Jump to content
ColtsBlueFL

Tyreek Hill being investigated / abuse involving minor

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, MPStack said:

 

Will KC and the NFL do the right thing? Hmm

How about waiting till the investigation is complete?

Till it is resolved no ones knows what the right thing is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, BluHorzhu said:

R. Kelly and A.P. have reached out to him.

 

Why would Ryan Kelly reach out to him? :)

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think this is going  to turn out to be nothing.

Based on what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Based on what?

I think the media is blowing it up to be something it isn’t.  There has already been so many false hoods an inaccuracies in some of these reports. His kid had a broken arm last year not recently. How does anyone know if it was a accident but because of past history it got investigated. The report recently doesn’t even have his name on it.  There is a good chance this entire thing is nothing. If it does turn out to be something he should of course be banned.-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First and foremost I hope that kid is safe. 

 

If Hill is guilty of this, the league should ban him for a year no matter what any attorney can do for him in court or what his sentence is if he is convicted.

 

Sheesh.... between the Chiefs having drafted Marcus Peters and Tyreek Hill on his watch as VP of football operations for KC... I can see how  Ballard’s “strict criteria” for acquiring a player has, shall we say... evolved.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pacolts56 said:

First and foremost I hope that kid is safe. 

 

If Hill is guilty of this, the league should ban him for a year no matter what any attorney can do for him in court or what his sentence is if he is convicted.

 

Sheesh.... between the Chiefs having drafted Marcus Peters and Tyreek Hill on his watch as VP of football operations for KC... I can see how  Ballard’s “strict criteria” for acquiring a player has, shall we say... evolved.

 

 

Ballard, regardless of what he says, was an Indian in KC, not a Chief.....  no matter how much you see eye to eye with your boss, or differ from them, at the end of the day Ballard is a good company guy, and will do whatever job he is tasked with to the best of his abilities it seems.....  including investigating potential picks, even ones maybe he himself wouldn't make if he was in charge...  No one really knows, of course....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Shafty138 said:

Ballard, regardless of what he says, was an Indian in KC, not a Chief.....  no matter how much you see eye to eye with your boss, or differ from them, at the end of the day Ballard is a good company guy, and will do whatever job he is tasked with to the best of his abilities it seems.....  including investigating potential picks, even ones maybe he himself wouldn't make if he was in charge...  No one really knows, of course....

Well.... short of Irsay endorsing a problem child in free agency or the draft.... he’s in charge now.

 

I’m just glad that the front office evidently sets a high bar as a guard against any serious distractions in the locker room and around the team in general.

 

In addition to the deplorable nature of all this.... if Hill is indeed convicted... he will have redefined the meaning of “bad timing” and the Chiefs are dealt a serious blow.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, pacolts56 said:

Sheesh.... between the Chiefs having drafted Marcus Peters and Tyreek Hill on his watch as VP of football operations for KC... I can see how  Ballard’s “strict criteria” for acquiring a player has, shall we say... evolved.

 

CB was the one who checked out Peters and convinced Dorsey to get him. The others, I don't know if he was involved at any level at all??

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hill supposedly wasn’t even home when this last incident happened. If there really was one. Looks like the KC media made some big mistakes in reporting this story. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes he was, the mother of the child is working with the police. The child had a broken arm and other injuries. this is the same women he beat the hell out of before, he has a thug history. I have no doubt that if the report is true that he's done, he'll be suspended but no team will touch him..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ColtJax said:

Yes he was, the mother of the child is working with the police. The child had a broken arm and other injuries. this is the same women he beat the hell out of before, he has a thug history. I have no doubt that if the report is true that he's done, he'll be suspended but no team will touch him..

There has been nothing come out that says that. All I am saying be very careful of believing what you read. The problem is he isn’t going to get the benefit of the doubt because of his past. He was supposedly out of town when one of these incidents happened. The child broke his arm in January. Accidents so happen. We will see if this is all true 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, pacolts56 said:

First and foremost I hope that kid is safe. 

 

If Hill is guilty of this, the league should ban him for a year no matter what any attorney can do for him in court or what his sentence is if he is convicted.

 

Sheesh.... between the Chiefs having drafted Marcus Peters and Tyreek Hill on his watch as VP of football operations for KC... I can see how  Ballard’s “strict criteria” for acquiring a player has, shall we say... evolved.

 

 

Well maybe he is using his past history and what he has learned? 

He has been pretty consistent since he has been here.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Espinal told authorities Hill had punched her in the face and stomach and put her in a chokehold after they had an argument in December 2014. Espinal was eight weeks pregnant with their son at the time.

 

THIS didn't look good either, yet he was drafted!!

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

The Browns are already clearing out some locker space for him!

That would actually be a huge loss for KC's offense. He is a great talent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doubt they cut him, they already seen how that can back fire.. Still, unless he's found guilty and evidence points to him hurting a child it's going to be tough for the Chief's to cut him and yet a PR nightmare to keep him..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they can’t have contact with him I wonder how that is going to effect OTA’s. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/17/2019 at 8:18 PM, Shafty138 said:

Ballard, regardless of what he says, was an Indian in KC, not a Chief.....  no matter how much you see eye to eye with your boss, or differ from them, at the end of the day Ballard is a good company guy, and will do whatever job he is tasked with to the best of his abilities it seems.....  including investigating potential picks, even ones maybe he himself wouldn't make if he was in charge...  No one really knows, of course....

 

Everyone in Kansas City is a Chief!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

Wow

 

 

yeah that's not a good look there....KC looks to be possibly hemorrhaging  most of their elite players from last year...either cap/trade or the players own fault. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, I appreciate you straightening out the information.  That still isn't the number of possible schedules, it's just the number they created based on the financial needs mixed with the venue availability issues and other stuff.   There are some horrendous schedules for certain teams out there.  Whatever human intervention took place, they clearly didn't care about screwing teams.  Oakland and Tampa got it the worst and it was needless.  But money is all that matters, not the health of the players or fairness of competition.  That much is clear.  
    • I didn't suggest anything. I'm just saying that by applying you logic to everyone on the roster, we shouldn't need to upgrade anything. Or does that just hold true to WR?
    • Simple.  It means we need to continue to look elsewhere for someone ready to play out of the box.  Someone who shines, even if its just as a rookie.  I would suggest the draft and we hope that Cain's brief spark before injury was more than fools gold.  Johnson and Paschal had brief moments where they appeared capable but certainly were far from Elite talent.  Rogers and the rest of the guys on the roster after Hilton and Funchess seem like cannon fodder for the most part.  We need elite talent.  We need elite speed.  We need elite hands.  We need elite route running.  In essence, we need SOMETHING to be elite about our qualified #2 and #3.  I didn't see anything that suggested "Elite" from any of these guys last year.  Did you? Someone will be #2 even if they're terrible.  There WILL be a #2.  What I think most people hope for is that the #2 has something elite, if not many things elite about their skill set.  Outside of Hilton, that isn't a word that applies to the backups from last year and camp bodies.     Are you going on the record to say we have our full time, long term #2 and eventual #1 when Hilton is gone on the roster?  Who would that be?  And no matter how you answer, using your criteria, what supposed practical value is that supposed to have?     What practical value does my opinion have? At least the same value as any opinion you or anyone else shares.  None of us have power over the team.  The point of a message board is to post opinions and discuss.  You apparently disagree with my statement, so let's hear who our #2 elite talent is among the scrubs? Settling for a #2 without elite talent is what we did last year.  Ryan Grant was devoid of anything elite and it showed.     Questions? 
    • Based on snap counts last year. TE was 1.29, WR 2.56, RB 1.03 So we ran 2 TE sets a little less than a 3rd of the time (likely a lot on early running downs or RZ), 3 WR sets more than half the time, and used only one RB except for a few instances.    A few things to ponder.... How sure are you that DF was signed assumed to be full time starter? By most reports, Cain had locked down the #2 spot last year before he got injured. Do you think Cain was told DF was signed to be the starter? Might he have been signed to provide depth to the unit while Cain gets his form back? Or even while a drafted WR comes on....   Also, as discussed, DF's most successful routes were short to intermediate middle type routes (not X WR routes). Not necessarily perimeter or deep. Do you think the coaches will force fit him into areas where he's had the least success? It's also been discussed that he might find more success as a big or bully slot?   In terms of stretching the field... If you've read up on Reich's offense, there is a lot of talk about "4 vert" or K gun (going back to his own QB days). Yes there is a lot of up tempo quick hits, but there is supposed to be a stretch element too. It's supposed to be multiple formations, multiple plays, all up tempo. 4 vert is just what it sounds like. 4 players going vertical. Not just all short to intermediate. Luck can throw every ball. Not using his vertical talents would be a bit silly, no?   On the whole WR unit, we have literally only one proven guy and that's TY. Potential and talent are great words, but we have only TY that's proven. DF has had his ups and downs, and hopefully he gets it turned around. I love Cain, but he's rehabing and didn't exactly light the world on fire at Clemson. Both he and Renfrow were there in 16 and 17. Cain stayed about the same while Renfrow took a nice step forward.   All the other guys (Pascal, Johnson, Fountain) are projects that we hope might pan out. You mentioned Johnson, and I like his potential too, but he didn't do much at TX, and has been hurt 2 of his 3 NFL years. In short, based on last years stats, not one WR ranked inside the top 80 in yards other than Hilton. It's incredible what Luck did with all the moving parts last year, but he shouldn't have to work this hard.    And you mentioned you'd take a RB early. If we're talking about proven, and also potential... When Mack came back in game 6 IIRC, we were a top 10 rushing team the rest of the year (I think if you normalize, Mack would have been 5th or 6th in yards). We also just drafted Hines who had a very good first year (700+ all purpose yards), and Wilkins who averaged 5.6 yards per carry in back up duty to Mack. Individually, that's much more proven than our WR corp. I would like to have a power back compliment over Williams, but that's in the middle to late rounds.   Not saying we will, or won't take a WR early, but every mock and "needs" board out there has WR in the top 2. Even Colts.com listed WR first in their post FA needs. Of course Ballard will do what he wants, but the overwhelming majority of "experts" out there are saying Indy needs to upgrade WR. 
    • WHERE EXACTLY did I say any of the nonsense you stated above?  Dude, I don't know you but you either have the wrong person or you are simply projecting.  I didn't comment on the 30 allowed visits at all.  I made no pro or con comments of any kind on the topic.  I asked a legit question that I did not know the answer to.  You need to.. uh... relax or something.  It's all in your head! 
  • Members

    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 94

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Irish YJ

      Irish YJ 351

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jchandler7

      jchandler7 238

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Melancholie

      Melancholie 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...