Jump to content
Click here to get your free tickets for Colts Training Camp today!
MTC

Colts draft Khari Willis, SS, Michigan State

Recommended Posts

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought it'd be Hooker but oh well.

Box safety, great character guy. Average athlete below average speed. Nothing really jumps out about him other than character praise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NannyMcafee said:

They just traded their second pick in this round to Oak. 

It's alright. This is a solid pick.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Valpo2004 said:

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

He's a box safety that doesn't miss tackles. Fits our scheme perfectly.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jared Cisneros said:

It's alright. This is a solid pick.

I like the fact they only gave the two 4ths

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jared Cisneros said:

He's a box safety that doesn't miss tackles. Fits our scheme perfectly.

 

Can he cover?  Cause Geathers doesn't really miss tackles either, he just has problems with coverage.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

I like the fact they only gave the two 4ths

I thought it might of been a slight overpay value-chart wise, but I like the player.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

They must really like him.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's more of a great teammate than a good player. I thought he had 6th-7th round value. He's not beating out Clayton Geathers or Matthias Farley any time soon. 

 

He's a good fit for this defense, but I think they fell in love with the character and picked him too early. He provides nothing in coverage at all man to man on RBs, TEs, and slot receivers.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Can he cover?  Cause Geathers doesn't really miss tackles either, he just has problems with coverage.

Not sure how well tbh. I hope so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

What’d we give up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they (CB) really liked him I’m glad they went and got him. 

 

Get somebody you love rather than two  picks later.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a huge fan. Seems like a guy with limited upside and versatility. 

 

Selfishly, I hate that they don’t have that other pick now. Lots of guys are going to be there.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bluefire4 said:

I think he's more of a great teammate than a good player. I thought he had 6th-7th round value. He's not beating out Clayton Geathers or Matthias Farley any time soon. 

 

He's a good fit for this defense, but I think they fell in love with the character and picked him too early.

He was a late 4th to Mid 5th by most “expert” sources. So a bit of a reach but not drastically 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jared Cisneros said:

both 4ths.

Meh not terrible

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

So did the ESPN crew

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

 

Music to my ears...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

This explains it. Both Ballard and Kiper were high on him. I like that.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s great in coverage against tight ends. Something we struggle against badly. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

He was a late 4th to Mid 5th by most “expert” sources. So a bit of a reach but not drastically 

Yeah I was saying he was a 6th-7th round pick in my opinion watching Michigan State games. He could prove me wrong but I don't see it. Would definitely rather have Hooker or Deionte Thompson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard's stressed it time and time again, especially recently, but he loves his high character guys.  Obviously they liked him on the field enough to trade up for him, but I definitely believe character played a part in our apparently high interest in him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BOTT said:

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

More than likely he was his top S and there was a fear of a run on Safety

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BOTT said:

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

 

Agreed, he has to be someone Ballard thinks will help the team on the field.  Likely as a replacement for Geathers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

Here’s his draft profile...

 

 

Pre-Draft Analysis

Willis is a thick safety with below-average length and average speed. He's a downhill run defender who takes sound angles and is effective playing close to the line of scrimmage. He's instinctive and runs well enough to cover a deep half. He limits production after the catch. He's not a centerfielder, he doesn't have the cover skills to regularly match up with slot receivers and his frame raises concern about his ability to cover tight ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BOTT said:

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

Obviously they see something I don't. Hoping for the best. He has the work ethic, but I don't think he has the ability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Here’s his draft profile...

 

 

Pre-Draft Analysis

Willis is a thick safety with below-average length and average speed. He's a downhill run defender who takes sound angles and is effective playing close to the line of scrimmage. He's instinctive and runs well enough to cover a deep half. He limits production after the catch. He's not a centerfielder, he doesn't have the cover skills to regularly match up with slot receivers and his frame raises concern about his ability to cover tight ends.

That Report match up with what everyone else is saying 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ProblChld32 said:

With Hooker still available I’m really shocked with this move.

Hooker has character concerns. We were never touching him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the 1st draft pick i’m underwhelmed about but Ballard wanted him so he gets a pass

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK....    here we go....    my list is not to be taken as complete,  but it's as much as I could find after doing a number of searches...   I'm sure I may have missed a player here or there...   I used the Pro Football Hall of Fame as a reference.    I tried not to go back too far.   So, I won't have guys like Butkus, or Nitzchke or Nobis...     they didn't have good medical, training, nutrition, etc.   So,  I went mostly with guys who have played since 2000...    but there are some who were drafted in the mid-90's and whose career extended into the 2000's....    This list is not ALL linebackers, just most of the top ones.    I did not include outside linebackers.    But I can make another list if you like..   Middle or Inside Backers.   1.  Patrick Willis       https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WillPa98.htm 2.  Navarro Bowman https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BowmNa99.htm 3.  Jarrod Mayo https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/MayoJe99.htm 4.  Brian Urlacher https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/U/UrlaBr00.htm 5.  Sean Lee https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/L/LeexSe99.htm 6.  Jon Beason https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BeasJo99.htm 7.  Brian Cushing https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CushBr99.htm 8.  Jonathon Vilma https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/V/VilmJo99.htm 9.  DQWell Jackson https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JackDQ20.htm 10.   Bart Scott https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/ScotBa20.htm 11.   David Harris https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HarrDa99.htm 12.   Keith Bullock https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BullKe00.htm    
    • I don’t care if you find my “sad” reactions are weak.    I find your views of the Colts....   unique.    Makes me wonder how many games you were actually able to view last year?   As for your claims of using facts and data....  don’t forget opinion.   You live yours (which’s fine),  but sometimes you think your opinion is fact.   Those have drawn some of my sad faces...  and even some laughing faces too.    Camp starts in a week...   plenty for you to opine on....     
    • Amen brother.   I'm lighting candles nightly too.
    • I am just happy there seems to be an increase in our teams health. It is something to be happy about.
    • @NewColtsFan   is your "sad" "reaction" a disagreement to most of my posts?    if so, feel free to challenge with a reply. you're constant "sad" faces are pretty weak. happy to debate with fact and data.    
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...