Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

In the interest of fairness I’m not sure any GM has signed anyone to a 2-year fully guaranteed contract.   It just isn’t done.   I think the Cousins deal was the first multiyear fully guaranteed deal.  

 

If im wrong I’m sure someone will come along and correct me.    As for the three top players you mentioned...  we definitely offered big, big money including plenty of guaranteed money. It just wasn’t enough.   That’s Ballard’s discipline on full display...

 

 

I meant that 2 years of the long-term deal were guaranteed. The actual contract length would be longer and have non-guaranteed years. Cousins is the only one who got his whole contract guaranteed on multi-year deal, yes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Some cool stuff here.    

Brad wells is a child with rocks for brains. How does re-signing Geathers effect hooker? They play different positions. I swear I have no clue how he has a job. Half the people on this forum are more

Posted Images

10 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Was it coincidence that Tannehill was also traded today?

 

The connection to trading Tannelhill today was that Bridgewater turned them down yesterday.

 

Odds are Miami is now drafting a QB in R1.

8 minutes ago, Finball said:

 

I meant that 2 years of the long-term deal were guaranteed. The actual contract length would be longer and have non-guaranteed years. Cousins is the only one who got his whole contract guaranteed on multi-year deal, yes.

 

Yes,  I understood your meaning.   Thanks.    Appreciate it.

 

 

Late Edit:   Apologies to all.   I accidentally turned responding to two posters into one long response.    This was unintentional.     My bad!

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

Was it coincidence that Tannehill was also traded today?

 

Maybe. Maybe Miami contacted us, and Ballard wanted to have a second check down on the QB’s in draft before deciding. Maybe he didn’t feel encouraged by that update and turn the deal down.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I've never heard of these guys either.   But the speculation of drafting a rookie to replace JB makes no sense.    You can't espect a rookie to step in and win in the NFL.

 

So, if we trade JB in the next two weeks, as I hope we can,  then I'd think we want a proven veteran back-up like we had with Hasselback.    And the FA veterans who fit that description are Josh McNoun,  Ryan Fitzpatrick and Mike Glennon.    I'd be happy with any of those three to replace JB if we eventually trade him.

Bortles. :headspin:

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I don’t know who this is. This same thread was putting it out there the colts may have asked about a Oakland first round pick.

 

 

 

Sounds pretty legit...and makes too much sense. Need to get Luck's backup now so he can learn the system and be in place for the next few years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I've never heard of these guys either.   But the speculation of drafting a rookie to replace JB makes no sense.    You can't espect a rookie to step in and win in the NFL.

 

So, if we trade JB in the next two weeks, as I hope we can,  then I'd think we want a proven veteran back-up like we had with Hasselback.    And the FA veterans who fit that description are Josh McNoun,  Ryan Fitzpatrick and Mike Glennon.    I'd be happy with any of those three to replace JB if we eventually trade him.


Yeah we'd definitely need a backup, or at least IMO. 

I just wouldn't be surprised if Ballard wanted to develop a young QB(s). He seems very cautious like that, plus we have Reich to help in that development. I could see us spending a 6th, or even a 5th if we potentially pick up another pick in the draft, on a QB he might really like. Although a 5th may be pushing it.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

That doesn't upgrade the position...or cover for Mitchell leaving. I can only speculate on the upgrade part...cause that is my opinion. But I can't just can't see any way they would rely on both Geathers and Farley to stay healthy all year.

 

Ballard said they were going to try to get Geathers resigned for no reason huh?

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

The Raiders also have pick 35 in the 2nd. Rd.  

 

Heard Mike Mayock on NFL Radio this morning.

 

Said (smartly) that they view pick 35 as another 1st round pick.    Just as I'm sure we view pick 34 as another 1st round pick.    Both teams will be drafting a player from the top-32 on their board.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I've never heard of these guys either.   But the speculation of drafting a rookie to replace JB makes no sense.    You can't espect a rookie to step in and win in the NFL.

 

So, if we trade JB in the next two weeks, as I hope we can,  then I'd think we want a proven veteran back-up like we had with Hasselback.    And the FA veterans who fit that description are Josh McNoun,  Ryan Fitzpatrick and Mike Glennon.    I'd be happy with any of those three to replace JB if we eventually trade him.

 

Makes perfect sense. Can't just keep rotating out vets. Develop a legit backup for Luck who can be in the system for a few years. NE did this with Jimmy G. And also drafted Brissett when they thought they knew they would be getting rid of one of Brady or Jimmy G. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Makes perfect sense. Can't just keep rotating out vets. Develop a legit backup for Luck who can be in the system for a few years. NE did this with Jimmy G. And also drafted Brissett when they thought they knew they would be getting rid of one of Brady or Jimmy G. 

I can see the thinking on drafting a young QB.  They wouldn't have to pay a big contract for a Vet.  It would be a gamble that Bellicheck wasn't afraid to take the risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, shastamasta said:

 

Makes perfect sense. Can't just keep rotating out vets. Develop a legit backup for Luck who can be in the system for a few years. NE did this with Jimmy G. And also drafted Brissett when they thought they knew they would be getting rid of one of Brady or Jimmy G. 

 

Sorry.   But no.  

 

NE didn't try to develop Jimmy G as a back-up.     He was supposed to eventually replace Brady.   He was drafted in the 2nd round to be the future starter, not a back-up.

 

And while we're developing this late round draft pick as a rookie,  he's not the back-up on the 53.   He likely would be on the PS.    He can't be the back-up in 19,  he'll be too busy learning where the cafeteria and bathrooms are. 

 

As for "can't keep rotating out vets"....   since when?    Where is that written?    Whose law or rule is that?     Are you going to try and argue the Hasselbeck years were not well spent?    Come on now.   You could rotoate in a new veteran back-up every two years for as long as you wanted.   That's the beauty of a veteran back-up.   They can figure things out pretty quickly,  where a rookie,  typically can't.

 

Your attempts to make a JB deal for a Day 2 pick are getting carried away here....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:


Yeah we'd definitely need a backup, or at least IMO. 

I just wouldn't be surprised if Ballard wanted to develop a young QB(s). He seems very cautious like that, plus we have Reich to help in that development. I could see us spending a 6th, or even a 5th if we potentially pick up another pick in the draft, on a QB he might really like.

 

Although a 5th may be pushing it. Not to mention we wouldn't keep 3 QB's o a roster and it'd be risky to keep a draft pick on the P.S...Yeah, I dunno, I'm shooting holes in my own logic.

 

If they get back a legit pick for Brissett...I don't think they would have any issue using even an early Day 3 pick if they really liked someone.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

It's happening. This will be fun to watch. Been a while since the Colts traded a player.

 

 

Tell me....    did Richard Pallo hack your account?

 

It's hard to tell the difference between you two here....

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Boiler_Colt said:

If I'm reading correctly, that article is from a month ago and all based off a speculative Chad Forbes tweet.

I mainly posted it because someone asked about the ties Brissett had with Miami.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Virtuoso80 said:

Wasnt there some connection between Brissett and the Coach in Miami?

 

Both Miami's HC and GM came from New England where Brissett started his NFL career.

 

Also,  and perhaps importantly,  JB comes with a very big endorsement from Bill Parcels,  who was coached both NE and Miami in his career and is a big fan of JB.    All those are the connections you're talking about.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, shastamasta said:

 

It's happening. This will be fun to watch. Been a while since the Colts traded a player.

 Did you see his recommended trade with the Colts? The 13th to the Colts for 26, Brissett and a 2nd. rounder.   Interesting. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Heard Mike Mayock on NFL Radio this morning.

 

Said (smartly) that they view pick 35 as another 1st round pick.    Just as I'm sure we view pick 34 as another 1st round pick.    Both teams will be drafting a player from the top-32 on their board.

 

I've been thinking... the biggest appeal of late first vs early second pick is the extra year you get from the 1st rounder. If a player like Jeffery Simmons starts dropping, I wonder if trading a 4th round pick along with #36 to move at the back of the 1st is worth it? Simmons is very likely a redshirt rookie, so the extra year will be welcome. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Boiler_Colt said:

If I'm reading correctly, that article is from a month ago and all based off a speculative Chad Forbes tweet.

 

Yup.....   and an article that says....    and I'm cutting and pasting here....   "Brissett could probably be Miami's newest quarterback for a mid-to-late round draft pick, considering that former Super Bowl Champion Joe Flacco was dealt for a fourth-rounder."

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

 Did you see his recommended trade with the Colts? The 13th to the Colts for 26, Brissett and a 2nd. rounder.   Interesting. 

A 13th would get us the guy we need. Wouldn’t be a bad trade of picks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Sorry.   But no.  

 

NE didn't try to develop Jimmy G as a back-up.     He was supposed to eventually replace Brady.   He was drafted in the 2nd round to be the future starter, not a back-up.

 

And while we're developing this late round draft pick as a rookie,  he's not the back-up on the 53.   He likely would be on the PS.    He can't be the back-up in 19,  he'll be too busy learning where the cafeteria and bathrooms are. 

 

As for "can't keep rotating out vets"....   since when?    Where is that written?    Whose law or rule is that?     Are you going to try and argue the Hasselbeck years were not well spent?    Come on now.   You could rotoate in a new veteran back-up every two years for as long as you wanted.   That's the beauty of a veteran back-up.   They can figure things out pretty quickly,  where a rookie,  typically can't.

 

Your attempts to make a JB deal for a Day 2 pick are getting carried away here....

 

 

Jimmy G was still a rookie when he was the backup in NE..on a Super Bowl team no less. So they must have expected him to be able to step in and win if necessary.  

 

All I am saying is there is no right or wrong way...and it doesn't have to be a vet QB. It makes perfect sense to get some continuity at the backup QB position.

 

And it would seem like the Colts could be entertaining that idea as we speak. I didn't say anything about a Day Two pick for JB...but it is very likely they are shopping him.

 

Let's not forget that Ballard would have entered the 2017 season with Scott Tolzien and one of Stephen Morris/Phillip Walker...neither of which had played a snap in the NFL...if not for the Brissett trade falling in his lap. I wouldn't put it past him to have a rookie backup QB next year...especially with Luck 100% healthy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, stitches said:

I've been thinking... the biggest appeal of late first vs early second pick is the extra year you get from the 1st rounder. If a player like Jeffery Simmons starts dropping, I wonder if trading a 4th round pick along with #36 to move at the back of the 1st is worth it? Simmons is very likely a redshirt rookie, so the extra year will be welcome. 

 

Works for me!

 

To get a top 10-15 player that late in the 1st round,  or the top of the 2nd?

 

I'd be as happy as can be.    

 

#2019ManCrush!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

 Did you see his recommended trade with the Colts? The 13th to the Colts for 26, Brissett and a 2nd. rounder.   Interesting. 

 

No...but I don't think I really like that deal. Even if it's the late 2nd round pick. Like Ballard, "I like them 2nd round picks." And unless I am getting back a legit player...I don't really want to trade one.

 

I would rather target a player with Brissett and a pick...than swap spots. But not sure who that player would be.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

 Did you see his recommended trade with the Colts? The 13th to the Colts for 26, Brissett and a 2nd. rounder.   Interesting. 

 

Add Minkah Fitzpatrick and i'll do it. moving up 13 spots isnt worth two picks and a player

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Jimmy G was still a rookie when he was the backup in NE..on a Super Bowl team no less. So they must have expected him to be able to step in and win if necessary.  

 

All I am saying is there is no right or wrong way...and it doesn't have to be a vet QB. It makes perfect sense to get some continuity at the backup QB position.

 

And it would seem like the Colts could be entertaining that idea as we speak. I didn't say anything about a Day Two pick for JB...but it is very likely they are shopping him.

 

Let's not forget that Ballard would have entered the 2017 season with Scott Tolzien and one of Stephen Morris/Phillip Walker...neither of which had played a snap in the NFL...if not for the Brissett trade falling in his lap. I wouldn't put it past him to have a rookie backup QB next year...especially with Luck 100% healthy. 

 

Come on now!

 

Youre comparing Jimmy G,  drafted in the 2nd round with some rookie we'd take in R's 6 or 7 and think that's the same caliber of QB?     You know that's not the case.    And remember,  this is not a great class of QB's, so a guy taken that late in the draft is not going to be helpful this year, odds are.

 

I just don't see the objection to a veteran.   Why are some many giddy with the idea of drafting a QB this year?    We need to draft a WR, an OL, perhaps a TE,  perhaps a RB.    And now, a QB?   On the offensive side priority list,  it's hard to see a QB being very high.    And we haven't even started talking about drafting defensive players yet,  which we need,  and which this is a great draft for defense.     We only have so many darts to throw in the draft.    Why spend one in the draft when we can fill the need with a quality veteran FA.    Don't you want a veteran at the most important offensive position?     If Luck goes down for 2-4 weeks,  don't you want some veteran and not an untested rookie to fill that spot?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

 

Tell me....    did Richard Pallo hack your account?

 

It's hard to tell the difference between you two here....

 

 

 

Are you saying we both have the same opinion on wanting to trade Brissett? Is it that weird that two people have a similar opinion on something? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Are you saying we both have the same opinion on wanting to trade Brissett? Is it that weird that two people have a similar opinion on something? 

 

No,  I'm not.    I never, ever mind that another poster has a different opinion than I do.   

 

I only mind when they can't present a rationale explanation for what they want to do.    And that's never been a problem for you in all the years I've been here.    You're a long time favorite of mine.  One of the top posters here.    You make great arguments on all sorts of issues and threads and posts.    I love talking football with you in all circumstances.

 

But in this thread,  I barely recognize you.   The arguments are not typical of you, IMO.   And that's meant actually as a compliment.     You're super smart,  but I don't see a smart argument from you in this thread.

 

P.S. -- by the way,  for the record,  I would LOVE to trade JB.   But only in a deal that makes sense for us,  and with a good plan for the next back-up,  which for me,  is obviously a veteran,  and not a rookie.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also have been very high on Darrisaw as well and would love to see the Colts draft him.  Said it before and with Sewell taking the year off was hoping to see the two of them compete at the combine, I really wouldn't been shocked to see Darrisaw get taken before Sewell.  Also have similar gut feelings about where the Colts are drafting and a good Day 1 starting LT being available for the Colts later in Round 1 am just not buying it.   With Williams guess its just a difference in opinion and will respect yours but Williams to me is the best available LT in FA.  We have the cap space to sign Williams that was never an argument.   Like I mentioned in original thread that Kelly is probably only going to be here another 2-3 years.  If Kelly remains healthy possibly longer but with his contract structured the way it is the Colts could cut Kelly and save over $10 million in 2023 and if remember correct $12 million in 2024.  The biggest concern we have seen in the past is not having a quality backup at center and McCollum is an intriguing prospect I think the Colts might be interested in.  Pinter probably could play center and manage.  If Glowinski was out for a long timer could see Smith move back over and Pinter at RT.  Lack of depth at LG for Nelson might still be questionable but at least with the suggested model  above the Colts replenish lost players on the OL and add players would should be able to take over when required.   Luckily in 2022 the only big players the Colts will have to really focus on resigning are Hines, Nelson, Leonard, and Smith and we have plenty of capital to resign each of them next year.  Glowinski to me is the wild card of the group.  By 2023 currently have only 9 players to resign of which Willis, Okereke, Rock, and Campbell will cost us but still at this point none will break the bank.  In 2024 that will be more costly but still the Colts are in great shape financially.   Besides look at the Saints, Rams, and TB Bucs as great examples of teams betting the farm on win now attitudes.  To be really honest am tempering my expectations of Wentz given his history going from starter to bench/injury back to starter back to bench.  Luckily the Colts can cut bait on Wentz anytime in 2022 - 2024 recover $22-26 million in cap space and use that on a QB upgrade if things go south.   Biggest thing was trying to accomplish was secure major area of need both in the off-season and in the draft with these assumptions.  May not have the exact person identified but the positions of importance was more of a key factor.  Next year TE, WR, MLB/SLB, DE, DBs would be areas of need.
    • I know. Theres more there than you think.  In past series (other teams) I’ve seen some very clear signs of player personalities and social dynamics as well as team culture, leaders, “problem children”, etc.  I think they do a great job getting you on the “inside.”   In fact, to the degree that i dont want Colts doing it so we dont show our “special sauce” so to speak.  The top scouting guys we have, our “mantra”.  I love those Colts-made things every year.   LOVE them. But our staff looks Sooooo good in them i always get nervous.  Ha.
    • You know this really isn’t that hard to make a reasonable educated guess at.    Carson has a new team and he is reinventing himself. He grew up a Brett Favre fan.    I’d bet he wears #4 for the Colts. 
    • Defjamz....   I tried to send you a message, but your mail box is closed to me.    Do you happen to remember the thread I think you started a few weeks back that had a link to a story from I think Stampede Blue? They had a story about low level, under the radar,  offensive tackles that no one knows about.    I can’t find it on the SB website, or here.   Can you help?   It was a good story....    Thanks...    
    • I’m not telling you not to enjoy it.  I’m only saying it’s deliberate positive spin designed to get the fan base excited enough to buy tickets and jerseys.    But these are NOT documentaries.  NFL Films does this for all 32 teams. 
  • Members

    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 365

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RNGDShobby

      RNGDShobby 179

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Roosarioo

      Roosarioo 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...