Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Schrager First Round Mock


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Caleb3502 said:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001019166/article/peter-schrager-2019-nfl-mock-draft-10-kyler-murray-goes-no-1

 

Has the Colts taking RB Josh Jacobs.  I don't agree with his choice, especially with WR D.K. Metcalf, DL Dre'Mont Jones, and S Nasir Adderly still on the board. 

saw that and felt the same.  I don't think ballards confidence in Mack is a smoke screen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

I would be shocked if the Colts took a RB in the first round.

 

1 minute ago, krunk said:

His choice was terrible!  

 

When you have Mack, Hines, and Wilkins, I don't know why you would spend the 26th pick on RB, when you have a bigger need on defense and at WR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Caleb3502 said:

 

 

When you have Mack, Hines, and Wilkins, I don't know why you would spend the 26th pick on RB, when you have a bigger need on defense and at WR. 

I don't like much of anything Shrager says in most cases.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am actually not surprised at this pick.  In most mocks he is long gone by 26.   Looking at this years class he is rated as a top 10 overall player in most evaluations.   Jeremiah has him as the 6th best overall prospect in the entire draft.  I think he has him going top 5 in his mock.  I would also bet he has a high ranking on Ballards board.  At 26 I think he would be BPA still on the board.  Ballard would probably be shocked if was there at 26.  Ballard has said he is about BPA so I wouldn't rule it out so quickly.   A top 10 talent at 26.  Pretty sweet.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Caleb3502 said:

 

 

When you have Mack, Hines, and Wilkins, I don't know why you would spend the 26th pick on RB, when you have a bigger need on defense and at WR. 

Well you have to see how FA plays out.  Ballard will most likely will find some help on defense and WR.  Ballard has also said he is about BPA.  Jacobs is rated at top 10 talent in the entire draft class.  He said yesterday he wouldn't hesitate to add a top talent to a position group where they thought they were good.  Chances are he will be gone by 26 anyway.  Top 10 talents rarely fall that far.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, richard pallo said:

Well you have to see how FA plays out.  Ballard will most likely will find some help on defense and WR.  Ballard has also said he is about BPA.  Jacobs is rated at top 10 talent in the entire draft class.  He said yesterday he wouldn't hesitate to add a top talent to a position group where they thought they were good.  Chances are he will be gone by 26 anyway.  Top 10 talents rarely fall that far.  

Both Kiper and McShay have Jacobs in the 20’s.

 

So I don’t think there is a consensus just yet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DarkSuperman said:

Does Shrager know we have Marlon Mack? lol.

 

Not only does Schrager know we have Marlon Mack, but he’s one of the bigger Colts fans in the media community.   Schrager and Kyle Brandt both love the Colts.   Colin Cowherd is a HUGE fan of Luck.    And because of his friendship with Ballard,  I think Lance Zierlein keeps a pretty close eye on Indy too. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, it would be hard to be mad if a player like that fell to 26 and Ballard thought he added a dynamic to the offense, then okay. I'd love to have a Pro Bowl RB on the roster, and this kid looks legit...although like many have said, that's like need #14 on the team at this juncture, so it's very unlikely, and very unnecessary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I knew I had a favorite last year, but I thought I would be good with whoever the Colts picked... and this was until the odds for the Colts picking Levis hit -4000 or something of the sort about half an hour before the draft and my heart completely dropped. In a way I'm happy the odds-makers completely missed on this one... it showed me how I really felt about those players and made me even more appreciative for us drafting Richardson an hour later.    So... you would be good with any of them... but who do you REALLY want?    On your question... if I had to guess, most Colts fans haven't watched this QB draft extensively. I know I haven't. So his statistical profile doesn't scream 1st rounder so... possibly why not many people really like him. 
    • My sleepers: (meaning, the kind of players coaches would like to have, more than what consensus big board gives credit to them. Some of them might need couple of years to attain their high potential, if drafted into suitable coaching environment, so a lot depends on that. Some of them have injury concerns too).   Most of them are high IQ players or high-effort, high-motor players - two traits I look for from the Drafted players, list is long but I like these guys.. gonna be interesting to see where they land and how it works out for them in long run.    Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest Kiran Amegadjie, OT, Yale Maason Smith, IDL, LSU Christian Mahogany, OG, Boston College Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Zak Zinter, OG, Michigan Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Khyree Jackson, CB Oregon Dylan McMahon, C, NC State (good fit for Browns)  Tykee Smith, SAF, Georgia Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Michael Barrett, LB Michigan Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky Beaux Limmer, IOL, Arkansas   Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami McKinnley Jackson, IDL, Texas A&M Kalen King, CB, Penn State Justin Eboigbe, IDL, Alabama    Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Beau Brade, SAF, Maryland Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Jalyx Hunt, EDGE, Houston Christian (I'm hoping for day 3 Vikings pickup, as Flores could work wonders with him)  Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State Brennan Jackson, EDGE, Washington State  Delmar Glaze, OT, Maryland Myles Cole, EDGE, Texas Tech Kristian Boyd, DT, Northern Iowa Javontae Jean-Baptiste, DL, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, LB, Temple Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota Jalen Green, EDGE, James Madison (UDFA Target prospect)  Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (UDFA prospect) Eyabi Okie-Anoma, EDGE, Charlotte Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto  Sundiata Anderson, EDGE, Grambling State  Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (Special Teams, Returner)  Emani Bailey, RB, TCU   As for Vikings, I don't wanna rush to draft QB if the team isn't confident in the guys they could move up in draft range, and I'd like to just draft impact players that build the roster at this point.   Build the team, draft a franchise QB at right time, don't rush and ruin years trying to make someone work out in the NFL. 
    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
  • Members

    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,816

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,191

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pkbrux

      pkbrux 104

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 1,764

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Matthew Gilbert

      Matthew Gilbert 399

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,756

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 153

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...