Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Scott Pennock

Indy 500 Package on Offense

Recommended Posts

Here ya go @dodsworth!

 

Hines 4.38 speed

Mack 4.50 speed 

 

Ebron 4.56 speed @ 250 lbs

Travis 4.65 speed @ 248 lbs

Brown 4.66 speed @ 255 lbs

 

Campbell 4.31 speed

Hilton 4.34 speed

Johnson 4.39 speed

Dulin 4.39 speed

Cain 4.43 speed

Fountain 4.46 speed

Rogers 4.49 speed

Veasy 4.49 speed

 

Heck......Luck ran a 4.57 40 himself

 

There are our track stars on offense - could become the "Greatest Show on Turf"....

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Scott Pennock said:

Here ya go @dodsworth!

 

Hines 4.38 speed

Mack 4.50 speed 

 

Ebron 4.56 speed @ 250 lbs

Travis 4.65 speed @ 248 lbs

Brown 4.66 speed @ 255 lbs

 

Campbell 4.31 speed

Hilton 4.34 speed

Johnson 4.39 speed

Dulin 4.39 speed

Cain 4.43 speed

Fountain 4.46 speed

Rogers 4.49 speed

Veasy 4.49 speed

 

Heck......Luck ran a 4.57 40 himself

 

There are our track stars on offense - could become the "Greatest Show on Turf"....

Wow, nice speed on both sides of

the ball! Thanks for digging up the

times Scott.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldnt this hav gone in your nascar thread?  Or maybe start a new "enter racing word here" thread.

 

(just bustin your butt)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

Couldnt this hav gone in your nascar thread?  Or maybe start a new "enter racing word here" thread.

 

(just bustin your butt)

It could have, but, he asked and I provided! Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Scott Pennock said:

It could have, but, he asked and I provided! Lol

I know my "Clue" reference was a big hit (haha), how about Sgt Peacock from the Dirty Dozen?

 

And i agree with the excitement about our team speed.  On BOTH sides of the ball. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know we have the big named players of TY, Campbell, Cain and Funch but the

guy I'm watching closely is Marcus Johnson and if he can get back to 100%.

 

He is #5 on my depth chart unless one of the newbies burn it up. The kid did

well before his injury.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

You forgot to mention that we drafted EJ Speed.

It's posted on the "NASCAR package" thread.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dodsworth said:

I know we have the big named players of TY, Campbell, Cain and Funch but the

guy I'm watching closely is Marcus Johnson and if he can get back to 100%.

 

He is #5 on my depth chart unless one of the newbies burn it up. The kid did

well before his injury.

 

We all probably agree that the first three spots are set with TY, Funch, and Campbell.  

 

That leaves ten guys going for two or three spots.  All with talent.  

 

This is going to be my favorite position to watch in the preseason.  Can’t wait!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Smonroe said:

 

We all probably agree that the first three spots are set with TY, Funch, and Campbell.  

 

That leaves ten guys going for two or three spots.  All with talent.  

 

This is going to be my favorite position to watch in the preseason.  Can’t wait!

Who you got rising to the top for your final 2 or 3 spots?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

Who you got rising to the top for your final 2 or 3 spots?

 

Assuming he’s healthy, Cain should be #4.  After that, its anyone’s guess. 

 

Chester is from Huntsville so I’m rooting for him to be 5.  They liked him enough to tender him and he’s a reliable returner.  But he may be one of the least naturally talented. 

 

I think Johnson has the strength and size I doubt we keep 6.  I’m hoping we can keep a couple on the PS.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, dodsworth said:

Who you got rising to the top for your final 2 or 3 spots?

Hilton

Funchess

Campbell

Cain

Fountain

Johnson

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/24/2019 at 3:37 PM, WoolMagnet said:

Couldnt this hav gone in your nascar thread?  Or maybe start a new "enter racing word here" thread.

 

(just bustin your butt)

 

Come on now. The Indy 500 is both faster and superior to NASCAR, not to mention from Indianapolis.

 

All three can be said for the Colts as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Scott Pennock said:

Hilton

Funchess

Campbell

Cain

Fountain

Johnson

 

 

In the above, you have one Z (TY), two slots (PC and MJ), and three Xs (Funch, Cain, Fountain). 

 

I'm good with only carrying one Z (keep in mind Rogers was his back up), and three Xs.. But at slot.... PC is a rookie, and MJ has been oft injured and hasn't ever had any real production dating back to college... 

 

Do you really think they cut Rogers after the gains he made last year, he's the only experienced TY backup, and starting returner from last year...? I know he's not razzle dazzle, but we relied on him a lot (in a lot of areas) last year.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Johnson as more of a Z and Fountain as a slot. 

 

If I'm not mistaken, Johnson's big game last year right before he got hurt was as the Z. Though I could be wrong.

 

Also, I see Fountain as Reich's Agholor in the slot, but a bit more athletic.

 

Rogers puts on clinics in practice making DB's look like they're on skates, but that rarely (if ever) translated to game day. To me he is a JAG.....a reliable one, but a JAG nonetheless.

 

The best player for the team will earn the spot. He and Pascal will have to outshine the size/speed guys that Ballard drafted since Campbell can return kicks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is pagenaud and who is Rossi?  

 

I assume the ol is the pit crew.   Let’s hope Nelson isn’t the guy that gets hit by the tire. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We forgot Funchess. He runs anywhere between 4.48 - 4.70.  So we will give him a 4.60. He says he has sneaky speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/25/2019 at 1:14 PM, dodsworth said:

I know we have the big named players of TY, Campbell, Cain and Funch but the

guy I'm watching closely is Marcus Johnson and if he can get back to 100%.

 

He is #5 on my depth chart unless one of the newbies burn it up. The kid did

well before his injury.

I too was a huge fan of Johnson. Speed and height is unteachable  traits. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wouldn't consider #10 a diss..... but I have a bit of an issue with the Cowpies ranked #2 at the same time.   We not only shut them out last season, we out manned, out-muscled and intimidated them in a way that none of us have seen a Colts team do to any team in a long, long time.   You could say "well its only one game".... and that's true.   But that was a statement game, and I just don't see how Brandt can justify a #2 ranking for Dallas given each team's additions this off-season....not to mention all those other teams he has them ranked ahead of.   As for the Colts...on our own merits.... I would have us closer to the middle of the pack on this list, around 7th and certainly ahead of Dallas.
    • His mom sounds awesome.  
    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 21,095

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonC

      ClaytonC 23

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,807

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 416

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 369

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Jammer

      Jared Jammer 97

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Surge89

      Surge89 965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SVFD Colts Fan

      SVFD Colts Fan 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,322

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...