Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
runthepost

Colts @ Saints Week 9 TNF

Recommended Posts

Hopefully we play this game after our bye week :goodluck:

Source Reddit and Indy Sports One

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If that is true I hope it is after a bye week. The TNF game at NE we were so beat up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Thats gonna be a tough game to play on a short week

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, CR91 said:
 
Thats gonna be a tough game to play on a short week

 

I like that it is in a dome.  That should help. Plus who knows the Saints might take a step back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, indyagent17 said:

Is that Source reputable?

 

Indy sports one is pretty legit yea

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm strange. the tweet is gone on twitter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, CR91 said:

hmm strange. the tweet is gone on twitter

Probably got in trouble for leaking it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

Probably got in trouble for leaking it.

NFL probably flagged it. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saints prime time game were leaked they also play Tennessee on the road for a Monday night game 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, runthepost said:

Saints prime time game were leaked they also play Tennessee on the road for a Monday night game 

 

How is titans saints a better monday night game then colts saints :scratch:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

How is titans saints a better monday night game then colts saints :scratch:

Who said it was? They are two separate weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

Who said it was? They are two separate weeks.

 

Colts saints will apparently be on TNF 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen a Saints schedule leak that has Indy at the Saint in week 6 at 4:25 PM.
 

Who know what you to believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

How is titans saints a better monday night game then colts saints :scratch:

It was separate weeks like that game was week 5 and our game with the saints is week 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

I've seen a Saints schedule leak that has Indy at the Saint in week 6 at 4:25 PM.
 

Who know what you to believe.

They are all fake. Have if these twitter accounts have like 10 followers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, runthepost said:

It was separate weeks like that game was week 5 and our game with the saints is week 9

Correction Saints @ Titans in week 4 MNF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

How is titans saints a better monday night game then colts saints :scratch:

 

Halloween night in New Orleans is a way bigger deal IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

They are all fake. Have if these twitter accounts have like 10 followers.

 

That account has over 3,000 followers, & he corrected his tweet...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

That account has over 3,000 followers, & he corrected his tweet...

 

That sounds more like it. They would never stick this game in a Thursday night. Those games usually aren’t the better games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, runthepost said:

Great news the game is week 16 Monday Night :peek:

That is actually horrifying to me. Having a game like that being a game we might need to make the playoffs scares me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d have to imagine the game would primetime regardless.

 

Also, FWIW... IndySportsOne isn’t a reputable source. It’s an account that gathers information from other reporters on Twitter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

That is actually horrifying to me. Having a game like that being a game we might need to make the playoffs scares me.

 

As long as they don't start 1-5 it won't be a problem.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MTC said:

I’d have to imagine the game would primetime regardless.

 

Also, FWIW... IndySportsOne isn’t a reputable source. It’s an account that gathers information from other reporters on Twitter.

Yes that tweet about it being Monday night can’t from a unverified account lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We owe them some get back. They have had our number in recent matchups.  I know we remember that beat down in 2011

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Mr.Debonair said:

We owe them some get back. They have had our number in recent matchups.  I know we remember that beat down in 2011

Don’t forget the onside kick in the SB that changed that game.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping that the Colts have 0 Thursday night games.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Myles said:

I'm hoping that the Colts have 0 Thursday night games.   

I think every team has one. I also read a team can’t go on the road two years in a row on Thursday night.  Chances are the TNF game will be a home divisional game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, if this is true to have to prepare for the Saint offense in 2 days, what a break for the Saints. Sean Payton and company will take that.. If it is played on a Thursday with both teams coming off of a bye, that's fair. But, when is the nfl ever fair about anything???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw on CBS sports schedule tracker Colts at saints is the December 16th MNF game.  I’ll just wait and see what comes out at 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/17/2019 at 11:15 AM, CR91 said:

 

Indy sports one is pretty legit yea

Guess not!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, indyagent17 said:

Guess not!

 

I mean, he's not Rappaport or Schefter, but for Colts related content, he's a pretty good source. He corrected his tweet & called that Dec 16 MNF like 6 hours before the official schedule release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wouldn't consider #10 a diss..... but I have a bit of an issue with the Cowpies ranked #2 at the same time.   We not only shut them out last season, we out manned, out-muscled and intimidated them in a way that none of us have seen a Colts team do to any team in a long, long time.   You could say "well its only one game".... and that's true.   But that was a statement game, and I just don't see how Brandt can justify a #2 ranking for Dallas given each team's additions this off-season....not to mention all those other teams he has them ranked ahead of.   As for the Colts...on our own merits.... I would have us closer to the middle of the pack on this list, around 7th and certainly ahead of Dallas.
    • His mom sounds awesome.  
    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 21,095

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonC

      ClaytonC 23

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,807

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 416

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 369

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Jammer

      Jared Jammer 97

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Surge89

      Surge89 965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SVFD Colts Fan

      SVFD Colts Fan 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,322

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...