Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Chloe6124

Tyreek Hill max four games

Recommended Posts

Looks like the max Hill will be suspended is four games. Wouldn’t you know they will get him back just in time to play the colts lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/28/2019 at 1:28 PM, Chloe6124 said:

Looks like the max Hill will be suspended is four games. Wouldn’t you know they will get him back just in time to play the colts lol.

 

Where did you read this?    Or hear this?

 

You may be right,  but I'd like to see that for myself......

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Where did you read this?    Or hear this?

 

You may be right,  but I'd like to see that for myself......

I saw it on twitter by a couple sources. I will see if I can find it today. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I saw it on twitter by a couple sources. I will see if I can find it today. 

You may be right but do not believe everything you read on Twitter. Unless it comes from someone from the NFL Network or ESPN I would not believe it at all. After you had posted this I looked everywhere and could not find anything regarding his suspension possibilities. The NFL hasn't said anything either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t believe everything. They might of been guessing. If I remember right it was a couple legitimate sources.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a bunch more of these from twitter with sources that have blue check marks.

 

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/30/2019 at 11:07 AM, Chloe6124 said:

There are a bunch more of these from twitter with sources that have blue check marks.

 

 

 

Those two tweets say two completely different things

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/30/2019 at 11:07 AM, Chloe6124 said:

There are a bunch more of these from twitter with sources that have blue check marks.

 

 

 

"Max" and "At least", two completely different meanings.  Until the league rules, no one will know.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If all that Hill gets is 4 games...   that will be a bad BAD look for the league.

 

I hope the minimum is 6 games and a better amount is 8 games.    Very curious to see just how badly the league screws this one up?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the thing this is sounding more and more like his fiancé tried to extort him. There is no proof he broke his kids arm. The hospital ruled it a accident. The stuff on the tape seems to be from what sources say is when he called her a + and was going to get back at her it was about exposing her. It is said he had a very good meeting with the nfl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody hear the new audio today? Everything his fiancé tried to do might back fire..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, runthepost said:

Anybody hear the new audio today? Everything his fiancé tried to do might back fire..

no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here it is. He said she lied in 2014 and he never touched her.  She is real winner. Lol. It’s also looking like won’t be suspended at all.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just hoping Tyreek Hill plays this year. If for nothing else other than Mike Florio said he'd stop covering the NFL if Hill played this year.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

Here it is. He said she lied in 2014 and he never touched her.  She is real winner. Lol. It’s also looking like won’t be suspended at all.

 

 

 

 

There’s also the matter of a 3-year old boy with a broken arm.  And a threatening audio tap which makes him sound like a monster.    Hard to see how Hill gets away zero suspensions.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

There’s also the matter of a 3-year old boy with a broken arm.  And a threatening audio tap which makes him sound like a monster.    Hard to see how Hill gets away zero suspensions.

 

 

The hospital cleared them and said it was a accident pretty quickly after he was taken to the hospital.

 

I do think the tape alone should be a couple of games. I don’t know if in 2014 there is a proof he beat her or she just made it up. The way this has all gone down it would not shock me if she was making all this stuff up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you ask me they both seem like liars and neither can be trusted from what I have read/heard from their past and present. Sounds like they deserve each other and I have a hard time believing anything either say. I just feel sorry for the kid being in the middle of this. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man this case has gotten more complex.  After I heard there was an audio tape where he said he broke a kids arm I figured he was just done and stopped paying attention.  Now apparently there must be a bunch of other stuff that I've missed.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

 

The hospital cleared them and said it was a accident pretty quickly after he was taken to the hospital.

 

I do think the tape alone should be a couple of games. I don’t know if in 2014 there is a proof he beat her or she just made it up. The way this has all gone down it would not shock me if she was making all this stuff up.

How could the hospital know if it was an accident?  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

How could the hospital know if it was an accident?  

It’s not that hard looking at a X-ray if it is accidental or done on purpose.

i am not on his side at all but there has also been a lot of Misinformation.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

It’s not that hard looking at a X-ray if it is accidental or done on purpose.

i am not on his side at all but there has also been a lot of Misinformation.

What if someone is pushed on purpose and falls to the ground and breaks their arm? The doctors wouldn't know the difference between that or if the kid tripped and fell and broke his arm. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

What if someone is pushed on purpose and falls to the ground and breaks their arm? The doctors wouldn't know the difference between that or if the kid tripped and fell and broke his arm. 

Exactly.... if the hospital had a child psychologist interview the boy in addition to a full examination and conclude that it was an accident, then that would be different.... but an X-ray alone couldn't possibly determine that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, pacolts56 said:

Exactly.... if the hospital had a child psychologist interview the boy in addition to a full examination and conclude that it was an accident, then that would be different.... but an X-ray alone couldn't possibly determine that.

My guess is that was all done. My family had a accident to my sister when she was a baby  which caused burns. They interviewed both separate to make sure the stories were straight. Sorry I didn’t add that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

It’s not that hard looking at a X-ray if it is accidental or done on purpose.

i am not on his side at all but there has also been a lot of Misinformation.

Um,   what??

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/11/2019 at 2:47 PM, Valpo2004 said:

Man this case has gotten more complex.  After I heard there was an audio tape where he said he broke a kids arm I figured he was just done and stopped paying attention.  Now apparently there must be a bunch of other stuff that I've missed.  

I don't think he ever said that.  I think he made some general threat to the woman that made reference to the kid, and then people quickly ran with that to interpret it as him saying that he would do to her what he did to the kid, thereby indirectly implying he broke the kids arm.  At least it seemed like there could be enough smoke generated from this tape to justify kicking him out of the league to send the all-important proper social message.  I think now the feeling is that the interpretation of what he was talking about is flawed.

 

It sounds like this has come down to where he simply threatened her during an argument.  Not enough smoke to suspend him, IMO.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Tyreek Hill will not be suspended 

Chiefs will still have a great offense 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The NFL did the right thing. There was no evidence of child abuse and the hospital ruled it a accident. Sure maybe he could of got a couple games from the way that tape came off but they did the right thing. It looks like his fiancé is a piece of you know what. Everyone wanted him to fail so bad.  For the kids sake I hope these two go there separate ways so this kid isn’t stuck with them going at it all the time.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

The NFL did the right thing. There was no evidence of child abuse and the hospital ruled it a accident. Sure maybe he could of got a couple games from the way that tape came off but they did the right thing. It looks like his fiancé is a piece of you know what. Everyone wanted him to fail so bad.  For the kids sake I hope these two go there separate ways so this kid isn’t stuck with them going at it all the time.

"Everyone wanted him to fail so bad". Not really IMO to your post. I could care less about him and I still think at times he may abuse his wife and he has anger issues. She puts up with it because he has millions and they have a kid together. Based on his past I believe he has issues. This here doesn't change my mind about him. They won't have an excuse now when we beat them haha . I hope Leonard knocks him silly when he goes over the middle, I would as he is fair game on the field and players know it.

 

You seem to really defend the guy, why I have no idea. You say she is "a piece of you know what". I think he is too and a proven abuser. 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

"Everyone wanted him to fail so bad". Not really IMO to your post. I could care less about him and I still think at times he may abuse his wife and he has anger issues. She puts up with it because he has millions and they have a kid together. Based on his past I believe he has issues. This here doesn't change my mind about him. They won't have an excuse now when we beat them haha . I hope Leonard knocks him silly when he goes over the middle, I would as he is fair game on the field and players know it.

 

You seem to really defend the guy, why I have no idea. You say she is "a piece of you know what". I think he is too and a proven abuser. 

Well was there actual evidence he beat her or was it hear say. I know he plead guilty but that doesn’t mean much. Why is it that people also can’t see that a woman can lie and be manipulating also. Just because she is s woman doesn’t mean she is telling the truth either. 

 

These two remind me of a aunt and uncle I had. They were so bad for each other they brought out the worst. 

 

As much as I  would love to see KC fail I don’t want someone suspended for something they didn’t do. All those initial reports out of KC about him breaking his kids arm were false. They made up stories and everyone ran with it.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Well was there actual evidence he beat her or was it hear say. I know he plead guilty but that doesn’t mean much. Why is it that people also can’t see that a woman can lie and be manipulating also. Just because she is s woman doesn’t mean she is telling the truth either. 

 

These two remind me of a aunt and uncle I had. They were so bad for each other they brought out the worst. 

 

As much as I  would love to see KC fail I don’t want someone suspended for something they didn’t do. All those initial reports out of KC about him breaking his kids arm were false. They made up stories and everyone ran with it.

 

 

Why would you believe him and not her? I think both of them lie but I don't believe him. Women do lie so you are correct there, can't argue that. You seem to think he is innocent. Was OJ innocent, he got off because the evidence wasn't proven in court. So I guess since he was proven innocent he didn't do anything haha . 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Why would you believe him and not her? I think both of them lie but I don't believe him. Women do lie so you are correct there, can't argue that. You seem to think he is innocent. Was OJ innocent, he got off because the evidence wasn't proven in court. So I guess since he was proven innocent he didn't do anything haha . 

There was plenty of evidence OJ MURDERED. All I am saying is he said he didn’t even touch her in 2014. My question was how do we know she didn’t make it up unless there were pictures or other evidence. I don’t know if there was or not.

 

These two are clearing toxic for each other and need to stay away from each other.  The NFL can’t go around suspending people without actual evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! I must admit I was completely wrong on this. I figured that the audio alone would have gotten him at least 4 games. But it appears lack of evidence so kudos for the NFL for waiting until the facts got found. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/19/2019 at 11:51 AM, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Why would you believe him and not her? I think both of them lie but I don't believe him. Women do lie so you are correct there, can't argue that. You seem to think he is innocent. Was OJ innocent, he got off because the evidence wasn't proven in court. So I guess since he was proven innocent he didn't do anything haha . 

 

I'll admit that this is tough for me to judge.  

Why believe her and not him......why believe him and not her.   

I actually think he probably gets rough with his family, but without sufficient proof, I don't know that he should be punished.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/19/2019 at 10:47 AM, Chloe6124 said:

The NFL did the right thing. There was no evidence of child abuse and the hospital ruled it a accident. Sure maybe he could of got a couple games from the way that tape came off but they did the right thing. It looks like his fiancé is a piece of you know what. Everyone wanted him to fail so bad.  For the kids sake I hope these two go there separate ways so this kid isn’t stuck with them going at it all the time.

I agree.  The innocent until proven guilty thing is a big deal to me personally. That said, I think there is going to still be some court struggles over this, likely in civil court  where the requirement to prove guilt is much, much lower.  But I think the two need to stay far away from each other.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/22/2019 at 3:31 PM, csmopar said:

I agree.  The innocent until proven guilty thing is a big deal to me personally. That said, I think there is going to still be some court struggles over this, likely in civil court  where the requirement to prove guilt is much, much lower.  But I think the two need to stay far away from each other.  

 

Lol. What did you think of Hill telling reporters that his son was referring to boxing lessons when his son told Child Protective Services that his father punches him when be cries? 

 

Hill:

 

“Punching my son in [his] chest, that would probably refer to me teaching my son how to box, ‘cause we do got boxing gloves at our house, and our son he’s like Iron Man. So he loves Iron Man, Aquaman, he’s like “daddy, come on come on come on” all the time. So, that’s what it is, man. And, you know, sometimes things get thrown out of context when feelings get involved, and emotions. But I ain’t gonna get into all that right now.”

Link

 

Those who believe he is innocent are probably thinking this is plausible. SMH

 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, NFLfan said:

 

Lol. What did you think of Hill telling reporters that his son was referring to boxing lessons when his son told Child Protective Services that his father punches him when be cries? 

 

Hill:

 

“Punching my son in [his] chest, that would probably refer to me teaching my son how to box, ‘cause we do got boxing gloves at our house, and our son he’s like Iron Man. So he loves Iron Man, Aquaman, he’s like “daddy, come on come on come on” all the time. So, that’s what it is, man. And, you know, sometimes things get thrown out of context when feelings get involved, and emotions. But I ain’t gonna get into all that right now.”

Link

 

Those who believe he is innocent are probably thinking this is plausible. SMH

 

Yeah... if anyone believes that, I have some ocean front property for sale in Kansas, 1,000 bucks an acre

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I rewatched the game as I thought this would be pretty strange as well.  He did not play in the fourth except for his usual special teams slot.     I was confused as well by those who say he had a bad game.  He gave up one completion where he got turned around.  Other than that he was glued to his man as usual.    I think he's still having trouble living down his reputation from his rookie year. 
    • depth wise, S, OL, and iDL are my biggest concerns. if folks were grading positions ( starters and depth), i'd be surprised if many graded safety in the top half.  outside of Hooker, lots of questions, at least to me. i definitely don't agree with Venturi. ESPN doesn't either. Hopefully the starters stay healthy, and Willis grows into a stud.
    • lol... you wrote a novel. while i didn't read it all, i did skim. the mock draft stuff, it wasn't a poll. it was a well defined systemic grading. if you're mom can do well on the 1st round, why didn't your favorite guys? lol. on the wide receiver study, it was laughable. no defined parameters, no comparative cross position stats, etc.. not even Busch league stuff.  like i said, legend in your own mind.   in terms of who can dish it out, but can't take it, look at your reaction above to a "sad".... what a rant/tantrum.....  self awareness is obviously not your strongest trait. feel free to "crush" me anytime... gives me a good laugh.
    • very astute observations!!
    • You live your life like the Coyote chasing the Road Runner....    and you keep running into the mountain side,  or running off the cliff....     OK....    you're not going to change....   So, I'll take apart your nonsense --- again.    This will be the longest post I've ever made,  trying to answer all your nonsense.    Doubt you'll read it.    But here it comes....     Of course we know if Luck's injury, whatever it is,  ISN'T minor.   What minor injury do you know lasts four months?    He barely participated in any off-season program.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    The Colts have NEVER, EVER called it minor.   Not once.  The only thing they've said is he hopes to be back by certain deadlines,  and he's missed almost every one.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    This paragraph may confuse you.   It's full of common sense and logic.   I don't know how you got the nerve to try to argue that no one knows.   Unbelieveable!   Nope.   No Tantrum from me.   Just pointing ot what should be obvious,  but apparently the obvious isn't obvious to you.     By the way,  while you were giving me a sad on my post to my friend CBE,   do you know who was giving me a "like"?    CBE.    I criticized his post and he still gave me a like.    He know while we may not agree,  he knows I'm not trying to pound him.   I'm  trying to be as honest and factual as I can.    No wonder you can't see for yourself.   What triggered me, was your latest attempt to sound like you know what you're talking about.   You judged Willis on half of the first pre-season game.    That's all you've got.    That's it.   Doesn't even occur to you that that is.....   NOTHING!    Hello?    And you present it like it should be taken seriously,  when it should be laughed at.    Goodness gracious, you want to go back to the media draft comparison?    I was hoping for your sake that you wouldn't.    But since you insist.     Did you ever really look at that poll?   Seriously,  did you look at the four category breakdown?    Did you see what was actually involved?    If you did,  you shouldn't have been crowing about it.    First,  what I care about from guys like Kiper and McShay and Jeremiah and others isn't just the first round.   My  momma can do a decent job on the first round, and she's been dead for nearly 30 years!    I care about their view on ALL ROUNDS.   And your survey was only about the first round.   That's it.   There were four categories.    In three of them,  the leader got no more than 50%.   That's it.   The best person in three of the four categories scored no more than 50 percent.   When the top guy is scoring no more than 50 percent and everyone else is close behind,  then no one really knows anything.    And the one category that the winner did well in --- one category --- he scored in the 90's.   And everyone else was right behind him.    So, most everyone did well in ONE OUT OF THE FOUR categories.   Big stinking deal.    I tried to tell you this silly survey didn't support what you believed but you wouldn't listen.   No surprise there.  All you cared about the results.   The fatal flaw.     Finally,  without a single fact,  you offered this opinion in that post.    I remember it like it was yesterday,  that your new age guys were doing a better job than the more traditional scouts.   Based on one poll.   One poll of one round.    And you said the older guys like Kiper and company were resting on their laurels and not working as hard.   Nope, the old guys were covering all seven rounds.    Most of your guys,  covering one round.   You have no facts to support that, but that's your view.    When logic and common sense would tell you that the guys I prefer make a ton more money and have their reputation at stake.    They have more to lose.    There's no way they're resting on anything.    But you'll say ANYTHING to try and prove a point.   There's no argument you won't twist to try to win an argument, no matter how foolish the argument is.   I've told you publicly and privately,  you're not interested in honest debate.   You're the least honest poster here.  You're only interested in winning and you'll do anything, say anything to do that.      As to the WR study.    You got crushed.   I'm talking about a bank safe fell on you and your response was to talk about cherry picking stats.    Either English is a second language or you don't know the meaning of the words.     I made two links for you.    One was almost identical to yours.    Yours covered 25 years dating back to a time when passing rules were dramatically different so comparing a receiver from 1990 to one from 2018 was silly.   We're playig a different game now.    My first link covered 20 years from 1995 to 2014 .   There was great over-lap in the two studies.  But the conclusions were entirely different.   The only reason I used it was your post said roughly 60% percent of 1st Round WR's were successes.    Mine said roughly 40%.   Guess which one you preferred?    Surprise!   Then the second link was one of my own making.    I listed every 1st round WR since Luck came into the league in 2012.  That's 7 years.   The last 7 years.   I put into bold each 1st Round WR who was clearly a success.   It came to 41%.   It also showed how few WR's have been taken in the last few drafts.   That's the NFL talking, in case you weren't paying attention.    You didn't dispute one WR.    Not one.   But you called it cherry picking.   Clearly you don't know how to use that expression correctly.    And now you throw out a list of criteria as if you're making the rules here.   Here's another free tip.   You're not.   Never have.   I'm not surprised you don't recognize the facts I put into posts.   You don't use them.   You're all about the opinion.   Most posters here are.   Because that means every single poster can simply say.....    "I'm entitled to my opinion."    Yes, they are.   Everyone is,  even you, who has no need for facts.    But what you're not entitled to is your own facts.    Just like you stated Funchess was a terrible signing based on your facts,  and it never even occured to you that Ballard and Reich had other facts that showed DF could be useful to us.    You actually thought you knew more than they did?!?    Again, unbelieveable.   You had no facts to support your nonsense about Reich being a poor play caller.   You had one game.   And I called you on it.   You've been doing a very bad back-peddle ever since,  but that's your view, with no facts to support it.   In fact all the facts support the exact opposite view.   Yet, you still try to claim victory.   It's so intellectually dishonest that it's nauseating.   And so I observed,  that with almost nothing to base it on,  you thought Willis has inconsistancies.    Thanks, Capt. Obvious.    Tomorrow will likely be sunny during the day,  turning to widely scattered darkness at night.    Anymore obvious insights?   Funny, how you now publicly call for me to ignore your posts,  when a few days ago,  in a thread I was barely even in,  you took a completely uncalled for shot at me.    Or does the phrase "legend in his own mind" not mean anything to you?      Bottom line....    you can dish it out,  especially when you think no one is looking.....   but you can't take it.   Glass ego.   I call a fraud a fraud.   
  • Members

    • yankeeclipper

      yankeeclipper 22

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,181

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,435

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HoosierHero

      HoosierHero 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 1,265

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Cynjin

      Cynjin 2,841

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • COLTS7

      COLTS7 283

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 837

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ManningGM

      ManningGM 515

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,795

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...