Jump to content
Virtuoso80

Robert Kraft Charged in Prostitution Probe

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, NFLfan said:

https://sports.yahoo.com/patriots-owner-robert-kraft-gets-court-date-and-must-appear-161905332.html
"Patriots owner Robert Kraft gets court date for solicitation charges — and must appear..."

 

Let's see what happens. Since it is a misdemeanor, it is likely that he will get a slap on the wrist. 

 

9 hours ago, Gramz said:

Maybe our legal team on here can shed more light, but I believe the "ONLY"  way he legally gets out of appearing, would be to plea bargain and settle.   Plea bargain, meaning pleads guilty to a charge.    It is my understanding if he continues a plea of  "not guilty"  then he will have to appear before the judge.       Any of our lawyers on here care to chime in...??

 

I'm not a lawyer, but-

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's a misdemeanor in FL. Kraft's lawyer has already filed a notice of appearance om Kraft's behalf.

 

**However, Kraft's defense attorney, Jack Goldberger, insisted in a statement Thursday that his client is not required to appear in court under Florida law, despite the court's notice.

 

"This is a routine procedural hearing that the Court sets based on its schedule,’’ Goldberger wrote in an e-mail to The Boston Globe. “The notice of appearance by the defendant is boilerplate, but in fact the lawyer appears for the defendant in a misdemeanor case. The defendant does not appear."

 

The Palm Beach County clerk also confirmed {to WBZ} that Kraft can be represented by his attorney at the hearing.

 

The case could also be continued until another date to allow both sides to work out a plea, according to WBZ-TV’s Cheryl Fianadaca. Kraft has already entered an early not guilty plea and previously asked for a trial with no jury on the low-level charges.

 

These cases rarely go to trial...

 

{more}

 

https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/03/07/robert-kraft-prostitution-arraignment/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a slap on the ol wrist to me. What he is being charged with is only a Misdemeanor anyway, not a Felony. He will do no jail time. What the NFL will do as far as punishment will be interesting though. Irsay got fined 500,000 and suspended for 6 games for a DWI - a Misdemeanor for 1st timers. So I am sure something harsh may come from Goodell and the NFL.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/7/2019 at 6:52 PM, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Sounds like a slap on the ol wrist to me. What he is being charged with is only a Misdemeanor anyway, not a Felony. He will do no jail time. What the NFL will do as far as punishment will be interesting though. Irsay got fined 500,000 and suspended for 6 games for a DWI - a Misdemeanor for 1st timers. So I am sure something harsh may come from Goodell and the NFL.

 

You have summed it up correctly.   A slap on the wrist from the legal system.   Likely a fine..   some community service...   and some probation.

 

The real embarrassment will come the NFL.   Don’t see hiw the league can’t give Kraft at least what they gave Irsay.    Krafts offense was high profile, an embarrassment to the league, and just a horrible example for everyone.   The league CANT let Kraft off easily.   The shield will drop the hammer on Kraft.

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎7‎/‎2019 at 3:47 PM, Gramz said:

lol  How exactly do you fight videoed evidence?

 

Well.....He's going all out, bringing in the big guns to fight a misdemeanor.

Well if you remember he talked real big about suing the NFL over the deflate issue and had all the high dollar lawyers ready till those lawyers advised him not to sue.

The story later turned into him having a change of heart. Really? haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎4‎/‎2019 at 11:35 AM, buccolts said:

I'm sure he's sponsoring one of the ladies for citizenship.

:hat:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/6/2019 at 5:05 PM, Nadine said:

The law has a way of bending to money as in the Jeffery Epstein case.  But I think he would need the prosecuting attorneys to be complicit and I don't think these prosecutors will do that. Fingers crossed anyway.

 

There are quite a few wealthy types that got caught up in this.

 

Law enforcement is realizing arresting the workers isn't correcting the trafficking, and (unfortunately) neither is arresting the Johns.  But cracking the true issue is quite difficult. One story I read recently points it out.

 

It's so sad.  What is worse, these Asian spas are everywhere in South and Southwest Florida.  It is estimated roughly 25% of those provide illegal 'favors'.

 

Some excerpts from a Miami Herald story recently-

 

"For law enforcement, cracking the rings that are behind the massage parlors is challenging — and bringing trafficking charges even more difficult — because of workers’ reluctance to testify, cultural barriers and an international business structure that makes identifying the masterminds next to impossible."

 

"An estimated 9,000 “illicit massage businesses” operate in the United States, reaping a suspected $2.5 billion in profits, according to Polaris, a non-profit that aims to combat human trafficking."

 

"In Queens, New York, home to a sizable Chinese enclave, the arrests were so numerous that in 2004, authorities started a “Human Trafficking Court” designed to connect women arrested for prostitution with social services and a chance to get their charges dropped. The program was expanded in 2014 to other parts of the city."

 

"Many of the women who wind up working in massage parlors and spas are recruited from rural parts of China with nebulous promises of legal employment in the United States. Some are fleeing domestic abuse, or their families are heavily in debt. Typically they have little education. Agencies in China arrange for them to travel to the United States on tourist visas, and charge them thousands of dollars that many women agree to work off rather than paying up front."

 

And there is a great story how Miami Beach tried and and somewhat failed in getting at the trafficking issue here-
 

"The case of Miami Beach spa madam Mi Cha Jones demonstrates just how difficult it is to make even a carefully constructed trafficking case stick."

 

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article226942349.html#storylink=cpy

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

Law enforcement is realizing arresting the workers isn't correcting the trafficking, and (unfortunately) neither is arresting the Johns.  But cracking the true issue is quite difficult. One story I read recently points it out.

 

It's so sad.  What is worse, these Asian spas are everywhere in South and Southwest Florida.  It is estimated roughly 25% of those provide illegal 'favors'.

 

Some excerpts from a Miami Herald story recently-

 

"For law enforcement, cracking the rings that are behind the massage parlors is challenging — and bringing trafficking charges even more difficult — because of workers’ reluctance to testify, cultural barriers and an international business structure that makes identifying the masterminds next to impossible."

 

"An estimated 9,000 “illicit massage businesses” operate in the United States, reaping a suspected $2.5 billion in profits, according to Polaris, a non-profit that aims to combat human trafficking."

 

"In Queens, New York, home to a sizable Chinese enclave, the arrests were so numerous that in 2004, authorities started a “Human Trafficking Court” designed to connect women arrested for prostitution with social services and a chance to get their charges dropped. The program was expanded in 2014 to other parts of the city."

 

"Many of the women who wind up working in massage parlors and spas are recruited from rural parts of China with nebulous promises of legal employment in the United States. Some are fleeing domestic abuse, or their families are heavily in debt. Typically they have little education. Agencies in China arrange for them to travel to the United States on tourist visas, and charge them thousands of dollars that many women agree to work off rather than paying up front."

 

And there is a great story how Miami Beach tried and and somewhat failed in getting at the trafficking issue here-
 

"The case of Miami Beach spa madam Mi Cha Jones demonstrates just how difficult it is to make even a carefully constructed trafficking case stick."

 

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article226942349.html#storylink=cpy

 

The Miami Herald has been doing an amazing job investigating this

BTW, we have this problem in Indiana as well

http://youarecurrent.com/2015/02/06/suspect-found-guilty-in-dove-spa-prostitution-trial-in-carmel/

 

https://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/indianapolis/owner-of-indy-massage-parlor-arrested-charged-with-prostitution

 

http://www.dailyjournal.net/2016/10/22/after_massage_parlor_shut_down_what_next/

 

https://www.wishtv.com/news/crime-watch-8/police-raid-multiple-local-massage-parlors/1064269194

 

It is flipping everywhere. I met a woman at a summer event who was handing out flyers about human trafficking in Indiana.  She said her daughter had been drawn into it via social media.

 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

In Queens, New York, home to a sizable Chinese enclave, the arrests were so numerous that in 2004, authorities started a “Human Trafficking Court” designed to connect women arrested for prostitution with social services and a chance to get their charges dropped. The program was expanded in 2014 to other parts of the city."

 

I read that in another article. My colleagues and I were talking about this because we work in that part of Queens (Flushing), which is about a mile from where the NY Mets play (Citifield). Queens is a large county in NYC. Most of those living in that part of Queens are Chinese or Korean. I never realized there were these "parlors". I did not know that sex trafficking was so prevalent there. Someone who is not aware of them will not know that there are prostitutes in the area. You don't see them. The whole thing is very sad. It is hard to prosecute those responsible for perpetuating this. Many of these women are undocumented; so, I suspect that many won't come forward because they are worried about being deported.

 

Here is an article that is long but a good read. It is a true story about a young Chinese woman who got involved in this.

 

The Case of Jane Doe Ponytail 

https://nyti.ms/2A5iCb0

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a problem, but solving it will not be easy, or fast I'm afraid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like a pretty good deal

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Nadine said:

Seems like a pretty good deal

 

 

Sounds like a deal that'd let him to move on quickly and brush it under the rug without facing charges.

 

Also sounds like the kind of thing Kraft will reject as he will say hes not guilty of anything and doesn't want the public perception or the league's penalty for admitting he would have been guilty.

 

I could totally see him declining this deal and fighting it and saying "if they're willing to not prosecute it's because they know they can't convict. screw this, I'm fighting it".  lol

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

An Alford Plea

confusing

Quote

An Alford plea (also called a Kennedy plea in West Virginia, an Alfordguilty plea and the Alford doctrine), in United States law, is a guilty plea in criminal court, whereby a defendant in a criminal case does not admit to the criminal act and asserts innocence.

 

It's a guilty plea in which you don't admit the criminal act and assert your innocence?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alford_plea

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Nadine said:

Seems like a pretty good deal

 

I figured he would get nothing but dealing with the NFL is a different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Nadine said:

confusing

 

It's a guilty plea in which you don't admit the criminal act and assert your innocence?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alford_plea

I haven't read the article but it is admitting they have enough evidence to find you guilty but you are not saying you did it.   You aren't exactly saying you didn't do it though either.  That isn't required.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Nadine said:

confusing

 

It's a guilty plea in which you don't admit the criminal act and assert your innocence?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alford_plea

Kind of

  an Alford Plea often occurs when the Prosecution has a large amount of evidence against a defendant and as a result of a deal

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a way for him to wiggle out of appearing at a trial.  People will soon forget this and move one without a trial and conviction and punishment.

 

But, as someone pointed out, the NFL is a whole different matter on how they handle it.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Kind of

  an Alford Plea often occurs when the Prosecution has a large amount of evidence against a defendant and as a result of a deal

I see.  So it would be Krafts side admitting only that it's possible that the prosecution has enough evidence to find him guilty. Apparently, it's standard operating procedure for first time offense misdemeanors.

 

Also part of the deal

Quote

under the deal, Kraft would have to be screened for sexually transmitted diseases, complete an education course about prostitution and do 100 hours of community service.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/19/prosecutors-offer-to-drop-prostitution-charges-against-robert-kraft.html

 

Seems like a win win

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nadine said:

I see.  So it would be Krafts side admitting only that it's possible that the prosecution has enough evidence to find him guilty. Apparently, it's standard operating procedure for first time offense misdemeanors.

 

Also part of the deal

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/19/prosecutors-offer-to-drop-prostitution-charges-against-robert-kraft.html

 

Seems like a win win

Yes

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering  if he'll take this plea, that would mean admitting guilt and knowing they have enough evidence that he'd be found guilty if going to trial.

 

And then there's the dealing with the NFL if admitting guilt.  :dunno:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Fluke_33 said:

I haven't read the article but it is admitting they have enough evidence to find you guilty but you are not saying you did it.   You aren't exactly saying you didn't do it though either.  That isn't required.

 

6 hours ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Kind of

  an Alford Plea often occurs when the Prosecution has a large amount of evidence against a defendant and as a result of a deal

 

This may be a silly question. How is this different from pleading no contest?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

 

This may be a silly question. How is this different from pleading no contest?

 

20190319_210200.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

 

This may be a silly question. How is this different from pleading no contest?

  Nolo Contendere(No Contest) Plea in most US Jurisdiction is an alternative to a  guilty/not plea while an Alford Plea is technically a guilty plea

  They both have the same immediate results but different residual results

   

 

  Info from Wikipedia 

 

   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NFLfan said:

 

 

This may be a silly question. How is this different from pleading no contest?

That is what I get for not reading the article.  I was thinking no contest. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Gramz said:

I'm wondering  if he'll take this plea, that would mean admitting guilt and knowing they have enough evidence that he'd be found guilty if going to trial.

 

And then there's the dealing with the NFL if admitting guilt.  :dunno:

 

By all accounts, he is in a terrible position. Even if there isn't much legal repercussions (if he takes this deal), there will certainly be repercussions from the NFL. Not to mention his reputation is now ruined and there will be lots of personal and probably financial fallout for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Annnnnd just as I figured and stated earlier, Kraft refuses the deal and calls it a non-starter.

 

He will not admit to anything wrong. That is his way and the only way that he can try to save face and minimize or avoid any league punishment or tarnishing of his legacy.

 

Could have seen this coming from a mile away.

 

He has the money and will fight this until it is not worth the prosecution's time and resources and they drop it and he gets away with whatever he did.

 

Ugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, TomDiggs said:
is

 

Annnnnd just as I figured and stated earlier, Kraft refuses the deal and calls it a non-starter.

 

He will not admit to anything wrong. That is his way and the only way that he can try to save face and minimize or avoid any league punishment or tarnishing of his legacy.

 

Could have seen this coming from a mile away.

 

He has the money and will fight this until it is not worth the prosecution's time and resources and they drop it and he gets away with whatever he did.

 

Ugh

I am not surprised that he is not taking the plea deal.   He's kind of in a no-win situation (that he put himself in).   Too arrogant to admit guilt (even tho there is supposed photos and videos).    I'm sure he thinks his $$ will get him out of this.

 

I am, however,  not convinced that he'll walk scott free.   I honestly believe he'll be found guilty.  

 

I guess he is above doing 100 hours of community service, subjecting himself to STD testing, and classes,   yet...  he is facing and sure to get time behind bars if convicted.       smh      

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Gramz said:

I am not surprised that he is not taking the plea deal.   He's kind of in a no-win situation (that he put himself in).   Too arrogant to admit guilt (even tho there is supposed photos and videos).    I'm sure he thinks his $$ will get him out of this.

 

I am, however,  not convinced that he'll walk scott free.   I honestly believe he'll be found guilty.  

 

I guess he is above doing 100 hours of community service, subjecting himself to STD testing, and classes,   yet...  he facing and sure to get time behind bars if convicted.       smh      

guess you can say he's got a "grip" on the situation. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Gramz said:

I am not surprised that he is not taking the plea deal.   He's kind of in a no-win situation (that he put himself in).   Too arrogant to admit guilt (even tho there is supposed photos and videos).    I'm sure he thinks his $$ will get him out of this.

 

I am, however,  not convinced that he'll walk scott free.   I honestly believe he'll be found guilty.  

 

I guess he is above doing 100 hours of community service, subjecting himself to STD testing, and classes,   yet...  he is facing and sure to get time behind bars if convicted.       smh      

I am not surprised but Refusing a deal on a case like this could be a bad thing

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

I am not surprised but Refusing a deal on a case like this could be a bad thing

:agree:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Kraft not listening to his lawyers? It would seem that the lawyers would try to talk Kraft into accepting the plea deal. I think refusing this would be a huge mistake. He thinks that he really didn't do anything wrong. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, teganslaw said:

Is Kraft not listening to his lawyers? It would seem that the lawyers would try to talk Kraft into accepting the plea deal. I think refusing this would be a huge mistake. He thinks that he really didn't do anything wrong. 

Evidently not. I understand that this is normal procedure for first time offenders, it's not like he personally is being given special treatment.  It's been offered to everyone accused in this case, as first time offenders.

 

It would only make sense to take the plea deal, given the supposed evidence they have.

 

It will be interesting... stay tuned. :popcorn:

 

:edit:. I just read he's filing a motion to suppress the video evidence.  :scratch:. Why file that motion if you're innocent. :scratch:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sort of amusing how quickly this story dropped from the big spotlight.  I figured as much.  This guy is a snake IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, PrincetonTiger said:

I am not surprised but Refusing a deal on a case like this could be a bad thing

 

For who?  Him, or folks looking for justice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

For who?  Him, or folks looking for justice?

There have many instances where the refusal of deals have made the prosecution mad 

9 hours ago, Gramz said:

Evidently not. I understand that this is normal procedure for first time offenders, it's not like he personally is being given special treatment.  It's been offered to everyone accused in this case, as first time offenders.

 

It would only make sense to take the plea deal, given the supposed evidence they have.

 

It will be interesting... stay tuned. :popcorn:

 

:edit:. I just read he's filing a motion to suppress the video evidence.  :scratch:. Why file that motion if you're innocent. :scratch:

 

Good Question 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good point.  I think this has serious merit 
    • My take   1. We overachieved last season. Period 2. We played at KC 3. TY limited the offense because he was so injured.  4. We played a very very good coach with time to prepare and his guys got some rest too and time to scout the team. Remember, Reich is well known to Reid as well by now.  5. Not having Hooker really mattered 6. Play calling was a bit blah 7. How does Vinny automatic miss those kicks? 8. A strip sack for us turns into a strip sack for them a few plays later, that hurt.  9. A young team who wasn’t supposed to be in the playoffs, let alone a second game in the playoffs had some factor here.  10. KC had a pretty good team   my concern from that game would be how poorly our run game was going forward. Kelly better play better than he did this season or I don’t see a 15 million/yr contract coming his way in Indy. I think with a healthy TY, the additions of DF and Cain and Paris and others should really boost that offense. An offense with TY, Paris, Doyle, EE and Mack, now that’s gonna be a tough group to match up with and defend. Run or pass, heck coach, idk what they are doing lol.    Gonna be fun to see this team evolve and have better back ups coming off the bench. I just hope we have enough beef in the middle to stop the run and I just hope that Kelly was hobbled in that KC game because it was one of his worst games that year. 
    • This again boils down to you hanging on to 'this is how it's always been done.' And you don't get that I don't care about that rationale. I think it can be done better. Which is why, in my first post in this thread, I said "to me, it's a no brainer." To me. It should be obvious that this is my stated preference, not me saying that teams that don't do it this way are stupid.   There should be nothing more that I have to say about that, except you continue to rely on that appeal to authority, and I'm telling you that 'how it's always been done' isn't legitimate reason for not examining potential alternatives. Not just in this area, but in everything.      You're missing an important detail, and I think it's because you've put my argument in a box and are unwilling to actually examine it on its merits.   As I said initially, and have said since, my argument is to make this change six months sooner, not six months later. "Imagine if we had fired Grigson in June 2016 instead of January 2017." Did you miss that part, again? What about "if the Texans had waited until January 2020 to fire Gaine..."?    I want him in asap. You want him asap, but not until January.   My statement about it being just one draft is referencing the worst case scenario, which is 'we just blew a draft cycle by letting a lame duck GM stay,' to which I say 'get over it, I'm okay with that if that's what it takes to get the guy I want in the building, with the staff he wants.' And that's where my argument about it potentially being easier to interview candidates in the down season after the draft is critical. The Jets wanted Joe Douglas; he evidently didn't want to entertain a move during draft season, but jumped at it in May/June. (There's the matter of moving his family during the school year, etc.) In theory, this approach could make it easier to interview good candidates. Whether you agree with that or not, whether it's important to you or not, this is mostly an aside. As I said, this was my response to the alarmist reaction of 'they just blew a draft!' Which I think is overstated, especially in the Texans' case.     Not at all. Again, if Ballard started in June 2016, he theoretically could have changed coaches a year sooner.      This is a hindsight fallacy. Go back to the Texans wanting to hire Caserio. I'm not arguing that he's going to be a great GM, I'm arguing that he's the guy they want to hire, and he's available in June. Same for the Jets and Douglas. The Chiefs and Veach.    We know that every person hired doesn't succeed. I never argued that they do. That's true of whoever you rush to hire in January. The point is that there is always a pool of qualified candidates from which to choose. I won't be retracting that, I firmly believe it, and I said it when the Colts were interviewing coaches in 2012, when they interviewed GMs in 2017, and when they interviewed coaches in 2018. You choosing to reject that is pretty ridiculous, to be honest. There are always qualified candidates. Choosing the right one is a different story.   And again, if there's one guy you really, desperately want, why wait until January to get him?     You could give me the benefit of the doubt and assume that if I'm saying it, I mean it. Especially this far into the discussion...    And going back to what I said earlier, this is and always has been my opinion. I'm not offering studies and conclusive evidence to support this opinion because it's a personal preference, it's what I think would be best (although I have offered evidence and rationale to support my opinion, you've just chosen to reject, for reasons I don't agree with).    I'm okay with the disagreement. What I find personally off-putting is the insistence that, because you don't understand my angle, it means I either haven't actually thought it through, or I don't actually believe it. As I said earlier, I understand that general consensus disagrees with my viewpoint, but that doesn't mean I'm just going to conform. The fact that I'm presenting an argument in earnest should be enough.
    • I'm an Iowa fan but I'd kind of like to see Michigan win that game so that it can maybe move back towards the appearance of a real rivalry.     That is unless an Ohio State victory would somehow help Iowa, in that situation I would root for the Buckeyes. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...