Jump to content
Click here to get your free tickets for Colts Training Camp today!
Southside Hoosier Fan

Basically we could have had Tevin Coleman

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

 

 He probably just saved $5M.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

All that matters is that Ballard knows what he's doing.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

You do realize Atlanta rode Coleman and Freeman to a Superbowl right?

 

 

They also couldn’t close the game out after having a 28-3 lead. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Coleman, but I would rather the colts sign a bigger, more bruising back. Currently there isn't a rb like that on the roster.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

 

Just spitballing here

 

1) he did not like Coleman as much as you

 

2) he did not want to pay one guy more than the 3 backs he already Has

 

3) he likes those 3 other back (4) if you count Williams. 

 

Not it too hard to figure really

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if he really is after anyone cause in 72 hours all he has to show for 100 million in cap space is Funchess.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far Ballard reminds me of the guy in an auction fantasy football league with $250 to spend. Who lets everyone else bid on the star players and then buys everyone late and ends the draft with $125 left.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We were best in the league on third downs. Mack ran out the clock in the Texas game. We are just fine. Hines had s big year and even Wilkins had a good year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

So far Ballard reminds me of the guy in an auction fantasy football league with $250 to spend. Who lets everyone else bid on the star players and then buys everyone late and ends the draft with $125 left.

 

Yes, but he's still has $125 left.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

So far Ballard reminds me of the guy in an auction fantasy football league with $250 to spend. Who lets everyone else bid on the star players and then buys everyone late and ends the draft with $125 left.

 

Lel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

So far Ballard reminds me of the guy in an auction fantasy football league with $250 to spend. Who lets everyone else bid on the star players and then buys everyone late and ends the draft with $125 left.

And still wins because the sum of his parts versus one or two stars....

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but the Colts aren't going to go FA for a running back. I DO expect them to pick one up late in the draft. A short yardage, good blocking, good hands type of RB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't Mack and Coleman pretty much the same kind of back? redundancy seems less important than versatility in a RB group.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

Don’t worry about it.    You have made it clear for over a year that you’ve NEVER understood what Ballard is doing.   So this isn’t new.

 

Ballard has said several times that he believes Mack is a three down back and he likely believes in Wilkins as the backup..   he has said he likes the 4 backs we have... Mack, Hines, Wilkins and Williams, a late free agent pick up.

 

Ballard doesn’t think we need a timeshare.  

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

Hines and Wilkins together don't even come close to Coleman. We have so much money its disturbing and aren't even trying to get anyone.

You have no idea — none — who we are trying to get.   No idea at all.

 

Honestly, all of us have no idea...  but some of us know how to deal with that..   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Don’t worry about it.    You have made it clear for over a year that you’ve NEVER understood what Ballard is doing.   So this isn’t new.

 

Ballard has said several times that he believes Mack is a three down back and he likely believes in Wilkins as the backup..   he has said he likes the 4 backs we have... Mack, Hines, Wilkins and Williams, a late free agent pick up.

 

Ballard doesn’t think we need a timeshare.  

Wrong. I am a huge supporter of Chris Ballard. I just would like to know what he is doing Right now. Most money in FA and have 3 signings. Funchess, who I like, desir, who I like, and Milton, who can't cover anyone but is a special teams player. Still have what 80+ million left....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

We have a thread for complaining, please post comments like this over here https://forums.colts.com/topic/61637-official-complaints-about-free-agency-thread-merge/

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could have also bought a brand new car because I have the money to, but that doesn’t mean I needed to. 

 

Relax. The only RB we would have ever pursued was Bell, and that was a minimal chance at best. 

 

Today is the first official day of FA, and guys will be picked up that can contribute. You’re just upset we aren’t going balls to the wall on spending when we don’t need to. 

 

Ballard won executive of the year without spending money on a ton of FA last year for a reason. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coleman= not very good

 

would rather give the youngster’s more opportunity 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

Wrong. I am a huge supporter of Chris Ballard. I just would like to know what he is doing Right now. Most money in FA and have 3 signings. Funchess, who I like, desir, who I like, and Milton, who can't cover anyone but is a special teams player. Still have what 80+ million left....

Come on!   You’re a supporter of Ballard’s because the Cokts went 10-6 and won 9 of their last 10 games.

 

But you complained a year ago about YHUS SAME free agent approach when we also had a lot of money and then you screamed bloody murder during the three days of the draft!   Now you’re back a year later with the same routine.    Who are you kidding?

 

What he’s doing right now is what he said he’d do since he became our GM about 26 months ago.   You either haven’t paid attention or your ignoring it. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coleman was a change of pace back and when Freeman was hurt, didn't have the production that screamed he was a true starter. I'm glad we didn't get him, also we don't need another RB because we have a starter and a change of pace 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, BOTT said:

I like Coleman, but I would rather the colts sign a bigger, more bruising back. Currently there isn't a rb like that on the roster.

 

Agreed. And I bet this is exactly why we are bringing in Jay Ajayi for a visit next week to check up on him. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

Hines and Wilkins together don't even come close to Coleman. We have so much money its disturbing and aren't even trying to get anyone.

 

Please tell us more about how you know what's going on behind the scenes. We'd love to hear it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coleman got his chance to be RB1 last year when Freeman went down and he struggled. He was even benched down the stretch last year for something called an Ito Smith. He's essentially a lesser version of Mack. If you're going to add a RB it should be one that adds something different.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And now we are going to bring in Jay Ajayi...Off a torn ACL. To those saying we dont need a RB what do you make of that news? Coleman is way better than Ajayi. Lets roll him out 10 million per year.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

Wrong. I am a huge supporter of Chris Ballard. I just would like to know what he is doing Right now. Most money in FA and have 3 signings. Funchess, who I like, desir, who I like, and Milton, who can't cover anyone but is a special teams player. Still have what 80+ million left....

Not knowing is hard, but kinda exciting too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

And now we are going to bring in Jay Ajayi...Off a torn ACL. To those saying we dont need a RB what do you make of that news? Coleman is way better than Ajayi. Lets roll him out 10 million per year.

Ajayi is who I wanted. He tore his ACL, but was playing late in the year, so he should be good to go for next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ColtsAC said:

Aren't Mack and Coleman pretty much the same kind of back? redundancy seems less important than versatility in a RB group.

 

No they aren't. Mack runs between the tackles better...and is probably the twice the player Mack is in the passing game.

 

I actually they think complemented each other incredibly well.

 

SF actually has a nice crop of RBs (Breida and Wilson)...probably better than the Colts. I don't think you can have too many RBs...as long as they aren't expensive. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

And now we are going to bring in Jay Ajayi...Off a torn ACL. To those saying we dont need a RB what do you make of that news? Coleman is way better than Ajayi. Lets roll him out 10 million per year.

 

Still complaining!

 

Im not one who thinks we don’t need a back...  but what I’d say is that Coleman’s 2/10 is more than Ballard wants to pay for the back he brings in.

 

He wants something more modest.

 

Because the more he pays Coleman the more leverage it gives Mack on a few years.

 

Face it...   you don’t see things as Ballard does.   That’s fine.   But all these meltdowns you’re having says you trust your views more than Ballard.  No matter how much you claim you like him.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • qbs and rbs have tangible abilities yu can see throughout a game (speed, throw power, accuracy, elusiveness)   Mahomes had one of the best seasons All Time and Barkely literally does everything yu can do as a rb as good or better than his piers. yu can see it, it flashes    Nelson is a guard, madden is skill position driven. it’s common sense. ppl don’t look en the trenches and say this lineman’s technique is AMAZING. yu want him rated highly bc he is a colt and yu want what yu see reflected i get it.    As a guard he has to consistently show he is improving and maintain his elite level. everything isn’t created equal why yu can’t grasp this fact idk
    • because there's a forum dedicated to gaming topics
    • It's not just about sacks, but hits, pressures, etc.. And these stats should be viewed by pass rush snaps to get a comparable pressures/snap value. So I trust my eyes, Clowney is ultra talented, but I have multiple "issues" with him. Compared to the others mentioned (tends to disappear for periods, even games, I'm not a big fan of his motor, his pass rush arsenal, etc. Again, I'm comparing him to the bests. Watch him - him exclusively, and all of his snaps - in a game, and watch Flowers. Or Clark. Imo you will see what I mean.)   We will see how the league values him, 'cause I think O'Brien does not want to keep him. So he'll be available, probably sooner than later.   My bet: no one will give a 1st + 2nd for Clowney, and he won't get the deal Clark (or Flowers) got in Kansas City (assuming he gets traded and extended this season, 'cause next year's market may skyrocket again, that's unpredictable).
    • No they didn't. The roots were indeed the Steel Curtain, but there's nothing in football withouts roots. The tampa2, as the middle lb dropping deep when he reads a pass play was Dungy's and Monte Kiffin-s invention/addition.
    • Mahomes has only played one season, yet he's already the best QB in the game with a 97 rating.  Barkley was also a rookie, yet he's the #5 RB with a rating of 91.   While Nelson was voted to the Pro Bowl and All-Pro, but is like G #8 with a rating of 87, behind guys like Ali Marpet and Kevin Zeitler...   How is that consistent?  Again, it's all subjective according to EA game developers.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...