Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Chloe6124

AC talks contract extension

Recommended Posts

Dont see any other options. Its not like we have anyone currently on the roster that can replace AC. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, CR91 said:

Dont see any other options. Its not like we have anyone currently on the roster that can replace AC. 

Right there are no other options. Teams don’t trade their superstar left tackles and it’s not like you can just get one in the draft and they will be good right away.  This o line would take a huge step back if he wasn’t extrnddd. O lineman age well in the nfl. They can play well into this mid thirties. I think it will get done once they get back to camp.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Right there are no other options. Teams don’t trade their superstar left tackles and it’s not like you can just get one in the draft and they will be good right away.  This o line would take a huge step back if he wasn’t extrnddd. O lineman age well in the nfl. They can play well into this mid thirties. I think it will get done once they get back to camp.

Agreed. There may be one or two elite left tackles per draft, and most aren't NFL ready lineman like a Quenton Nelson. We also probably won't have a high enough pick to take an elite one in the 1st round. Best to extend Constanzo and draft his successor in the 2nd round next year IMO.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the interview he did say he isn’t about chasing the money. He said he is thirty years old and he doesn’t need to do that. As long as they offer him s fair deal I think it will get done pretty quick. He should retire here. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

 O lineman age well in the nfl. They can play well into this mid thirties. 

 

Left tackles don’t age that well.  I’m an AC fan but they definitely have to prepare for his level of play to start waning soon.  

 

Check out this article:

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.milehighreport.com/platform/amp/2017/2/27/14724674/age-wall-for-offensive-tackles-nfl

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Fluke_33 said:

 

Left tackles don’t age that well.  I’m an AC fan but they definitely have to prepare for his level of play to start waning soon.  

 

Check out this article:

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.milehighreport.com/platform/amp/2017/2/27/14724674/age-wall-for-offensive-tackles-nfl

 

 

 

 

WE actually need to find a competent backup that can take over when he retires.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love AC and definitely want him back past next year (assuming all goes well this season).

 

But lets hope we can develop SOMEONE to be competent enough to take over just in case. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tarick Glenn played 10 years and retired at 30.

 

I'm not opposed to re-signing AC. But I'm more concerned about finding his replacement sooner than later. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will begin with I’m glad the Colts went on their winning streak and made the playoffs. You play to win and never tank...ever. However, I was hoping we had one more year of picking in the top 15 so we could grab another tackle and really have our core of linemen for the remainder of Lucks career. AC is a starting caliber tackle but the drop off behind him is drastic.  

 

Same happened with Grigson and Pagano, they had immediate success as they were turning the worst roster in the league over.  They never were able to have that 3yrs of higher draft picks and whiffed on the ones they chose or traded for bc well, Grigson wasn’t that good at evaluating players and neither was Pagano at developing them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, AwesomeAustin said:

I will begin with I’m glad the Colts went on their winning streak and made the playoffs. You play to win and never tank...ever. However, I was hoping we had one more year of picking in the top 15 so we could grab another tackle and really have our core of linemen for the remainder of Lucks career. AC is a starting caliber tackle but the drop off behind him is drastic.  

 

Same happened with Grigson and Pagano, they had immediate success as they were turning the worst roster in the league over.  They never were able to have that 3yrs of higher draft picks and whiffed on the ones they chose or traded for bc well, Grigson wasn’t that good at evaluating players and neither was Pagano at developing them. 

Look at it this way. If the draft picks really pan out  from this past draft we are going to be stacked. We will have a lot of draft picks in the next couple of years to move way up to get that tackle. As stacked as we seem to be right now we won’t need that many draft picks in the next couple of years.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, egg said:

Tarick Glenn played 10 years and retired at 30.

 

I'm not opposed to re-signing AC. But I'm more concerned about finding his replacement sooner than later. 

He was so over weight though. It seems like lineman today are more in shape then being fat. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, egg said:

Tarick Glenn played 10 years and retired at 30.

 

I'm not opposed to re-signing AC. But I'm more concerned about finding his replacement sooner than later. 

I'm not that concerned right now.  I really expect us to resign him.  That said I can see us taking a LT early this year.  Costanzo was a late first rounder, I believe, and I think he started right away.  He fell and Polian was thrilled when he was there for us.  Every year is different but if he resigns I wouldn't be surprised to see us use a 2nd rounder.  There is also FA and trade opportunities might develop.   Many ways to find an eventual replacement.  Hopefully we resign him and he can anchor that left side and we can win a couple of SB's. with him there.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's only 30 years old and has been protecting Luck's blindside since 2012. I would love if the Colts extended him for another 3 years giving them the option to draft their future LT in a year or two and have AC groom him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think AC could play until 35. We do need to draft his future replacement though if for nothing else we need a good quality backup.

 

I found it interesting in that interview he blamed himself for that injury last season. He said he didn’t listen to his body and pushed himself to far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, AwesomeAustin said:

 They never were able to have that 3yrs of higher draft picks and whiffed on the ones they chose or traded 

True but they lacked long term success because of the second thing, not the first.

 

I'm confident Ballard and Reich will be a championship calibre team without another top 10 pick. Look at the way they already accumulate draft picks in the top 2 rounds with their trade backs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, NorthernBlue said:

True but they lacked long term success because of the second thing, not the first.

 

I'm confident Ballard and Reich will be a championship calibre team without another top 10 pick. Look at the way they already accumulate draft picks in the top 2 rounds with their trade backs. 

 

Thats the key to sustained success. Hopefully your team can keep choosing players that fit their system and adapt as times and players change.  I believe we do have that in place.  In a couple years it should be a well oiled machine and legitimate SB contenders. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just keep on scrolling past the *s who think we should let AC walk because ''he's too old''

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, DarkSuperman87 said:

I just keep on scrolling past the *s who think we should let AC walk because ''he's too old''

 

Not one person in this thread has said the Colts should let AC walk.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/21/2019 at 12:11 PM, egg said:

Tarick Glenn played 10 years and retired at 30.

 

I'm not opposed to re-signing AC. But I'm more concerned about finding his replacement sooner than later. 

Glenn said he was getting tired of football and wanted to purse other things.  he could have kept going 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, aaron11 said:

Glenn said he was getting tired of football and wanted to purse other things.  he could have kept going 

 

Regardless ANY NFL player who isn't a QB, Kicker or Punter you have to start thinking about replacements when they hit 30.  

 

We should probably give AC a short term extension, 2 or 3 years.  But the idea is that he will hold down the fort til we can draft a quality a replacement and develop him to step into the role.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 7/20/2019 at 4:31 PM, Chloe6124 said:

Right there are no other options. Teams don’t trade their superstar left tackles and it’s not like you can just get one in the draft and they will be good right away.  This o line would take a huge step back if he wasn’t extrnddd. O lineman age well in the nfl. They can play well into this mid thirties. I think it will get done once they get back to camp.

 

Here's a nice read on Anthony "Benjamin Button" Castonzo... https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2019/05/16/indianapolis-colts-anthony-castonzo-rusty-jones-andrew-whitworth-jason-peters/1164815001/ --- sounds like Rusty Jones really helped him last off-season by getting him to work on some hip imbalances and strengthening some muscles to support his knees, hamstrings and chest which had been bother Castonzo in the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/20/2019 at 7:21 PM, Fluke_33 said:

 

Left tackles don’t age that well.  I’m an AC fan but they definitely have to prepare for his level of play to start waning soon.  

 

Check out this article:

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.milehighreport.com/platform/amp/2017/2/27/14724674/age-wall-for-offensive-tackles-nfl

 

 

 

 

Good info.

Sounds like a 2 or maybe 3 year extension is as far as we should pay for AC.... and hopefully land a solid LT prospect along the way. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, I just hope he stays healthy this year. He's at an age where all the wear and tear over the years can start to catch up. I definitely want him back assuming he can stay healthy and is reasonable (which I think he likely will be). 

 

Second, we absolutely need to start planning ahead. We have draft capital if we needed to move up and take a LT in the middle of the first. We also have the money to chase a FA. Hope that's not the case, but we have the ability to do something if we had to.

 

Hopefully, AC will stay healthy for a few more years, he gets extended, and we nail a LT in the draft late 1st or 2nd in 2020 that can develop into a young stud to be Qs running mate for years to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I rewatched the game as I thought this would be pretty strange as well.  He did not play in the fourth except for his usual special teams slot.     I was confused as well by those who say he had a bad game.  He gave up one completion where he got turned around.  Other than that he was glued to his man as usual.    I think he's still having trouble living down his reputation from his rookie year. 
    • depth wise, S, OL, and iDL are my biggest concerns. if folks were grading positions ( starters and depth), i'd be surprised if many graded safety in the top half.  outside of Hooker, lots of questions, at least to me. i definitely don't agree with Venturi. ESPN doesn't either. Hopefully the starters stay healthy, and Willis grows into a stud.
    • lol... you wrote a novel. while i didn't read it all, i did skim. the mock draft stuff, it wasn't a poll. it was a well defined systemic grading. if you're mom can do well on the 1st round, why didn't your favorite guys? lol. on the wide receiver study, it was laughable. no defined parameters, no comparative cross position stats, etc.. not even Busch league stuff.  like i said, legend in your own mind.   in terms of who can dish it out, but can't take it, look at your reaction above to a "sad".... what a rant/tantrum.....  self awareness is obviously not your strongest trait. feel free to "crush" me anytime... gives me a good laugh.
    • very astute observations!!
    • You live your life like the Coyote chasing the Road Runner....    and you keep running into the mountain side,  or running off the cliff....     OK....    you're not going to change....   So, I'll take apart your nonsense --- again.    This will be the longest post I've ever made,  trying to answer all your nonsense.    Doubt you'll read it.    But here it comes....     Of course we know if Luck's injury, whatever it is,  ISN'T minor.   What minor injury do you know lasts four months?    He barely participated in any off-season program.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    The Colts have NEVER, EVER called it minor.   Not once.  The only thing they've said is he hopes to be back by certain deadlines,  and he's missed almost every one.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    This paragraph may confuse you.   It's full of common sense and logic.   I don't know how you got the nerve to try to argue that no one knows.   Unbelieveable!   Nope.   No Tantrum from me.   Just pointing ot what should be obvious,  but apparently the obvious isn't obvious to you.     By the way,  while you were giving me a sad on my post to my friend CBE,   do you know who was giving me a "like"?    CBE.    I criticized his post and he still gave me a like.    He know while we may not agree,  he knows I'm not trying to pound him.   I'm  trying to be as honest and factual as I can.    No wonder you can't see for yourself.   What triggered me, was your latest attempt to sound like you know what you're talking about.   You judged Willis on half of the first pre-season game.    That's all you've got.    That's it.   Doesn't even occur to you that that is.....   NOTHING!    Hello?    And you present it like it should be taken seriously,  when it should be laughed at.    Goodness gracious, you want to go back to the media draft comparison?    I was hoping for your sake that you wouldn't.    But since you insist.     Did you ever really look at that poll?   Seriously,  did you look at the four category breakdown?    Did you see what was actually involved?    If you did,  you shouldn't have been crowing about it.    First,  what I care about from guys like Kiper and McShay and Jeremiah and others isn't just the first round.   My  momma can do a decent job on the first round, and she's been dead for nearly 30 years!    I care about their view on ALL ROUNDS.   And your survey was only about the first round.   That's it.   There were four categories.    In three of them,  the leader got no more than 50%.   That's it.   The best person in three of the four categories scored no more than 50 percent.   When the top guy is scoring no more than 50 percent and everyone else is close behind,  then no one really knows anything.    And the one category that the winner did well in --- one category --- he scored in the 90's.   And everyone else was right behind him.    So, most everyone did well in ONE OUT OF THE FOUR categories.   Big stinking deal.    I tried to tell you this silly survey didn't support what you believed but you wouldn't listen.   No surprise there.  All you cared about the results.   The fatal flaw.     Finally,  without a single fact,  you offered this opinion in that post.    I remember it like it was yesterday,  that your new age guys were doing a better job than the more traditional scouts.   Based on one poll.   One poll of one round.    And you said the older guys like Kiper and company were resting on their laurels and not working as hard.   Nope, the old guys were covering all seven rounds.    Most of your guys,  covering one round.   You have no facts to support that, but that's your view.    When logic and common sense would tell you that the guys I prefer make a ton more money and have their reputation at stake.    They have more to lose.    There's no way they're resting on anything.    But you'll say ANYTHING to try and prove a point.   There's no argument you won't twist to try to win an argument, no matter how foolish the argument is.   I've told you publicly and privately,  you're not interested in honest debate.   You're the least honest poster here.  You're only interested in winning and you'll do anything, say anything to do that.      As to the WR study.    You got crushed.   I'm talking about a bank safe fell on you and your response was to talk about cherry picking stats.    Either English is a second language or you don't know the meaning of the words.     I made two links for you.    One was almost identical to yours.    Yours covered 25 years dating back to a time when passing rules were dramatically different so comparing a receiver from 1990 to one from 2018 was silly.   We're playig a different game now.    My first link covered 20 years from 1995 to 2014 .   There was great over-lap in the two studies.  But the conclusions were entirely different.   The only reason I used it was your post said roughly 60% percent of 1st Round WR's were successes.    Mine said roughly 40%.   Guess which one you preferred?    Surprise!   Then the second link was one of my own making.    I listed every 1st round WR since Luck came into the league in 2012.  That's 7 years.   The last 7 years.   I put into bold each 1st Round WR who was clearly a success.   It came to 41%.   It also showed how few WR's have been taken in the last few drafts.   That's the NFL talking, in case you weren't paying attention.    You didn't dispute one WR.    Not one.   But you called it cherry picking.   Clearly you don't know how to use that expression correctly.    And now you throw out a list of criteria as if you're making the rules here.   Here's another free tip.   You're not.   Never have.   I'm not surprised you don't recognize the facts I put into posts.   You don't use them.   You're all about the opinion.   Most posters here are.   Because that means every single poster can simply say.....    "I'm entitled to my opinion."    Yes, they are.   Everyone is,  even you, who has no need for facts.    But what you're not entitled to is your own facts.    Just like you stated Funchess was a terrible signing based on your facts,  and it never even occured to you that Ballard and Reich had other facts that showed DF could be useful to us.    You actually thought you knew more than they did?!?    Again, unbelieveable.   You had no facts to support your nonsense about Reich being a poor play caller.   You had one game.   And I called you on it.   You've been doing a very bad back-peddle ever since,  but that's your view, with no facts to support it.   In fact all the facts support the exact opposite view.   Yet, you still try to claim victory.   It's so intellectually dishonest that it's nauseating.   And so I observed,  that with almost nothing to base it on,  you thought Willis has inconsistancies.    Thanks, Capt. Obvious.    Tomorrow will likely be sunny during the day,  turning to widely scattered darkness at night.    Anymore obvious insights?   Funny, how you now publicly call for me to ignore your posts,  when a few days ago,  in a thread I was barely even in,  you took a completely uncalled for shot at me.    Or does the phrase "legend in his own mind" not mean anything to you?      Bottom line....    you can dish it out,  especially when you think no one is looking.....   but you can't take it.   Glass ego.   I call a fraud a fraud.   
  • Members

    • yankeeclipper

      yankeeclipper 22

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,181

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,435

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HoosierHero

      HoosierHero 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 1,265

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Cynjin

      Cynjin 2,841

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • COLTS7

      COLTS7 283

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 837

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ManningGM

      ManningGM 515

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,795

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...