Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

stitches

Landon Collins status/rumors (merge)

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, krunk said:

I totally don't see Collins and Geathers on the same team at the same time.

 

If Geathers signs, we'll have to see what the contract is like.

 

I don't see Ballard or any GM looking at a player on Geathers' level, a player who has averaged 6 starts a season in his career as the future.  

 

I could be wrong, but I'm guessing he either signs a Butler-type deal or turns it down and moves on like Melvin did.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't realize Collins and Hooker share the same agent. Could help in negotiating him to sign with Indy perhaps. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me..... if you get a chance at Collins, and it isnt crazy money...... you do the deal

 

EVEN IF, you also sign Geathers.........

 

I am sure that he can come in as a fast LB on passing downs

 

I just dont trust Geathers to be the guy.........

 

 

Additionally......

 

We had guys named Wilcox and Odum playing  downs last year at S, WHILE Geathers and Hooker were out there

 

Surely we can find a defense that could use Collins AND Geathers at the same time

 

In this defense, the FS and SS are two very important cogs   

 

Geathers is GOOD (when actually on the field)

Collins is GREAT

 

This defense, at a key position needs some GREAT to be able to get through a playoff run.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be very disappointed if we don't go after him and sign him. With or without geathers,  we need to get him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope Ballard is excited about having a chance to get this guy as everyone else is. Giants are stupid. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People talk about the safety position not being valued but according to snap counts Hooker was 2nd on the defense in snaps played, only behind Leonard and Geathers, even with his injuries was 6th, so he would have been top 3 had he played a full season.  So, whomever the Colts sign at safety is going to be on the field a lot.

 

To me, it makes sense to sign a young probowl player if the opportunity presents itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

 

 

To me, it makes sense to sign a young probowl player if the opportunity presents itself.

This.......

 

To me....... he hits the top four

Young - Check

Leader - Check

Top Performer - Check

Improves our defense - Check

 

Lets say that he wants 13Mil........ SO WHAT?.... Do It..... sign the man

 

That 2-3 mil above baseline isnt going to put us over the cap......

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MikeCurtis said:

To me..... if you get a chance at Collins, and it isnt crazy money...... you do the deal

 

EVEN IF, you also sign Geathers.........

 

I am sure that he can come in as a fast LB on passing downs

 

I just dont trust Geathers to be the guy.........

 

 

Additionally......

 

We had guys named Wilcox and Odum playing  downs last year at S, WHILE Geathers and Hooker were out there

 

Surely we can find a defense that could use Collins AND Geathers at the same time

 

In this defense, the FS and SS are two very important cogs   

 

Geathers is GOOD (when actually on the field)

Collins is GREAT

 

This defense, at a key position needs some GREAT to be able to get through a playoff run.

 

 

 

Yep...team needs to be 3 deep with starting caliber Ss...AND have some solid depth for those 3. I don't really want to see this team using 3 LBs very often...unless they upgrade pass coverage from the MIKE spot. 

 

But S depth is critical...so I wouldn't rule out signing Collins and drafting someone...in addition to tendering Farley or bringing back Geathers. But there are a lot of Ss available...so Ballard could decide to go in a few different directions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

This.......

 

To me....... he hits the top four

Young - Check

Leader - Check

Top Performer - Check

Improves our defense - Check

 

Lets say that he wants 13Mil........ SO WHAT?.... Do It..... sign the man

 

That 2-3 mil above baseline isnt going to put us over the cap......

 

 

 

 

 You are funny. Let's say Ballard has a limit of $10M for the position and stays disciplined. 
 But you don't have a Limit to build Your 53 man roster. You see a hot babe and buy her a Maseratti. Ballard and his Capologist actually have a long term plan if you can possibly believe him.
They aren't :loco: :cheers: sailors.
 

Quote

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Coffeedrinker said:

People talk about the safety position not being valued but according to snap counts Hooker was 2nd on the defense in snaps played, only behind Leonard and Geathers, even with his injuries was 6th, so he would have been top 3 had he played a full season.  So, whomever the Colts sign at safety is going to be on the field a lot.

 

To me, it makes sense to sign a young probowl player if the opportunity presents itself.

 

If anything, Ss not being valued highly plays into the Colts' hands...because that means they can sign multiple Ss without breaking the bank.

 

I don't necessarily agree with the notion that Ss aren't highly valued. I just think the supply is higher than the demand...as there are more and more good ones coming out of a college each year. 

 

For these reasons...it's a position where the Colts should really shine...with the resources they have...and the defense they run. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 You are funny. Let's say Ballard has a limit of $10M for the position and stays disciplined. 
 But you don't have a Limit to build Your 53 man roster. You see a hot babe and buy her a Maseratti. Ballard and his Capologist actually have a long term plan if you can possibly believe him.
They aren't :loco: :cheers: sailors.
 

 

I dont know   ........ is plus 2 Mil to get a your pro bowl needed player a stretch?

 

I think 12 mil ISNT too much

 

And...... if I was a younger and SINGLE man..........  I am not buying a hot babe a Maserati.........

 

Being divorced once, I dont exactly know how to cut a sports car in HALF  :(

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

I dont know   ........ is plus 2 Mil to get a your pro bowl needed player a stretch?

 

I think 12 mil ISNT too much

 

And...... if I was a younger and SINGLE man..........  I am not buying a hot babe a Maserati.........

 

Being divorced once, I dont exactly know how to cut a sports car in HALF  :(

 

 

 

  
 We can get a very solid S in the draft at pick 59 or 90. Or a less expensive FA.
 I have a hard time believing CB pays up that kind of $$$ for safety before he has his D-Line set. 
 Of course if he lands his pass rusher that would leave us in a great position to add one more high end FA, then nail the draft to improve on all 3 levels.
He is going to do it, just a matter of how, who, and how fa$t.  lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

  
 We can get a very solid S in the draft at pick 59 or 90. Or a less expensive FA.
 I have a hard time believing CB pays up that kind of $$$ for safety before he has his D-Line set. 
 Of course if he lands his pass rusher that would leave us in a great position to add one more high end FA, then nail the draft to improve on all 3 levels.
He is going to do it, just a matter of how, who, and how fa$t.  lol

Agreed.  I think people r going to b disappointed when he doesn't make play for Collins.  Just a hunch of mine.  I believe Ballard may pay top money for Thomas and Berry in their prime.  If Hooker reaches that level then he may pay him top dollar.  Not sure he is going to doll out 12 million or more for a strong safety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Im liking this photoshop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone has to remember just because we don’t get a FA doesn’t mean he was not willing to pay him or didn’t go after them. There is always a chance the player didn’t want to come here or they like another city better. Don’t assume he didn’t try. Collins is exactly the type of free agent Ballard would want. We will see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We also probably can’t wait for the draft if he does want to sign someone like Collins. FA like that are probably going to go quickly.

 

Can teams talk to FA before the 13th?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MikeCurtis said:

This.......

 

To me....... he hits the top four

Young - Check

Leader - Check

Top Performer - Check

Improves our defense - Check

 

Lets say that he wants 13Mil........ SO WHAT?.... Do It..... sign the man

 

That 2-3 mil above baseline isnt going to put us over the cap......

 

 

 

 

That is known as death by inches.  

 

He does check all the boxes like you suggest but the bolded to me is death by inches.  It sets precedent and seemingly opens the door for other similar "slightly over the top" contracts.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Safeties are now a devalued position. I don't see Ballard paying him top tier FA money when you can pick a S later in FA for a lot less. Besides, we have more pressing needs. 

I seriously doubt Ballard goes after him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We should of drafted him the first time around. I think we sign him during the first couple of hours

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jskinnz said:

 

That is known as death by inches.  

 

He does check all the boxes like you suggest but the bolded to me is death by inches.  It sets precedent and seemingly opens the door for other similar "slightly over the top" contracts.

 

 

Actually no

 

If you have to overpay slightly on ONLY your 3-4 KEY positions, the positions that make the defense work such as DE, SS, WSLB, FS, you arent going to net a cap problem.

If you draft right, 2-3 of these positions at any given time, might be on cheaper rookie contracts

 

The same goes for our offense. Your highest paid will be LT, WR1, QB.

 

Everyone is worried about our cap.........  Its not our money being spent.

 

Not a dime is coming out of my pocket

 

We have so much room, we can spend a bit more this year....... not stupid money,

but $ on a proven star.... 

 

If we bring in just TWO top FAs and 2-3 mid teir FAs........, and then get a starter or two and depth in the draft..... This team can compete for a Superbowl.... This year.....

and if the FAs are young..........for a few years in the future

 

Watching the Colts play since 1971 (I was 9) The Colts have been in the SB, only a few times.

If you are close, and have the resources (yes on both)

 

You might take a bigger step

 

That's my only point

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

Actually no

 

If you have to overpay slightly on ONLY your 3-4 KEY positions, the positions that make the defense work such as DE, SS, WSLB, FS, you arent going to net a cap problem.

If you draft right, 2-3 of these positions at any given time, might be on cheaper rookie contracts

 

The same goes for our offense. Your highest paid will be LT, WR1, QB.

 

Everyone is worried about our cap.........  Its not our money being spent.

 

Not a dime is coming out of my pocket

 

We have so much room, we can spend a bit more this year....... not stupid money,

but $ on a proven star.... 

 

If we bring in just TWO top FAs and 2-3 mid teir FAs........, and then get a starter or two and depth in the draft..... This team can compete for a Superbowl.... This year.....

and if the FAs are young..........for a few years in the future

 

Watching the Colts play since 1971 (I was 9) The Colts have been in the SB, only a few times.

If you are close, and have the resources (yes on both)

 

You might take a bigger step

 

That's my only point

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think they do one market setting contract.  Collins may be that player and I really have no problem with that.

 

But I also really like and respect Ballard for his ability to stay disciplined and not get into bidding wars. I think that kind of restraint serves the team best in the long run

 

My two cents... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I look at his highlights he is a playmaker. There is a huge gap between how good he is and Geathers. Teams have to game plan around Collins. Geathers is efficient and does his job. Collins would be a huge upgrade over Geathers. But there is still a place for Geathers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, runthepost said:

We should of drafted him the first time around. I think we sign him during the first couple of hours

Can teams talk to players before the 13th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Can teams talk to players before the 13th.

March 11-13

Clubs are permitted to contact, and enter into contract negotiations with, the certified agents of players who will become Unrestricted Free Agents upon the expiration of their 2018 player contracts at 4:00 p.m., New York time, on March 13.

https://operations.nfl.com/football-ops/league-governance/2018-19-important-nfl-dates/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Virtuoso80 said:

March 11-13

Clubs are permitted to contact, and enter into contract negotiations with, the certified agents of players who will become Unrestricted Free Agents upon the expiration of their 2018 player contracts at 4:00 p.m., New York time, on March 13.

https://operations.nfl.com/football-ops/league-governance/2018-19-important-nfl-dates/

Next week is going to be very interesting. Should be fun. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Next week is going to be very interesting. Should be fun. 

That’s officially...I’m sure backdoor communications started last week at the combine, if not before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on CB bring him home where he should of been in the first place. Did I read that he and hooker were good friends?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

Come on CB bring him home where he should of been in the first place. Did I read that he and hooker were good friends?

And have the same agent!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, jskinnz said:

 

I think they do one market setting contract.  Collins may be that player and I really have no problem with that.

 

But I also really like and respect Ballard for his ability to stay disciplined and not get into bidding wars. I think that kind of restraint serves the team best in the long run

 

My two cents... 

I agree with you 

 

We need to be selective

 

Bringing in 6 top FAs  MAY look good for a year or two.... You will spike at very high levels, you will drop at very low levels.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen us run lots of 3 safety sets like others have said. I'd sign both him and Geathers. Better to have 3 good safety's that way hopefully we can always keep two on the field

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes we basically had no healthy safeties for that KC game. It killed us. Wouldn’t mind all three at all. Let’s not forget hooker is injury prone also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heard an interesting take on NFL radio during the drive into work.  The talking heads were Bob Papa (Giants play by play guy) and Charlie Weis.  Both know a little bit about the game and the Giants.

 

Weis posed the question - do people think Gettlemen got stupid overnight in relation to all the uproar over Collins not being signed or tagged.  Paraphrasing here but the basic premise was that the GM knows what he is doing and while Weis likes Collins as a player, there are some clear limitations.  He also said he was not very good in 2018.  Papa chimed in with similar takes.

 

Now someone's trash is another man's treasure and Collins could come here (or anywhere) and be fantastic.  But this "pushback" on the Collins' hype was interesting. Why exactly are the Giants allowing a universally loved, young lockerroom leader to walk out the door?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

Heard an interesting take on NFL radio during the drive into work.  The talking heads were Bob Papa (Giants play by play guy) and Charlie Weis.  Both know a little bit about the game and the Giants.

 

Weis posed the question - do people think Gettlemen got stupid overnight in relation to all the uproar over Collins not being signed or tagged.  Paraphrasing here but the basic premise was that the GM knows what he is doing and while Weis likes Collins as a player, there are some clear limitations.  He also said he was not very good in 2018.  Papa chimed in with similar takes.

 

Now someone's trash is another man's treasure and Collins could come here (or anywhere) and be fantastic.  But this "pushback" on the Collins' hype was interesting. Why exactly are the Giants allowing a universally loved, young lockerroom leader to walk out the door?

 

Personally I think Gettlemen is an odd duck.  He doesn't want to pay a team captain and a top safety top dollar.  But he pays OBJ and is now willing to listen to trade overtures.  Two of his best players.  Doesn't look like he is trying to win now.  Looks like he is entering rebuild territory.  Good luck to them and good luck for us I hope.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

Heard an interesting take on NFL radio during the drive into work.  The talking heads were Bob Papa (Giants play by play guy) and Charlie Weis.  Both know a little bit about the game and the Giants.

 

Weis posed the question - do people think Gettlemen got stupid overnight in relation to all the uproar over Collins not being signed or tagged.  Paraphrasing here but the basic premise was that the GM knows what he is doing and while Weis likes Collins as a player, there are some clear limitations.  He also said he was not very good in 2018.  Papa chimed in with similar takes.

 

Now someone's trash is another man's treasure and Collins could come here (or anywhere) and be fantastic.  But this "pushback" on the Collins' hype was interesting. Why exactly are the Giants allowing a universally loved, young lockerroom leader to walk out the door?

 

well, the Giants have been making a TON of stupid moves the last year or two

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to get Collins. But I am not sure it is even smart based on value alone.

 

There are a lot of solid Safeties on this market right now.

 

Safety was very very slow to develop last year. Guys like Reid (yes I know there were other factors), Boston, Vaccaro all sat out there for awhile and then signed deals way less than people anticipated. This year there is even more talent out there.

 

L.Collins

A.Amos

L.Joyner

E.Thomas

T.Mathieu

H.Clinton-Dix

T.Boston

K.Vaccaro

A.Harris

E.Weddle

A.Phillips

J.Ward

G.Quinn

 

That's 13 guys right there that could start or be a fantastic 3rd Safety. And of them all, only Weddle, Quinn and E.Thomas are over the age of 28.

 

So there is a lot of talent out there at the Safety position.

 

This doesn't even include Geathers.

 

This is why I bet Ballard is letting Geathers test the waters. That market is going to be flush with talent and some of these guys will have to settle for small one and two year deals.

 

Heck, last year Boston, Phillips, Vaccarro and Reid all basically settled for 1 year, $1.5M deals essentially.

 

W a market this flush, some guys will have to take similar deals and can likely be had for 2 year deals in the $4M-$8M range at the rate of $2M-$4M a year.

 

This is where the Collins stuff gets complicated. Is Collins at $10M+ a year (if he commands that as some of our fans are suggesting) a better pickup than some of these other guys at considerably less?

 

I would rather sign Anthony Harris or Tre Boston or a guy like that for $2M-$4M if I had to make that choice.

 

I would be happy to have Collins, but I would not want to pay him more than around $8M a year in this market. Even that is rich with how many good Safeties are out there for a lot cheaper.

 

This is also why I think fans might be disappointed if/when we do not land Collins. If we are even in contention for him that's a plus. But the sky is not falling if we miss out. There are a lot of good Safeties out there for the taking this off-season.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, csmopar said:

well, the Giants have been making a TON of stupid moves the last year or two

 

I am not a Giants fan so I don't really care but I would bet your definition of stupid differs from Gettleman. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This guy (writer) is the same guy that thought the Lions would win the NFC North last year, and that the NYGs would have one of the better O's last year...        This is hilarious.... Brady's receiving corp is #1 Edleman who leads the league in drops and is only target #1 because Brown and Gordon were let go. Dorsett is their #2 lol... They picked up Sannu, but he's averaging less than 30 YPG. Brown did better than both Dorsett and Sannu in just one game before he was cut. Their TEs are pretty much non-existent.   Also, JBs averages early on are a little misleading. 4 of those early games were vs teams with bottom 10 passing Ds, and we've probably played more teams with bad passing Ds this year than the majority of the league. Also, teams did not have film early on of JB in FR's O. Opponents learned quick to focus on the run and dare JB to throw.     Remove the Hoyer games as they're irrelevant. Sure you can blame AV for some of our woes, but lets be honest, we shouldn't have been in a situation where we had to have a FG to win, in a lot of these games against mediocre teams. Aside from just a few games vs very bad passing Ds, our passing O has been bad to mediocre all year.     Faster processor? Huh? His time to throw has not improved at all. And it's not like there haven't been a ton of film showing wide open WRs and TEs all year long...... Underrated touch? Are you kidding me. He has two speeds. Fast and faster.      We should probably look at the regression of every pass catcher (when healthy) this year with the exception of  Pascal.    Also, if A is the Pats, like I said above, they've been a revolving door at WR, had no TEs, plus serious OL woes..... yet are still a top 10 passing O.... while we are bottom 10.
    • When a QB has nearly 30 starts in his career, regardless of the circumstances, you know whether or not you have a franchise QB. If anyone has doubts about Jacoby at 27 years old and nearly 30 starts then he isn't the franchise QB.   There seems to be 2 thoughts regarding Brissett this season.   1. He is a franchise QB if the Colts upgrade the receivers and they stay healthy. 2. He is terrible and should be replaced as soon as possible.   The truth is somewhere between those two thoughts.   Jacoby would be better if he played with better receivers but that doesn't mean that Jacoby becomes a franchise QB. This doesn't mean the Colts don't need to upgrade that position group though.   Jacoby is not terrible. He is a QB a team can make the playoffs with and going on a run. But he is not an elite QB. So if the Colts come across someone in the draft who they view as being elite, or the potential to become elite, they will absolutely select him and let him sit a year or two behind Jacoby.    The Colts can believe in Jacoby as a starter but still look to upgrade that position if the right player comes along. 
    • When Hurts got pulled at half time 2 years ago in the national title game for true Freshman Tua that was all I needed to see. They interviewed Sabin after the game and asked why he put Tua in and he said “Because we needed to throw the ball and I thought he could do it better”. Pretty much a clear indication that Hurts isn’t exactly an amazing passer.   Then he goes to a coach who produced back to back Heisman QBs And has a turnaround and people want to act like it’s anything other than scheme. Hurts isn’t good; Lincoln Riley is.   I want no parts of Hurts. Give me Love all day
    • I just picked out this area of the quote in the post itself. Wasn’t picking on you, you’re just the quoted person it attached to I guess. 
    • I agree that I would challenge that as well.  Also, I didn't write it, the SI author did.
  • Members

    • dodsworth

      dodsworth 1,069

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfan77

      coltsfan77 111

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 2,946

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • aaron11

      aaron11 2,357

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AlanNC

      AlanNC 125

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BleedBlue4Shoe86

      BleedBlue4Shoe86 122

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 181

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 121

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr.Debonair

      Mr.Debonair 2,245

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robin

      Robin 147

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...