Jump to content
Click here to get your free tickets for Colts Training Camp today!
MTC

Colts draft Khari Willis, SS, Michigan State

Recommended Posts

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought it'd be Hooker but oh well.

Box safety, great character guy. Average athlete below average speed. Nothing really jumps out about him other than character praise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NannyMcafee said:

They just traded their second pick in this round to Oak. 

It's alright. This is a solid pick.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Valpo2004 said:

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

He's a box safety that doesn't miss tackles. Fits our scheme perfectly.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jared Cisneros said:

It's alright. This is a solid pick.

I like the fact they only gave the two 4ths

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jared Cisneros said:

He's a box safety that doesn't miss tackles. Fits our scheme perfectly.

 

Can he cover?  Cause Geathers doesn't really miss tackles either, he just has problems with coverage.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

I like the fact they only gave the two 4ths

I thought it might of been a slight overpay value-chart wise, but I like the player.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

They must really like him.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's more of a great teammate than a good player. I thought he had 6th-7th round value. He's not beating out Clayton Geathers or Matthias Farley any time soon. 

 

He's a good fit for this defense, but I think they fell in love with the character and picked him too early. He provides nothing in coverage at all man to man on RBs, TEs, and slot receivers.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Can he cover?  Cause Geathers doesn't really miss tackles either, he just has problems with coverage.

Not sure how well tbh. I hope so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

Seems like a lot to give up to move up in the 4th.  Must be someone they really believe in.

What’d we give up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they (CB) really liked him I’m glad they went and got him. 

 

Get somebody you love rather than two  picks later.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a huge fan. Seems like a guy with limited upside and versatility. 

 

Selfishly, I hate that they don’t have that other pick now. Lots of guys are going to be there.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bluefire4 said:

I think he's more of a great teammate than a good player. I thought he had 6th-7th round value. He's not beating out Clayton Geathers or Matthias Farley any time soon. 

 

He's a good fit for this defense, but I think they fell in love with the character and picked him too early.

He was a late 4th to Mid 5th by most “expert” sources. So a bit of a reach but not drastically 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jared Cisneros said:

both 4ths.

Meh not terrible

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

So did the ESPN crew

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

 

Music to my ears...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

This explains it. Both Ballard and Kiper were high on him. I like that.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s great in coverage against tight ends. Something we struggle against badly. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

He was a late 4th to Mid 5th by most “expert” sources. So a bit of a reach but not drastically 

Yeah I was saying he was a 6th-7th round pick in my opinion watching Michigan State games. He could prove me wrong but I don't see it. Would definitely rather have Hooker or Deionte Thompson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard's stressed it time and time again, especially recently, but he loves his high character guys.  Obviously they liked him on the field enough to trade up for him, but I definitely believe character played a part in our apparently high interest in him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BOTT said:

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

More than likely he was his top S and there was a fear of a run on Safety

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BOTT said:

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

 

Agreed, he has to be someone Ballard thinks will help the team on the field.  Likely as a replacement for Geathers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

I was listening to nfl channel o Sirius.  They said he was the S that all the TEs had the hardest time against.  They loved the pick and how Ballard is building the team. 

Here’s his draft profile...

 

 

Pre-Draft Analysis

Willis is a thick safety with below-average length and average speed. He's a downhill run defender who takes sound angles and is effective playing close to the line of scrimmage. He's instinctive and runs well enough to cover a deep half. He limits production after the catch. He's not a centerfielder, he doesn't have the cover skills to regularly match up with slot receivers and his frame raises concern about his ability to cover tight ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BOTT said:

I highly doubt Ballard traded up because the guy is a great teammate.

Obviously they see something I don't. Hoping for the best. He has the work ethic, but I don't think he has the ability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Here’s his draft profile...

 

 

Pre-Draft Analysis

Willis is a thick safety with below-average length and average speed. He's a downhill run defender who takes sound angles and is effective playing close to the line of scrimmage. He's instinctive and runs well enough to cover a deep half. He limits production after the catch. He's not a centerfielder, he doesn't have the cover skills to regularly match up with slot receivers and his frame raises concern about his ability to cover tight ends.

That Report match up with what everyone else is saying 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ProblChld32 said:

With Hooker still available I’m really shocked with this move.

Hooker has character concerns. We were never touching him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the 1st draft pick i’m underwhelmed about but Ballard wanted him so he gets a pass

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Personally, I don’t think he did much of anything that warrants suspension. All he might have done was punish his kid, and if that’s illegal, the world is getting too soft. However, it’s just things that have happened in the past that make me second guess everything, so personally I would have handed out a suspension just so I wouldn’t get complaints and everything from people about how this case is “no better than Zeke’s”. It’s more about keeping the public happy, though I think the entirety of this thing is a joke and parents spanking their child isn’t something that should mean suspension. 
    • Actually it says "it is believed" that we did. He also believes we haven't spent squat and have MOST of our Cap $$$ still available. NOT!
    • Due diligence.  Kick the tires on anything you can and maybe you catch lightning in a bottle. 
    • Mack got $90M gtd...I can't see Clowney getting close to that. I think it would probably be ~$60-65M...which is what Lawrence and Clark both got...and maybe not even that much.    It's not my money...but I would do it. The Colts have the money...and I don't think the Colts will find a better player to add to the team in FA...Clowney is a 3x consecutive Pro Bowler with double digit sack upside...heading into his prime...whose skill sets fits perfectly into a position where they have a long-term need.    To put it another way...I would much rather give Clowney a deal and add him to this team to try and win a Super Bowl...than spend that cash on extending guys 1-2 years before they are due. The Colts have a nice 3-4 year window where they can be a lot more aggressive.   Signing someone like Clowney will make a dent...but it won't hurt them long-term. There is a very good chance this team will have left upwards of $80M on the table over this four-year period. Right now, they have to spend $44M in cash next offseason just to get 89% (using OTC and estimating a $10M increase for the salary cap). They will make that up for sure (in FA and extensions)...but they have the flexibility to commit to a player like Clowney. I get being lean during those first two years...but not now.   The key for me would be the draft capital. If it's only one of those 2nds...I am very intrigued. 
    • You can't believe everything you hear. He's perhaps just testing out market value
  • Members

    • NorthernBlue

      NorthernBlue 2,987

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BPindy

      BPindy 376

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Greyghost80

      Greyghost80 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SteelCityColt

      SteelCityColt 6,872

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 8,204

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WarGhost21

      WarGhost21 934

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Jammer

      Jared Jammer 97

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 386

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jchandler7

      jchandler7 239

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nesjan3

      Nesjan3 934

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...