Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Scott Pennock

Devin Funchess

Recommended Posts

I know he's come in and impressed in the offseason workouts thus far but something has always stuck in my craw about complaints against him: hands and a slow 40 time at the combine of 4.70.

 

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2015/profiles/devin-funchess?id=2552458

 

At his Pro day supposedly he ran a 4.47 and a 4.53.

 

After watching both college and pro video of him he definitely runs closer to 4.50 than 4.70. In fact, his game speed reminds me a lot of Reggie Wayne's - though obviously not as good a route runner or the hands, just the game speed.

 

Has anyone actually seen him run versus our DB's this year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Scott Pennock said:

I know he's come in and impressed in the offseason workouts thus far but something has always stuck in my craw about complaints against him: hands and a slow 40 time at the combine of 4.70.

 

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2015/profiles/devin-funchess?id=2552458

 

At his Pro day supposedly he ran a 4.47 and a 4.53.

 

After watching both college and pro video of him he definitely runs closer to 4.50 than 4.70. In fact, his game speed reminds me a lot of Reggie Wayne's - though obviously not as good a route runner or the hands, just the game speed.

 

Has anyone actually seen him run versus our DB's this year?

he's got build up speed, but not really a deep threat. he's got good hips and is probably quicker than fast. I'd say he's closer to 4.6ish than 4.5 or 4.7. 

 

I'd bet a paycheck that he's used predominantly in short and intermediate routes (at X). Hoping he's used heavy as "big slot" where his catch % is the highest. 

 

Regardless, he's going to do better with Luck as his QB in terms of drops. I just hope folks don't expect to him be a well rounded X. Big slot, possession X, RZ, and short yardage is where he can kill. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of his timed speed I've seen him outrun enough DB's to know he isn't too slow to play WR and he can create separation.

 

Having said that, I'm with you @Irish YJ in that they will play him (and Campbell) to their strengths while developing the rest of their route tree's in practice.

 

That's where another X receiver needs to step up like Cain, Fountain, Johnson, etc., to give Sirianni and Reich more route combo options to work with.

 

I'd personally love some 4 WR sets with a RB leaking out or an empty backfield with Ebron and 4 WR's - that would be "Greatest Show on Turf" video game stuff all over again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Scott Pennock said:

Regardless of his timed speed I've seen him outrun enough DB's to know he isn't too slow to play WR and he can create separation.

 

Having said that, I'm with you @Irish YJ in that they will play him (and Campbell) to their strengths while developing the rest of their route tree's in practice.

 

That's where another X receiver needs to step up like Cain, Fountain, Johnson, etc., to give Sirianni and Reich more route combo options to work with.

 

I'd personally love some 4 WR sets with a RB leaking out or an empty backfield with Ebron and 4 WR's - that would be "Greatest Show on Turf" video game stuff all over again!

I'd love to see a few 4 vert sets per game with TY, Campbell, Cain (if healthy), and Ebron (or Hines). If we could be successful on those, the running lanes would open up and teams would be like wth.....

 

Funchess had pretty poor separation stats last year (ranked in the 90s), so not going to get my hopes up. He had better separation over the middle than out wide. 

 

If we could establish a well rounded X with Cain or Fountain, I agree. Greatest show on turf. Crazy options all over the field. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Scott Pennock said:

After watching both college and pro video of him he definitely runs closer to 4.50 than 4.70. In fact, his game speed reminds me a lot of Reggie Wayne's - though obviously not as good a route runner or the hands, just the game speed.

 

 

His combine speed was always considered questionable. I don't know about 4.47 at his pro day, but I've always thought splitting the difference made sense in his case. He's probably not a 4.5 guy, but I don't think he's a 4.7 guy, either.

 

Regardless, he's not a burner. He has to run good routes to separate, and he's a better route runner than he's usually given credit for. If the staff uses him on his best routes, the ones that connect with what Luck does well, I think he'll be productive for us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what we have seen DF doesnt need separation. He is so big he just goes up over the DB and gets it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Scott Pennock said:

Regardless of his timed speed I've seen him outrun enough DB's to know he isn't too slow to play WR and he can create separation.

 

Having said that, I'm with you @Irish YJ in that they will play him (and Campbell) to their strengths while developing the rest of their route tree's in practice.

 

That's where another X receiver needs to step up like Cain, Fountain, Johnson, etc., to give Sirianni and Reich more route combo options to work with.

 

I'd personally love some 4 WR sets with a RB leaking out or an empty backfield with Ebron and 4 WR's - that would be "Greatest Show on Turf" video game stuff all over again!

Hines becomes the other slot guy especially out of the backfield

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Shepman said:

Hines becomes the other slot guy especially out of the backfield

Hines had a fantastic rookie season with 700+ all purpose yards. 

 

He's going to be a fun watch as the O matures. He's got jets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah... TY, even when healthy, never had a 100 yard game this year. And it wasn't a TY problem either.    We had plenty of open pass catchers all year. It is easy to stop the run (we still ran well by the way) when your QB can hit open guys. And there is no "consistency switch" to flick. The inconsistency is a product of deficiencies. 
    • Mack had 3 100+ yd games in 2019 and 5 in 2018.   Also, Williams got one of his 2 100 yard games against the Jags after Mack went out with his own 100+ yd game against them. They were worn down.   His other game was 26 attempts for 104. So 4.0 yds a carry. That is decent but I wouldn't call that great...   The following game against the Titans he rushed for 1.75 ypc
    • Something people don’t stop and think about is Burrow is almost 2 years older then all the QB in the draft. Has he already hit his ceiling? He isn’t that’s much younger then Mahomes. 
    • If Ballard drafts a QB at 13 or 34, I don't think fans will be triggered if JB starts the season. I think most will expect it (if they actually keep JB on the roster). Fans will only get triggered when we have sub 200 yard games, sub 50 QBRs, losses, etc.. Heck folks keep pointing toward how good JB played the 1st half of the season when we were 5-2. He didn't play really well at all. It's all smoke and mirrors He had two good game (Houston and ATL), one OK game (LAC), and 4 bad games. It just so happened that the "team" covered up a lot of the bad. 3 sub 40 QBR games.. 
    • Mack is simply not a power back.  We should be able to agree on that.    So his between the tackles running, and stats, benefits more from us having a great oline than probably a RB who was more of a power back.  For guys that don't catch the ball, I'd say that Henry, Lynch...and even Gurley or Blount (younger)...and Gore (younger) would probably have even more yardage than Mack behind our line.  Those are true between the tackles runners.   The question you posed is about money.  There may not be many RBs that do it all, but that's the kind I would look for to spend money on.  As it stands, with our oline, I think if Mack stays kinda one dimensional, he's fairly replaceable and isn't worth a big contract, IMO.   And I don't think of Hines as much of a RB at all.  He's earned his keep as a PR and should really be working towards being placed on the receiving corp depth chart and not the RB depth chart, IMO.  He's not a down the field receiver, but a specialty play receiver...aka Sproles...had a role in Reich's O.   You harp on JB, and he certainly has his faults, but our RB corps is not great and has players that are poor fits for doing things, IMO.  I think they are pretty easily upgradeable and not worth much of a contract, as it stands today.
  • Members

    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 736

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • aaron11

      aaron11 2,542

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 4192480

      4192480 7

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JMichael557

      JMichael557 261

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 2,368

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indeee

      Indeee 563

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • buccolts

      buccolts 3,859

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LockeDown

      LockeDown 2,459

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SteelCityColt

      SteelCityColt 8,236

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • adubb84

      adubb84 298

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...