Jump to content
Click here to get your free tickets for Colts Training Camp today!
Sign in to follow this  
Chloe6124

Chris Ballard on the fan

Recommended Posts

Ballard said he liked the Safety class this year. I can definitely see him taking Rapp at 34, or Hooker at 59. Nice tidbit of info there.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Ballard said he liked the Safety class this year. I can definitely see him taking Rapp at 34, or Hooker at 59. Nice tidbit of info there.

I think it is almost a necessity this year.

1 minute ago, lollygagger8 said:

 

Hooker & Hooker @ Safety? 

 

giphy.gif

The pimp formation. Lol

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think it is almost a necessity this year.

The pimp formation. Lol

They'll be slapping teams around in no time.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, PeterBowman said:

They'll be slapping teams around in no time.

Keep them away from Robert Kraft

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Solid interview. Makes sense that he liked Funchess coming into the league.

 

Also, we've all debated a lot about taking a safety at #34 or even #26, and I'd be fine with it (love me some Rapp, among others), but there could be some really good options there at #59 too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PeterBowman said:

Ballard's line about... "we're not building a team to match up with others, we're building a team for them to match up with us." Was brilliant.

 

They're not worried yet, Chris, I can assure you. :)

 

As it stands, KC, NE or NO will absolutely carve up this defense - 2-3 TDs in the blink of an eye - just like we saw last year, and if you can't match scores offensively, if you don't have the weapons to match them offensively, forget about it.

 

If you're only playing for the AFC South, that's one thing.  If you're playing for the whole thing, yes, you better try to match these teams offensely, especially with what the rules are today.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, #12. said:

 

They're not worried yet, Chris, I can assure you. :)

 

As it stands, KC, NE or NO will absolutely carve up this defense - 2-3 TDs in the blink of an eye - just like we saw last year, and if you can't match scores offensively, if you don't have the weapons to match them offensively, forget about it.

 

If you're only playing for the AFC South, that's one thing.  If you're playing for the whole thing, yes, you better try to match these teams offensely, especially with what the rules are today.

 

This is true, but you're not considering that free agency isnt over, the draft hasn't taken place, unrestricted FA haven't been signed, and the entire roster from last year will have a chance to grow and develop within the system. We had the youngest team in football minus Vinny last year. These guys are gonna grow and get better. The same people that looked at our roster last year and had us ranked 32nd are the same people huffing and puffing because we didn't give a strong safety 90 million dollars. 

 

You can't judge this team yet, because it's an unfinished product. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Legend of Luck said:

 

This is true, but you're not considering that free agency isnt over, the draft hasn't taken place, unrestricted FA haven't been signed, and the entire roster from last year will have a chance to grow and develop within the system. We had the youngest team in football minus Vinny last year. These guys are gonna grow and get better. The same people that looked at our roster last year and had us ranked 32nd are the same people huffing and puffing because we didn't give a strong safety 90 million dollars. 

 

You can't judge this team yet, because it's an unfinished product. 

Good points, but this team, unlike last year's, has some much higher expectations from us as fans. (wildcard minimum, win the division hopefully and make a better run)  Everyone is trying to improve and if Colts continue to ignore FA's that could be difference makers, the Colts better have the #1 draft again or we could regress and finish 3rd.  How would the fans react to CB's plans then.  This is a critical year for his banking cash and going with second wave players and draft only.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Old Colt said:

Good points, but this team, unlike last year's, has some much higher expectations from us as fans. (wildcard minimum, win the division hopefully and make a better run)  Everyone is trying to improve and if Colts continue to ignore FA's that could be difference makers, the Colts better have the #1 draft again or we could regress and finish 3rd.  How would the fans react to CB's plans then.  This is a critical year for his banking cash and going with second wave players and draft only.

The guys that got the big money in FA aren’t really difference makers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

The guys that got the big money in FA aren’t really difference makers. 

we'll have to see about that, Collins, Bell very well could be....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Old Colt said:

we'll have to see about that, Collins, Bell very well could be....

A safety is never going to be the difference in winning a SB. 

  • Confused 4
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

A safety is never going to be the difference in winning a SB. 

 

Holy cow...

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Old Colt said:

Good points, but this team, unlike last year's, has some much higher expectations from us as fans. (wildcard minimum, win the division hopefully and make a better run)  Everyone is trying to improve and if Colts continue to ignore FA's that could be difference makers, the Colts better have the #1 draft again or we could regress and finish 3rd.  How would the fans react to CB's plans then.  This is a critical year for his banking cash and going with second wave players and draft only.

 

Chris Ballard has no incentive to NOT spend on guys that can make a difference. His job depends on winning. 

 

If there were guys out there that would come in and make an impact, Ballard would have brought them in for a reasonable offer. 

 

Landon Collins getting 84 million is not reasonable. Many of the other big name FA's were given unreasonable deals as well.

 

Ballard believes not only in his ability and his teams ability to scout and draft, but on his staffs ability to make the players he drafts even better.

 

His job is to make the team better. His job is to prevent regression. His job isn't to blow big contracts on mid level free agents just to make it look on paper like the team is better. Hes going to make the team better through the draft and development instead. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

A safety is never going to be the difference in winning a SB. 

Bob Sanders says hi.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PeterBowman said:

Bob Sanders says hi.

Exactly, he was a big difference in the Colts lone SB win..... (INDY COLTS);  any position can be a difference maker, not just a QB, RB, etc.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

A safety is never going to be the difference in winning a SB. 

Jesus the amount of people on here that disrespect the S position is sad especially in our defense :facepalm:

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, PeterBowman said:

Bob Sanders says hi.

My point was at 84m that is ridiculous. For a elite defensive end yes the money is worth it.  We never would of got Collins anyway. He wanted to play in DC. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

My point was at 84m that is ridiculous. For a elite defensive end yes the money is worth it.  We never would of got Collins anyway. He wanted to play in DC. 

Now you are trying to twist your comment to make it seem less dumb?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

Solid interview. Makes sense that he liked Funchess coming into the league.

 

Also, we've all debated a lot about taking a safety at #34 or even #26, and I'd be fine with it (love me some Rapp, among others), but there could be some really good options there at #59 too.

Yeah, when a GM says he likes the safety class, he's not necessarily saying that he likes it better than the DT class. 

 

So if he just leaves it at that, people might think he's thinking S at 26 or 34 when he's coyishly thinking S at 59.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, #12. said:

 

They're not worried yet, Chris, I can assure you. :)

 

As it stands, KC, NE or NO will absolutely carve up this defense - 2-3 TDs in the blink of an eye - just like we saw last year, and if you can't match scores offensively, if you don't have the weapons to match them offensively, forget about it.

 

If you're only playing for the AFC South, that's one thing.  If you're playing for the whole thing, yes, you better try to match these teams offensely, especially with what the rules are today.

 

Young teams get better, old teams get worse. If we keep drafting & developing at the level we saw last year, we have nothing to worry about.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Old Colt said:

we'll have to see about that, Collins, Bell very well could be....

 

I can't see either the Jets or the Redskins getting over the playoff hump as a result of those 2 signings. Barring some crazy unforeseen circumstances, the Pats will easily win the East, & the Cowboys & Eagles will both keep the Redskins out of it, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

A safety is never going to be the difference in winning a SB. 

 

Not sure what you were thinking here...  but this post is false.   100 percent false.   

 

You might want to re-think this one....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Not sure what you were thinking here...  but this post is false.   100 percent false.   

 

You might want to re-think this one....

I think Bob slipped his mind because without him, we weren't winning it all in 2006.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 What he clearly did say was pass rush up the middle was important.
So i will be counting on it using our pic 26 and whatever else is needed to satisfy his hunger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 What he clearly did say was pass rush up the middle was important.
So i will be counting on it using our pic 26 and whatever else is needed to satisfy his hunger.

That was always the smart move, to get that guy at 26.  Now with the way the FA signings are falling into place around that guy, a DT pick at 26 or 34 seems highly likely.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

My point was at 84m that is ridiculous. For a elite defensive end yes the money is worth it.  We never would of got Collins anyway. He wanted to play in DC. 

So an $84 million safety won't help win a SB but a cheaper safety will help?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, #12. said:

 

They're not worried yet, Chris, I can assure you. :)

 

As it stands, KC, NE or NO will absolutely carve up this defense - 2-3 TDs in the blink of an eye - just like we saw last year, and if you can't match scores offensively, if you don't have the weapons to match them offensively, forget about it.

 

If you're only playing for the AFC South, that's one thing.  If you're playing for the whole thing, yes, you better try to match these teams offensely, especially with what the rules are today.

If you think other GMs and coaches haven't noticed what the Colts have done and are doing right now you are out of your mind. 

Luck having a full season of training camp and practice?

I can assure you they are worried.

Just the signing of Houston today drew some attention. Now they are going to have to game plan just for him. You think Maniac don't worry the other coaches? Wrong.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Loved Sanders, but he had some serious durability issues. He was the highest paid safety the last contract we gave him, and missed how many games? I had a serious love/hate relationship with that guy lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

If you think other GMs and coaches haven't noticed what the Colts have done and are doing right now you are out of your mind. 

Luck having a full season of training camp and practice?

I can assure you they are worried.

Just the signing of Houston today drew some attention. Now they are going to have to game plan just for him. You think Maniac don't worry the other coaches? Wrong.

 

sorry, still don't think they have to worry too much about our O. we haven't done anything to get TY out of double coverage. between that, and Reich's short/quick horizontal attack, DC's aren't going to quake. at least not the top ones. we still can't compete in a boat race.

 

they are definitely taking notice of our D though. houston alone is big time, but the biggest impact IMO is that he will demand enough attention, that other lanes will be open, and our other guys (and our new 1st round iDL :-) will all look much improved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Irish YJ said:

 

sorry, still don't think they have to worry too much about our O. we haven't done anything to get TY out of double coverage. between that, and Reich's short/quick horizontal attack, DC's aren't going to quake. at least not the top ones. we still can't compete in a boat race.

 

they are definitely taking notice of our D though. houston alone is big time, but the biggest impact IMO is that he will demand enough attention, that other lanes will be open, and our other guys (and our new 1st round iDL :-) will all look much improved.

Huh? Luck having a whole season to prepare himself and the offensive line with another year under their belts don't worry other GMs and coaches? 

Funchess can draw enough attention to help TY in the double coverage issue.

Getting Doyle back on the field also makes this offense better.

Just listen to what Ballard said about this team being so young last season and how they will get better as a unit.

With a much improved defense the offense don't have to carry the burden and have to score 30 points a game to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, lollygagger8 said:

 

Hooker & Hooker @ Safety? 

 

giphy.gif

Charlie Sheen will be our newest #1 fan.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

Huh? Luck having a whole season to prepare himself and the offensive line with another year under their belts don't worry other GMs and coaches? 

Funchess can draw enough attention to help TY in the double coverage issue.

Getting Doyle back on the field also makes this offense better.

Just listen to what Ballard said about this team being so young last season and how they will get better as a unit.

With a much improved defense the offense don't have to carry the burden and have to score 30 points a game to win.

Funchess isn't going to keep double coverage off TY. He isn't that fast, and doesn't get much cushion/separation. He's never been that guy (to get much separation). He will be a RZ mismatch, but not much of relief for TY between the 20s.

 

In terms of Ballard commenting on youth and getting better. youth was not our problem last year on O late season. our problem vs KC was we couldn't score even with the OL firing on all cylinders late in the year. TY had a big blanket on him the entire game, and they shut all of Reich's short/quick passes to everyone else. Reich's short game scheme was ineffective (that's another conversation), but it would not have mattered anyway as we had zero deep/vertical threat besides TY. 

 

Recap of our KC first half O possesions 

 

Punt after 3 and out, which included TY being DC'd and Ebron struggled to get open on a short toss. 

 

Punt after 3 and out, which included 2 short throws, one to a DC'd TY, and then a long attempt to Pascal who couldn't get separation. 

 

Next punt after 3 and out, after two run attempts and a sack. 

 

Next punt after a 3 out after 2 short passes.... 

 

Then, our best drive, which had zero pass attempts to TY (because he was shut down), ended in a missed FG to end the half. 

 

Funchess isn't changing the above. A fast, vertical threat WR2 would.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Irish YJ said:

Funchess isn't going to keep double coverage off TY. He isn't that fast, and doesn't get much cushion/separation. He's never been that guy (to get much separation). He will be a RZ mismatch, but not much of relief for TY between the 20s.

 

In terms of Ballard commenting on youth and getting better. youth was not our problem last year on O late season. our problem vs KC was we couldn't score even with the OL firing on all cylinders late in the year. TY had a big blanket on him the entire game, and they shut all of Reich's short/quick passes to everyone else. Reich's short game scheme was ineffective (that's another conversation), but it would not have mattered anyway as we had zero deep/vertical threat besides TY. 

 

Recap of our KC first half O possesions 

 

Punt after 3 and out, which included TY being DC'd and Ebron struggled to get open on a short toss. 

 

Punt after 3 and out, which included 2 short throws, one to a DC'd TY, and then a long attempt to Pascal who couldn't get separation. 

 

Next punt after 3 and out, after two run attempts and a sack. 

 

Next punt after a 3 out after 2 short passes.... 

 

Then, our best drive, which had zero pass attempts to TY (because he was shut down), ended in a missed FG to end the half. 

 

Funchess isn't changing the above. A fast, vertical threat WR2 would.

Since the day we signed him one you have doubted the talent level of Funchess.

Now you want to use one game to judge the whole team and what it did the last the last 12 games of the season?  That is being too narrow minded IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFL.com's Profile   Draft Grade: 5.30 NFL BACKUP OR SPECIAL TEAMS POTENTIAL Draft Projection: Round 5 College: Mich St Position: S Height: 5-11 Weight: 213 40 Time: 4.52     BIO: Willis was named the Ann Arbor News Michigan High School Player of the Year in 2014 as a running back after he covered nearly 3,000 yards on the ground and scored 31 touchdowns. He didn't end up at Ann Arbor for college, signing with Sparty. Willis started 3 of 9 games played as a true freshman (11 tackles), but his season ended before the Big Ten Championship Game due to a broken foot. He started one game in 2016, making 30 tackles in 11 contests overall. An opening occurred in MSU's secondary for 2017, and Willis took advantage. He garnered honorable mention All-Big Ten honors that season, accumulating 71 tackles, 5.5 for loss, four sacks, two interceptions, and three pass breakups. He repeated his honorable mention all-conference performance as a senior, posting 84 tackles, two interceptions, and 10 pass breakups in 13 starts for the Spartans.   Overview: Team leader known for his leadership and work ethic, Willis has been a reliable performer with a good nose for the football. However, he's an average athlete with below-average speed who needs to keep plays in front of him, so finding a roster spot on the next level could be a challenge. His high football character and consistent effort level, give him a shot at finding work as a backup with special teams value .   Strengths: Praised for exceptional character Good size with compact build and desired play strength Plays with consistent motor and effort all game long Runs the alley with accurate map to the ball carrier Reliable and plays under control Reads quarterback's eyes for early indicators in coverage Sees the entire field from deep safety Handled some slot cover duties in sub-packages Good awareness from short zone and responds quickly to throws   Weaknesses: Below-average athlete lacking explosiveness Top-end speed is a concern Struggles to range over the top from deep zone Slow to open hips and sprint with early speed Tight strider with below-average burst to close Limited lateral agility to maintain man coverage Very modest ball production    
    • 1. Again that is how people view QBs rather that is fair or not   2. Im referring more from a talent perspective   3. Its more to justify Luck as a talent.
    • I like that there's evidently a clear plan for developing and using him, and I think that's true for everyone they added this year. We'll see how it plays out, but I expect that they'll be trying to put guys in position to excel, not trying to force them to do something they aren't good at.   I think this shows with the Funchess signing. Definitely not my favorite acquisition, and I wanted them to go in a different direction, but Warren Sharp posted splits showing how Funchess performed on certain routes, and compared it with how Luck produces when throwing to those routes. It seems like an ideal match for our offense, and I think the front office and coaching staff identified that together, and went out and got him. I don't think they'll ask him to be a downfield burner, I think they're going to use him on curls, outs, and maybe slants, and I think it's going to add a dimension to the offense, especially on big downs when defenses play tight man coverage.    If they took a similar approach with the players they drafted -- what's the plan for this guy on our team, and how do we develop his traits so that he can excel in this role? -- it will show in the way they use them right away. Tell, Campbell, Willis, Banogu... all have traits that can be tapped into right away.
    • So I'm a little confused now. Are you basing your views on the roster that the QB is playing with instead of the QB himself? I don't see how you can say the AFC championship game on only had "3 great players."    If you ask me has Luck done more with less then some other QB's then that answer is 100% yes. But your question is How do you view Andrew without a championship?       Not how Andrew Luck will be viewed because he doesn't have great teams around him.
    • 1. If my aunt had a set, she'd be my uncle.  Marino didn't win 6 so who cares?   2. The larger point is I am lost on your arm talent argument.  Who cares who had the best arm?  That is only one small component of what makes an elite level QB.  Greg Maddux is a HoF pitcher and he had not close to the velocity of Kyle Farnsworth, who can only get into the HoF if he bought a ticket.  In an NFL comparison, Joe Montana did not have near the arm that Marino or Elway did but he is clearly among the best QB's ever to play the game. 3. I don't care about the Colts 2014 roster.  I know who was on the team and I don't think they would have been a good match up for the 1970 Steelers. I am simply saying that you don't really know if it was the worst roster to make the AFCCG in history.  It's over an over the top argument simply made to prove a point you can't make otherwise.
  • Members

    • Lef

      Lef 199

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 177

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 406

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JMichael557

      JMichael557 229

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • adubb84

      adubb84 228

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfansince65

      coltsfansince65 1,269

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Irish YJ

      Irish YJ 766

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Korey

      Korey 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 34,299

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 8,188

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...