Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

bravo4460

Free Agent Visits

Recommended Posts

I figured I would start A thread on these since free agent visits will start rolling in numbers within the coming days.

 

The first one:

 

RB Jay Ajayi

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A positive thread, I like it!

 

Ajaya.....a true power back, which would be a true 1-2 with Mack with Wilkins as the backup and Hines playing more slot receiver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IF he can pass a physical and stay healthy I would love to have Ajayi. However, that is a big IF. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I'd really like to see him be a Colt.

 

Guess Ballard does have some interest in a RB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sure he was also playing with a back fracture last year too. Tough guy and talented back, just wouldn't count on him to stay healthy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ajayi is good as depth I guess. But coming off an ACL injury and having had other injury issues...not sure how reliable he will. Plus he doesn't catch passes.  

 

Really wanted Coleman. Would be disappointed pretty disappointed if Ajayi gets similar money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe Mack is clearly the number 1. However if Ajayi came in and was healthy he would be a great #2 paired with Hines/Wilkins as #3. As stated before Hines obviously having more of a roll in the passing game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why we need him.  Seems to be filling space just because.

 

If we weren't going to get Bell, I was fine with Mack, Wilkins, and Hines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are injury concerns for sure.  The physical will be important.    I trust Ballard to properly evaluate.  If he signs Ajayi then he feels good enough about the knee and back to take the risk.  I’m sure he will mitigate against the risk some in terms of contract years and dollars.  Should be a pretty cheap low year sign.  If the physical is not encouraging then he won’t be a Colt.  Simple as that. Doesn’t hurt anything to kick the tires on him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

QB and our kickers are the only position groups that couldn’t be upgraded. We should welcome all potential value free agents that fit what we are doing and take BPA in the draft. Competition should always be priority.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, threeflight said:

Not sure why we need him.  Seems to be filling space just because.

 

If we weren't going to get Bell, I was fine with Mack, Wilkins, and Hines.

You seem like an individual who could win the $20 million lottery but then complain that there were 2 winners and you only received $10 million each.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, threeflight said:

Not sure why we need him.  Seems to be filling space just because.

 

If we weren't going to get Bell, I was fine with Mack, Wilkins, and Hines.

Give the Bell crap a break.  He was never in Ballard's sites, and for good reason.  He is a diva and a me guy, not a team guy and not a Colt thank God!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Valpo2004 said:

Oh I'd really like to see him be a Colt.

 

Guess Ballard does have some interest in a RB.

I have never been a fan of Mack as the #1 back.   I have said multiple times that we could and should upgrade the position,    I posted in another thread that I did not think Ballard would upgrade the RB position because Mack did gain a lot of yards at the end of the season. BUt he missed games.  And someone responded that is why we need to upgrade.  Whoever you are you seem to be onto something.

 

And I couldn't be happier.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, DerekDiggler said:

I have never been a fan of Mack as the #1 back.   I have said multiple times that we could and should upgrade the position,    I posted in another thread that I did not think Ballard would upgrade the RB position because Mack did gain a lot of yards at the end of the season. BUt he missed games.  And someone responded that is why we need to upgrade.  Whoever you are you seem to be onto something.

 

And I couldn't be happier.  

 

 He wouldn't be a Upgrade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 He wouldn't be a Upgrade.

Agreed, but he does bring a different dimension to the run game. Reich likes to rotate players anyway, so they will just be used differently. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 He wouldn't be a Upgrade.

 

I don’t think Ballard is looking to get an upgrade, no matter who he signs at RB.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 He wouldn't be a Upgrade.

He's not the power back people think he is.  He actually runs a lot like Mack, but dances and bounces even more.  Gase shipped him out because he wouldn't take a 5 yard gain and was always trying to hit the home run.  Just reading his scouting report.  He's a former soccer player.  That's where a lot of the excessive dancing/footwork apparently comes from.  

 

If you want a decisive runner who gets north and south, Wilkins is the better option, honestly.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, ColtJ82 said:

Agreed, but he does bring a different dimension to the run game. Reich likes to rotate players anyway, so they will just be used differently. 

 

 Philly got a lot out of Ajay in their SB run most should remember.
 Frank likes something about him, no matter what Gase or his soccer coaches thought.  Can't see us signing him for much at this time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Freenyfan102 said:

why four RB

The team has 4 now.... and just bringing a guy in doesnt mean signing him..... also, why not?  there's no 53 man limit for a long time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Freenyfan102 said:

why four RB

Patriots have like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Patriots have like 4

 

One for each down. BB is always thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

I wouldn’t consider NH a RB

 

I don't know why you'd think that?     The Colts think of him as a RB.    Isn't that good enough?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I don't know why you'd think that?     The Colts think of him as a RB.    Isn't that good enough?

 

He is often used in the hybrid RB/WR role(Darren Sproles) and therefore in my book is not a true RB DC like Mack and Wilkins

   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are still a lot of good options out there. CJ Anderson who is a bruiser at RB, Tate at WR, Suh, Houston, and who knows we could still even trade for Frank Clark? Let me say this, we may not pursue any of these guys but it is still early in Free Agency. Suh on a 1 yr deal I would definitely do if the opp is there, he is older but for 1 yr hell yes. Everyone in here wants a power back, why not Anderson to pair with Mack. Anderson was good last year and he's healthy. He averaged 6 yards a carry this past season. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

I wouldn’t consider NH a RB

 

 I hope his carries are very limited going forward. Last on the list.
 He is a gadget guy to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This doesn't really move the needle for me. Seems like a guy who would start the season on PUP and then maybe add something to the rotation later in the year when the other backs are maybe nicked up. I'm not against it, but if we sign him it would be for depth more than anything. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Superman said:

This doesn't really move the needle for me. Seems like a guy who would start the season on PUP and then maybe add something to the rotation later in the year when the other backs are maybe nicked up. I'm not against it, but if we sign him it would be for depth more than anything. 

I agree but the Unavailability for TC and start of the season(PUP) depends on his rehab

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

There are still a lot of good options out there. CJ Anderson who is a bruiser at RB, Tate at WR, Suh, Houston, and who knows we could still even trade for Frank Clark? Let me say this, we may not pursue any of these guys but it is still early in Free Agency. Suh on a 1 yr deal I would definitely do if the opp is there, he is older but for 1 yr hell yes. Everyone in here wants a power back, why not Anderson to pair with Mack. Anderson was good last year and he's healthy. He averaged 6 yards a carry this past season. 

 

 I expect a low priced vet S pre-draft. Probably a DT without any guarantees.
 That is about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Superman said:

This doesn't really move the needle for me. Seems like a guy who would start the season on PUP and then maybe add something to the rotation later in the year when the other backs are maybe nicked up. I'm not against it, but if we sign him it would be for depth more than anything. 

 

 More like a meet and greet to let him know we are interested once he is ready to go. Yes that could be like the Inman signing, into the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 I hope his carries are very limited going forward. Last on the list.
 He is a gadget guy to me.

hybrid guys are great if used properly. Guys like McCaf (Car), White (NE), Kamara (NO), Cohen (CHI), Barkley (NYG) are all highly productive in the passing game. 

 

Hines was our 4th leading receiver last year behind Hilton, Ebron, and Rogers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

He is often used in the hybrid RB/WR role(Darren Sproles) and therefore in my book is not a true RB DC like Mack and Wilkins

   

Curious.....

 

Darren Spoles is a running back and people in football thinks of him as a RB.   And the Colts think of Hines as a RB. 

 

Ok....   whatever....

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Curious.....

 

Darren Spoles is a running back and people in football thinks of him as a RB.   And the Colts think of Hines as a RB. 

 

Ok....   whatever....

 

Just like there are different types of WRs, there are different types of RBs. You have every down backs, short yardage backs, hybrid or all purpose backs. Sproles was absolutely a hybrid/APB. He had a lot more yards catching the ball than he did rushing. ~4800 receiving vs 3400ish running. So should we think of him more as a WR than a RB? 

 

Hines had 80ish rushing attempts and 80ish WR targets. He had more yards catching than rushing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Curious.....

 

Darren Spoles is a running back and people in football thinks of him as a RB.   And the Colts think of Hines as a RB. 

 

Ok....   whatever....

 

Did I ever say he wasn’t a RB but a player doesn’t have to play the position that they are listed at

   The NFL # rules play a big role

 

     Here is an example from my career

         I was listed as a OL/DL in every program but didn’t play a significant D snap as a Jr. and was not even on the Depth Chart as a Senior

 

     Back to Hines 

       I see him as a hybrid and not a featured back and therefore not truly in the RB depth chart without an asterisk 

 

    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

There are still a lot of good options out there. CJ Anderson who is a bruiser at RB, Tate at WR, Suh, Houston, and who knows we could still even trade for Frank Clark? Let me say this, we may not pursue any of these guys but it is still early in Free Agency. Suh on a 1 yr deal I would definitely do if the opp is there, he is older but for 1 yr hell yes. Everyone in here wants a power back, why not Anderson to pair with Mack. Anderson was good last year and he's healthy. He averaged 6 yards a carry this past season. 

I'd be thrilled with CJ Anderson.    I wanted the Colts to sign him last year.   He's a good RB and can block well.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Myles said:

I'd be thrilled with CJ Anderson.    I wanted the Colts to sign him last year.   He's a good RB and can block well.   

I agree, I would love to have him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Supe it's not an angle whatsoever, it's purely the truth.   I am, of course not talking about you, or what you do on this board in terms of evaluating players. I always enjoy hearing your take on players.   I am obviously talking about the people spewing bile on here after the loss to the Raiders, and every other loss for that matter. And a lot of that includes tripe about Jacoby Brissett that just goes way over the top.   We can disagree on Brissett, it's not really a big deal. And I apologize for quoting you in the other thread and giving you the impression I am including you in this. I'm really not. I quoted you because I would rather debate the topic with someone like yourself than get sucked into a flame war with some troll, which has happened to me a time or two. That's all. Me and you can have a somewhat interesting discussion. I always enjoy it.     
    • Nice thread...    There have been some arguments for a while now about the relative value of pass-coverage vs pass-rush. Teams offensively are turning to faster and faster game plans and this affects the pass-rush a ton. You can practically scheme the pass-rush away if you have good enough QB and receivers that get open quickly. The latest advanced analytics seem to favor positions like CB and WR value-wise over long-held champions like EDGE rushers or OTs. I will also take into account your characterization of the rest of the roster(average players as opposed to straight up trash). At some positions the improvement between pro-bowler and average/JAG is higher than at other positions. Those are just part of the considerations that will inform my choise here:   Offense:   1. QB: not controversial take here - most important position of all... he handles the ball and makes a decision that might affect the game pretty much 100% of the snaps. I want the best passer and decisionmaker to run my offense.    2. WR: yep, give me a beast of an X-receiver. Pass-catchers are incredibly important.   3. LT: Yeah, I know, this goes against some of the things I said above, but time and time again we see what a great LT does to an offensive line. Leremy Tunsil is not even that great and he almost single-handedly turned around the HOU OLine. Same with AC last year - we missed him mightily when he was injured to start the year and then turned the line into a great unit. And again - he's not even at the level we are talking here. He still has not had a pro-bowl or all-pro recognition(maybe he gets one this year, he deserves it). But yeah... give me Bakhtiari, give me Armstead, give me Tyron Smith level player... I think this raises the level of the whole O-Line, especially if it's filled with average players at the other positions(rather than horrible ones)   ------------------------------------ Those will be my selections offensively. I think a QB masks a lot of deficiencies and I think he elevates average players and squeezes everything out of most of them. Just look at what Luck used to do with players like Jack Doyle, Donte Moncrief, Eric Ebron, Inman, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen...    Defense:   4. CB: yep, I want a shut down corner. Like I said earlier, newest research shows pass-coverage and especially on the boundary is paramount. and it affects pass-rush more than pass-rush affects CB play.    5. CB: yep, give me one more... I'm shutting down both sides of the field and hoping this gives additional time to my pass-rush to get there. They will play on island and I will scheme out everything else(i.e. slot receivers and TEs)... if I have to I will double away from them.    6. WILL: I want a sideline to sideline monster to clean up the run game and take on crossing routes in the short-intermediate middle in coverage.     7. EDGE: I still want a player capable of beating his man one-on-one on the line and creating pressure/affecting the pass when my pro-bowl CBs lock down their match ups.    So what do you think? Does it make sense?     
    • 23: R1P23 DL JAVON KINLAW SOUTH CAROLINA   35: R2P3 QB JORDAN LOVE UTAH STATE   55: R2P23 OT CALVIN THROCKMORTON OREGON   87: R3P23 LB TROY DYE OREGON   129: R4P23 S J.R. REED GEORGIA   166: R5P22 G NICK HARRIS WASHINGTON   201: R6P23 CB ESSANG BASSEY WAKE FOREST   203: R6P25 WR MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. USC   236: R7P23 CB KINDLE VILDOR GEORGIA SOUTHERN
    • DE NT DT DE   LB   CB CB   Nobody is scoring on me. 
    • Don't be ridiculous   Darius Leonard was an All-Pro his rookie year. Okereke will have a hard time matching that.
  • Members

    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 1,398

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoatBeard

      GoatBeard 604

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colt18

      colt18 275

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Four2itus

      Four2itus 2,641

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 2,552

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Luck 4 president

      Luck 4 president 1,037

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dodsworth

      dodsworth 1,034

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chrisfarley

      chrisfarley 1,059

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...