Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
runthepost

Colts @ Saints Week 9 TNF

Recommended Posts

Hopefully we play this game after our bye week :goodluck:

Source Reddit and Indy Sports One

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If that is true I hope it is after a bye week. The TNF game at NE we were so beat up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Thats gonna be a tough game to play on a short week

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, CR91 said:
 
Thats gonna be a tough game to play on a short week

 

I like that it is in a dome.  That should help. Plus who knows the Saints might take a step back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, indyagent17 said:

Is that Source reputable?

 

Indy sports one is pretty legit yea

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm strange. the tweet is gone on twitter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, CR91 said:

hmm strange. the tweet is gone on twitter

Probably got in trouble for leaking it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

Probably got in trouble for leaking it.

NFL probably flagged it. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saints prime time game were leaked they also play Tennessee on the road for a Monday night game 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, runthepost said:

Saints prime time game were leaked they also play Tennessee on the road for a Monday night game 

 

How is titans saints a better monday night game then colts saints :scratch:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

How is titans saints a better monday night game then colts saints :scratch:

Who said it was? They are two separate weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

Who said it was? They are two separate weeks.

 

Colts saints will apparently be on TNF 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen a Saints schedule leak that has Indy at the Saint in week 6 at 4:25 PM.
 

Who know what you to believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

How is titans saints a better monday night game then colts saints :scratch:

It was separate weeks like that game was week 5 and our game with the saints is week 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

I've seen a Saints schedule leak that has Indy at the Saint in week 6 at 4:25 PM.
 

Who know what you to believe.

They are all fake. Have if these twitter accounts have like 10 followers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, runthepost said:

It was separate weeks like that game was week 5 and our game with the saints is week 9

Correction Saints @ Titans in week 4 MNF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

How is titans saints a better monday night game then colts saints :scratch:

 

Halloween night in New Orleans is a way bigger deal IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

They are all fake. Have if these twitter accounts have like 10 followers.

 

That account has over 3,000 followers, & he corrected his tweet...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

That account has over 3,000 followers, & he corrected his tweet...

 

That sounds more like it. They would never stick this game in a Thursday night. Those games usually aren’t the better games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, runthepost said:

Great news the game is week 16 Monday Night :peek:

That is actually horrifying to me. Having a game like that being a game we might need to make the playoffs scares me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d have to imagine the game would primetime regardless.

 

Also, FWIW... IndySportsOne isn’t a reputable source. It’s an account that gathers information from other reporters on Twitter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

That is actually horrifying to me. Having a game like that being a game we might need to make the playoffs scares me.

 

As long as they don't start 1-5 it won't be a problem.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MTC said:

I’d have to imagine the game would primetime regardless.

 

Also, FWIW... IndySportsOne isn’t a reputable source. It’s an account that gathers information from other reporters on Twitter.

Yes that tweet about it being Monday night can’t from a unverified account lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We owe them some get back. They have had our number in recent matchups.  I know we remember that beat down in 2011

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Mr.Debonair said:

We owe them some get back. They have had our number in recent matchups.  I know we remember that beat down in 2011

Don’t forget the onside kick in the SB that changed that game.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping that the Colts have 0 Thursday night games.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Myles said:

I'm hoping that the Colts have 0 Thursday night games.   

I think every team has one. I also read a team can’t go on the road two years in a row on Thursday night.  Chances are the TNF game will be a home divisional game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, if this is true to have to prepare for the Saint offense in 2 days, what a break for the Saints. Sean Payton and company will take that.. If it is played on a Thursday with both teams coming off of a bye, that's fair. But, when is the nfl ever fair about anything???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw on CBS sports schedule tracker Colts at saints is the December 16th MNF game.  I’ll just wait and see what comes out at 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/17/2019 at 11:15 AM, CR91 said:

 

Indy sports one is pretty legit yea

Guess not!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, indyagent17 said:

Guess not!

 

I mean, he's not Rappaport or Schefter, but for Colts related content, he's a pretty good source. He corrected his tweet & called that Dec 16 MNF like 6 hours before the official schedule release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
    • I missed the first couple innings, was keeping track on phone, didn’t realize things got chippy with the benches clearing after the Contreras HR! Seems the Cubs were playing with a little extra edge tonight, I love it!!! 
    • and then NE goes into KC and throws for 350 and Sony runs for 100+ on them. our O, and O game plan just sucked.   i get KC was good, but our O just sucked.
  • Members

    • HungarianColtsFan

      HungarianColtsFan 2,077

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 420

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 260

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 44

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Franklin County

      Franklin County 452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,668

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...