Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Would anything surprise you this season?


Lucky Colts Fan

Recommended Posts

I mean outside of 19-0 or 0-16.

 

I can see this team continuing to improve and take the next step.  The Colts could be in the AFCCG or even the SB this year.  It's not unreasonable to think the Colts could hoist the Lombardi this year if everything goes right.

 

I can also see this team regress from last year.  Remember that last year was the first year in new systems on both offense and defense.  Opponents might be better prepared for the Colts this year since they have a years worth of film to study from last year.  This is a very young team, and a few significant injuries could really sink the ship like 2011 and 2017.

 

This season could go either way, and I don't think I'd be surprised at anything from the worst record in the NFL to being SB champs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Good post,  Chloe...

 

While I think regression is possible I don’t think it’s likely.   I think only bad injuries could lead to a disastrous season.   I think it’s more likely we’d have a disappointing season than a bad season.   Like, 8-8 or something close that would leave us out of the playoffs.

 

But I think the most likely outcome is making the playoffs.   The only question is how far do we go?   One win?   Two wins?   More? 

 

This is a much harder schedule this year, so we could finish pretty close to last year’s totals.   Some would be satisfied with that but others would be badly disappointed.   That’s life with higher expectations.   It’s a very different world.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it will be a disapointment  if we don’t make the AFCCG. We need to get farther then last year. It’s going to be interesting to see how this team handles the success of last year and being a favorite to win it all. This is where the high character should pay off.

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think it will be a disapointment  if we don’t make the AFCCG. We need to get farther then last year. It’s going to be interesting to see how this team handles the success of last year and being a favorite to win it all. This is where the high character should pay off.

Yeah my expectations are 11-5 and an AFC Title Game appearance so anything less than would disappoint me. Not making the playoffs and going something like 8-8 or 9-7 though would floor me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think it will be a disapointment  if we don’t make the AFCCG. We need to get farther then last year. It’s going to be interesting to see how this team handles the success of last year and being a favorite to win it all. This is where the high character should pay off.

 

2 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Yeah my expectations are 11-5 and an AFC Title Game appearance so anything less than would disappoint me. Not making the playoffs and going something like 8-8 or 9-7 though would floor me.

Lol...

How about just trying to win the div.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Way tougher schedule this yr.  and while I can’t predict what I believe the record will be.    Throwing out 10-6 or 11-5 is silly unless you say who they lose/win to 

 

I’m optimistic but mostly because of Luck./Reich    

 

Give me some one time to make a prediction on W/L

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

I mean outside of 19-0 or 0-16.

 

I can see this team continuing to improve and take the next step.  The Colts could be in the AFCCG or even the SB this year.  It's not unreasonable to think the Colts could hoist the Lombardi this year if everything goes right.

 

I can also see this team regress from last year.  Remember that last year was the first year in new systems on both offense and defense.  Opponents might be better prepared for the Colts this year since they have a years worth of film to study from last year.  This is a very young team, and a few significant injuries could really sink the ship like 2011 and 2017.

 

This season could go either way, and I don't think I'd be surprised at anything from the worst record in the NFL to being SB champs.

 

That's a pretty Bold prediction, But you could be right. :thinking:

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Buck Showalter said:

Lol...

Well, since the Colts haven't won the division since 2014, it'd be a good place to start...

 

The Colts didn't win the division last year but they were clearly the best team in it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think it will be a disapointment  if we don’t make the AFCCG. We need to get farther then last year. It’s going to be interesting to see how this team handles the success of last year and being a favorite to win it all. This is where the high character should pay off.

Good point.  CB's effort to mix vets with this young core could really come into play this year.   It would be easy to get a big head after that great run last year.  The loss to KC was humbling and hopefully the kids will stay with the basics and will focus on improving, not living off last year's record.  I'm sure Reich and crew will be preaching it, but the vets could also play a big role in training camp.  The competition will also help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m going to go the opposite of the other posters and say I would be surprised with a 16-0 regular season, or even 15-1. However, it would be a very good surprise so I wouldn’t be upset if the team goes out there and gets that! Let’s go Blue!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Count me in the group that would not be shocked if they slightly regress. I think it's entirely possible they will be a much better team but could finish with the same or less wins due to the brutal schedule.

 

There's been so much hype around the team and I'm not quite sure it's totally deserved...yet. There are still a few holes on the roster. I think this team can be very good, compete for the division title and a top 4 team in the AFC if all goes right. I just don't know if they're the SB contenders that many on this board proclaim.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stephen said:

I'll be surprised  if we win our first game. We haven't  had much luck in first games since  Luck has arrived. 

Against San Diego-should be a solid indication of which team is ready to go. Some pick SD to go to the SB this season and some pick the Colts. I don't any threat from Tennessee and Houston this year. Jacksonville is a guess until we see how their QB does. KC is my biggest worry to win it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stephen said:

I'll be surprised  if we win our first game. We haven't  had much luck in first games since  Luck has arrived. 

That first game could actually be important in deciding home field in the playoffs.  I'm very optimistic about the upcoming year and if we could start off with an important conference win on the road in our first game I think it would really set the the team up for a great season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Restored said:

 

The Colts didn't win the division last year but they were clearly the best team in it.

Clearly??? Lol...

The Colts let the Texans leap frog them in divisional standings from '17 to '18...

 

If one wants to discuss what will define a successful '19 season, it has to start with winning the division, a feat that has elluded the Colts for four seasons. Can't have visions of grandeur without first proving that last years run wasn't a fluke.

 

If the Colts are the clear-cut "best" team in the AFC South, then they need to go out & win the AFC South. I would think that any reasonable fan would expect this before expecting an AFCCG appearance...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be surprised by having one of the poorer records...provided a certain #12 stays healthy.

 

But a 7-8 win season would not shock me. Schedule is much tougher on paper. Of course there’s always a chance it’s not as tough...but there’s also a chance it’s even tougher.

 

And there could absolutely be regression. Plus, teams have tape on the Colts offense this year.

 

I am excited as I have ever been...but I will have a much better expectation after a handful of weeks into the season.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the expectations for this team are set far too high because we won 10 out of 12 games to end the year last season.

 

Ive heard everything from Dynasty, Superbowl champs to guaranteed to win the division...lol. I enjoy the optimism but its a all a little pre mature IMO.

 

I could see a lot of people schocked if we ended 9-7 and missed the playoffs. Which really is not far fetched, its still a young team and Ballard is still  building.

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

I think the expectations for this team are set far too high because we won 10 out of 12 games to end the year last season.

 

Ive heard everything from Dynasty, Superbowl champs to guaranteed to win the division...lol. I enjoy the optimism but its a all a little pre mature IMO.

 

I could see a lot of people schocked if we ended 9-7 and missed the playoffs. Which really is not far fetched, its still a young team and Ballard is still  building.

The 2018 team started out with a 1-5 record with a whole new coaching staff, brand new offensive and defensive schemes and personnel mostly fitted

for those schemes. 

 

This year, the team will start game one with knowing both the

offensive and defensive schemes along with upgraded personnel 

aquisititions over the off-season. 

 

The Pats, Chiefs and Steelers are going to be big hurdles this year, 

but rest assured that these teams won't want to face the Colts either.

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

I think the expectations for this team are set far too high because we won 10 out of 12 games to end the year last season.

 

Ive heard everything from Dynasty, Superbowl champs to guaranteed to win the division...lol. I enjoy the optimism but its a all a little pre mature IMO.

 

I could see a lot of people schocked if we ended 9-7 and missed the playoffs. Which really is not far fetched, its still a young team and Ballard is still  building.

Agreed. Let's not forget the soft schedule down the stretch and beating a very overrated Texans team. When the team lined up at Arrowhead the following week, the talent gap was very noticeable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Boiler_Colt said:

Agreed. Let's not forget the soft schedule down the stretch and beating a very overrated Texans team. When the team lined up at Arrowhead the following week, the talent gap was very noticeable. 

Not really.  The offense didn't  show and hooker didn't  play

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Boiler_Colt said:

Agree to disagree, they got their backsides handed to them in all 3 phases of the game.

 

Oct 3rd 2018 colts vs patriots 

 

 

NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS (2-2)

OUT
No Players Listed

 

INDIANAPOLIS COLTS (1-3)

OUT
TE Jack Doyle - Hip (DNP)
T Denzelle Good - Not Injury Related - Personal Matter (DNP)
WR T.Y. Hilton - Chest/Hamstring (DNP)
RB Marlon Mack - Hamstring (DNP)
CB Kenny Moore II - Concussion (DNP)
DT Hassan Ridgeway - Calf (DNP)
CB Quincy Wilson - Concussion (DNP)

 

They played second stringers so the outcome of that game was no surprise. 

 

Everyone knew before that game kicked off that the colts were depleted and it would take a miracle to win it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have to agree with the masses here and say it would be surprising if the Colts don't at least make the post-season, especially if Luck remains healthy.  I don't think Brissett can guide them there for more than 2-3 games.  I suppose if it's a December injury they could still make it, but not if before IMHO.  It wouldn't even surprise me much if they made the Superbowl.  I think they have that much going for them.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, NannyMcafee said:

 

Oct 3rd 2018 colts vs patriots 

 

 

NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS (2-2)

OUT
No Players Listed

 

INDIANAPOLIS COLTS (1-3)

OUT
TE Jack Doyle - Hip (DNP)
T Denzelle Good - Not Injury Related - Personal Matter (DNP)
WR T.Y. Hilton - Chest/Hamstring (DNP)
RB Marlon Mack - Hamstring (DNP)
CB Kenny Moore II - Concussion (DNP)
DT Hassan Ridgeway - Calf (DNP)
CB Quincy Wilson - Concussion (DNP)

 

They played second stringers so the outcome of that game was no surprise. 

 

Everyone knew before that game kicked off that the colts were depleted and it would take a miracle to win it.

I believe Darius Leonard was out this game as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, NannyMcafee said:

 

Oct 3rd 2018 colts vs patriots 

 

 

NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS (2-2)

OUT
No Players Listed

 

INDIANAPOLIS COLTS (1-3)

OUT
TE Jack Doyle - Hip (DNP)
T Denzelle Good - Not Injury Related - Personal Matter (DNP)
WR T.Y. Hilton - Chest/Hamstring (DNP)
RB Marlon Mack - Hamstring (DNP)
CB Kenny Moore II - Concussion (DNP)
DT Hassan Ridgeway - Calf (DNP)
CB Quincy Wilson - Concussion (DNP)

 

They played second stringers so the outcome of that game was no surprise. 

 

Everyone knew before that game kicked off that the colts were depleted and it would take a miracle to win it.

I think Leonard was out that NE also. We had 11 starters out I believe. If we had been healthy I think we win that game.

We are not as bad as we showed in KC. We were a young team that had injuries that ran out of gas. That is why we built depth this off season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's a lot of work, I'm always appreciative of the people here that put that kind of effort into the forum.  So thank you.    I just wrote a post on a different topic that touches on this a little bit.  I'm not sure what to make of the receiver carousel but typically receiver production is a by-product of the QB.  Rivers has a lot to do with it as it relates to schemes etc.  We're way to shotgun dependent (75%) which takes play action out of the equation which we're built for. To me, that's because Rivers like to read the defense but it also works in reverse and makes routes and patterns easier to cover because there's no play action and NOBODY is biting on backfield run fakes from the gun.  My two cents.  Thanks again.
    • 2/3, or 4/6 is good for me. If you're taking up 25% for your top picks every year for 11% of your roster, some areas of your roster will simply be imbalanced. It also depends on what you do with in FA, and especially your strategy for other high end positions.  Not saying that's a bad financial strategy, but it is a bad locker room strategy. Not talking specifically about JJSS, just in general. If you're known as an organization that discards after rook contracts, players view you as a factory. I know it's a business, but you have to have to consider it. It would be like us moving away from Leonard, or others, after they perform well and exhaust their cheep rookie contracts.    Houston was stupid to give him up. Considered one of the biggest boneheaded moves of the years. It's why a certain coach has a bad rep. It's a position that's rotated for sure, but a lot of positions are. DL, DB, TE, RB, etc are all highly rotated. Only QB and OL are positions with little to no rotation. In Indy, we don't rotate Leonard, or some other thin positions that much, but that hurts us long term. Anyway, you have to look at averages. Just like TEs. You often list 2 starting TEs along with 3 WRs, but you don't have 2+3 on the field. You average ~1.5+2.5ish. If you're going to use 3 WR with that logic, you have to use 2 TEs, etc. and now your adding to your "22" total to normalize.   I think we both value the position the highly. We just differ on acquisition strategy. I think you have to look at all high priced and strategic positions, and have a better mix for a healthy roster. It doesn't really matter if they are drafts, UDFA, FAs, etc. so long as you have a good age, cost, experience, and skill mix. For example, Ballard has probably over drafted early/mid DEs (2nd and 3rd) round and failed. And looking at the DL in general, only one of the starting 4 are draft picks (which is the cheapest one), and the drafted depth don't look capable of stepping up. So we're in a position end of year where both starting DEs need renewal or replacement. It's a position/area where we've invested both heavy in draft capital, but have had to spend a bunch in FA as well.    Anyway, give me 2 early/mid WRs every 3 years, and 1 FA every 3 years, and some late round or UDFA project lottery tickets every year. That's what we've done. Only injury has gotten in our way from some very potent starting 3s.
    • Exactly right, play action from under center also lends itself to taking the big shots.  We're way too shotgun heavy for a team that wants to lean on the run game and set up play action.  That's part of the reason we're not getting the deep ball as much as we like.  Some people think that we need faster receivers, that's not the issue. It's two fold, it's what Rivers wants (shotgun) so we cater to it because he's the qb and he's so slow afoot by the time he hits his drop in play action the short route windows have already expired, meaning crossers and slants have entered the coverage zone, too slow.     Right now the totality of this offense is driven by one guy, I've said from week one, this team will go as far as Philip can take it.  What offenses fail to realize is zone read is totally pointless if the QB is neve going to keep it.  That makes it easier for the defense to read and react as well.  So not only is it easier for Philip to read a defense but its also easier for the defense to read Philip.    I'll close by saying, I never wanted Rivers here but now that he is, I do like him personally, and he can still be wildly effective when protected.  That scenario will only take us so far.  I have a strong suspicion who our QB may be for 2021 but I'm going to sit on that for a bit...
    • No idea you are a woman, always thought you were a guy. Learned something today on the forum!
    • so the only Colt impacted is Nelson?   So do I have this right - now teams could release a 5th year option player after year 4 and not be on the hook for the contract unless he got hurt in in that 4th year?   If that is right, seems a minimal impact rule to me.  
  • Members

    • Rally5

      Rally5 712

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 10,300

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 59

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 5,753

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nickster

      Nickster 508

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 6,965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 42

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 5,463

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 255

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 1,188

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...