Jump to content
Click here to get your free tickets for Colts Training Camp today!
Southside Hoosier Fan

Basically we could have had Tevin Coleman

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

 

 He probably just saved $5M.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

All that matters is that Ballard knows what he's doing.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

You do realize Atlanta rode Coleman and Freeman to a Superbowl right?

 

 

They also couldn’t close the game out after having a 28-3 lead. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Coleman, but I would rather the colts sign a bigger, more bruising back. Currently there isn't a rb like that on the roster.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

 

Just spitballing here

 

1) he did not like Coleman as much as you

 

2) he did not want to pay one guy more than the 3 backs he already Has

 

3) he likes those 3 other back (4) if you count Williams. 

 

Not it too hard to figure really

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if he really is after anyone cause in 72 hours all he has to show for 100 million in cap space is Funchess.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far Ballard reminds me of the guy in an auction fantasy football league with $250 to spend. Who lets everyone else bid on the star players and then buys everyone late and ends the draft with $125 left.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We were best in the league on third downs. Mack ran out the clock in the Texas game. We are just fine. Hines had s big year and even Wilkins had a good year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

So far Ballard reminds me of the guy in an auction fantasy football league with $250 to spend. Who lets everyone else bid on the star players and then buys everyone late and ends the draft with $125 left.

 

Yes, but he's still has $125 left.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

So far Ballard reminds me of the guy in an auction fantasy football league with $250 to spend. Who lets everyone else bid on the star players and then buys everyone late and ends the draft with $125 left.

 

Lel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

So far Ballard reminds me of the guy in an auction fantasy football league with $250 to spend. Who lets everyone else bid on the star players and then buys everyone late and ends the draft with $125 left.

And still wins because the sum of his parts versus one or two stars....

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but the Colts aren't going to go FA for a running back. I DO expect them to pick one up late in the draft. A short yardage, good blocking, good hands type of RB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't Mack and Coleman pretty much the same kind of back? redundancy seems less important than versatility in a RB group.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

Don’t worry about it.    You have made it clear for over a year that you’ve NEVER understood what Ballard is doing.   So this isn’t new.

 

Ballard has said several times that he believes Mack is a three down back and he likely believes in Wilkins as the backup..   he has said he likes the 4 backs we have... Mack, Hines, Wilkins and Williams, a late free agent pick up.

 

Ballard doesn’t think we need a timeshare.  

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

Hines and Wilkins together don't even come close to Coleman. We have so much money its disturbing and aren't even trying to get anyone.

You have no idea — none — who we are trying to get.   No idea at all.

 

Honestly, all of us have no idea...  but some of us know how to deal with that..   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Don’t worry about it.    You have made it clear for over a year that you’ve NEVER understood what Ballard is doing.   So this isn’t new.

 

Ballard has said several times that he believes Mack is a three down back and he likely believes in Wilkins as the backup..   he has said he likes the 4 backs we have... Mack, Hines, Wilkins and Williams, a late free agent pick up.

 

Ballard doesn’t think we need a timeshare.  

Wrong. I am a huge supporter of Chris Ballard. I just would like to know what he is doing Right now. Most money in FA and have 3 signings. Funchess, who I like, desir, who I like, and Milton, who can't cover anyone but is a special teams player. Still have what 80+ million left....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

for $5.5 Mill. That also would have given the Colts a 1-2 punch at RB 2nd to none. I am sorry but I don't understand what Ballard is doing.

We have a thread for complaining, please post comments like this over here https://forums.colts.com/topic/61637-official-complaints-about-free-agency-thread-merge/

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could have also bought a brand new car because I have the money to, but that doesn’t mean I needed to. 

 

Relax. The only RB we would have ever pursued was Bell, and that was a minimal chance at best. 

 

Today is the first official day of FA, and guys will be picked up that can contribute. You’re just upset we aren’t going balls to the wall on spending when we don’t need to. 

 

Ballard won executive of the year without spending money on a ton of FA last year for a reason. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coleman= not very good

 

would rather give the youngster’s more opportunity 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

Wrong. I am a huge supporter of Chris Ballard. I just would like to know what he is doing Right now. Most money in FA and have 3 signings. Funchess, who I like, desir, who I like, and Milton, who can't cover anyone but is a special teams player. Still have what 80+ million left....

Come on!   You’re a supporter of Ballard’s because the Cokts went 10-6 and won 9 of their last 10 games.

 

But you complained a year ago about YHUS SAME free agent approach when we also had a lot of money and then you screamed bloody murder during the three days of the draft!   Now you’re back a year later with the same routine.    Who are you kidding?

 

What he’s doing right now is what he said he’d do since he became our GM about 26 months ago.   You either haven’t paid attention or your ignoring it. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coleman was a change of pace back and when Freeman was hurt, didn't have the production that screamed he was a true starter. I'm glad we didn't get him, also we don't need another RB because we have a starter and a change of pace 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, BOTT said:

I like Coleman, but I would rather the colts sign a bigger, more bruising back. Currently there isn't a rb like that on the roster.

 

Agreed. And I bet this is exactly why we are bringing in Jay Ajayi for a visit next week to check up on him. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

Hines and Wilkins together don't even come close to Coleman. We have so much money its disturbing and aren't even trying to get anyone.

 

Please tell us more about how you know what's going on behind the scenes. We'd love to hear it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coleman got his chance to be RB1 last year when Freeman went down and he struggled. He was even benched down the stretch last year for something called an Ito Smith. He's essentially a lesser version of Mack. If you're going to add a RB it should be one that adds something different.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And now we are going to bring in Jay Ajayi...Off a torn ACL. To those saying we dont need a RB what do you make of that news? Coleman is way better than Ajayi. Lets roll him out 10 million per year.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

Wrong. I am a huge supporter of Chris Ballard. I just would like to know what he is doing Right now. Most money in FA and have 3 signings. Funchess, who I like, desir, who I like, and Milton, who can't cover anyone but is a special teams player. Still have what 80+ million left....

Not knowing is hard, but kinda exciting too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

And now we are going to bring in Jay Ajayi...Off a torn ACL. To those saying we dont need a RB what do you make of that news? Coleman is way better than Ajayi. Lets roll him out 10 million per year.

Ajayi is who I wanted. He tore his ACL, but was playing late in the year, so he should be good to go for next season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ColtsAC said:

Aren't Mack and Coleman pretty much the same kind of back? redundancy seems less important than versatility in a RB group.

 

No they aren't. Mack runs between the tackles better...and is probably the twice the player Mack is in the passing game.

 

I actually they think complemented each other incredibly well.

 

SF actually has a nice crop of RBs (Breida and Wilson)...probably better than the Colts. I don't think you can have too many RBs...as long as they aren't expensive. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Southside Hoosier Fan said:

And now we are going to bring in Jay Ajayi...Off a torn ACL. To those saying we dont need a RB what do you make of that news? Coleman is way better than Ajayi. Lets roll him out 10 million per year.

 

Still complaining!

 

Im not one who thinks we don’t need a back...  but what I’d say is that Coleman’s 2/10 is more than Ballard wants to pay for the back he brings in.

 

He wants something more modest.

 

Because the more he pays Coleman the more leverage it gives Mack on a few years.

 

Face it...   you don’t see things as Ballard does.   That’s fine.   But all these meltdowns you’re having says you trust your views more than Ballard.  No matter how much you claim you like him.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • While some of those folks own up to it later, it is amazing how quiet some of them get.
    • A 5th round pick and a ham sandwich.  With extra mayo.
    • I don't think he ever said that.  I think he made some general threat to the woman that made reference to the kid, and then people quickly ran with that to interpret it as him saying that he would do to her what he did to the kid, thereby indirectly implying he broke the kids arm.  At least it seemed like there could be enough smoke generated from this tape to justify kicking him out of the league to send the all-important proper social message.  I think now the feeling is that the interpretation of what he was talking about is flawed.   It sounds like this has come down to where he simply threatened her during an argument.  Not enough smoke to suspend him, IMO.
    • I don't want to use resources on another linebacker, so in order for me to pull the trigger, it would have to be a huge steal. I'd do a 2nd rounder
    • You're acting as if we don't know anything about Deon Cain. The higher ceiling is based on the fact that he's a second round talent that dropped due to personality concerns, and the fact that he was doing so well in camp. Obviously I'm not saying they don't like Fountain, but before the preseason the Colts were calling him "the steal of the draft". Turns out we did have the steal of the draft, but that's besides the point    The ACL tear isn't being underestimated, the thing is that there's a difference when you tear your ACL in August vs October or November. Also, what has Fountain done to prove more than Cain? He was on the practice squad, and he had that one divisional game drop. Other than that I don't see why you think Fountain is more proven or whatever. And it is simply absurd to have him over Pascal and Chester. The problem is that we know what they are: not very good. When deciding who to keep on the roster, the question is not "have these guys contributed before?" The question is "will these guys contribute?" And the answer is, from what I've seen and heard, Deon Cain is talented and is at least worth keeping more than Pascal and Chester. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...