Jump to content
Lucky Colts Fan

Would anything surprise you this season?

Recommended Posts

I mean outside of 19-0 or 0-16.

 

I can see this team continuing to improve and take the next step.  The Colts could be in the AFCCG or even the SB this year.  It's not unreasonable to think the Colts could hoist the Lombardi this year if everything goes right.

 

I can also see this team regress from last year.  Remember that last year was the first year in new systems on both offense and defense.  Opponents might be better prepared for the Colts this year since they have a years worth of film to study from last year.  This is a very young team, and a few significant injuries could really sink the ship like 2011 and 2017.

 

This season could go either way, and I don't think I'd be surprised at anything from the worst record in the NFL to being SB champs.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be shocked if we didn't make the playoffs if Luck stays healthy and plays all 16 games. That would be real surprising.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also would be shocked if they didn’t make the playoffs.

 

I would be surprised if we ended up with another rookie all pro or a DROTY. Same thing if Campbell got OROTY.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember Reich kept it simple last season. I think we have so much we didn’t show that teams having tape on us won’t be a big deal.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if we didn't finish 1 or 2 in our Div.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good post,  Chloe...

 

While I think regression is possible I don’t think it’s likely.   I think only bad injuries could lead to a disastrous season.   I think it’s more likely we’d have a disappointing season than a bad season.   Like, 8-8 or something close that would leave us out of the playoffs.

 

But I think the most likely outcome is making the playoffs.   The only question is how far do we go?   One win?   Two wins?   More? 

 

This is a much harder schedule this year, so we could finish pretty close to last year’s totals.   Some would be satisfied with that but others would be badly disappointed.   That’s life with higher expectations.   It’s a very different world.  

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it will be a disapointment  if we don’t make the AFCCG. We need to get farther then last year. It’s going to be interesting to see how this team handles the success of last year and being a favorite to win it all. This is where the high character should pay off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think it will be a disapointment  if we don’t make the AFCCG. We need to get farther then last year. It’s going to be interesting to see how this team handles the success of last year and being a favorite to win it all. This is where the high character should pay off.

Yeah my expectations are 11-5 and an AFC Title Game appearance so anything less than would disappoint me. Not making the playoffs and going something like 8-8 or 9-7 though would floor me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think it will be a disapointment  if we don’t make the AFCCG. We need to get farther then last year. It’s going to be interesting to see how this team handles the success of last year and being a favorite to win it all. This is where the high character should pay off.

 

2 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Yeah my expectations are 11-5 and an AFC Title Game appearance so anything less than would disappoint me. Not making the playoffs and going something like 8-8 or 9-7 though would floor me.

Lol...

How about just trying to win the div.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Buck Showalter said:

 

Lol...

How about just trying to win the div.

 

I think it’s reasonable to have expectations that go beyond just winning the division this year.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Way tougher schedule this yr.  and while I can’t predict what I believe the record will be.    Throwing out 10-6 or 11-5 is silly unless you say who they lose/win to 

 

I’m optimistic but mostly because of Luck./Reich    

 

Give me some one time to make a prediction on W/L

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

I mean outside of 19-0 or 0-16.

 

I can see this team continuing to improve and take the next step.  The Colts could be in the AFCCG or even the SB this year.  It's not unreasonable to think the Colts could hoist the Lombardi this year if everything goes right.

 

I can also see this team regress from last year.  Remember that last year was the first year in new systems on both offense and defense.  Opponents might be better prepared for the Colts this year since they have a years worth of film to study from last year.  This is a very young team, and a few significant injuries could really sink the ship like 2011 and 2017.

 

This season could go either way, and I don't think I'd be surprised at anything from the worst record in the NFL to being SB champs.

 

That's a pretty Bold prediction, But you could be right. :thinking:

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Restored said:

 

I think it’s reasonable to have expectations that go beyond just winning the division this year.

Lol...

Well, since the Colts haven't won the division since 2014, it'd be a good place to start...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be surprised  if we win our first game. We haven't  had much luck in first games since  Luck has arrived. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if we didnt win our division this year. Time to take the crown back for the next 10 years. Put those division opponents back in there place :P

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Buck Showalter said:

Lol...

Well, since the Colts haven't won the division since 2014, it'd be a good place to start...

 

The Colts didn't win the division last year but they were clearly the best team in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think it will be a disapointment  if we don’t make the AFCCG. We need to get farther then last year. It’s going to be interesting to see how this team handles the success of last year and being a favorite to win it all. This is where the high character should pay off.

Good point.  CB's effort to mix vets with this young core could really come into play this year.   It would be easy to get a big head after that great run last year.  The loss to KC was humbling and hopefully the kids will stay with the basics and will focus on improving, not living off last year's record.  I'm sure Reich and crew will be preaching it, but the vets could also play a big role in training camp.  The competition will also help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think anything under 9 wins would be shocking.. the schedule is tough but this team is good and should be better than last year.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m going to go the opposite of the other posters and say I would be surprised with a 16-0 regular season, or even 15-1. However, it would be a very good surprise so I wouldn’t be upset if the team goes out there and gets that! Let’s go Blue!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Count me in the group that would not be shocked if they slightly regress. I think it's entirely possible they will be a much better team but could finish with the same or less wins due to the brutal schedule.

 

There's been so much hype around the team and I'm not quite sure it's totally deserved...yet. There are still a few holes on the roster. I think this team can be very good, compete for the division title and a top 4 team in the AFC if all goes right. I just don't know if they're the SB contenders that many on this board proclaim.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stephen said:

I'll be surprised  if we win our first game. We haven't  had much luck in first games since  Luck has arrived. 

Against San Diego-should be a solid indication of which team is ready to go. Some pick SD to go to the SB this season and some pick the Colts. I don't any threat from Tennessee and Houston this year. Jacksonville is a guess until we see how their QB does. KC is my biggest worry to win it all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stephen said:

I'll be surprised  if we win our first game. We haven't  had much luck in first games since  Luck has arrived. 

That first game could actually be important in deciding home field in the playoffs.  I'm very optimistic about the upcoming year and if we could start off with an important conference win on the road in our first game I think it would really set the the team up for a great season.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Restored said:

 

The Colts didn't win the division last year but they were clearly the best team in it.

Clearly??? Lol...

The Colts let the Texans leap frog them in divisional standings from '17 to '18...

 

If one wants to discuss what will define a successful '19 season, it has to start with winning the division, a feat that has elluded the Colts for four seasons. Can't have visions of grandeur without first proving that last years run wasn't a fluke.

 

If the Colts are the clear-cut "best" team in the AFC South, then they need to go out & win the AFC South. I would think that any reasonable fan would expect this before expecting an AFCCG appearance...

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be surprised by having one of the poorer records...provided a certain #12 stays healthy.

 

But a 7-8 win season would not shock me. Schedule is much tougher on paper. Of course there’s always a chance it’s not as tough...but there’s also a chance it’s even tougher.

 

And there could absolutely be regression. Plus, teams have tape on the Colts offense this year.

 

I am excited as I have ever been...but I will have a much better expectation after a handful of weeks into the season.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the expectations for this team are set far too high because we won 10 out of 12 games to end the year last season.

 

Ive heard everything from Dynasty, Superbowl champs to guaranteed to win the division...lol. I enjoy the optimism but its a all a little pre mature IMO.

 

I could see a lot of people schocked if we ended 9-7 and missed the playoffs. Which really is not far fetched, its still a young team and Ballard is still  building.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

I think the expectations for this team are set far too high because we won 10 out of 12 games to end the year last season.

 

Ive heard everything from Dynasty, Superbowl champs to guaranteed to win the division...lol. I enjoy the optimism but its a all a little pre mature IMO.

 

I could see a lot of people schocked if we ended 9-7 and missed the playoffs. Which really is not far fetched, its still a young team and Ballard is still  building.

The 2018 team started out with a 1-5 record with a whole new coaching staff, brand new offensive and defensive schemes and personnel mostly fitted

for those schemes. 

 

This year, the team will start game one with knowing both the

offensive and defensive schemes along with upgraded personnel 

aquisititions over the off-season. 

 

The Pats, Chiefs and Steelers are going to be big hurdles this year, 

but rest assured that these teams won't want to face the Colts either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the philosophy Ballard is instilling into this team from top to bottom will pay dividends. I'd be surprised by only one thing. A team that is thinking past 1-0.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

I think the expectations for this team are set far too high because we won 10 out of 12 games to end the year last season.

 

Ive heard everything from Dynasty, Superbowl champs to guaranteed to win the division...lol. I enjoy the optimism but its a all a little pre mature IMO.

 

I could see a lot of people schocked if we ended 9-7 and missed the playoffs. Which really is not far fetched, its still a young team and Ballard is still  building.

Agreed. Let's not forget the soft schedule down the stretch and beating a very overrated Texans team. When the team lined up at Arrowhead the following week, the talent gap was very noticeable. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Boiler_Colt said:

Agreed. Let's not forget the soft schedule down the stretch and beating a very overrated Texans team. When the team lined up at Arrowhead the following week, the talent gap was very noticeable. 

Not really.  The offense didn't  show and hooker didn't  play

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Not really.  The offense didn't  show and hooker didn't  play

Agree to disagree, they got their backsides handed to them in all 3 phases of the game.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter  what we are dealt, I think we will persevere as a team, We have an axe to grind this year  and I think we will continue to advance as a team 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be surprised if the Colts meet the Pats in the AFCCG and don't let Brady drop a 50-burger on them.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the beauty of it, The patriots seem to falter, just when you think it's status quo among them lol   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of teams seem to have a advantage on paper. but injuries and other circumstances until proven otherwise  can prove otherwise as the season goes on 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Boiler_Colt said:

Agree to disagree, they got their backsides handed to them in all 3 phases of the game.

 

Oct 3rd 2018 colts vs patriots 

 

 

NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS (2-2)

OUT
No Players Listed

 

INDIANAPOLIS COLTS (1-3)

OUT
TE Jack Doyle - Hip (DNP)
T Denzelle Good - Not Injury Related - Personal Matter (DNP)
WR T.Y. Hilton - Chest/Hamstring (DNP)
RB Marlon Mack - Hamstring (DNP)
CB Kenny Moore II - Concussion (DNP)
DT Hassan Ridgeway - Calf (DNP)
CB Quincy Wilson - Concussion (DNP)

 

They played second stringers so the outcome of that game was no surprise. 

 

Everyone knew before that game kicked off that the colts were depleted and it would take a miracle to win it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have to agree with the masses here and say it would be surprising if the Colts don't at least make the post-season, especially if Luck remains healthy.  I don't think Brissett can guide them there for more than 2-3 games.  I suppose if it's a December injury they could still make it, but not if before IMHO.  It wouldn't even surprise me much if they made the Superbowl.  I think they have that much going for them.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, NannyMcafee said:

 

Oct 3rd 2018 colts vs patriots 

 

 

NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS (2-2)

OUT
No Players Listed

 

INDIANAPOLIS COLTS (1-3)

OUT
TE Jack Doyle - Hip (DNP)
T Denzelle Good - Not Injury Related - Personal Matter (DNP)
WR T.Y. Hilton - Chest/Hamstring (DNP)
RB Marlon Mack - Hamstring (DNP)
CB Kenny Moore II - Concussion (DNP)
DT Hassan Ridgeway - Calf (DNP)
CB Quincy Wilson - Concussion (DNP)

 

They played second stringers so the outcome of that game was no surprise. 

 

Everyone knew before that game kicked off that the colts were depleted and it would take a miracle to win it.

I believe Darius Leonard was out this game as well?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, NannyMcafee said:

 

Oct 3rd 2018 colts vs patriots 

 

 

NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS (2-2)

OUT
No Players Listed

 

INDIANAPOLIS COLTS (1-3)

OUT
TE Jack Doyle - Hip (DNP)
T Denzelle Good - Not Injury Related - Personal Matter (DNP)
WR T.Y. Hilton - Chest/Hamstring (DNP)
RB Marlon Mack - Hamstring (DNP)
CB Kenny Moore II - Concussion (DNP)
DT Hassan Ridgeway - Calf (DNP)
CB Quincy Wilson - Concussion (DNP)

 

They played second stringers so the outcome of that game was no surprise. 

 

Everyone knew before that game kicked off that the colts were depleted and it would take a miracle to win it.

I think Leonard was out that NE also. We had 11 starters out I believe. If we had been healthy I think we win that game.

We are not as bad as we showed in KC. We were a young team that had injuries that ran out of gas. That is why we built depth this off season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • we are in a division that likes to run too.   the titans and texans ranked 7th and 8th in rushing yards, while the colts and jaguars were 19th and 20th.  that was down year for the jaguars, the previous year they were top 5
    • People love to prognosticate. My crystal ball broke so I don't have any insight into the future, but Ballard is using particular criteria (data) that has shown to be better predictors than merely guessing. Let's watch to see whether his approach to dealing with the unknown is better than other teams. I think we will be surprised.
    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
  • Members

    • Behle

      Behle 17

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,807

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndySouthsider

      IndySouthsider 232

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,516

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tdblue17

      tdblue17 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 9,354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rob220

      rob220 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • aaron11

      aaron11 2,014

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...