Jump to content
HOF19

My grade on this 2019 draft won't be a high as I hoped.

Recommended Posts

And I know I might take some crap for this . But I seem to recall have read dozens of articles by Bill Polian stating you should draft offensive lineman every year (and drafting them in 4th -7th round is fine )…...I personally consider that #1 rule of the draft...…..  #1 rule period !!!

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • I pray we bring in at 4-5 undrafted offensive lineman …… Gotta have lots of OL depth...……….. LOTS !!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, HOF19 said:
  • I pray we bring in at 4-5 undrafted offensive lineman …… Gotta have lots of OL depth...……….. LOTS !!!!!!!!!

 

Or maybe just select one with their last pick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, HOF19 said:

And I know I might take some crap for this . But I seem to recall have read dozens of articles by Bill Polian stating you should draft offensive lineman every year (and drafting them in 4th -7th round is fine )…...I personally consider that #1 rule of the draft...…..  #1 rule period !!!

How many super bowls did Polians teams win

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MFT5 said:

How many super bowls did Polians teams win

 

Name a GM besides Belichick that got his teams to more SBs than Polian.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure if Roemer is still available, but i'd bring him in as an undrafted prospect so long as he has his head on straight now. he has a very high ceiling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Or maybe just select one with their last pick?

One  ok …..2-3 more as undrafted FA would be even nicer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We might be able to get some later when teams are cutting after training camp.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, HOF19 said:

And I know I might take some crap for this . But I seem to recall have read dozens of articles by Bill Polian stating you should draft offensive lineman every year (and drafting them in 4th -7th round is fine )…...I personally consider that #1 rule of the draft...…..  #1 rule period !!!

 

Take a look at our depth for OL.  The question is, would anyone drafted in 4-7 make the team?

 

I'm not saying they wouldn't, but I think it would be tough.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost every guy drafted tested at the elite level in many of the categories.

 

Can't ask for much more out of a draft. As long as the coaches do their job, they've just been given a handful of guys who are great athletes and good locker room guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey......As a lifetime USC Trojan fan I am trying to keep my happy emotions down ever since we drafted Tell...……. Drafting him as a DB makes me want jump for joy.....His range  !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So rather than grade the draft on what they did do you are going to grade them on what they didn’t do?  To each their own.

 

personally I think grading drafts before guys even get to their first mini camp is stupid but that’s just me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Name a GM besides Belichick that got his teams to more SBs than Polian.

it’s about winning who cares who got there 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard looking like a early GOAT candidate 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MFT5 said:

it’s about winning who cares who got there 

 

Just now, MFT5 said:

Ballard looking like a early GOAT candidate 

 

In one post you bash Polian, whose teams made it to six SBs, won one, and had more wins in the 2000s than any other team; then in the next post you say Ballard looks like he could be the GOAT before having even made one SB?


tim and eric awesome show great job shrug GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MFT5 said:

it’s about winning who cares who got there 

People who understand getting there is an accomplishment in its own right and hard to do.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

 

In one post you bash Polian, whose teams made it to six SBs, won one, and had more wins in the 2000s than any other team; then in the next post you say Ballard looks like he could be the GOAT before having even made one SB?


tim and eric awesome show great job shrug GIF

 

bruh my words aren’t that deep ignore me if yu that sensitive. ‘Bash’ pull your skirt dwn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this thread was started as a joke....?

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

People who understand getting there is an accomplishment in its own right and hard to do.

 

new standards. yu think Belichick just okay getting there. no yu here to win 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MFT5 said:

bruh my words aren’t that deep ignore me if yu that sensitive. ‘Bash’ pull your skirt dwn

 

Just trying to understand your logic.

 

Polian is in the HoF.

 

Ballard is in his 3rd year.

 

Do you think Ballard is better than Polian?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Just trying to understand your logic.

 

Polian is in the HoF.

 

Ballard is in his 3rd year.

 

Do you think Ballard is better than Polian?

 

i think he’s going to be. We arguably have No weaknesses and he’s setting us up for future success 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MFT5 said:

i think he’s going to be. We arguably have No weaknesses and he’s setting us up for future success 

 

Fair enough.  I hope he ends up better than Polian too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, egg said:

I think this thread was started as a joke....?

 

Or, it's just dumb...           .......In either case, why am I here?

 

 

Good question and why am I 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MFT5 said:

 

new standards. yu think Belichick just okay getting there. no yu here to win 

K

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, HOF19 said:

And I know I might take some crap for this . But I seem to recall have read dozens of articles by Bill Polian stating you should draft offensive lineman every year (and drafting them in 4th -7th round is fine )…...I personally consider that #1 rule of the draft...…..  #1 rule period !!!

I finally woke up from that Nightmare please don’t take me back I beg you!  So sick n tired of 4-7 rd draft picks expected to protect a #1 overall Franchise QB and it’s no coincidence our OL is rated top 5 after that garbage changed.  3 #1’s and a high 2nd is not rocket science but to Polian/Grigson it was.  The old saying, some can seem to be so smart but yet be so stupid at the same time, Yep. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is 1 give 2-3 more as undrafted free agents .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HOF19 said:

And I know I might take some crap for this . But I seem to recall have read dozens of articles by Bill Polian stating you should draft offensive lineman every year (and drafting them in 4th -7th round is fine )…...I personally consider that #1 rule of the draft...…..  #1 rule period !!!

 

What is your grade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soon gonna have to start looking to see who Colts sign as undrafted free gents ,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's 2  OL would have like to pick OL 4th or 5th round tho .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last two picks oline...

 

HOF19 Draft grade saved! Hallelujah!

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HOF19 said:

And I know I might take some crap for this . But I seem to recall have read dozens of articles by Bill Polian stating you should draft offensive lineman every year (and drafting them in 4th -7th round is fine )…...I personally consider that #1 rule of the draft...…..  #1 rule period !!!

 

Time to admit this thread was premature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Time to admit this thread was premature.

Wanted offensive lineman in 4th or 5th round .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
    • I missed the first couple innings, was keeping track on phone, didn’t realize things got chippy with the benches clearing after the Contreras HR! Seems the Cubs were playing with a little extra edge tonight, I love it!!! 
    • and then NE goes into KC and throws for 350 and Sony runs for 100+ on them. our O, and O game plan just sucked.   i get KC was good, but our O just sucked.
  • Members

    • Davvon2590

      Davvon2590 3

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShakerColt

      ShakerColt 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Introspect

      Introspect 179

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 415

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • luckyBatistuta

      luckyBatistuta 109

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • el duderino

      el duderino 61

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...