one would think the games was rigged. I'm sure you will see this on the sports shows tomorrow. These two calls could cost the Lions a run for the SB. "Not reviewable" now is like "diplomatic immunity". The NFL is a joke.
    • Wait a minute...I'm a little slow tonight...So, your happy dream is to have famous fetching females come over to your flat & play a board game? Maybe you play a more adventuresome game in Scotland then we do in North America BHC. That must be it. Wink; Wink.   Something got lost in translation here. Only kidding! 
    • Injuring the  brain is not like injuring say a knee.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...