Indy's Biggest Position of Need
Biggest Position Need
19 members have voted
-
1. What is the biggest position need, and likely first draft pick?
-
Edge
-
WR
-
Interior DL
-
CB
-
S0
-
OT0
-
OG0
-
LB0
-
RB (every down back)0
-
RB (APB)0
-
QB0
-
TE0
-
OC0
-
-
2. Bonus Question - What gives the Colts the biggest boost to point differential
-
WR - A new toy for Luck, and more points on the board
-
Edge or Interior Pass Rusher - A potential QB wrecker to combat the improved level of passers we'll face this year, and less opponent points on the board
-
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted
It's not that deep with me, I think you are one of the best posters here. Apparently when I call you one of the best here, you just ignore it and just see that I don't want to be wrong. In my book we are good, I am not even upset over this. -
By superrep1967 · Posted
If we move up, it would be for a TE like in Bowers. -
By superrep1967 · Posted
Unfortunately, You're probably right. I just want this offense to get one more dynamic player for AR and this offense would explode. -
By superrep1967 · Posted
He'll have to move up to dd it. IMO But I think it's worth it. -
By superrep1967 · Posted
I agree! IMO Bowers is the best pick if Ballard and Co think that Pierce is a good enough deep threat receiver. I'm not saying that I think he is I'm just saying if they think he is then Bowers is the best pick. But unfortunately, I think Ballard stays at 15 and picks a corner which isn't necessarily a bad pick. I just think we need one more dynamic offensive player like a Bowers to make this offensive explosive one more will do it. IMO. But I know we need more defense playmakers so maybe Turner is who they're looking at. I'm not a big Paye fan we could use a formidable pass rusher. I would be surprised if Ballard moves up and loses picks unless there is a player that he loves. I think it's more likely moving down than moving up. But if I were to answer what I would love to see him do it would be to move up and get either Nabers or Bowers there on my wish list. To me either one of those players would make this offense sizzle. I think Nabers would be the deep treat this offense needs. If Ballard thinks he can get what he wants in the second round and beyond there are enough quality players then he moves down. But to me, I don't agree with this strategy because this team needs more difference-makers that's why I like the idea of moving up.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now