Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
CR91

Bobby Okereke has been signed

Recommended Posts

 

 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That means no more hand-wringing until training camp. What are we going to talk about now?

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, CoachLite said:

That means no more hand-wringing until training camp. What are we going to talk about now?

Exactly. This won't be the popular one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems odd in general that it took so long.  Outside of the guy in SD, we rarely hear why someone holds out this long on a mundane contract with so little to quibble over. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, JPFolks said:

Seems odd in general that it took so long.  Outside of the guy in SD, we rarely hear why someone holds out this long on a mundane contract with so little to quibble over. 

For whatever reason, all draft pick contracts are predetermined except for the third round. It has nothing to do with Okereke, it's just the uniqueness of third round contracts in the CBA.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/17/2019 at 9:39 AM, dew5150 said:

For whatever reason, all draft pick contracts are predetermined except for the third round. It has nothing to do with Okereke, it's just the uniqueness of third round contracts in the CBA.

Really? That's even stranger than I thought then.  I think that would qualify as being odd in general.  Any idea why they would leave a loophole where in other cases there is none? 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/17/2019 at 6:39 AM, dew5150 said:

For whatever reason, all draft pick contracts are predetermined except for the third round. It has nothing to do with Okereke, it's just the uniqueness of third round contracts in the CBA.

 

Huh?

 

Never heard that before.   Doesn’t sound logical.    Do you have a link to anything to support this? 

 

Just asking....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go...

 

https://www.espn.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4793076/qb-jacoby-brissett-continues-to-stand-alone-as-patriots-only-unsigned-pick

 

"One NFL salary cap man relayed that third-round negotiations have proven to be more challenging than other rounds in recent years. The reason is that first- and second-round picks can receive a maximum of 25 percent allocation of a team's rookie salary cap, but because the third round doesn't max out at 25 percent, there is often debate over what the correct percentage should be. That has created a situation where the third round has been the spot in the draft where some agents are pushing for more annually, such as the inclusion of workout bonuses in the deals."

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, dew5150 said:

Here you go...

 

https://www.espn.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4793076/qb-jacoby-brissett-continues-to-stand-alone-as-patriots-only-unsigned-pick

 

"One NFL salary cap man relayed that third-round negotiations have proven to be more challenging than other rounds in recent years. The reason is that first- and second-round picks can receive a maximum of 25 percent allocation of a team's rookie salary cap, but because the third round doesn't max out at 25 percent, there is often debate over what the correct percentage should be. That has created a situation where the third round has been the spot in the draft where some agents are pushing for more annually, such as the inclusion of workout bonuses in the deals."

Thanks for looking that up Dew.  Odd that they wouldn't just set the number.  Perhaps it is a learning tool for both sides.  3rd round is where battles take place to set the market in a way, rather than holding up 1st and 2nd rounders. It seems illogical, but perhaps only on the surface.  This might just be revealing on where certain battles in the next player/league negotiations will settle for each side.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  Leonard said Okereke was ahead of where he (Leonard) was last year.

   If he turns out to be on the same level, I could see the trio of Leonard, Okereke and Walker as being pretty darn good.

   Even if he is a backup and a STs player, the depth we have this year is much improved over last year.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Curiously, I still don't see Okereke's name on the Colts' Transactions page.  All the other draftees are listed there as having signed contracts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He does not have small legs at all, just high calves that give that impression. His quads are also big.

 

Google photos has enough photos, I don't need to post any.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, rock8591 said:

He does not have small legs at all, just high calves that give that impression. His quads are also big.

 

Google photos has enough photos, I don't need to post any.

One of the digs on him from many of the "experts" including NFL.com was that his base was to slight and he lacked the necessary strength for the NFL.

 

Here's his combine profile....

Quote

 

Undersized but instinctive and rangy, Okerke plays fast and is generally on the right track with his initial reads and response to play development. While he's fairly sound from a technical standpoint, his lack of size and strength shows up in both tackling and downhill duties against blockers. He has adequate talent to drop and cover in space and his experience on special teams gives him a shot to become a quality NFL backup.

 

Weaknesses

-Undersized as inside linebacker

-Absorbs majority of force when meeting lead blocks in hole

-Below-average base to maintain contact balance

 

 

 

His legs may not be "small", but comparative to Walker and other Mikes, they are. Take a look at the tree trunks on Walker compared to Okereke. As I've said before, I think he'd be better suited for WILL or SAM.

 

 usa-today-9919775.0.jpg

 

usatsi_12280086.jpg?w=1000&h=667

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks LOS for the pregame stuff. Go Colts!
    • Agree.  Last weeks game gave new definition to "flag" football, lol.
    • I respect Gill Brandt but I agree, Titans aren't even top 10. He is way off with that one IMO.
    • On the surface, this looks bad. However, there's always much more that we do not know.  A tiny tidbit of that is this--     He wasn't at home, but the home burglar alarm was supposedly tripped.  Police enter (probable cause stated) the residence and while looking for burglars find some powder somehow/somewhere they want to test? Does / was said item have to be in plain sight through a window for them to enter? Or can they claim they went in and were looking for bad guys when they 'stumbled upon the contraband?   Has he ever failed any NFL drug test?  Who else has access to that home besides Chung?  Chung will get a good lawyer to challenge this and there are likely multiple other issues we have no clue about.  It's cloudy enough I doubt the NFL does anything, at least for the near future.   Another grey area, this matter seems to be under the NFL substance abuse policy and not the personal conduct policy.   If so, this is an excerpt from a connected article covering it-   "First, nothing can be done until the charges are resolved. The league can’t, and won’t, conduct its own investigation and take action independent of the criminal process.   Second, Chung can’t be suspended with pay pending resolution of the charges. It’s simply not available under the substance-abuse policy. The Commissioner-Exempt list applies only to potential Personal Conduct Policy violations involving alleged crimes of violence.   Third, Chung will be subject to NFL discipline only if he ultimately is found responsible for a drug-related offense. This requires a conviction, a guilty plea, a no-contest plea, or entry into a diversion program. If Chung fights the charges and wins exoneration, the league can do nothing."   Chung might play all 2019 while the legal battle ensues. We'll just have to let the justice system play out here.   https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/patrick-chung-will-face-no-league-punishment-likely-for-a-while/ar-AAGbAoZ
    • Jarret Stidham, and Brian Hoyer.  It will be highly interesting to see what BB does...  recently he more often has only kept 2, with exceptions (IE: Garoppolo and Brissett for one).  He once kept 4, and the 4th stringer made #2 (backup) next season, and supplanted the #1 later and has become arguably the best QB ever to play.   Ironically, Hoyer is the guy who made Belichick comfortable enough to go to only 2 QB's, and now Stidham might phase out Hoyer for that spot.   https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/wholl-be-tom-bradys-backup-a-quarterback-controversy-may-be-brewing-with-patriots/      
  • Members

    • WarGhost21

      WarGhost21 945

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • uniquicity

      uniquicity 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • onebad150

      onebad150 67

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • erock

      erock 25

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 284

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Finch23

      Finch23 246

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 16,182

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fisticuffs111

      Fisticuffs111 1,500

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan0112

      Coltsfan0112 139

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 21,949

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...