-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
No intent on building offense first then fixing the d next year. We have talent on defense. Three of which were hurt most the year in the secondary we will can still find zone corners in the second third 4th 5th 6th 7th. Heck our best ones are undrafted and 7th rounder and our 5th rounder didn't make the team. Our second rounder was hurt. Given Ballard's tendency to draft the wrong corner early see quincy wilson, rock ya sin I rather not draft another bust at corner in the first. -
Hasn't Nabers been primarily a slot wr? Why would they trade all the way to 5 for a slot wrs that needs to work on playing outside -
By ClaytonColt · Posted
Pick a player with long arms and a high RAS score -
We could go corner in the 2nd and get the same quality as the first as we run a zone scheme. Plus let's not forget flowers is an undrafted guy.
-
I'm going to respectfully disagree here. I think, regardless of what the fans might think, their lack of FAs and re-signing all our own means the Colts believe this team is truly capable of making waves in 2024, being only 1 play away from a playoff birth/division title. I think they believe that they are a couple pieces away but clearly need a top skill position wideout to pair with Pittman and Downs. Every pick after that is fillers, depth, and/or less important needs in their minds. You could wind up being correct but I'm sticking with my trade up scenario where the only way I'm wrong is that we find out later, the Colts could not find a trade partner or that the trade partners really wanted to much in compensation. I'm sticking with Colts trade to with Chargers and take Nabers at pick 5.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now