Jump to content
holeymoley99

Chad Kelly signed

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Buck Showalter said:

Not worried about the signing, just think it sorta gives some credence to anyone who wants to argue that Ballard's message is inconsistent...

 

Regardless if he thinks he can "save a troubled player" it is still pretty early in the team branding & identity building process especially for a 3rd string player...

 

There's a whole season & off season for him to worry about the 2020 season backup quarterback...

Didn't stop him last year in picking up a troubled, but very talented 1st/2nd Rounder in corner Jalen Collins. 

 

He has stated all along he would give second chances.

 

The part that most people miss is the stigma of the veteran with the high dollar contract dogging it in practice and loafing on game days - he's worried that THOSE guys will hurt the locker room. 

 

He's not worried about a second chance kid because they will likely be on their very best behavior, they'll be hungry to fit in and earn their spot at the table. If they don't then very little capital was invested and they're cut immediately.

 

That is the point that most people are missing!

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tikyle said:

 

So was Aaron Hernandez, Ryan Leaf and Lawrence Phillips and we saw how those ended up.

It goes both ways though. There are a good handful of knuckleheads in Hall of Fame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

It is amazing this thread has got almost 2 full pages. IMO, Kelly won't even be on the roster when the season starts.

Agreed that he likely won't be on the active roster. But I do think he has an excellent chance at the practice squad. I'm rooting for the guy obviously. Odds are he'll find a way to screw things up again based on his track record. I just really hate to see when guys pee their talent away.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Matthew Gilbert said:

Agreed that he likely won't be on the active roster. But I do think he has an excellent chance at the practice squad. I'm rooting for the guy obviously. Odds are he'll find a way to screw things up again based on his track record. I just really hate to see when guys pee their talent away.

He's a talented kid but with Luck and Brissett on the roster already our depth chart at QB is solid. Brissett as a backup is about as good as it gets.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Scott Pennock said:

Didn't stop him last year in picking up a troubled, but very talented 1st/2nd Rounder in corner Jalen Collins. 

 

He has stated all along he would give second chances.

 

The part that most people miss is the stigma of the veteran with the high dollar contract dogging it in practice and loafing on game days - he's worried that THOSE guys will hurt the locker room. 

 

He's not worried about a second chance kid because they will likely be on their very best behavior, they'll be hungry to fit in and earn their spot at the table. If they don't then very little capital was invested and they're cut immediately.

 

That is the point that most people are missing!

 

 

Good points.

 

My posts in this thread were really just addressing a poster who asked why some were not on board with the signing. While I am not a fan of the signing, it isn't that big of a deal, really nothing more than an off season talking point... 

 

Overall I love how Ballard is building the team & I just feel like the more razor focused & consistent he stays on message etc. the less ammo the nay-sayers or detractors will have. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/20/2019 at 11:18 AM, Jared Jammer said:

That white guy who makes money pretending to be a black guy on Twitter is upset by this signing. He says we should have signed Kaepernick instead.

No Thanks, dude is a team cancer and whats to start not play 3rd string.  Canadian and XFL looking for starters.He may  play there,perhaps?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, conklincolt said:

No Thanks, dude is a team cancer and whats to start not play 3rd string.  Canadian and XFL looking for starters.He may  play there,perhaps?

Kaep wants more money than we are paying Kelly too.   No way would Kaep be a good signing in Indy.   Seattle gave him a chance and he didn't work out.   Baltimore was very interesting in him until his outspoken girlfriend called the owner a racist.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

It is amazing this thread has got almost 2 full pages. IMO, Kelly won't even be on the roster when the season starts.

Who said he’s making the roster this year? That’s not what the discussion has been about. The consensus has the PS being the best case scenario 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing but Cain is hanging out with Kelly today. Please Cain don’t let him get you in trouble. Hopefully the culture in Indy will help him get his life together.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/23/2019 at 12:29 PM, Scott Pennock said:

Didn't stop him last year in picking up a troubled, but very talented 1st/2nd Rounder in corner Jalen Collins. 

 

He has stated all along he would give second chances.

 

The part that most people miss is the stigma of the veteran with the high dollar contract dogging it in practice and loafing on game days - he's worried that THOSE guys will hurt the locker room. 

 

He's not worried about a second chance kid because they will likely be on their very best behavior, they'll be hungry to fit in and earn their spot at the table. If they don't then very little capital was invested and they're cut immediately.

 

That is the point that most people are missing!

 

 

 

Good post.    And I completely forgot giving Collins a second chance last season.   So Kelly is NOT Ballard’s first attempt at saving a troubled player.   Collins is/was.

 

Much appreciated!     :thmup:

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sincerely asking, did Collins suspensions or issues dating back to LSU extend past anything other than PEDs??? & then how would that equivalate to the same type of "issues" or "troubles" Kelly has had???

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention they are also hanging out with the colts draft pick Javon Patterson. I love watching our players IG and seeing how close this team is. Everyone hangs with Ebron. He must be fun to hang out with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Buck Showalter said:

Sincerely asking, did Collins suspensions or issues dating back to LSU extend past anything other than PEDs??? & then how would that equivalate to the same type of "issues" or "troubles" Kelly has had???

Collins was drugs snd Kelly has been alcohol - both have the same effects on the mind/body as an addiction I would think.

 

Both are on a short leash of one and done behavior.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Scott Pennock said:

Collins was drugs snd Kelly has been alcohol - both have the same effects on the mind/body as an addiction I would think.

 

Both are on a short leash of one and done behavior.

Usually addiction is a symptom of a deeper issue. Which all can be over come wants the issue is worked on

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, NewEra said:

Usually addiction is a symptom of a deeper issue. Which all can be over come wants the issue is worked on

He said wants......once

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/22/2019 at 9:45 PM, NewColtsFan said:

nd my concern level is elivated that we haven't read news that Kelly has gone and completed rehab.    I would've guessed that would be mandatory for Ballard.    And maybe he has,  but if so,  you would think the team press release could say so,  or the kid would do an interview and say so.    It's important that that message would get out.    It's an important step to take.    But so far,  nothing on that front.

 

I'm surprised it wasn't mandatory as a part of his plea deal. I assumed it was, but nope. Probation and community service, but no mandated rehab. 

 

Of course, it's possible he got treatment that wasn't mandated, or publicized (can't find any mention of it).

 

Either way, I assume the Colts did their due diligence, which includes Brian Decker's evaluation. I don't think they would sign someone with Kelly's history without Decker's sign-off, so the idea that Kelly got signed just because his family is close to Frank Reich doesn't hold up, for me.

 

And end of the day, either he does well in camp and pushes for a spot on the PS and a chance to be the primary backup in 2020, or he doesn't do well and he's off the team. No question in my mind that he's better than Philip Walker. I don't see a lot of risk for the team with this acquisition. Same as Jalen Collins. Low risk, potential reward down the line.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • we are in a division that likes to run too.   the titans and texans ranked 7th and 8th in rushing yards, while the colts and jaguars were 19th and 20th.  that was down year for the jaguars, the previous year they were top 5
    • People love to prognosticate. My crystal ball broke so I don't have any insight into the future, but Ballard is using particular criteria (data) that has shown to be better predictors than merely guessing. Let's watch to see whether his approach to dealing with the unknown is better than other teams. I think we will be surprised.
    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
  • Members

    • Behle

      Behle 17

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 374

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,807

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndySouthsider

      IndySouthsider 232

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,516

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tdblue17

      tdblue17 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 9,354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...