Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

rayski

Colts Corner trade rumours

Recommended Posts

 

Not the most reliable source, but interesting to note. I could think of some nice options to compliment Desir. Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, rayski said:

 

Not the most reliable source, but interesting to note. I could think of some nice options to compliment Desir. Thoughts?

He’s actually been spot on lately. 

 

Trae Waynes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure we need any starters at corner. I think that is set. But maybe some as depth.

I think Wilson and Moore with Desir we are set. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

Not sure we need any starters at corner. I think that is set. But maybe some as depth.

I don’t think we are “set”, definitely could upgrade. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't say were set, could definitely upgrade, but if we don't i think we can get by with what we have. Maybe he meant Safety?? haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think that means corner back. I think that means corners of the nfl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I don’t think that means corner back. I think that means corners of the nfl.

You’re right. I just got that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I don’t think that means corner back. I think that means corners of the nfl.

hmmm, interesting. I wonder what Ballard has on his mind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Could be anything.  Maybe trade up this year instead of back?

I actually think we need a DE so bad this would be the year to trade up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Benjamin Allbright is way more reliable than "insiders" like Mike Silver and Jason La Canfora. 

 

In terms of potential trade targets, I do not really have a clue. I find it difficult for Ballard and company to trade a draft pick, but maybe a late round/conditional. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Think they might be trying to trade brissett

 

I've seen this mentioned on both Twitter and Reddit, but I don't see them trading away Brissett. He's a valuable member of the locker room that the Colts are continuing to establish.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, MTC said:

 

I've seen this mentioned on both Twitter and Reddit, but I don't see them trading away Brissett. He's a valuable member of the locker room that the Colts are continuing to establish.  

 

He's also gone next year regardless. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll predict Brissett to the Giants for a 3rd round pick. They got an extra 3rd in the Beckham trade, and the Giants have Eli at QB and aren't interested in Haskins. Also think the Cardinals take Murray before them. Perfect match for Brissett. Predicting it now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Id like to see some links to some solid "Brisset being traded" info. I personally don't think it's happening and all i have seen is pure speculation from fans..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Id like some links to some solid "Brisset being traded" info. I personally don't think it's happening and all i have seen is pure speculation from fans..

I feel like it would have happened by now but maybe if someone misses out on a qb in the draft.  As much as I like Brissett on this team I do want to see him start somewhere.  Can’t wait to root for him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont see a trade up in the draft happening until draft day with how late our pick is. the draft is just to unpredictable in how the board will fall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Id like some links to some solid "Brisset being traded" info. I personally don't think it's happening and all i have seen is pure speculation from fans..

Just my personal opinion. I don’t think we will trade him. Ballard loves him and I wonder if he will let him hit free agency next year so he can choose his own team. It’s not like we will get much for him. If he doesn’t get a starting job he will probably re sign here and continue as a back up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are doing the sniffing what position would he feel the need to pursue a player for?  We know he values picks but you would have to assume he would be willing to give up a pick to get a player.  ER is the biggest need and I thought a future 2nd. was a good price for Ford.   Crazy thought I know but here we are still sitting with all of that cap space.  Oh well nothing like having fun with a new rumor. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

If we are doing the sniffing what position would he feel the need to pursue a player for?  We know he values picks but you would have to assume he would be willing to give up a pick to get a player.  ER is the biggest need and I thought a future 2nd. was a good price for Ford.   Crazy thought I know but here we are still sitting with all of that cap space.  Oh well nothing like having fun with a new rumor. 

Right now I would say a safety. Hooker and Farley are the only ones signed. Odum is just a back up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully the trade is for DE Frank Clark. I’d be stoked if we got him for a 2020 3rd or something along those lines. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

Hopefully the trade is for DE Frank Clark. I’d be stoked if we got him for a 2020 3rd or something along those lines. 

 

 

That's way low on what it would take to get Clark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MTC said:

Benjamin Allbright is way more reliable than "insiders" like Mike Silver and Jason La Canfora. 

 

In terms of potential trade targets, I do not really have a clue. I find it difficult for Ballard and company to trade a draft pick, but maybe a late round/conditional. 

Yep . Look at this from Jan 31st.  

Quote

 

Benjamin Allbright‏Verified account @AllbrightNFL

FollowFollow @AllbrightNFL

More

Would not be surprised to see #Dolphins move Tannehill and not worry about QB this draft. Bring in a free agent like Ryan Fitzpatrick. Use 2019 as an evaluation year. Look QB in 2020 draft.

5:57 AM - 31 Jan 2019

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DerekDiggler said:

Yep . Look at this from Jan 31st.  

 

Wow. I made sure to follow this guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hassan Ridgeway?

Nate Hairston?

 

Hairston & Ridgeway both had really limited minutes in 2018, yet both look like they can play in the league. Scheme fit issues?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

Hopefully the trade is for DE Frank Clark. I’d be stoked if we got him for a 2020 3rd or something along those lines. 

I would think a 2020 2nd and another mid round pick this year or a player. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were rumors that Seattle might have been interested in Brissett. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. If the trade is indeed for a corner back, my gut says it has to be for a high level starter.

 

Desir and Moore are very good starters, and with Wilson and Collins on the roster, I feel like the ONLY trade that would make sense for that group would be to add a true CB1.

 

If all of that is true, then Howard from Miami may be the guy. 

 

2. I definitely think a trade for Jacoby is plausible. Two things have to be there for the trade to happen. 

 

1. It has to be a place that Jacoby wants to go, and a place that Ballard thinks will be a good spot for him to be successful. This is the number 1 concern for him.

 

2. It has to be a VERY good return. It'd likely take numerous picks, probably including a 1st rounder. Jacoby just offers this team too much value and safety to be traded for anything less than a true haul of picks.

 

With that said, its still on the table. All it takes is one team.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Legend of Luck said:

 

 

1. It has to be a place that Jacoby wants to go, and a place that Ballard thinks will be a good spot for him to be successful. This is the number 1 concern for him.

 

2. It has to be a VERY good return. It'd likely take numerous picks, probably including a 1st rounder. Jacoby just offers this team too much value and safety to be traded for anything less than a true haul of picks.

 

 

1. False

 

2. False

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, ColtsLegacy said:

 

1. False

 

2. False

 

Ballard literally said these exact words.

 

“It would take somebody doing something that would blow me away, and it has to be the right thing for the kid, too.”

 

“I’m not just sending him anywhere.”

 

“This is what I told Jacoby: ‘I’m not giving you away. I won’t do it.' I had chances last year, and I didn’t do it, and I won’t do it again. It would have to be right for the organization and for him.”

 

 

So go ahead and correct your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe ballard when  he said  that about Jacoby. He has never lied. That is why he isn’t going anywhere this year. Next year he will probably let him test FA to see if there is a starting job for him. If there isn’t Jacoby will re sign. I think ballard would gladly give up that pick to let Brissett decide where he wants to go. It is  not like we are going to get much  anyway. Teams probably don’t want to trade for him because he will be a FA next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

I believe ballard when  he said  that about Jacoby. He has never lied. That is why he isn’t going anywhere this year. Next year he will probably let him test FA to see if there is a starting job for him. If there isn’t Jacoby will re sign. I think ballard would gladly give up that pick to let Brissett decide where he wants to go. It is  not like we are going to get much  anyway. Teams probably don’t want to trade for him because he will be a FA next season.

 

Dont forget, if he lets Jacoby leave in FA next year to be a starter somewhere else, he will get a 3rd round compensatory pick in return due to the size of the contract. So Ballard will get SOMETHING regardless of how he plays this out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Legend of Luck said:

 

Dont forget, if he lets Jacoby leave in FA next year to be a starter somewhere else, he will get a 3rd round compensatory pick in return due to the size of the contract. So Ballard will get SOMETHING regardless of how he plays this out.

 

I don’t think another team will sign him to a big deal in free agency in 2020 so the most Ballard might get is a 4th in compensation. So I believe he’d get more value by trading Brissett before 2020. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if he leaves as a free agent we kind of would get the same kind of pick if we traded him. So if Ballard loves him as much as he says I can see him letting him pick his own team in FA. Brissett isn’t worth more than a 3rd or 4th. I don’t think Brissett is going to leave for another backup job. He will stay if he don’t get a starting job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vikes are shopping both Trae Waynes and Xavier Rhodes. I’d be real happy with either of those for the right price. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Legend of Luck said:

 

Dont forget, if he lets Jacoby leave in FA next year to be a starter somewhere else, he will get a 3rd round compensatory pick in return due to the size of the contract. So Ballard will get SOMETHING regardless of how he plays this out.

 

I just caution everyone on this. All of our people on this board and the media keep preaching the comp pick for JB next year. But here’s the thing, that pick is not for 2020. It’s for 2021. And we don’t get that pick at all if we pay any outside free agent any significant contract that offsets the comp pick formula. 

 

So basically if we as dans want some outside help next year and out locker room is ready to add that piece on a big FA contract, it would ultimately offset JB’s deal elsewhere and we’d likely get no comp pick for him. 

 

A comp pick for him is not guaranteed unless we let him walk and we are inactive ourselves on any top tier talent. So take it w a grain of salt. If people are banking on the comp pick then those same people must be banking on our inactivity next off season as well and this shouldn’t be complaining if we sit on our money again. 

 

This is why id be all for trading JB now. A pick in 2020 is worth one round less (typically) than 2019. So a pick in 2021 is worth two rounds less than 2019. Even if we got a 3rd in 2021 that’s equal to a 5th this year. 

 

That means if we can get anything better than a 5-6th this year then we should take it. 

 

Againits just semantics but it should be said and thought of. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with your logic.  But it is the same logic some people are using for the converse.  We have young receivers and no Funchess, so no one is open.
    • Not trying to start an argument. I'm only pointing out that you are essentially drawing a conclusion based on assumptions.   1) ........receivers are fast 2) ........QB makes few attempts 3).........the box is stacked   So, Brissett must be missing open receivers downfield.   I'm sure he misses some. But how many compared to other QBs?  ....  We don't really know.         
    • SO your contention is that teams leave Ebron open because of his drops?
    • No more than someone being convicted and imprisoned when it's obvious the police force engaged in improper procedure.   I guess the issue here is that I can see the world outside my own head better than a lot of people.  And I know a little more about physics than the average bear, simply from boredom clicks that turned into self directed study sessions.    The idea that the balls were below PSI because the air was cold and cold air is denser and reduces air pressure, makes a lot more sense to me than some nefarious conspiracy, especially because the Colts' balls were also just barely under PSI, and we all know Andrew Luck doesn't cheat.   The way I had it explained to me is the Patriots keep their balls at the low end of the allowed PSI limit at room temperature.  Throw in a super cold January evening that was way below room temperature and the nefarious becomes the inevitable.  That's why the Colts' balls were also low, because air cold enough to shrink a Patriots ball will shrink a Colts ball too.    The reason that the Colts' balls had higher PSI is that they started higher -- Colts don't push the lower edge of the PSI limit.  Also the Colts balls were tested later, after things had a chance to warm up and normalize   If it was Manning or Luck being accused none of us would have been satisfied with the standard of "proof" on display.    there might just barely be enough actual evidence to get the equipment people themselves on something, if you completely ignore the way temperature affects air pressure, but the evidence tying any of that directly back to Brady is practically nonexistent.   They would have had a better reason to suspend either of Robert Kraft or Bill Belichick than Tom Brady.  Both of them have more authority over the equipment personnel than the starting QB does and at least you could get them on the commander clause. '   All they have on Brady is that he destroyed his phone after they said they didn't want it and before they changed their minds and decided they did
    • I was going to respond to each point but it's not really worth it so I will just say, the fact that he was suspended and fined was not proof enough for you?
  • Members

    • krunk

      krunk 11,708

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • egg

      egg 791

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • runthepost

      runthepost 721

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • anunnakidna

      anunnakidna 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 431

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 139

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Qwiz

      Qwiz 3,722

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 2,016

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • davidshoff

      davidshoff 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 2,104

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...