Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

A few thoughts about Desir....


NewColtsFan

Recommended Posts

On 2/21/2019 at 1:11 AM, BlueShoe said:

We don’t need to pay a cover 2 corner big money. They’re the easiest to find. We are not asking them to protect an island all day like we did Vontae in our old man scheme. 

 

Our defense requires our corners to be physical and they will take a beating. So will our safeties. 

 

In my mind, we should only pay big money to our quarterback, the front seven and the offensive line. Every other position we need to get at a bargain or we let walk. 

I agree to an extent

 

However.  Desir has become a very good player as part of the Colts family

 

CB has said that he wants to resign his own.

 

Desir is in that group, and played very well for most of the year. In certain games he played lights out

 

He shouldnt get 15M based on your points. But.........  He should get paid

 

I wouldnt be surprised at all with a $8-9Mil signing

 

I dont see anyone giving him $10 Mil 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I'm not in favor of breaking the bank on Desir.

 

I posted the article to let the Colts Community know that if the writer's guesstimation is even close to being right,  then there's little chance of the Colts bringing him back.     Just a heads-up so that posters here are not surprised by what Desir might get on the open market.

 

I assume Ballard will have all the bases covered.     We should be fine.

 

 

I do get this point. I just have a hard time believing that a guy who's been around for years, and who couldn't get a bite in FA last year and settled for a cheap one year deal, is suddenly worth double digit millions annually. We'll find out pretty soon, I guess. But until it happens, I remain skeptical that Desir is worth elite money on the open market. I still think a $6-7m per year contract offer from the Colts will get it done. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Hoose said:

Desir played well last year. He's going to get paid much better this year. I hope the Colts step up and pay the man a fair salary. Something like 2 yrs/$12m. with a team option for year 3. $8 m guaranteed. Keep the talent you have and build out from there. I believe the Colts would miss Desir if they let him walk. If a crazy offer comes forward, so be it. But if he's available for the price tag noted above, re-sign the man. He earned it. 

I could get behind that kind of deal. In my thinking, a  3 yr deal of 5-7/yr was my thought so that fits perfectly in the middle, I think he has played well enough to earn that kind of contract. 

 

Wilson “should” progress in a much bigger leap for year 3. Moore was our play maker last year, can he follow that up? Jalen Collins is someone we “hope” will make an impact but this kid never played for us last season so who knows what he will provide, if anything at all. Will we draft high another corner (1-2 round)? 

 

As for me, I’m still more concerned about the player who can defend the 5 yard pass in the middle than the attempted 30 yard bombs. If we get the pass rush more involved, gonna see far less 30 yard attempts than we those 5 yard passes. If we can’t get a safety that can cover those underneath passes to the rb or the TE, won’t matter who is out at the cb spot, teams will just keep nickel and diming us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I'm not in favor of breaking the bank on Desir.

 

I posted the article to let the Colts Community know that if the writer's guesstimation is even close to being right,  then there's little chance of the Colts bringing him back.     Just a heads-up so that posters here are not surprised by what Desir might get on the open market.

 

I assume Ballard will have all the bases covered.     We should be fine.

 

 

My feeling is since he hasn’t been resigned yet, Desir feels his worth is far enough apart from what CB values him at and Desir is going to seek a FA contract opportunity, with CB blessing, perhaps encouragement. Seeing that the team signed Glowinski right away, they felt his play warranted an immediate strike and fair pay. If the team felt Desir had those same attributes, they would have signed him to a similar fair type deal. So this signals to me that the team doesn’t see fair deal anywhere close enough to have Desir give up some of his gamble that he can strike a richer contract in the open market and have a potential playoff ready team offer it to him. 

 

The one part part of this same thought process has me concerned that we are also far apart on Inman, and I’d rather see Inman back over the desire to have Desir back. Not sure what’s going on there. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hoose said:

I do get this point. I just have a hard time believing that a guy who's been around for years, and who couldn't get a bite in FA last year and settled for a cheap one year deal, is suddenly worth double digit millions annually. We'll find out pretty soon, I guess. But until it happens, I remain skeptical that Desir is worth elite money on the open market. I still think a $6-7m per year contract offer from the Colts will get it done. 

 

You ever heard of Tim Jennings? 

 

We were lined up 15 wide around the block to drive that guy to the airport to get him out of town. He went on to Chicago to play at al all-pro level, and had he been able to play there a while longer could have had a potentially HOF worthy career there. 

 

Desir’s struggle elsewhere has no play on his value here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jdubu said:

My feeling is since he hasn’t been resigned yet, Desir feels his worth is far enough apart from what CB values him at and Desir is going to seek a FA contract opportunity, with CB blessing, perhaps encouragement. Seeing that the team signed Glowinski right away, they felt his play warranted an immediate strike and fair pay. If the team felt Desir had those same attributes, they would have signed him to a similar fair type deal. So this signals to me that the team doesn’t see fair deal anywhere close enough to have Desir give up some of his gamble that he can strike a richer contract in the open market and have a potential playoff ready team offer it to him. 

 

The one part part of this same thought process has me concerned that we are also far apart on Inman, and I’d rather see Inman back over the desire to have Desir back. Not sure what’s going on there. 

 

I'm modestly hopeful that we will have several re-signings of our own free agents right after the combine and right before the start of the FA window.

 

It's a period of about a week.

 

Or course,  there could be another group of signings the first week or two of he FA period after our guys go out on the market and get offers and bring them back to the Colts to see if we'll meet or beat them.     I hope so.     I want our guys to feel like we appreciate what they did and reward them for their efforts.     I don't want too many of our guys feeling like they have to go elsewhere to get paid.

 

We'll soon find out.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, John Waylon said:

 

You ever heard of Tim Jennings? 

 

We were lined up 15 wide around the block to drive that guy to the airport to get him out of town. He went on to Chicago to play at al all-pro level, and had he been able to play there a while longer could have had a potentially HOF worthy career there. 

 

Desir’s struggle elsewhere has no play on his value here. 

 

 John, Jennings had one really good year on THAT D. And one or two more good ones. That was his career. It was great that someone else got him to play better for that brief time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jdubu said:

My feeling is since he hasn’t been resigned yet, Desir feels his worth is far enough apart from what CB values him at and Desir is going to seek a FA contract opportunity, with CB blessing, perhaps encouragement. Seeing that the team signed Glowinski right away, they felt his play warranted an immediate strike and fair pay. If the team felt Desir had those same attributes, they would have signed him to a similar fair type deal. So this signals to me that the team doesn’t see fair deal anywhere close enough to have Desir give up some of his gamble that he can strike a richer contract in the open market and have a potential playoff ready team offer it to him. 

 

The one part part of this same thought process has me concerned that we are also far apart on Inman, and I’d rather see Inman back over the desire to have Desir back. Not sure what’s going on there. 

 

 More like Desir and his agent feel like this is his ONE shot to get as much Guaranteed income for his LIFE. He will get to see the Number in the 3 days up to FA, and pray he has more than 1 good option, especially US.
 Ballard may be reasonably confident that Collins has changed his life.
If so, he had the skills to be as good or better than Desir, for just $1M next season.
That would be sweet. And CB would have maybe $6-7 M to spend on..... a 2nd Prize. 

 or 3rd really good one. 
I hope this is it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 More like Desir and his agent feel like this is his ONE shot to get as much Guaranteed income for his LIFE. He will get to see the Number in the 3 days up to FA, and pray he has more than 1 good option, especially US.
 Ballard may be reasonably confident that Collins has changed his life.
If so, he had the skills to be as good or better than Desir, for just $1M next season.
That would be sweet. And CB would have maybe $6-7 M to spend on..... a 2nd Prize. 

 or 3rd really good one. 
I hope this is it.

Until Collins plays in a game at corner for the team, we truly don’t know what we have in him. We may know what his potential could be but unlike Desir, we don’t know how he will play with these guys, in this defense on this team. I mean, Collins could absolutely be a huge steal but it’s possible he isn’t anything more than a PS guy. The nice thing is, CB at least has seen what he looks like in practice and his behaviors while being a teammate. Let’s just hope it all works out in our favor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2019 at 11:18 AM, throwing BBZ said:

 

 Our D desperately needs a good shutdown corner don't be _____ about it folks.
 It is about winning Playoff games and the SB not beating the other 22 Joe's. 
 That is expected.
 

 Fuller is younger, better, with a different level of expectations so the comp is IFFY.

 And he got a poison pill offer from GB with $18M fully guaranteed. His $1M 1st year salary and his signing bonus.
 Fuller had a 81 PFF grade last year #7 CB. Desir 77 and #18 CB.
 Jaylen Collins had a 81 grade once. CB was more than kicking tires? 
 My Guesstimate for Desir is his 1st year also guaranteed set up similar to Fuller's, but no more than 8-10M, if that, and a roster bonus in year 2 of a Milliom or two paid in March 2020, leaving his buyer with an option to move on. A 3 yr deal.
 I definitely thought his game got really good in the 2nd half of the season,
He didn't turn the ball over like we could use, so Collins and the draft are strong possibilities i am sure.

I agree with all of this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Desir loves Indy, loves the team; both players and organization. (I heard an  interview).  I think he would take slightly less to stay, but not a lot less.  So then market offers (vs. Colts value offer) will determine whether he stays or leaves.  He want's to take care of himself and his family.  If our offer is close, I think he returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
    • I suppose Murphy being the next Donald is possible, but I wouldn’t think it’s likely.     As for Smith playing right tackle, I believe I was simply echoing Ballard’s initial viewpoint.  That Smith’s short arms made him an unlikely RT.  And that he had to be talked into it by Morocco Brown and Ed Dodds.   I don’t think I was stating MY personal view.    As for skillset vs measurements.  I think it’s been an issue for all of us because Ballard has such specific requirements for each position.  So we factor that into our judgements. 
    • Bold prediction?    I will predict either Kwity or Pierce will be traded sometime during the draft.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...