Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
stitches

[Breer] The Colts Are Quietly Winning the Offseason

Recommended Posts

Albert Breer has to make up for kissing Josh McDaniels' behind when he published that unsubstantiated "organizational structure" crap about the Colts. I lost respect for him when he said that. Remember this link??? I have not forgotten.

 

 

We, Colts fans, are pretty high on Ballard, regardless of whether Breer sings his praises or not. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not really digging all the attention the team has been getting. I want to lay low

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, chad72 said:

Albert Breer has to make up for kissing Josh McDaniels' behind when he published that unsubstantiated "organizational structure" crap about the Colts. I lost respect for him when he said that. Remember this link??? I have not forgotten.

 

 

We, Colts fans, are pretty high on Ballard, regardless of whether Breer sings his praises or not. 

 

Seriously, again?   It’s not Breer’s job to confirm the organizational structure of the Colts.   That’s what McDaniels put out.   THAT’S Who should be apologizing to the Colts.   Brewer simply reported what McDaniels said. 

 

How would anyone go about confirming  that anyway?   It’s one man’s opinion.   And the better the Colts do, the dumber McDaniels looks. 

 

The article glows and gushes about the Colts from first sentence to last sentence and you’re still not happy due to some perceived slight.   The only person who slighted the Colts is JM.   And hopefully we can repay him by beating his rear end for years to come.   Breer is fully on board the Colts bandwagon.   Read the whole story.   You’ll be a happy Colts fan.   I promise.

 

PS— thanks to Stiches for posting this as he did.   This story is required reading for every Colts fan. 

  • Like 3
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, IndyD4U said:

I'm not really digging all the attention the team has been getting. I want to lay low

 

Doesn't really matter.  You just plug away, regardless.  KC gets attention.  NE gets even more.  It's a part of success, and it means you're doing something right. So, I hope the Colts keep getting attention.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, CurBeatElite said:

 

Getting Reich instead of McDaniels is probably the best thing that could have happened for the Colts.

 

 

Absolutely, the Colts dodged a bullet on that one & all seems to have worked out for the best.

lol... I mean, where was Brian Decker at when we needed him to profile mcdaniels leadership qualities??? 

 

While Ballard has handled that mishap as well as possible, I still gotta question that initial hiring. How in the world were there NO red flags that he might pull a move like that??? I mean I wasn't surprised when it happened so can't really assume Ballard was either... lol...

 

anywho, it seems to have worked out for the best...

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Ballard sees the 2020 rookie WR class as stacked. Funchess got a one year deal. No pressure then Devin....

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, braveheartcolt said:

So Ballard sees the 2020 rookie WR class as stacked. Funchess got a one year deal. No pressure then Devin....

that's beauty about their focus on competition....it'll either bring out the best in them or they'll wilt. 

 

We'll find out soon enough. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Seriously, again?   It’s not Breer’s job to confirm the organizational structure of the Colts.   That’s what McDaniels put out.   THAT’S Who should be apologizing to the Colts.   Brewer simply reported what McDaniels said. 

 

How would anyone go about confirming  that anyway?   It’s one man’s opinion.   And the better the Colts do, the dumber McDaniels looks. 

 

The article glows and gushes about the Colts from first sentence to last sentence and you’re still not happy due to some perceived slight.   The only person who slighted the Colts is JM.   And hopefully we can repay him by beating his rear end for years to come.   Breer is fully on board the Colts bandwagon.   Read the whole story.   You’ll be a happy Colts fan.   I promise.

 

PS— thanks to Stiches for posting this as he did.   This story is required reading for every Colts fan. 

Living well has always been the best revenge

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, IndyD4U said:

I'm not really digging all the attention the team has been getting. I want to lay low

You know you may be right.  Imagine how unglued and ferocious the attacks on Cleveland will be next year when they open 2-4.  Then the stress will mount up a great deal when it really shouldn't.  Reasonable expectations are when the fan faithful (like this message board) and local media are hyped, but the mainstream is busy preening over every action the mega-market teams make.  (examples: The endless LA Lakers stories for the team with the worst record in the NBA over the past half dozen years give or take is an example or the frenzy over Dallas for every sneeze or hiccup Jerry Jones makes).  Players listen to the mainstream and many get their value from their respect/support there and adopt those expectations.  It's human nature and many of us would do the same in their place.  Odell and his QB are in a media fight right now with Cowherd on Fox.  Cowherd LOVES it, it builds his brand.  I am not sure it helps anything in Cleveland for them all to be caught up in it. 

 

The Colts are working hard to find the right personalities/mentalities for this team in part to be able to discount and ignore outside garbage and focus on the job at hand.  We don't have any Social Media stars on this team.  Andrew Luck, who would likely be 100 times more popular if he played the brand-building media games and that would put raw cash in his pockets, but it wouldn't help his game, it wouldn't win late in the 4th Quarter and this team seems to be building for character almost above all else (perhaps it IS above all else).  If you said the Colts ranked all the players first based on that and then brought athleticism and positional fit just below, I would believe it.  And I think courage to overcome exhaustion and distraction in critical moments (I think it takes internal fortitude to battle through it when all seems lost or at risk) will serve this team very well.  

 

BUT...  we live in a new universe where media of all types, especially social media, rules the roost of today's culture.  No one is 100% immune to it.  Being built up is a way media can either claim they were geniuses to have predicted it, or in most cases, they can then use their own efforts to do so to tear people back down for ratings and $'s when someone succumbs to the pressure and false expectations.  

 

So some might scoff.. but I think you may be on to something.  It was better when no one was paying attention.  It took a big heavy burden completely away from the team.  Sort of like the Pacers when they lost Paul George and blew everyone away coming out of nowhere.  Even this year after losing Oladipo no one thought they could do anything and they finished strong.  If the Colts stumble out of the gate (as we tend to do) the merciless attacks will be legion   

 

Who needs that?  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is nigh on impossible to understand the impact on the team regarding the social media attention we (or any team for that matter) get. How will the players cope with being rated in the top 5 of most Power Rankings this season, compared to last year when we were commonly placed last or near to last? Or is it all irelevant?

 

Ballards considered words imdicate the latter.......

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Nadine said:

Living well has always been the best revenge

 

Beautifully said!   Thank you!!   :thmup:

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good article.  Ive already forgotten Josh McDaniels. Reich has the right stuff.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, IndyD4U said:

I'm not really digging all the attention the team has been getting. I want to lay low

  I read (on the Pats fan forum), very little concern for the Colts. I think the question posed was; “ which team has the best chance to win 5 SBs”?

   Of course, many fans said the Pats but only 2 posters (out of 40-50 posters) said the Colts. Many picked KC, Philly, NO and even the Browns. If  that’s any indication of how that fanbase views the Colts, they are in for a surprise.

    We know the Patriots are probably going to be competitive but the gap could be closing. Of course, the Colts still have to earn it but I love the way this thing is getting built. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, IndyD4U said:

I'm not really digging all the attention the team has been getting. I want to lay low

 

I've seen this statement a few times around the board and I have to say I agree and disagree. The Colts have always been the underdog. Even during the manning era it took forever for the Colts to get true recognition. So we as fans have grown used to not being in the spotlight. 

 

But on the other hand, so many people want to see the Colts become the next NFL dynasty. And in order for that to happen this organization needs to get used to being in the spotlight. They need to get used to being praised all the time. They need to get to a place where it doesn't matter if people are talking to up or not. 

 

I am embracing this. Because being in the spotlight and being praised all the time comes with the territory of being an NFL dynasty... so happy Ballard is the man running the show. He understands that outside noise is just that. Noise. 

 

And as a fan for the last 16 years I'm going to eat this up. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, chad72 said:

Albert Breer has to make up for kissing Josh McDaniels' behind when he published that unsubstantiated "organizational structure" crap about the Colts. I lost respect for him when he said that. Remember this link??? I have not forgotten.

 

 

We, Colts fans, are pretty high on Ballard, regardless of whether Breer sings his praises or not. 

 

 I would think JM would have wanted to have serious amounts of roster control.

That therefore might have given some pause. No way did NE want to compete against him.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, NannyMcafee said:

 

I've seen this statement a few times around the board and I have to say I agree and disagree. The Colts have always been the underdog. Even during the manning era it took forever for the Colts to get true recognition. So we as fans have grown used to not being in the spotlight. 

 

But on the other hand, so many people want to see the Colts become the next NFL dynasty. And in order for that to happen this organization needs to get used to being in the spotlight. They need to get used to being praised all the time. They need to get to a place where it doesn't matter if people are talking to up or not. 

 

I am embracing this. Because being in the spotlight and being praised all the time comes with the territory of being an NFL dynasty... so happy Ballard is the man running the show. He understands that outside noise is just that. Noise. 

 

And as a fan for the last 16 years I'm going to eat this up. 

 

Very good point made.

 

The underdog role has been our "fuel". It's easy to get complacent and feel like you've got it wrapped up once all the talking heads start giving you W's before you even step on the practice field.

 

I too am glad Ballard and Reich are here to keep the young guys focused.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what Breer is drinking these days but I might guess he's abusing the beverage thats almost spelled like his name. Lol 

Best offseason?

I like the Houston and not against the Funchess signings but don't think along with our draft that our off season is the best of all the teams.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff as usual, @stitches. Ballard is building a team as I like it, through the draft and without overly spending in free agency. I've never been a fan of spending on free agents outside the organization. 

 

Anyhow, other teams' fans want their favorite teams to emulate what the Colts have done. The Jets SB Nation site has a good piece on how Ballard has built the Colts. One area the writer mentions is the value that Ballard has placed on second round picks. I thought it was a good read. 

 

https://www.ganggreennation.com/2019/5/21/18631702/the-colts-provide-the-jets-with-a-great-model-to-turn-things-around

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

but don't think along with our draft that our off season is the best of all the teams.

 

Who had better?

 

Who had the best?

 

Who are your top 10?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/20/2019 at 3:56 PM, braveheartcolt said:

So Ballard sees the 2020 rookie WR class as stacked. Funchess got a one year deal. No pressure then Devin....

I wonder what that means for Hilton.  Will 2020 be his last year in Indy?  If Campbell and Cain develop nicely, and a solid WR is drafted next year, that could be the end of Hilton's time here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Who had better?

 

Who had the best?

 

Who are your top 10?

 

So your saying wirh Houston, Funchess and no picks in 1st round we had the best??

 

Not researching all teams offseason but just going off top of my head I'd say Raiders, Pats had a very good draft. Jags got a SB mvp qb. Browns got the most talented wr in nfl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Not researching all teams offseason

 

You do this every year.

 

You throw out an opinion on the Colts offseason without a reference point to compare it to.  The Colts Free Agency is never good enough for you, but compared to what?  The Colts Draft is never good enough for you, but compared to what?  You only know the Colts offseason, and not the other 31 teams, so you have no point of reference other than what you think the Colts should have done.

 

If you want to talk comparatively, the Colts have had some pretty good offseasons under Ballard compared to the other 31 teams.  But if you just want to talk about what you think they should have done, I'm guessing none of the 32 teams have good offseasons.

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/20/2019 at 10:36 AM, stitches said:

Ballard has long-term view of the roster!!! They are looking ahead for following year's drafts and assessing the potential strengths and weaknesses of future drafts. He thinks next year's draft will be stacked WR-wise: 

  Quote

“We think next year’s receiver class is pretty good,” Ballard said, before doubling down. “It’s gonna be really good.”

 

 

Sorry,  been meaning to respond to this point with a reminder.    One year ago,  Ballard was talking about the 19 draft by raving about the DL class we all just saw get drafted.    So, I personally wouldn't read too much into his observatin that the wide receiver class looks very good.    Ballard almost passed over the entire DL class,  and didn't address the OL class until R7.    Even as late as the week of the draft, Ballard stated that the Colts would always pay close attention to both lines.  Then he turned around and almost avoided them.

 

As for next year's great WR class?   Maybe we take one in R1?    Maybe.   Or maybe R2?    Or R3?  Maybe.

 

But I also read his comment as a subtle message to players like TY and Funchess and Rodgers and the 27 other nameless, faceless WR's who are also on our roster.   That they shouldn't price themselves off the roster next year when looking for their next contract.    That they should played their best or they could easily be replaced.   Ballard doesn't do anything with a heavy hand.   But he's not above a little subtle messaging to those who might need a reminder.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/22/2019 at 2:37 PM, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

You do this every year.

 

You throw out an opinion on the Colts offseason without a reference point to compare it to.  The Colts Free Agency is never good enough for you, but compared to what?  The Colts Draft is never good enough for you, but compared to what?  You only know the Colts offseason, and not the other 31 teams, so you have no point of reference other than what you think the Colts should have done.

 

If you want to talk comparatively, the Colts have had some pretty good offseasons under Ballard compared to the other 31 teams.  But if you just want to talk about what you think they should have done, I'm guessing none of the 32 teams have good offseasons.

 

There you go again with your argumentative homer bias rants. Lol

 

The Raiders acquired WR's Antonio Brown & Tyrell Williams.... T Trent Brown ... S Joyner plus 3 First Round picks DE Ferrell, best rated RB Josh Jacobs and S Abram!!!

 

The Brownies added to a already stacked team the most talented WR OBJ..... Olivea Vernon... Sheldon Richardson... star RB Kareem Hunt and drafted possibly the best CB Greedy Williams.

 

Jets added RB Leveon Bell.... CJ Mosley... twice pro bowler G Osmele and 3rd overalk pick DT Quin Williams.

 

I'm not even going to mention pats moves/draft caus I hate them but it was good.

 

It's not the end of the world(for colt fans) if in May the Colts didn't win the off season OR if Warner doesn't include Luck on his Top 5 list......unless of course the Colt fan is YOU! haha

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/23/2019 at 9:36 PM, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

There you go again with your argumentative homer bias rants. Lol

 

It's not the end of the world(for colt fans) if in May the Colts didn't win the off seasonOR if Warner doesn't include Luck on his Top 5 list......unless of course the Colt fan is YOU! 

 

Am I a homer?  Yes.

 

Did I say the Colts had the best offseason this year?  No.  (It's too early to say one way or another)

 

Since we now have the results of this past season to judge last years offseason, is it safe to say that the Colts had the best offseason last year?  Yes.  (An offseason you were critical of at this time last year)

 

We'll have to see how this season turns out before we decide who had the best offseason this year.  (But if you wanna crown the Raiders, then crown 'em  :P)

 

:hat:

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Am I a homer?  Yes.

 

Did I say the Colts had the best offseason this year?  No.  (It's too early to say one way or another)

 

Since we now have the results of this past season to judge last years offseason, is it safe to say that the Colts had the best offseason last year?  Yes.  (An offseason you were critical of at this time last year)

 

We'll have to see how this season turns out before we decide who had the best offseason this year.  (But if you wanna crown the Raiders, then crown 'em  :P)

 

:hat:

...and we let them off the hook. :) 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think most of us are thinking Ballard will strike again with this years draft, which is probably wishful thinking. We are also lapping up the 'good dressing room character' philisophy and the 'build from within culture'. Whilst good on paper, we may be getting carried away. 

 

But with Luck tucked up our sleeve, it could all just land perfectly. It' s good to dream, is it not.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Ssuper Bowl in Miami? Check.  Media jumping on our bandwagon finally? Check. Irsay spotted at Bilderberg? We shall see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • we are in a division that likes to run too.   the titans and texans ranked 7th and 8th in rushing yards, while the colts and jaguars were 19th and 20th.  that was down year for the jaguars, the previous year they were top 5
    • People love to prognosticate. My crystal ball broke so I don't have any insight into the future, but Ballard is using particular criteria (data) that has shown to be better predictors than merely guessing. Let's watch to see whether his approach to dealing with the unknown is better than other teams. I think we will be surprised.
    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
  • Members

    • Behle

      Behle 17

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 374

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,807

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndySouthsider

      IndySouthsider 232

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,516

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tdblue17

      tdblue17 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 9,354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...