Jump to content
Click here to get your free tickets for Colts Training Camp today!
MTC

Colts draft Khari Willis, SS, Michigan State

Recommended Posts

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought it'd be Hooker but oh well.

Box safety, great character guy. Average athlete below average speed. Nothing really jumps out about him other than character praise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NannyMcafee said:

They just traded their second pick in this round to Oak. 

It's alright. This is a solid pick.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Valpo2004 said:

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

He's a box safety that doesn't miss tackles. Fits our scheme perfectly.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jared Cisneros said:

It's alright. This is a solid pick.

I like the fact they only gave the two 4ths

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jared Cisneros said:

He's a box safety that doesn't miss tackles. Fits our scheme perfectly.

 

Can he cover?  Cause Geathers doesn't really miss tackles either, he just has problems with coverage.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

I like the fact they only gave the two 4ths

I thought it might of been a slight overpay value-chart wise, but I like the player.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

They must really like him.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's more of a great teammate than a good player. I thought he had 6th-7th round value. He's not beating out Clayton Geathers or Matthias Farley any time soon. 

 

He's a good fit for this defense, but I think they fell in love with the character and picked him too early. He provides nothing in coverage at all man to man on RBs, TEs, and slot receivers.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Can he cover?  Cause Geathers doesn't really miss tackles either, he just has problems with coverage.

Not sure how well tbh. I hope so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

What’d we give up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they (CB) really liked him I’m glad they went and got him. 

 

Get somebody you love rather than two  picks later.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a huge fan. Seems like a guy with limited upside and versatility. 

 

Selfishly, I hate that they don’t have that other pick now. Lots of guys are going to be there.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bluefire4 said:

I think he's more of a great teammate than a good player. I thought he had 6th-7th round value. He's not beating out Clayton Geathers or Matthias Farley any time soon. 

 

He's a good fit for this defense, but I think they fell in love with the character and picked him too early.

He was a late 4th to Mid 5th by most “expert” sources. So a bit of a reach but not drastically 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jared Cisneros said:

both 4ths.

Meh not terrible

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

So did the ESPN crew

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

 

Music to my ears...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

This explains it. Both Ballard and Kiper were high on him. I like that.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s great in coverage against tight ends. Something we struggle against badly. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

He was a late 4th to Mid 5th by most “expert” sources. So a bit of a reach but not drastically 

Yeah I was saying he was a 6th-7th round pick in my opinion watching Michigan State games. He could prove me wrong but I don't see it. Would definitely rather have Hooker or Deionte Thompson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard's stressed it time and time again, especially recently, but he loves his high character guys.  Obviously they liked him on the field enough to trade up for him, but I definitely believe character played a part in our apparently high interest in him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BOTT said:

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

More than likely he was his top S and there was a fear of a run on Safety

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BOTT said:

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

 

Agreed, he has to be someone Ballard thinks will help the team on the field.  Likely as a replacement for Geathers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

Here’s his draft profile...

 

 

Pre-Draft Analysis

Willis is a thick safety with below-average length and average speed. He's a downhill run defender who takes sound angles and is effective playing close to the line of scrimmage. He's instinctive and runs well enough to cover a deep half. He limits production after the catch. He's not a centerfielder, he doesn't have the cover skills to regularly match up with slot receivers and his frame raises concern about his ability to cover tight ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BOTT said:

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

Obviously they see something I don't. Hoping for the best. He has the work ethic, but I don't think he has the ability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Here’s his draft profile...

 

 

Pre-Draft Analysis

Willis is a thick safety with below-average length and average speed. He's a downhill run defender who takes sound angles and is effective playing close to the line of scrimmage. He's instinctive and runs well enough to cover a deep half. He limits production after the catch. He's not a centerfielder, he doesn't have the cover skills to regularly match up with slot receivers and his frame raises concern about his ability to cover tight ends.

That Report match up with what everyone else is saying 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ProblChld32 said:

With Hooker still available I’m really shocked with this move.

Hooker has character concerns. We were never touching him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the 1st draft pick i’m underwhelmed about but Ballard wanted him so he gets a pass

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If its the deflate gate thing we're talking about, his how he conducted himself and the cover up were in the capacity of an NFL player.    To me there is a huge distinction between personal conduct as a player and personal conduct as just another citizen. 
    • Right, I agree with you, I’m saying it’s not up to us to pass judgement and none of us should blame anyone for any decision. I guess I could have phrased it better, but what I mean is that we can’t be sure about anything that has been said or has surfaced, so why are we even arguing over it and getting upset about decisions when we have minimal insight into it. I just want everyone to let it go and leave decision making to the people who get it, yet that will never happen and people will always want justice. I agree though, Goodell catches way too much flak, and we all prance around acting like we know better. 
    • What people want is to criticize Goodell and the league, and they'll do that no matter what.    The NFL said they cannot conclude that Hill violated the conduct policy. There's significant doubt cast on whether Hill harmed the child at all. I think what Hill said on the phone call with his ex-partner was terrible, but I don't think that saying something terrible rises to the level of being worthy of a suspension.   And let's say the league did suspend him over this matter, based on what they know so far. If further information came out, would they be able to suspend him again? I think that's a major legal consideration.   To me, it's hypocritical to make an issue over how the NFL handles player conduct, because the fans and media are quite literally NEVER happy with what happens. If a player is suspended, Goodell is being unfair, and everyone says the league shouldn't be punishing players for off the field actions. If a player is not suspended, Goodell is being inconsistent, and everyone says they should treat each situation the same.    The NFL is now using a committee to give input and help make determinations on these matters. It's not Roger Goodell sitting at his desk and deciding on a whim whether to suspend a player or not. But the popular and seemingly automatic reaction is 'Goodell is an *,' and it doesn't matter what the decision is. It's always about how awful Goodell is.
    • The hype train has been huge compared to what it usually is.   The shows have actually talked about the Colts and I haven’t seen but maybe 1 predication where the Colts are not winning the division.   The Colts usually play better when they are under the radar. Now that they have the NFL’s attention we will see what happens.
    • I've seen lots touting Colts as contenders
  • Members

    • DougDew

      DougDew 3,098

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • il vecchio

      il vecchio 114

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 382

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 21isSuperman

      21isSuperman 13,396

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DalTXColtsFan

      DalTXColtsFan 218

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WarGhost21

      WarGhost21 934

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 4,937

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 706

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 1,824

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 34,325

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...