Jump to content
stitches

PFF: Indianapolis Colts 2019 Draft Recap

Recommended Posts

 

Highlights:

- The Colts have a type of player they like on defense - long athletes

- not much reading - reaction and speed paramount, that's what they target

- Rock Ya-Sin - fits well with the system, worried about his mirror ability downfield - not an issue in this system. Instincts as good as it gets at the position. 

-Ben Banogu - project at this point, fits the mold of what the Colts want - freakishly athletic. Here's a nugget - Banogu told PFF in the pre-draft process that they didn't teach them pass-rushing moves at TCU - it was scheme over pass-rush. He was asked to stunt and loop... not a lot of one-on-one pass-rush reps. 

-Parris Campbell - their least favorite pick of the first 4-5 picks. Very redundant with TY Hilton according to Renner. Best role from the slot, not a real deep threat right now[this is the precise thing I've been saying I have a problem with PFF for in their college-to-NFL projection. They lack the imagination and are extremely conservative projecting players to do something they haven't seen them do in college, even if their skillset and athleticism suggest they might be able to do it). A lot of tools, but don't see him as a #2 receiver in this offense. 

- Bobby Okereke - longest arms of this LB draft class, reminiscent of Darius Leonard and will fit seamlessly next to him and make plays with his athleticism and length.

- Marvell Tell - possible cornerback transition with how fluid his hips are and how athletic and long he is (ridiculous 3cone). He makes some plays that require short-area quickness that are special. 

-Jackson Barton - did very well on must-pass situations, good pass-protector

 

UHIUTKP.jpg

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, stitches said:

 

Highlights:

- The Colts have a type of player they like on defense - long athletes

- not much reading - reaction and speed paramount, that's what they target

- Rock Ya-Sin - fits well with the system, worried about his mirror ability downfield - not an issue in this system. Instincts as good as it gets at the position. 

-Ben Banogu - project at this point, fits the mold of what the Colts want - freakishly athletic. Here's a nugget - Banogu told PFF in the pre-draft process that they didn't teach them pass-rushing moves at TCU - it was scheme over pass-rush. He was asked to stunt and loop... not a lot of one-on-one pass-rush reps. 

-Parris Campbell - their least favorite pick of the first 4-5 picks. Very redundant with TY Hilton according to Renner. Best role from the slot, not a real deep threat right now[this is the precise thing I've been saying I have a problem with PFF for in their college-to-NFL projection. They lack the imagination and are extremely conservative projecting players to do something they haven't seen them do in college, even if their skillset and athleticism suggest they might be able to do it). A lot of tools, but don't see him as a #2 receiver in this offense. 

- Bobby Okereke - longest arms of this LB draft class, reminiscent of Darius Leonard and will fit seamlessly next to him and make plays with his athleticism and length.

- Marvell Tell - possible cornerback transition with how fluid his hips are and how athletic and long he is (ridiculous 3cone). He makes some plays that require short-area quickness that are special. 

-Jackson Barton - did very well on must-pass situations, good pass-protector

 

UHIUTKP.jpg

 

There are plenty of highlights of Campbell going deep.  Maybe that's not what OSU did with him most of the time but he has the ability to stretch a defense.  

 

And so what if he's redundant with TY.   TY's got 2 years left on his contract and is turning 30 this year.  Bringing in a guy who could potentially replace him but with a few years in which he can safely develop (because we still have TY) makes loads of sense.  

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol The Parris Campbell take. He is probably the one who has the best chance to succeed with the colts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Banogu numbers..

2018

57 Tkl. 18 TFL.  8.5 Sk.  10 QBH. 2 FF.

60 QB Pressures

 

2017

49 Tkl.  16.5 TFL. 8.5 Sk. 7 QBH. 3 FF.

 

All of that was scheme and very little technique. Imagine what he's going to do with technique + scheme!

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NewEra said:

It's hard to take a dude with a manbun serious

Thas the truth

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

The beauty of Campbell is that he’s NOT small.   He’s not Hilton's size.   

 

Parris is 6’0” and 205.

 

Hilton is 5’10” and 180.

 

In the football world those two are not the same.   

Yep, I don't know why people in the media continue to call him small... he's not small. He's bigger than players like Stefon Diggs or OBJ or Antonio Brown... 

 

He's VERY VERY well built receiver...

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting factoid on Campbell...   I read somewhere last week that of the 90 passes he caught last year (yes, 90!)  only 21 traveled further than 10 yards past the line of scrimmage.  Just 21!  Yikes, that’s not much. 

 

But I view that as good news, not bad. That’s why he fell to pick 59.

 

At the presser,  Reich said he made it a point to watch Campbell at the Combine and focused on both his rout running and his catching.   Said he came away very impressed.    

 

So, PC is raw.   And needs polishing.  With his physical skills that gives him a super high ceiling.   He can get a lot better.   I’ll take that at pick 59 on every draft, thank you very much!

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Interesting factoid on Campbell...   I read somewhere last week that of the 90 passes he caught last year (yes, 90!)  only 21 traveled further than 10 yards past the line of scrimmage.  Just 21!  Yikes, that’s not much. 

 

But I view that as good news, not bad. That’s why he fell to pick 59.

 

At the presser,  Reich said he made it a point to watch Campbell at the Combine and focused on both his rout running and his catching.   Said he came away very impressed.    

 

So, PC is raw.   And needs polishing.  With his physical skills that gives him a super high ceiling.   He can get a lot better.   I’ll take that at pick 59 on every draft, thank you very much!

 

That's a PFF stat... and it's actually even crazier than you remember... it's out of his 111 targets only 21 were with depth of target of 10+ yards. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah on Parris' size, he and Marlon are pretty similar in size. Marlon's just a tad bit heavier, or at least wants to keep his playing weight at 210. Not that Mack is a huge guy at RB, but still.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

Yeah on Parris' size, he and Marlon are pretty similar in size. Marlon's just a tad bit heavier, or at least wants to keep his playing weight at 210. Not that Mack is a huge guy at RB, but still.

Honestly Parris looks like he could take some snaps in the backfield with Marlon.  He definitely is built like a Runing Back.  Not hard to see that's what he used to be at one point.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, krunk said:

Honestly Parris looks like he could take some snaps in the backfield with Marlon.  He definitely is built like a Runing Back.  Not hard to see that's what he used to be at one point.

He was a running back in high school I think...

 

He was also used on all kinds of sweeps and screens and other catch-and-run opportunities, which are glorified RB snaps... those were part of the reason his average depth of target was so low(I think about 4 yards) - because he was getting a ton of his targets at or behind the line of scrimmage. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s a terrible take by PFF, and I am a big fan of PFF. That’s basically like the Browns saying ‘we already have Jarvis Landry, why would we want OBJ?’ Campbell has a strong grade from them, he’s one of the fastest in the draft, and he wasn’t even used as a deep threat at OSU. He projects better to the NFL game than any of our other draft picks. 

 

If anything the project edge rusher who graded out average, was drafted in the second round, and is being moved to a different role should be their least favorite draft pick. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so Campbell is "Very redundant with TY Hilton..." How is it a bad thing when you force your opponent to cover TWO TY Hiltons? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw plenty of Campbell highlights that show him going deep. I don’t think he will have a issue after a little learning curve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see PC as redundant at all.  TY is going to be working the mid to deep parts of the field and constantly threatening to take the top off the D.   

Our other receivers and tight ends are going to be occupying the safeties and linebackers across the middle of the field.  PC is going to potentially do either or will even be coming out from the backfield like Mack or take very shallow crossing routes just past the LOS and using his speed and YAC abilities. 

 

Reich is going to have a lot of fun working with all of these options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

Interesting factoid on Campbell...   I read somewhere last week that of the 90 passes he caught last year (yes, 90!)  only 21 traveled further than 10 yards past the line of scrimmage.  Just 21!  Yikes, that’s not much. 

 

Those are the plays that NE and KC rode all the way to the AFC championship.   Reich likes those mid-level passes too.  High completion rate and keeps Luck clean.  We're gonna lay on teams what KC did to us last year.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I think they might have been a tiny bit too critical, PC is raw, and his route tree is limited. And they did say he's not really a deep threat "yet", which likely means to me they think he can be after he polishes some things.

 

He called Banogu a project, which I think is fair. 

 

Overall I didn't think it was that bad.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

Those are the plays that NE and KC rode all the way to the AFC championship.   Reich likes those mid-level passes too.  High completion rate and keeps Luck clean.  We're gonna lay on teams what KC did to us last year.

Hill killed us in the KC game with those kind of passes. He didn’t beat us deep at all. Campbell is the same type of player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This draft may actually be better than last years. I have that feeling.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, krunk said:

This draft may actually be better than last years. I have that feeling.

That would be crazy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, krunk said:

This draft may actually be better than last years. I have that feeling.

That would be crazy!

What i like is Ballard seems to define what skills and traits are needed and he targets players to fill that role.  The past regime seemed to say " wow, thats a great player, i'll draft him and figure out how to use him later."

2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

That would be crazy.

Haha.  Great minds think alike!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, krunk said:

This draft may actually be better than last years. I have that feeling.

Eh let’s not count the chicks before they hatch. I like our catch but they still have to live up to this post draft hype

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Eh let’s not count the chicks before they hatch. I like our catch but they still have to live up to this post draft hype

I said I have a feeling.  Feelings aren't based on facts.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, krunk said:

This draft may actually be better than last years. I have that feeling.

 

I think it’ll be less stellar than last years but a little better than Ballard’s first draft. I’m probably in the minority in thinking this class is kind of raw as a whole, with a high ceiling of course.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

 

I think it’ll be less stellar than last years but a little better than Ballard’s first draft. I’m probably in the minority in thinking this class is kind of raw as a whole, with a high ceiling of course.

I agree. I’m not talking about the colts picks either. Rather the entire prospect class was rather underwhelming and that resulted in some false hype. I think we’re gonna see a lot of busts out of this class league wide

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bleedin Blue said:

I don't see PC as redundant at all.  TY is going to be working the mid to deep parts of the field and constantly threatening to take the top off the D.   

Our other receivers and tight ends are going to be occupying the safeties and linebackers across the middle of the field.  PC is going to potentially do either or will even be coming out from the backfield like Mack or take very shallow crossing routes just past the LOS and using his speed and YAC abilities. 

 

Reich is going to have a lot of fun working with all of these options.

I am a HUGE fan of crossing routes.  I hope our team becomes crossing route FREAKS.  By doing so, the run game and deep passing game will benefit and our mismatches on the crossing routes will destroy most teams without elite pass defending LBs and Safeties.  I can't WAIT to see this play out.  If Doyle is back to full strength the mismatches will be crazy.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

 

I think it’ll be less stellar than last years but a little better than Ballard’s first draft. I’m probably in the minority in thinking this class is kind of raw as a whole, with a high ceiling of course.

I would agree it looks very raw. It might take a couple years to see what this class does. The good thing is by picking smart players it should take less time. There might be a surprise once we get to training camp at how good one of these defensive players is. Time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, csmopar said:

I agree. I’m not talking about the colts picks either. Rather the entire prospect class was rather underwhelming and that resulted in some false hype. I think we’re gonna see a lot of busts out of this class league wide


Yeah I tend to agree about the overall talent in this class. Not terrible but definitely not as deep/talented as I thought it might be. I liked the talent in the 2nd round though, for the most part. 
 

5 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I would agree it looks very raw. It might take a couple years to see what this class does. The good thing is by picking smart players it should take less time. There might be a surprise once we get to training camp at how good one of these defensive players is. Time will tell.

 

Yeah the best thing about it is that all the guys we got seem to be committed to working/getting better, have a good head on their shoulders and all that. Tell's really the only one who I've seen have some effort questions from what I've read. But I've read mixed stuff on him and I really like him as a player. Probably my favorite pick in day 3.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

There are plenty of highlights of Campbell going deep.  Maybe that's not what OSU did with him most of the time but he has the ability to stretch a defense.  

 

And so what if he's redundant with TY.   TY's got 2 years left on his contract and is turning 30 this year.  Bringing in a guy who could potentially replace him but with a few years in which he can safely develop (because we still have TY) makes loads of sense.  

 

 

It was said that Ohio State didn't use him right. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

The beauty of Campbell is that he’s NOT small.   He’s not Hilton's size.   

 

Parris is 6’0” and 205.

 

Hilton is 5’10” and 180.

 

In the football world those two are not the same.   

To further drive this point home...Parris Campbell is a bigger (and faster) receiver than Reggie Wayne (6-0 198 lbs.)  Chew on that for a minute.  Not too many thought of Reggie as small.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I just double checked the Colts roster....   TY is officially  listed at 183.    So, I accidentally shorted him 3 pounds.  (Sorry, TY!)   Let's round him up to 185.    Hilton is still 20 pounds lighter than Campbell.   And that's plenty for a fast WR.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Irish YJ said:

While I think they might have been a tiny bit too critical, PC is raw, and his route tree is limited. And they did say he's not really a deep threat "yet", which likely means to me they think he can be after he polishes some things.

 

He called Banogu a project, which I think is fair. 

 

Overall I didn't think it was that bad.

Honestly  Campbell  reminds me alot of hill. I watch Hill's college  highlights  when he was a running back and was amazed  at how much he has developed  as a receiver.  Campbell  will probably  develop  in a similar  way

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, krunk said:

This draft may actually be better than last years. I have that feeling.

 

Huh?

 

In what way?

 

Two rookie all-pro's vs............  ????? this year?

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

I would agree it looks very raw. It might take a couple years to see what this class does. The good thing is by picking smart players it should take less time. There might be a surprise once we get to training camp at how good one of these defensive players is. Time will tell.

Orekeke could surprise

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NewColtsFan said:

 

Huh?

 

In what way?

 

Two rookie all-pro's vs............  ????? this year?

 

10 all pros according  to mcgahee  lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Honestly  Campbell  reminds me alot of hill. I watch Hill's college  highlights  when he was a running back and was amazed  at how much he has developed  as a receiver.  Campbell  will probably  develop  in a similar  way

I think Campbell could play any position (speed X, slot, or Z) if he can beat the press. I have know idea how he does smacking CBs down at the line though. Going to watch some tape on him this weekend. I can easily see him as being TY's eventual replacement. Had he now went to OSU, he likely would not have been pigeon holed like he was. OSU just always has an overabundance of O skill players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wouldn't consider #10 a diss..... but I have a bit of an issue with the Cowpies ranked #2 at the same time.   We not only shut them out last season, we out manned, out-muscled and intimidated them in a way that none of us have seen a Colts team do to any team in a long, long time.   You could say "well its only one game".... and that's true.   But that was a statement game, and I just don't see how Brandt can justify a #2 ranking for Dallas given each team's additions this off-season....not to mention all those other teams he has them ranked ahead of.   As for the Colts...on our own merits.... I would have us closer to the middle of the pack on this list, around 7th and certainly ahead of Dallas.
    • His mom sounds awesome.  
    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 21,095

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonC

      ClaytonC 23

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,807

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 416

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 369

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Jammer

      Jared Jammer 97

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Surge89

      Surge89 965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SVFD Colts Fan

      SVFD Colts Fan 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,322

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...