Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
BProland85

Should we secure Ed Dodds?

Recommended Posts

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/06/14/report-nick-caserio-has-a-contractual-provision-that-keeps-him-from-leaving-new-england/

 

With New England prohibiting Caserio from interviewing with other teams for GM jobs, could Ballard possibly do this for Dodds and also give him a pay raise so he is more than fairly compensated to stay in Indy? He is a vital part to our scouting and front office team. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They could. If he wants to be a GM though that probably wouldn’t stop him.  I saw a report awhile back that mentioned he might not want to be a GM.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ed Dodds doesn't want to be a GM.

 

He wants to be heavily involved in the scouting and the GM responsibilities would take away from that. I think it's fair to say he is currently in his dream job. Ballard most likely gives him free reign to do what he does, or else, why would he have left Seattle?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Nulled said:

Ed Dodds doesn't want to be a GM.

 

He wants to be heavily involved in the scouting and the GM responsibilities would take away from that. I think it's fair to say he is currently in his dream job. Ballard most likely gives him free reign to do what he does, or else, why would he have left Seattle?

Maybe he wanted to get out of the rain.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Blueblood23 said:

Maybe he wanted to get out of the rain.

 

If that's the case, he should have gone to Phoenix or Los Angeles.  We get plenty of rain here in Indy.  Maybe not as much as Seattle, but way more than we need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Nulled said:

Ed Dodds doesn't want to be a GM.

 

He wants to be heavily involved in the scouting and the GM responsibilities would take away from that. I think it's fair to say he is currently in his dream job. Ballard most likely gives him free reign to do what he does, or else, why would he have left Seattle?

 

Even if that is the case, we would have heard if Dobbs declined to interview for the job. Could also be teams just arent interested. Its hard to separate success from the top dogs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Houston whispers, the Texans won't pursue a new candidate this year. O'Brien will be the GM for 2019. If that's true, I think Caserio will end up in there .... just not in 2019. (His contract will expire next year in Boston.)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's already secured and under contract. If they want to go further, they can offer him an extension with terms similar to whatever Caserio's contract with the Pats says. I'm not a big fan of that, though. If someone wants to pursue other opportunities, they should.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While under his current contract he can only leave if it's specifically for a GM position.

 

Having said that, we should absolutely try to retain Hogan and Dodds for as long as we possibly can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Scott Pennock said:

While under his current contract he can only leave if it's specifically for a GM position.

 

Having said that, we should absolutely try to retain Hogan and Dodds for as long as we possibly can.

Which is true only if his team under contract allows him to interview for GM position. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, lollygagger8 said:

giphy.gif

The Crow is an excellent movie and I still can't figure out how they

finished the movie when Brandon Lee got shot and killed "for real"

on the set midway through filming. I just rewatched it a few weeks ago.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

The Crow is an excellent movie and I still can't figure out how they

finished the movie when Brandon Lee got shot and killed "for real"

on the set midway through filming. I just rewatched it a few weeks ago.

 

The special effects don't hold up, but the story certainly does. Excellent movie! 

 

And that soundtrack....... :heart:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dodsworth said:

The Crow is an excellent movie and I still can't figure out how they

finished the movie when Brandon Lee got shot and killed "for real"

on the set midway through filming. I just rewatched it a few weeks ago.

 

It helps that movies are not filmed in order they are seen. But what helped the most was the lighting budget for the movie consisted of a couple light bulbs and the character wore the same costume that consisted of a long jacket, long hair, and face paint, which would have allowed a similar looking person to stand in as well as use close up shots from other unused scenes that would have wound up on the cutting room floor otherwise (I believe fast and furious used a cut Paul Walker scene from an earlier movie after his death).

 

I'm was more surprised to find out Lee's stunt double was the director of John Wick.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, our_dbs_rock said:

 John Wick.

 

Another excellent movie!!!  (er, movies) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's what I mean with the whole, "no one knows when/what happened". We have no right to know, but it's the source of all the angst and speculation.... Seems so easy to just be rid of it.  "I tweaked my ankle third day of practice, not too severe, but it's high on the ankle"   That would have been divulged I feel, as it almost always is when a player hurts something in organized team activities....    Why the mystery around this one?  They have had no problem confirming injuries in the past, kidney, ribs, other players....  But when it's Luck, AND in the off-season....that combination is seemingly always treated differently.  Just an observation.
    • I still believe the calf was healed and he injured the ankle on that third day of practice. I don’t think he had the ankle issue popped up until camp.
    • @Blueblood23 @Reidm   Care to give us some insight on your choices given some of the data in the OP? Thanks!     I said last year, that WR was by far our biggest limitation on O, and lack of QB pressure and Ints from our D needed to improve. I think we've helped out all three of those areas. The only thing I wish we would have done, is a picked up the a legit iDL.
    • Luck has proven he's plenty capable and willing to play through pain.... No one who's watched his career can doubt this.     What I can't understand, and it's admittedly complicated by the fact no one knows for certain how he hurt his ankle, let alone when.... Is why is Luck apparently without any sense of urgency when it comes to his own injuries or rehab during the off-season?   I don't mean he should rush through rehab or healing processes, but if I'm not wrong, this is the second time in his career he's had an entire off-season to fix an issue that was "rumored" to have been caused early in the off-season, in non football related activity, and he's just seemingly waited around until late in the off-season to address the health issue... It's like he always opts to just rest it and hope it gets better, which is fine.... Surgery or other measures are always a last resort... And then it gets worse, or is reinjured.... I guess he just seems way less proactive when dealing with injuries.   I dunno, it just seems odd, and it's a subject that no one really mentions or tries to address.  Dude has every right to snowboard, cliff dive, whatever he wants in his off-season and free time, but he seems to be the only guy who comes down with "snowboarding" injuries in August that then linger and bleed over into the preseason or early season...   Sorry for rambling.... Too much coffee today lol
    • I wouldn't put any stock in blowouts. A loss is a loss.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...