Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Frank Clark To Kansas City


Coltsfan66

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure how I feel about KC.  They were the hottest team in the league halfway through last year.  Then they lost Hunt.  Then they lost Ford and Houston.  Hills' availability is up in the air.

 

Clark might be an upgrade, but his salary... and what they gave up to get him...  and his domestic issue coupled with the domestic issues of Hunt and now Hill...  I guess the ends justify the means.

 

Mahomes is obviously good, but now that coaches have a full year of film on him, I don't know if the Chiefs are going to be this powerhouse going forward that some have made KC out to be.  :dunno:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ColtsGermany said:

Glad CB didn't pull the trigger on a trade. That's quite too much. And the salary will force them into some tough decisions the next years. 

 

People on here thought our first round pick would be too much... I knew they'd get a chunk for him, and his contract isn't surprising. Way out of line, in my opinion. He just got paid bigger (contract plus what the dealt for him) than Lawrence and isn't better, at all... Ballard sat back and watched and is probably smiling at this ongoing circus of stupid money being tossed around this offseason.  

 

I was in favor of exploring and pulling the trigger if it made sense. This doesn't make sense...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Ballard probably said the same thing, but at least he helped drive up the price for what was an ascending Chiefs team!  :thmup:

I'm actually curious if the Chiefs offered the 29th pick, Ballard offered the 26th pick, then the Chiefs said, screw it, you can have our 1st this year and 2nd next year! Ballard then says, ok, you win (meaning you lose), and lets them have him. :lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, its obvious to me that KC didn't think Ford and Houston were good enough to get them to the next level (and they're probably right).  Trading a few high picks to get a guy without a long term contract suggests that Clark is an immediate upgrade over those two.

 

TBD if KC feels that Clark is a long term decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DougDew said:

Well, its obvious to me that KC didn't think Ford and Houston were good enough to get them to the next level (and they're probably right).  Trading a few high picks to get a guy without a long term contract suggests that Clark is an immediate upgrade over those two.

 

TBD if KC feels that Clark is a long term decision.

 

You should've waited to see whether they'd hand him a contract before saying that he's a guy without a long term contract. Usually when teams trade for a star pass rusher who was in line for a contract, they pay him. It's what happened to Khalil Mack and Dee Ford.

 

The reason why KC didn't want to pay Dee Ford wasn't because of talent, it was because they're switching to a 4-3 and they don't think he'll fit the scheme. I still think they should've paid him, but I digress...

 

In sum, here's what the Chiefs received and gave from the Dee Ford and Frank Clark trades

 

Received: Frank Clark (paid average annual salary of $21.1 million), 2020 2nd round pick, 3rd round pick (No. 84 overall)

 

Gave: Dee Ford (49ers paid average annual salary of $17.1 million), 1st round pick (No. 29 overall), 2020 2nd round pick, 3rd round pick (No. 92 overall)

 

To over-simplify things, the Chiefs basically traded Dee Ford and a 1st for Frank Clark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Our defense will never be GREAT as long as we play * defense by having corners 10 yards off the ball on 3rd and 3. And an unbelievable unwillingness to blitz more than 4 times a game. And also, it doesn't matter who is in the secondary if the front seven can't stop the run(we can) and get to the passer(we did ok getting to the passer, but we need more blitzing from lb'ers). Our first pick should be an offensive lineman like Fuaga, Powers-Johnson, or Barton. Then target a receiver like Polk, Pearsall, Washington, Corley, or Roman Wilson in the second or third rounds. As much as I would like to get Bowers I just don't see it happening. And we need a very good linebacker to go along with Speed and Franklin.
    • Yeah, could very well be. I think I remember Ballard said he did it to have more flexibility when asked. if it is Paye, I would rather see him play out the year before extending.
    • The idea of DeJean going in the late first round is due to his instincts and overall very competent play in nearly all aspects of DB play.  Cover 3 FS is more valuable, IMO, than a cover 2 FS.   Contrast DeJean's overall RAS and talents with Hooker, who was only good at being a single high deep guy...especially his rookie year where he picked off bad QBs for a while...and DeJean at 22 or later with a 3rd round pick gathered from a trade down is a much better decision than Hooker was at 15.   BTW, Blackmon had the same ACL injury as Hooker and did well as an overall S as a rookie, but wasn't a single high speed guy, and is probably still a better overall S now than Hooker is in DAL...both having the exact same injury years ago.
    • To the bolded, I don't constantly hear that. I see people say it on the Internet. It was a big thing when we were looking for a HC, how candidates would be scared off because of how the Reich/Saturday thing went, Irsay's meddling, etc. One specific theory was Sirianni would tell Steichen not to take the Colts job. We see how that went.   Does Irsay's history negatively impact the team? I'd like to know if there's any examples where you think it has.
    • Some are not understanding this. Have a feeling there will be an upset group after Thursday night. Give AR every opportunity to succeed by surrounding him with weapons. If Pittman was to miss a few weeks, it would be bad. Tbh we should draft offense the 1st and 2nd rounds. Sign a Simmons and a vet corner. 
  • Members

    • Stephen

      Stephen 4,028

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DiogoSales

      DiogoSales 704

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,426

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 734

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 8,996

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,833

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HOZER

      HOZER 4,639

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Derakynn

      Derakynn 333

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,277

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...