Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just now, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

Will never play again after the video that was just released. What is wrong with these guys?

What video? Link?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it was audio. just heard them talking about it on ESPN. Has audio of child saying his dad did it and of Hill telling his gf that she should be terrified of him too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same day Mahomes gets on the cover of Madden.. :woah: The curse continues! Lol 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

at work cant link. 11 minute recording of he and girlfriend discussing him breaking his 3 year olds arm and punching him in chest and then  threatening her too.

that's what I heard as well just now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

at work cant link. 11 minute recording of he and girlfriend discussing him breaking his 3 year olds arm and punching him in chest and then  threatening her too.

Yeah.... dude needs to go to jail. He’s done for sure though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, csmopar said:

You think he gets banned for life? I highly doubt it. It's a horrible sickening thing he did but I'd bet he gets a year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Matthew Gilbert said:

You think he gets banned for life? I highly doubt it. It's a horrible sickening thing he did but I'd bet he gets a year.

He’s looking at doing 5-10 for child abuse plus intimidation. My guess is he does at least 18 months in prison

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Matthew Gilbert said:

He'll get a one year suspension like Adrian Peterson did.

This is much worse.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Matthew Gilbert said:

He'll get a one year suspension like Adrian Peterson did.

 

I don't know.  If his history becomes a factor, he could be out of the game for a long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody needs to break this little punk's arm and let him know how it feels to be bullied.

Money obviously doesnt knock the "punk" out of these *s.

Shameful to treat a child and woman like that.  That doesn't fit MY description of a man.  Not even close.  Lock him up and let his new "boyfriend" push him around a little.  He won't be so tough then i'll bet.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

Lock him up and let his new "boyfriend" push him around a little.  He won't be so tough then i'll bet.

 

That's a little extreme, but he might deserve it if it's even worse than we know.

 

But I bet he has some teammates that might have some words for him.

 

And I imagine if he ever makes it back on the field, his opponents will have plenty to say to him.  It will probably be easy to get under his skin and do something stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

That's a little extreme, but he might deserve it if it's even worse than we know.

 

But I bet he has some teammates that might have some words for him.

 

And I imagine if he ever makes it back on the field, his opponents will have plenty to say to him.  It will probably be easy to get under his skin and do something stupid.

Yes it is extreme.

But at least he can defend himself.

I get VERY emotional over men abusing children and women... on ANY level.  It needs to end.

 

People just need to be nicer to each other.  Its not as difficult as some think.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, csmopar said:

He’s looking at doing 5-10 for child abuse plus intimidation. My guess is he does at least 18 months in prison

He was an * in college too.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Matthew Gilbert said:

He'll get a one year suspension like Adrian Peterson did.

If he is lucky.  This guy is who he is.  Violence is engrained in his soul.  I said awhile back these type of men don't change.  I use to work with child protection services.  The incident that involved kicking his then pregnant girlfriend told me all I needed to know.  I believe Goodell will toss him out of the league.  The police might even bring forth charges again now that there is a tape.  I  believe he will never play in the league again

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

If he is lucky.  This guy is who he is.  Violence is engrained in his soul.  I said awhile back these type of men don't change.  I use to work with child protection services.  The incident that involved kicking his then pregnant girlfriend told me all I needed to know.  I believe Goodell will toss him out of the league.  The police might even bring forth charges again now that there is a tape.  I  believe he will never play in the league again

He’ll be out at least 2 years. He go on the exempt list this year, his trial will take that long, then suspended next season if not for good. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Report came out yesterday that they know something happened, but will not proceed with charges because lack of evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pelonskee323 said:

Report came out yesterday that they know something happened, but will not proceed with charges because lack of evidence.

But left open possibility of charging in future if something changed. The video coming out would seem to be a reason to open it back up. If it is authenticated, most likely will bring charges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll be interesting to see how this progresses.   If no charges are filed, will the NFL suspend him for long?    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my thoughts on what we know so far.

 

*He's barred from any team activities. 

*They dropped charges before the audio was released. I'd be surprised if they didn't reopen the investigation

*The NFL can do anything they want, regardless what the police do. This audio is enough to warrant at minimum a 1 year suspension. 

*The NFL will continue to investigate, but I think at minimum he's suspended for a year, and the Chiefs drop him.

 

I'm all for second chances, and believe that people can change, but hurting a child is hard to stomach. The Old Testament side of me wants him in jail, and rooming with a very big guy that hates child abusers. The New Testament guy in me wants him to serve some time, and then come out a changed man and perfect father.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Irish YJ said:

Just my thoughts on what we know so far.

 

*He's barred from any team activities. 

*They dropped charges before the audio was released. I'd be surprised if they didn't reopen the investigation

*The NFL can do anything they want, regardless what the police do. This audio is enough to warrant at minimum a 1 year suspension. 

*The NFL will continue to investigate, but I think at minimum he's suspended for a year, and the Chiefs drop him.

 

I'm all for second chances, and believe that people can change, but hurting a child is hard to stomach. The Old Testament side of me wants him in jail, and rooming with a very big guy that hates child abusers. The New Testament guy in me wants him to serve some time, and then come out a changed man and perfect father.

Agreed on all points...and I share your OT/NT sentiments.

 

And while I also agree with the concept of second chances....I'm troubled by what seems to be a "but he's a talented thug" rationale that sometimes drives the second chance.

 

The truth is hard enough to come by as it is.

 

Because in Hill's case, that rationale appears to have been nothing more than a get out of jail free card that, following his pattern of abusive behavior, has enabled him to continue his disgusting, abusive and entitled behavior.

 

The NFL.... and namely the Kansas City Chiefs, who after a string of these kinds of issues just accommodated the likes of Frank Clark.... need to undertake some serious self-reflection on this entire topic of domestic abuse before we see Rae Carruth 2.0.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, pacolts56 said:

Agreed on all points...and I share your OT/NT sentiments.

 

And while I also agree with the concept of second chances....I'm troubled by what seems to be a "but he's a talented thug" rationale that sometimes drives the second chance.

 

The truth is hard enough to come by as it is.

 

Because in Hill's case, that rationale appears to have been nothing more than a get out of jail free card that, following his pattern of abusive behavior, has enabled him to continue his disgusting, abusive and entitled behavior.

 

The NFL.... and namely the Kansas City Chiefs, who after a string of these kinds of issues just accommodated the likes of Frank Clark.... need to undertake some serious self-reflection on this entire topic of domestic abuse before we see Rae Carruth 2.0.

 

Agree. Chiefs are sitting with all kinds of clouds over them. 

 

As far as the get out of jail card, I agree. I hope that's not a driving force. If he does come of out of this as a changed man, I hope he gets a second shot at the league ONLY because it will likely benefit his son.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Irish YJ said:

Well, a buddy of mine (a KC fan) just reminded me it was Ballard that was front and center on KC taking Hill.

 

The below article didn't age well (Ballard's comments on Hill)

https://www.colts.com/news/is-chris-ballard-willing-to-take-red-flag-players-in-draft-18751420

Hopefully Ballard has adjusted his red flag criteria so some of these types of dirt bags wouldn't make the list of possibles. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎4‎/‎25‎/‎2019 at 8:03 PM, csmopar said:

He’s looking at doing 5-10 for child abuse plus intimidation. My guess is he does at least 18 months in prison

Not so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Matthew Gilbert said:

Not so much.

what makes you say so?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, csmopar said:

what makes you say so?

Reports today is that his criminal investigation is no longer active and he will likely rejoin the team for training camp. CPS case is still active though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the NFL will suspend him a few games just for that tape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

Good lord, what kind of world do we live in where that tape isn't enough?

 

That's the problem with "reasonable doubt" Superstar multi-millionaire athlete, accused of breaking their son's arm, and accuser admitted to keeping the tapes as an insurance policy? Sounds to me like she might have lied to keep herself rich. When this whole ordeal came up, all she has to do was tell the police that she was lying on the tape, then no one gets charged, and no one gets in trouble. If i were a betting man, I'd wager heavily on that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Nulled said:

 

That's the problem with "reasonable doubt" Superstar multi-millionaire athlete, accused of breaking their son's arm, and accuser admitted to keeping the tapes as an insurance policy? Sounds to me like she might have lied to keep herself rich. When this whole ordeal came up, all she has to do was tell the police that she was lying on the tape, then no one gets charged, and no one gets in trouble. If i were a betting man, I'd wager heavily on that.

 

 

Injury to Child 

Injury to wife/girlfriend (He beat the girlfriend, when she was pregnant)

 

BOTH are bad.... number one (with the tape) you cant come back from.

 

He didnt deny punching the boy and using the belt .... on a THREE year old

 

Ray Rice wasnt given a second chance

 

I HIGHLY doubt that they give this * another chance

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I said, it's never about "can you fit under the cap?", or "do you spend all your cap space?" Because you can fit under the cap certainly. Actually, you have to, that's the rule. And most teams do spend their cap space. That's the point. Use it all if possible. The Patriots use it all usually, the Steelers use it all usually, etc. Most teams do. Actually, the Colts do use almost all of their 2019 cap space too. (The 2019 total sum of contracts is a bit over 184 million, just a few mills under the cap. That "40ish cap space" is already nothing else but the rollovers from previous years.)   But, even with spending all the cap space, there is good cap management, and there is bad cap management. The Patriots spend all of their cap space, and they manage it very effectively. The Colts (now) spend all of their (excluding rollover), and I belive Ballard manages the cap very effectively. But the Jags didn't. They went over the line, and sacrifized their future effectiveness by getting into bidding wars and signing pricey free agents one after another. The problem wasn't Norwell. If it was only him, that would be ok. The problem was, that they also signed Moncrief for 10M, Jenkins for 6M, Church for 7M, traded for Hyde and payed him 4M and he barely saw the field, etc, etc. The list is very long.      I never said that having elite talents heading into their second contract is a burden. You are right, that is a blessing. Actually, that is the best that can happen to a team. That's what Ballard want's to do! The problem is, that the Jaguars got into a situation, when there is a very good chance that they cannot sign their own guys. And their roster got thin, because they could not refill it this offseason enough. They got worse. And they will become even worse in 2020, because they won't be able to retain their talent level. Yes, they can cut Campbell, they can cut Bouye, and they can trade Ngakogue, and fit under the cap. And then? Who will play at CB, who will play at DE? A mediocre somebody. So, instead of improving their team, they actually made it worse. That's the bad management. Cap wise and talent wise as well. (However, I do agree, that they kinda draft OK recently - one year exceptionally well, but still OK since then, so their talent infusion is somewhat OK. What they screwed up big time is cap management.)   Btw, this is an old story repeating itself. Coughlin has been with the Jags before. And he drove them into cap hell before. It was bad, it cost them years to recover. He's just doing it all over again. He is (was) a very good coach, but terrible at managing the cap.
    • https://www.1070thefan.com/blogs/kevins-corner/colts-coverage/colts-say-no-trade-offers-sticking-jacoby-brissett-backup?fbclid=IwAR0IGDgC2r_pBbt7tUzbQjxiBv0zfXiUyxQtxziGhcsvuaRHI3Or6xVIT74   I like Reich's quotes here:  “It’s impossible for me to have a higher opinion of Jacoby than I do,” Reich says. “I said it last year, I think he’s a top 20 quarterback. I still say that. After watching him for a year, this guy’s really good.   “I tell Chris all the time, ‘Please don’t let him go. I don’t care what anybody offers him. Don’t let him go.’ I love Jacoby. The problem is now I’ve gotten to know Jacoby and, at some point, I hope that it works out for Jacoby. But not now.”
    • How is the number of UDFAs significant to anything?     For the record, the Colts actually signed 11 UDFAs...JAC signed 21.    BTW, here are some of the "better teams" and the number of UDFAs this year:   HOU - 20 KC - 23 CHI - 22 NO -17 LAR - 19 LAC - 19   I see no clear correlation between "better teams", thin rosters and UDFAs. There is more of a correlation between the number of draft picks and UDFAs, if anything. Those teams typically had less draft picks...and therefore...more roster spots to give to UDFAs. And UDFAs understand this as well...and see a better path to making a roster if a draft pick is not in their way.   In 2018, the Colts...in the first year of a new offensive and defensive scheme...coming off a 4-win season...signed only 10 UDFAs...because they had 11 draft picks...which makes sense. But that roster was by no means deep.  
  • Members

    • Shepman

      Shepman 220

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fourstar40

      Fourstar40 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Boiler_Colt

      Boiler_Colt 3,716

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 9,729

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 261

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HectorRoberts

      HectorRoberts 443

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • COLTS7

      COLTS7 283

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dgierhart

      dgierhart 3

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • That Guy

      That Guy 806

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,807

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...