Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

rayski

Colts Corner trade rumours

Recommended Posts

 

Not the most reliable source, but interesting to note. I could think of some nice options to compliment Desir. Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, rayski said:

 

Not the most reliable source, but interesting to note. I could think of some nice options to compliment Desir. Thoughts?

He’s actually been spot on lately. 

 

Trae Waynes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure we need any starters at corner. I think that is set. But maybe some as depth.

I think Wilson and Moore with Desir we are set. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

Not sure we need any starters at corner. I think that is set. But maybe some as depth.

I don’t think we are “set”, definitely could upgrade. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't say were set, could definitely upgrade, but if we don't i think we can get by with what we have. Maybe he meant Safety?? haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think that means corner back. I think that means corners of the nfl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I don’t think that means corner back. I think that means corners of the nfl.

You’re right. I just got that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I don’t think that means corner back. I think that means corners of the nfl.

hmmm, interesting. I wonder what Ballard has on his mind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Could be anything.  Maybe trade up this year instead of back?

I actually think we need a DE so bad this would be the year to trade up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Benjamin Allbright is way more reliable than "insiders" like Mike Silver and Jason La Canfora. 

 

In terms of potential trade targets, I do not really have a clue. I find it difficult for Ballard and company to trade a draft pick, but maybe a late round/conditional. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Think they might be trying to trade brissett

 

I've seen this mentioned on both Twitter and Reddit, but I don't see them trading away Brissett. He's a valuable member of the locker room that the Colts are continuing to establish.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, MTC said:

 

I've seen this mentioned on both Twitter and Reddit, but I don't see them trading away Brissett. He's a valuable member of the locker room that the Colts are continuing to establish.  

 

He's also gone next year regardless. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll predict Brissett to the Giants for a 3rd round pick. They got an extra 3rd in the Beckham trade, and the Giants have Eli at QB and aren't interested in Haskins. Also think the Cardinals take Murray before them. Perfect match for Brissett. Predicting it now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Id like to see some links to some solid "Brisset being traded" info. I personally don't think it's happening and all i have seen is pure speculation from fans..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Id like some links to some solid "Brisset being traded" info. I personally don't think it's happening and all i have seen is pure speculation from fans..

I feel like it would have happened by now but maybe if someone misses out on a qb in the draft.  As much as I like Brissett on this team I do want to see him start somewhere.  Can’t wait to root for him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont see a trade up in the draft happening until draft day with how late our pick is. the draft is just to unpredictable in how the board will fall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Id like some links to some solid "Brisset being traded" info. I personally don't think it's happening and all i have seen is pure speculation from fans..

Just my personal opinion. I don’t think we will trade him. Ballard loves him and I wonder if he will let him hit free agency next year so he can choose his own team. It’s not like we will get much for him. If he doesn’t get a starting job he will probably re sign here and continue as a back up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are doing the sniffing what position would he feel the need to pursue a player for?  We know he values picks but you would have to assume he would be willing to give up a pick to get a player.  ER is the biggest need and I thought a future 2nd. was a good price for Ford.   Crazy thought I know but here we are still sitting with all of that cap space.  Oh well nothing like having fun with a new rumor. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

If we are doing the sniffing what position would he feel the need to pursue a player for?  We know he values picks but you would have to assume he would be willing to give up a pick to get a player.  ER is the biggest need and I thought a future 2nd. was a good price for Ford.   Crazy thought I know but here we are still sitting with all of that cap space.  Oh well nothing like having fun with a new rumor. 

Right now I would say a safety. Hooker and Farley are the only ones signed. Odum is just a back up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully the trade is for DE Frank Clark. I’d be stoked if we got him for a 2020 3rd or something along those lines. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

Hopefully the trade is for DE Frank Clark. I’d be stoked if we got him for a 2020 3rd or something along those lines. 

 

 

That's way low on what it would take to get Clark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MTC said:

Benjamin Allbright is way more reliable than "insiders" like Mike Silver and Jason La Canfora. 

 

In terms of potential trade targets, I do not really have a clue. I find it difficult for Ballard and company to trade a draft pick, but maybe a late round/conditional. 

Yep . Look at this from Jan 31st.  

Quote

 

Benjamin Allbright‏Verified account @AllbrightNFL

FollowFollow @AllbrightNFL

More

Would not be surprised to see #Dolphins move Tannehill and not worry about QB this draft. Bring in a free agent like Ryan Fitzpatrick. Use 2019 as an evaluation year. Look QB in 2020 draft.

5:57 AM - 31 Jan 2019

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DerekDiggler said:

Yep . Look at this from Jan 31st.  

 

Wow. I made sure to follow this guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hassan Ridgeway?

Nate Hairston?

 

Hairston & Ridgeway both had really limited minutes in 2018, yet both look like they can play in the league. Scheme fit issues?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

Hopefully the trade is for DE Frank Clark. I’d be stoked if we got him for a 2020 3rd or something along those lines. 

I would think a 2020 2nd and another mid round pick this year or a player. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were rumors that Seattle might have been interested in Brissett. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. If the trade is indeed for a corner back, my gut says it has to be for a high level starter.

 

Desir and Moore are very good starters, and with Wilson and Collins on the roster, I feel like the ONLY trade that would make sense for that group would be to add a true CB1.

 

If all of that is true, then Howard from Miami may be the guy. 

 

2. I definitely think a trade for Jacoby is plausible. Two things have to be there for the trade to happen. 

 

1. It has to be a place that Jacoby wants to go, and a place that Ballard thinks will be a good spot for him to be successful. This is the number 1 concern for him.

 

2. It has to be a VERY good return. It'd likely take numerous picks, probably including a 1st rounder. Jacoby just offers this team too much value and safety to be traded for anything less than a true haul of picks.

 

With that said, its still on the table. All it takes is one team.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Legend of Luck said:

 

 

1. It has to be a place that Jacoby wants to go, and a place that Ballard thinks will be a good spot for him to be successful. This is the number 1 concern for him.

 

2. It has to be a VERY good return. It'd likely take numerous picks, probably including a 1st rounder. Jacoby just offers this team too much value and safety to be traded for anything less than a true haul of picks.

 

 

1. False

 

2. False

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, ColtsLegacy said:

 

1. False

 

2. False

 

Ballard literally said these exact words.

 

“It would take somebody doing something that would blow me away, and it has to be the right thing for the kid, too.”

 

“I’m not just sending him anywhere.”

 

“This is what I told Jacoby: ‘I’m not giving you away. I won’t do it.' I had chances last year, and I didn’t do it, and I won’t do it again. It would have to be right for the organization and for him.”

 

 

So go ahead and correct your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe ballard when  he said  that about Jacoby. He has never lied. That is why he isn’t going anywhere this year. Next year he will probably let him test FA to see if there is a starting job for him. If there isn’t Jacoby will re sign. I think ballard would gladly give up that pick to let Brissett decide where he wants to go. It is  not like we are going to get much  anyway. Teams probably don’t want to trade for him because he will be a FA next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

I believe ballard when  he said  that about Jacoby. He has never lied. That is why he isn’t going anywhere this year. Next year he will probably let him test FA to see if there is a starting job for him. If there isn’t Jacoby will re sign. I think ballard would gladly give up that pick to let Brissett decide where he wants to go. It is  not like we are going to get much  anyway. Teams probably don’t want to trade for him because he will be a FA next season.

 

Dont forget, if he lets Jacoby leave in FA next year to be a starter somewhere else, he will get a 3rd round compensatory pick in return due to the size of the contract. So Ballard will get SOMETHING regardless of how he plays this out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Legend of Luck said:

 

Dont forget, if he lets Jacoby leave in FA next year to be a starter somewhere else, he will get a 3rd round compensatory pick in return due to the size of the contract. So Ballard will get SOMETHING regardless of how he plays this out.

 

I don’t think another team will sign him to a big deal in free agency in 2020 so the most Ballard might get is a 4th in compensation. So I believe he’d get more value by trading Brissett before 2020. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if he leaves as a free agent we kind of would get the same kind of pick if we traded him. So if Ballard loves him as much as he says I can see him letting him pick his own team in FA. Brissett isn’t worth more than a 3rd or 4th. I don’t think Brissett is going to leave for another backup job. He will stay if he don’t get a starting job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vikes are shopping both Trae Waynes and Xavier Rhodes. I’d be real happy with either of those for the right price. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Legend of Luck said:

 

Dont forget, if he lets Jacoby leave in FA next year to be a starter somewhere else, he will get a 3rd round compensatory pick in return due to the size of the contract. So Ballard will get SOMETHING regardless of how he plays this out.

 

I just caution everyone on this. All of our people on this board and the media keep preaching the comp pick for JB next year. But here’s the thing, that pick is not for 2020. It’s for 2021. And we don’t get that pick at all if we pay any outside free agent any significant contract that offsets the comp pick formula. 

 

So basically if we as dans want some outside help next year and out locker room is ready to add that piece on a big FA contract, it would ultimately offset JB’s deal elsewhere and we’d likely get no comp pick for him. 

 

A comp pick for him is not guaranteed unless we let him walk and we are inactive ourselves on any top tier talent. So take it w a grain of salt. If people are banking on the comp pick then those same people must be banking on our inactivity next off season as well and this shouldn’t be complaining if we sit on our money again. 

 

This is why id be all for trading JB now. A pick in 2020 is worth one round less (typically) than 2019. So a pick in 2021 is worth two rounds less than 2019. Even if we got a 3rd in 2021 that’s equal to a 5th this year. 

 

That means if we can get anything better than a 5-6th this year then we should take it. 

 

Againits just semantics but it should be said and thought of. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I personally don't think it is that simple.  For several reasons.  For one of course someone could come in and do it better.  He's not the greatest who ever lived, so yes someone, presumably many players could be better.   He played really well Sunday.  Not to denigrate his accomplishment but the team has been very fortunate the last two weeks as to what they have faced on the field and what they could have faced on the field.  So have the opponents.  Our secondary has been all kinds of banged up, but I am specifically talking about what JB needs to do.   Against KC, we ran the ball the entire second half against a bad and injured Dline after less than average start by JB in the 1st half.  He was a non factor in the 2nd half.  We were fortunate that Mahomes was injured, that Hill wasn't back, their OLIne was hurt.   Against Houston, the game plan was superb.  The Texans stacked the box with a poor secondary and JB made them pay just like an NFL QB should.  It was a good time to play them.  One dude was talking about he TDs.  Bubble screen and Shuffle pass are bascially handoffs.  The crosser to Pascal was an easy play for the protected QB and a special play by the WR.  The catch by Ebron is one of the best plays you'll ever see.   But was impressive to me was pocket presence for JB which I really hadn't seen yet.  He has had protection most of the time, and its been like "Stay in the * pocket dude and people will come open.  WEll he did that SUnday.   Darn windy response so far.   But why I say it's not simple is that JB may be at a replaceable level or he may be better than that.  Don't know yet.  I am still skeptical BUT saw some of the looking off, progressions, and pocket presence that I haven't seen from him.  It is a tough call IMO.     I think the real question is much more nuanced.  How likely is it that we can get someone better if JB isn't good enough.  A bunch of issues there.
    • If I had to guess...I would say 2-4 (maybe 3-3)...with more of a focus on rushing...especially around the goal line.   Hard to know what game plans would look like though...but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to think that Hoyer (or someone else) could operate well in this efficient Reich offense. They use a lot of rub routes and other creative ways of getting guys open...which helps any QB. It’s a far cry from the other offenses we have seen in Indy...except when NE came to town.   I remember, back in 2015, the Colts offense looking very efficient with Hasselback at the helm for a handful of games (which they won most of)...as they went to a similar offense. And I could see Hoyer doing just that.   But like Hasselback...I think he would get exposed eventually. Definitely have the best QB on the team going forward.
    • Interesting, is notice of requirement to visit a medical rep considered PHI?  And was it disseminated by a 'covered entity'?     To my understanding, People that get a hold of Protected Health Information (without illegal action of their own) and are not in the medical field and not in the direct care of the subject are not under HIPAA rules (covered entity). Those that allowed the leaks or discovery of such PHI may well be ... depending.   Also, Dr. John Lombardo independently runs the Substance abuse and PES testing.  (has been for 28 years).  The NFL/NFLPA collectively bargained the program, and he can be dismissed by either side at any time.   Each player faces one mandatory test per year under each policy. In addition, 10 players per team are chosen randomly by computer (cough: smart computer?) each week during the preseason, regular season and postseason to be tested under the policy on banned performance-enhancing substances. (only)   Rec drugs of abuse tested in the off season, or if one has previously rested positive.      
    • I think we've pretty much covered that big win over Houston on Sunday, so let's look at our next opponent.   Denver actually scares me a bit...not saying it's a trap game, but after two big wins against two very good teams, it's possible for a let down against a weak Broncos team.   Their offense isn't very good, but they do have some weapons in the backfield.  I think if we get pressure on Flacco, then he's going to be ineffective.  If they decide to run the ball, then we need to be ready to stuff the running game.   Defensively, they aren't terrible...they have some very good DBs, so we may be running the running the ball more this week.   Reich has done a very good job designing an offensive game plan to exploit the opponent's weaknesses, so I expect the same this Sunday.   Thoughts?
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...