Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
CR91

Bobby Okereke has been signed

Recommended Posts

 

 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That means no more hand-wringing until training camp. What are we going to talk about now?

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, CoachLite said:

That means no more hand-wringing until training camp. What are we going to talk about now?

Exactly. This won't be the popular one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems odd in general that it took so long.  Outside of the guy in SD, we rarely hear why someone holds out this long on a mundane contract with so little to quibble over. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, JPFolks said:

Seems odd in general that it took so long.  Outside of the guy in SD, we rarely hear why someone holds out this long on a mundane contract with so little to quibble over. 

For whatever reason, all draft pick contracts are predetermined except for the third round. It has nothing to do with Okereke, it's just the uniqueness of third round contracts in the CBA.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/17/2019 at 9:39 AM, dew5150 said:

For whatever reason, all draft pick contracts are predetermined except for the third round. It has nothing to do with Okereke, it's just the uniqueness of third round contracts in the CBA.

Really? That's even stranger than I thought then.  I think that would qualify as being odd in general.  Any idea why they would leave a loophole where in other cases there is none? 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/17/2019 at 6:39 AM, dew5150 said:

For whatever reason, all draft pick contracts are predetermined except for the third round. It has nothing to do with Okereke, it's just the uniqueness of third round contracts in the CBA.

 

Huh?

 

Never heard that before.   Doesn’t sound logical.    Do you have a link to anything to support this? 

 

Just asking....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go...

 

https://www.espn.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4793076/qb-jacoby-brissett-continues-to-stand-alone-as-patriots-only-unsigned-pick

 

"One NFL salary cap man relayed that third-round negotiations have proven to be more challenging than other rounds in recent years. The reason is that first- and second-round picks can receive a maximum of 25 percent allocation of a team's rookie salary cap, but because the third round doesn't max out at 25 percent, there is often debate over what the correct percentage should be. That has created a situation where the third round has been the spot in the draft where some agents are pushing for more annually, such as the inclusion of workout bonuses in the deals."

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, dew5150 said:

Here you go...

 

https://www.espn.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4793076/qb-jacoby-brissett-continues-to-stand-alone-as-patriots-only-unsigned-pick

 

"One NFL salary cap man relayed that third-round negotiations have proven to be more challenging than other rounds in recent years. The reason is that first- and second-round picks can receive a maximum of 25 percent allocation of a team's rookie salary cap, but because the third round doesn't max out at 25 percent, there is often debate over what the correct percentage should be. That has created a situation where the third round has been the spot in the draft where some agents are pushing for more annually, such as the inclusion of workout bonuses in the deals."

Thanks for looking that up Dew.  Odd that they wouldn't just set the number.  Perhaps it is a learning tool for both sides.  3rd round is where battles take place to set the market in a way, rather than holding up 1st and 2nd rounders. It seems illogical, but perhaps only on the surface.  This might just be revealing on where certain battles in the next player/league negotiations will settle for each side.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  Leonard said Okereke was ahead of where he (Leonard) was last year.

   If he turns out to be on the same level, I could see the trio of Leonard, Okereke and Walker as being pretty darn good.

   Even if he is a backup and a STs player, the depth we have this year is much improved over last year.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Curiously, I still don't see Okereke's name on the Colts' Transactions page.  All the other draftees are listed there as having signed contracts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He does not have small legs at all, just high calves that give that impression. His quads are also big.

 

Google photos has enough photos, I don't need to post any.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, rock8591 said:

He does not have small legs at all, just high calves that give that impression. His quads are also big.

 

Google photos has enough photos, I don't need to post any.

One of the digs on him from many of the "experts" including NFL.com was that his base was to slight and he lacked the necessary strength for the NFL.

 

Here's his combine profile....

Quote

 

Undersized but instinctive and rangy, Okerke plays fast and is generally on the right track with his initial reads and response to play development. While he's fairly sound from a technical standpoint, his lack of size and strength shows up in both tackling and downhill duties against blockers. He has adequate talent to drop and cover in space and his experience on special teams gives him a shot to become a quality NFL backup.

 

Weaknesses

-Undersized as inside linebacker

-Absorbs majority of force when meeting lead blocks in hole

-Below-average base to maintain contact balance

 

 

 

His legs may not be "small", but comparative to Walker and other Mikes, they are. Take a look at the tree trunks on Walker compared to Okereke. As I've said before, I think he'd be better suited for WILL or SAM.

 

 usa-today-9919775.0.jpg

 

usatsi_12280086.jpg?w=1000&h=667

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • IR. PUP. Starts Wk 1.    That's covered it. 
    • Multiple times I have said the length of the deal would be the issue...like probably in four different posts in this thread. But I think there are people who would even be against paying a RB (like Zeke) that much money for 1-2 years...or wouldn't even give up a late pick for him.    I brought up Funchess because signing Zeke would be akin to signing a Funchess each offseason for a few years. From a financial standpoint...that's not unreasonable. The picks are a different discussion...but Zeke is also on a completely different level...and there is going to be an acquisition cost to getting a player like that.    The bit about Mack was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. The rest of my comment isn't meant to be an attack or even a generalization...it's just an observation about what I have seen in many fans the past year (the Mack situation actually predated a lot of this).   There seems to be a theme...that when a talented non-Colts player vet is mentioned as a possibility to acquire (who would have a cost attached)...there are many that are either dismissive or against it...to the point that late round picks are too much to give up. I think that happens more often than people ignoring the acquisition cost and saying "gimme, gimme." (To be fair...I think saying people "routinely" ignore the acquisition cost is as much of an unfair representation or generalization as what I said...just on the opposite spectrum).   I respect your opinion...and we actually agree on many things (including aspects of roster construction)...I just think I must be in the minority when it comes to taking 'big swings' around here.
    • So here we are again, bunches of cap money, hoping our draft picks are as good as last year, but sweating our QB issue.     How many draft picks are we gonna horde?   How much cap space are we gonna bank?   I realize this deal with Zeke might be just a rumor and forum fodder, but if we have a chance to bring him in, I say yes.  As I, and many other members have said many times, we have a QB that can win a super bowl, but so far we have wasted the opportunity because we lack that 1 player that completes the puzzle.     Andrew has suffered more pain playing on our team then any other Colt's player that I can recall,  I say again, it's time to loosen the purse strings and sign some proven talent to give him a fighting chance.
    • I don't look for him to do much at DT. He played really limited snaps on the interior, really only when they game was far out of hand. Much like here in Indy, there were much better guys on that interior at Ohio State. Tyquan didn't get many "meaningful" snaps inside. Even now he's going to get limited snaps inside because Autry, Hunt, and Ward as just better interior players. I still think he would be a good, cheap replacement, for Sheard, if they got him back down in the 260's. He's good against the run and may get a handful of sacks a year against average RT's. I still scratch my head on why they insist on doing what they are doing with him now.     Yea that's not the story. Him and J Bosa were the starting DE's until they left. Hubbard eventually took over for Bosa when he left and Chase was still sitting behind Tyquan, Nick, and Sam. Chase will be a stud though and I have no doubts he'll be a top-10 pick next year barring injury. 6-5 265 with stupid athleticism, and is equally as good against the run as he is rushing the passer.   Maybe they were thinking Tyquan could turn into a Michael Bennett-type, who can bounce inside and outside on the fly, but I just don't see him being that kind of guy. He wasn't overly athletic at 260'ish, so he's definitely going be hindered with another 10-15-20lbs.
    • Cards lost 5-3 in a rain out called after the top of the 8th. Cubs back in 1st place after tonight. NL Central standings heading into August 22nd are:   Cubs 68-58 Cards 67-58 (.5 back) Brewers 65-62 (3.5 back)   Here's a question to Cards fans, @Jay Kirk , @Barry Sears, and @Myles, what do you guys think about important games being called after the bottom of the 5th of games? This was called in the bottom of the 8th. In the playoffs it is different, if a game is called because of weather, the 2 teams resume the next day where it left off. Having said that the regular season is different, thoughts?
  • Members

    • SteelCityColt

      SteelCityColt 6,926

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Swan Ronson

      Swan Ronson 279

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C0LT5

      C0LT5 102

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 2,283

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 8,688

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 332

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Trace Pyott

      Trace Pyott 250

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Defjamz26

      Defjamz26 3,954

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...