Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts sign P Rigoberto Sanchez to contract extension (Merge)


MTC

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Buck Showalter said:

Is that even a thing???

 

I don't think it's a big thing, although I did watch a McAfee video recently and he said something that he had gone out to a field and punted a bit.  It doesn't sound to me like he's completely closed out the idea of returning to the NFL.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, shastamasta said:

 

Well they likely would have put a 2nd round tender on him next offseason...which was $3M this past year. No way they were letting another team snag him without compensation.

 

Basically, they cost-controlled and bought out his RFA year (2nd round tender) and two years of FA...in exchange for an early guarantee.

 

Wouldn’t be surprised if they actually saved some money doing it this way...because he’s a P and his second contract will be small, relative to other players. Probably can’t do this with other positions though. 

 

Considering the price tag on the second round tender, you're probably right that this saves the team money. We haven't seen the numbers yet, but I'm assuming the average is somewhere close to $3m/year; if you tender him, that becomes the baseline.

 

In all, not a big deal. I'm not worried about the precedent, it's just not my favorite. 

 

Very glad to have Rigo locked up, though.

 

Edit: I hadn't seen the numbers yet, but they're out. It's basically five years, $12.25m, so the average is $2.45m/year, still less than the second round tender would have been. 

 

Second edit: I assume Kenny Moore is up next, but the math is different, since his contract average will likely exceed the second round tender by quite a bit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ColtJ82 said:

I haven't looked up the numbers and I'm just thinking outside the box on here. I wonder if this is one method Ballard will use to get us to the cap floor.

 

Regardless, it's not like we are up against the cap. I do get the issue with setting that precedent. I would consider him a little different since he was an UDFA. He was making relative pennies and is teetering on the Pro Bowl. May as well lock him up before that first Pro Bowl is on his resume.

 

On the two years, wouldn't it really only affect one year of those two years? It's an extension, so won't it tag on the back of his current contract, only negating the RFA year?

 

It does count toward the cap floor. I think fans and bloggers are way more worried about that than the team is, but yes, this could be part of the strategy, which I'm fine with. (I'm also curious whether that mechanism gets adjusted in the next CBA.)

 

As for the terms, they essentially replace his last contract with this new one, starting in 2019. We can look at it any number of ways, but the practical result is that his new cap numbers will be based on the extension he just signed. So the final year of his previous contract and the potential RFA year were replaced by Years 1 and 2 of this new four year extension.

 

Edit: It's actually four additional years, not four years total. Point still stands, just wanted to update now that we've seen the details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

Unless the Colts got a really good deal by underpaying him significantly this move makes no sense to me.

 

The fact that he's a punter might be a factor.  Relatively low injury chance compared to other positions.

 

Remember what happened with Earl Thomas and the Seahawks?  He wanted a big contract, but Seattle decided to wait until his contract was closer to expiring.  Maybe because he played a high-contact position in a very physical way.  He got injured, and Seattle saved a lot of money they would have guaranteed to him had they signed him early.

 

With most other positions, I can see waiting until their current contract is closer to expiring before extending them because injuries are more of a factor and you could end up with lots of "dead money".  But with punters, the chance of injury being much lower means you likely get more return on your investment, so why not invest early?  :dunno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

The only sense I see of paying him this early was if he gave us a discount in exchange for the early extension.

 

If he was signed to market value this makes very little sense.

Why market value now is less than market value will be in two years.  So by signing the extension now, rather than in 2020 RS did, in effect, give the Colts a discount.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

Why market value now is less than market value will be in two years.  So by signing the extension now, rather than in 2020 RS did, in effect, give the Colts a discount.

 

Saved the guaranteed inflation of the cap by doing it now rather than later. 

 

We have a pretty saavy cap manager in Mike Bluem. Not sure why people keep questioning him. Question Ballard, sure, but don't question the guy running the numbers that made Grigson's awful deals look pretty good at the end of the day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/4/2019 at 1:58 PM, Valpo2004 said:

Why do this?  We had him on contract for cheap all of this year and he would be an RFA next year and the tender wouldn't be too expensive.  

 

Unless the Colts got a really good deal by underpaying him significantly this move makes no sense to me.  

Because he’s playing better than he’s being paid. it’s not about “under paying and getting a good deal” it’s about paying your guys what they are worth so they  want to stay and be a part of your organization for the long haul. Take care of your guys they will take care of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
  • Members

    • MFT5

      MFT5 325

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,239

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 956

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 1,409

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Larry Horseman

      Larry Horseman 34

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • #12.

      #12. 3,304

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...