Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Scott Pennock

Indy 500 Package on Offense

Recommended Posts

Here ya go @dodsworth!

 

Hines 4.38 speed

Mack 4.50 speed 

 

Ebron 4.56 speed @ 250 lbs

Travis 4.65 speed @ 248 lbs

Brown 4.66 speed @ 255 lbs

 

Campbell 4.31 speed

Hilton 4.34 speed

Johnson 4.39 speed

Dulin 4.39 speed

Cain 4.43 speed

Fountain 4.46 speed

Rogers 4.49 speed

Veasy 4.49 speed

 

Heck......Luck ran a 4.57 40 himself

 

There are our track stars on offense - could become the "Greatest Show on Turf"....

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Scott Pennock said:

Here ya go @dodsworth!

 

Hines 4.38 speed

Mack 4.50 speed 

 

Ebron 4.56 speed @ 250 lbs

Travis 4.65 speed @ 248 lbs

Brown 4.66 speed @ 255 lbs

 

Campbell 4.31 speed

Hilton 4.34 speed

Johnson 4.39 speed

Dulin 4.39 speed

Cain 4.43 speed

Fountain 4.46 speed

Rogers 4.49 speed

Veasy 4.49 speed

 

Heck......Luck ran a 4.57 40 himself

 

There are our track stars on offense - could become the "Greatest Show on Turf"....

Wow, nice speed on both sides of

the ball! Thanks for digging up the

times Scott.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldnt this hav gone in your nascar thread?  Or maybe start a new "enter racing word here" thread.

 

(just bustin your butt)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

Couldnt this hav gone in your nascar thread?  Or maybe start a new "enter racing word here" thread.

 

(just bustin your butt)

It could have, but, he asked and I provided! Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Scott Pennock said:

It could have, but, he asked and I provided! Lol

I know my "Clue" reference was a big hit (haha), how about Sgt Peacock from the Dirty Dozen?

 

And i agree with the excitement about our team speed.  On BOTH sides of the ball. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know we have the big named players of TY, Campbell, Cain and Funch but the

guy I'm watching closely is Marcus Johnson and if he can get back to 100%.

 

He is #5 on my depth chart unless one of the newbies burn it up. The kid did

well before his injury.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

You forgot to mention that we drafted EJ Speed.

It's posted on the "NASCAR package" thread.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dodsworth said:

I know we have the big named players of TY, Campbell, Cain and Funch but the

guy I'm watching closely is Marcus Johnson and if he can get back to 100%.

 

He is #5 on my depth chart unless one of the newbies burn it up. The kid did

well before his injury.

 

We all probably agree that the first three spots are set with TY, Funch, and Campbell.  

 

That leaves ten guys going for two or three spots.  All with talent.  

 

This is going to be my favorite position to watch in the preseason.  Can’t wait!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Smonroe said:

 

We all probably agree that the first three spots are set with TY, Funch, and Campbell.  

 

That leaves ten guys going for two or three spots.  All with talent.  

 

This is going to be my favorite position to watch in the preseason.  Can’t wait!

Who you got rising to the top for your final 2 or 3 spots?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

Who you got rising to the top for your final 2 or 3 spots?

 

Assuming he’s healthy, Cain should be #4.  After that, its anyone’s guess. 

 

Chester is from Huntsville so I’m rooting for him to be 5.  They liked him enough to tender him and he’s a reliable returner.  But he may be one of the least naturally talented. 

 

I think Johnson has the strength and size I doubt we keep 6.  I’m hoping we can keep a couple on the PS.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, dodsworth said:

Who you got rising to the top for your final 2 or 3 spots?

Hilton

Funchess

Campbell

Cain

Fountain

Johnson

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/24/2019 at 3:37 PM, WoolMagnet said:

Couldnt this hav gone in your nascar thread?  Or maybe start a new "enter racing word here" thread.

 

(just bustin your butt)

 

Come on now. The Indy 500 is both faster and superior to NASCAR, not to mention from Indianapolis.

 

All three can be said for the Colts as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Scott Pennock said:

Hilton

Funchess

Campbell

Cain

Fountain

Johnson

 

 

In the above, you have one Z (TY), two slots (PC and MJ), and three Xs (Funch, Cain, Fountain). 

 

I'm good with only carrying one Z (keep in mind Rogers was his back up), and three Xs.. But at slot.... PC is a rookie, and MJ has been oft injured and hasn't ever had any real production dating back to college... 

 

Do you really think they cut Rogers after the gains he made last year, he's the only experienced TY backup, and starting returner from last year...? I know he's not razzle dazzle, but we relied on him a lot (in a lot of areas) last year.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Johnson as more of a Z and Fountain as a slot. 

 

If I'm not mistaken, Johnson's big game last year right before he got hurt was as the Z. Though I could be wrong.

 

Also, I see Fountain as Reich's Agholor in the slot, but a bit more athletic.

 

Rogers puts on clinics in practice making DB's look like they're on skates, but that rarely (if ever) translated to game day. To me he is a JAG.....a reliable one, but a JAG nonetheless.

 

The best player for the team will earn the spot. He and Pascal will have to outshine the size/speed guys that Ballard drafted since Campbell can return kicks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is pagenaud and who is Rossi?  

 

I assume the ol is the pit crew.   Let’s hope Nelson isn’t the guy that gets hit by the tire. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We forgot Funchess. He runs anywhere between 4.48 - 4.70.  So we will give him a 4.60. He says he has sneaky speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/25/2019 at 1:14 PM, dodsworth said:

I know we have the big named players of TY, Campbell, Cain and Funch but the

guy I'm watching closely is Marcus Johnson and if he can get back to 100%.

 

He is #5 on my depth chart unless one of the newbies burn it up. The kid did

well before his injury.

I too was a huge fan of Johnson. Speed and height is unteachable  traits. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. Up until that neck injury I don’t think manning missed a snap his entire career here.
    • Andrew has had 3 maybe 4 injuries since the beginning of his career, manning only missed one season here. So no worries the bad luck was all Bob's. 
    • that guy is too short, has no wheels, and has to take a time out after every 6 attempts. will never make it.. nice jugs though
    • The facts.. a hung jury (twice) mistrial with most voters having sided for the alleged accuser/victim... both times.     She (prosecution) didn't drop the charges, the school (judge/jury) did.  She wanted round 3.  She wanted a full yes or no vote (4-1 or 5-0) either way, not we're split 3-2 so we'll just call it against the majority vote and designate as "Not Responsible" because it isn't 4 or more votes either way. - 'Case closed'.     There were questions (and other items) from the accuser that were never allowed in or asked in follow up questioning.  I think one of the changes to the Stanford Title IX hearing rules is to also allow an attorney to be not only in attendance but to also perform all duties of representation.  And an outside group determines what is admissible as questions/evidence, follow questions, etc...     At some level, it did, and many things at Stanford were changed after. At the  minimum, it was a mistrial x2, with no conclusive verdict either way. Then school (not prosecution) drops the case.   So she really needed to report this to both the school, and also the Police.  But with what evidence does she have to convince the LEO?  Guess the gals need some hidden body cam w/audio these days, like many folks do with dash cams (like me and my wife's cars...) and be their own TMZ...   Video, apparently the only way things get rectified anymore...     No worries, at least we know each others positions.  All is good.     Except to have (at some level) differing story from a another high achieving Stanford student about another high achieving Stanford student-   https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/california/stanford-university/admission/     We don't even know for certain they ever got the FULL story, but articles I've read suggest that the Stanford Panel repressed/disallowed many/most of her interrogating questions and supplemental follow up inquiries to be asked of the accused.  Unless someone directly asks her directly, how could you answer as to whether her whole story was even heard or not?   If you are not truly interested to fully know those answers, then you don't ask.  At least, that's my perspective.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...