Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

needanoline63

Amos gone,mosely gone,flowers gone,collins,etc

Recommended Posts

All this money, and all we can show for it is Devin Funchess. We’re knocking on the door but Ballard still being shy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What else did anyone expect...Seriously this should not be a surprise to anyone. This is is strategy.

 

He has all but pretty much said in every interview that he has done since the season that he is not going to over spend for guys and he will save the money to pay their own players that they draft into the building.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, needanoline63 said:

All this money, and all we can show for it is Devin Funchess. We’re knocking on the door but Ballard still being shy

Every post you make I literally have to shake my head at. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, needanoline63 said:

All this money, and all we can show for it is Devin Funchess. We’re knocking on the door but Ballard still being shy

 

How do you know we weren't in the bidding for any or all of these other guys?  We weren't in the front office with Ballard yesterday.

 

Teams have historically overpaid for free agents and underachieved...then, they're locked into impossibly bad contracts or shelled out tons of bonuses they can never recover.

 

It's a process and Ballard wants the right players for this team and to be able to have the $$ to keep them, if he wants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, bravo4460 said:

What else did anyone expect...Seriously this should not be a surprise to anyone. This is is strategy.

 

He has all but pretty much said in every interview that he has done since the season that he is not going to over spend for guys and he will save the money to pay their own players that they draft into the building.

I know right? How much more blunt and obvious does Ballard need to be?

 

He is not going to overspend and dilute the locker room with overpaid divas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am more concerned about our own players, Desir, Inman, and all the others that may well walk away.  Funchess doesn't offset  Inman....  and Inman has far better hands.  Inman is much cheaper too....  Funchess at 13mm is same as T Y?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, needanoline63 said:

All this money, and all we can show for it is Devin Funchess. We’re knocking on the door but Ballard still being shy

There he is!! we’ve all missed your beam of positivity and the fact that you know more than Ballard! On serious note please go away...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Free agency is a scam anyway, I for one love Ballards approach, keep players who want to win, sign other players to prove it deals and who also want to win, look at the patriots, do they utilize overpriced free agents? Build through the draft with players that are hungry for success and fit in your system, Ballard is a genious and I for one, love what is taking place in the colts franchise. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, our FAs have worked out well during the Ballard years - Sheard, Hunt, Autry, Ebron  - so, I’m not going to worry about his approach.  OL FAs didn’t pan out last year, but they were low risk, and the position eventually worked itself out really well...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Old Colt said:

Funchess at 13mm is same as T Y?

 

He is at 10 million

 

Reportedly, he has to excel to earn the extra 3 million, and it would be worth it to the team if he can (and possibly have near TY type numbers too to get it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Superman said:

This thread serves no purpose.

 

Agreed, just another 'we don't spend money' rant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe at first, but in the spirit of cordial dialog/rebuttal here, we both do expand on our opinions and maybe even come closer to the center in so doing.
    • I'd recommend watching some of his college highlights. I watch a lot of both Big10 and SEC football, and any team that routinely plays ND. Unfortunately or fortunately lol I have several buds that huge Auburn fans, so I've both watch a lot of games, and heard a lot.   Not sure how you can say he wouldn't make a better OG, if you've never seen him play OG.   Here's NFL.com's combine rating on him.    
    • Nice effort, I like most of the picks, but YUTER.... (Sheeze, who names their kid Yuter) May go top 20.   I think we need a DT ASAP in the next draft
    • Making it work through athleticism is an incorrect statement and does a huge disservice to Smith.  Smith is making it work at tackle by working hard and becoming a tackle.  I'm not sure what makes a "true tackle" but to me a guy that plays tackle and plays it very well is as much of a true tackle as anyone else. As far as AC (or AT if you prefer  ) aging... yup, every player on the team is aging so that is not a shock.  But he is still just 30 and tackles often play into their mid to late 30s so that is not much of a concern.  Not to say they won't draft a tackle in the next couple of drafts, but I doubt they will try to find a starting tackle in the next couple of drafts.
    • I didn't watch him much in college, I typically watch Big 10 football but I have watched him closely in the NFL and if the "experts" think he would make a better guard then yes I disagree with them.  While he would be a good guard in a zone blocking scheme like the Colts use, his lack of lower body strength and quick hand punch off the snap would hamper him going against NFL DTs.  Additionally, Smith does better when he has a bit of space to work with before engaging and that would not happen often at RG. Again what "most" people on this board or in general think has no relevance on anything.  It's not unheard of for a tackle to move spots but it is uncommon, it's happening a bit more in the past few years as the skillsets for RT and LT are becoming closer because it's not just the LT that is dealing with the speed rushers, but it's still not preferred among oline coaches and teams.  that is why guys like Haeg are considered valuable assets to a team, he's not a great lineman but he is good and he can switch sides seamlessly and that is rare.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...