Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts draft Khari Willis, SS, Michigan State


MTC

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think he's more of a great teammate than a good player. I thought he had 6th-7th round value. He's not beating out Clayton Geathers or Matthias Farley any time soon. 

 

He's a good fit for this defense, but I think they fell in love with the character and picked him too early. He provides nothing in coverage at all man to man on RBs, TEs, and slot receivers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Can he cover?  Cause Geathers doesn't really miss tackles either, he just has problems with coverage.

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bluefire4 said:

I think he's more of a great teammate than a good player. I thought he had 6th-7th round value. He's not beating out Clayton Geathers or Matthias Farley any time soon. 

 

He's a good fit for this defense, but I think they fell in love with the character and picked him too early.

He was a late 4th to Mid 5th by most “expert” sources. So a bit of a reach but not drastically 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bluefire4 said:

I think he's more of a great teammate than a good player. I thought he had 6th-7th round value. He's not beating out Clayton Geathers or Matthias Farley any time soon. 

 

He's a good fit for this defense, but I think they fell in love with the character and picked him too early.

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

This explains it. Both Ballard and Kiper were high on him. I like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

He was a late 4th to Mid 5th by most “expert” sources. So a bit of a reach but not drastically 

Yeah I was saying he was a 6th-7th round pick in my opinion watching Michigan State games. He could prove me wrong but I don't see it. Would definitely rather have Hooker or Deionte Thompson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard's stressed it time and time again, especially recently, but he loves his high character guys.  Obviously they liked him on the field enough to trade up for him, but I definitely believe character played a part in our apparently high interest in him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

Here’s his draft profile...

 

 

Pre-Draft Analysis

Willis is a thick safety with below-average length and average speed. He's a downhill run defender who takes sound angles and is effective playing close to the line of scrimmage. He's instinctive and runs well enough to cover a deep half. He limits production after the catch. He's not a centerfielder, he doesn't have the cover skills to regularly match up with slot receivers and his frame raises concern about his ability to cover tight ends.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Here’s his draft profile...

 

 

Pre-Draft Analysis

Willis is a thick safety with below-average length and average speed. He's a downhill run defender who takes sound angles and is effective playing close to the line of scrimmage. He's instinctive and runs well enough to cover a deep half. He limits production after the catch. He's not a centerfielder, he doesn't have the cover skills to regularly match up with slot receivers and his frame raises concern about his ability to cover tight ends.

That Report match up with what everyone else is saying 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorry Jared, you are wrong. Johnson is remembered and will always be remembered for being one of the best and greatest wide receivers in NFL history.  He set the standard on what teams look for when drafting a wide receiver. 
    • I debated with people for years that Davis belonged in and most told me he didn't play long enough but having the 2 SB wins helped his argument and he got in. The problem with keeping players out that maybe only played 7 or 8 years and dominated is, Sayers got in for the Bears and only played like 5 seasons. He set that tone.
    • He might of been, but he didn't. I just don't believe his short career should be rewarded with a HOF bid. Maybe if he did what Terrell Davis did as an RB and helped win two SBs for his team, then you have a case. However, I can't approve of putting a WR that only played 9 years and didn't win or help win anything in the HOF. He's a stats guy and fantasy guy IMO and that's it. IMO, there will be a bunch of guys that end up doing what he does or better and play significantly longer. He was ahead of his time, but he won't be remembered for anything but stats.
    • I think Megatron belongs in, he only played 9 years but was the best WR in football for a lot of those years. I think Reggie Wayne belongs as well.
    • Jeez Jared, your total disregard of Johnson being a top ten receiver in NFL history is amazing.  According to ClutchPoints he is listed at #7 all time. It also stated had he played more years he would have fallen in the top three . 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...