Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

stitches

Landon Collins status/rumors (merge)

Recommended Posts

If we do try to pursuit Collins, I still expect us to sign geathers. We play a lot of three safety looks so geathers can continue to play in the box with Collins and hooker on the backside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

Except collins is an in the box safety and is better than Geathers if we sign him and dont play him in the box at SS we are stupid 

 

Not necessary. Collins is much better in coverage then Geathers, but Geathers is better playing inside.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CR91 said:

 

Not necessary. Collins is much better in coverage then Geathers, but Geathers is better playing inside.  

Sure hes better in coverage but hes not good enough to be playing deep he is also a better box safety than geathers we would prolly just play Odom deep in our 3 safety sets 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

im just waiting for this all to start.  its gonna be an intense off season, rumored FAs, signings, re-signings, the draft!  YAY WE ARE RELEVANT AGAIN!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

Sure hes better in coverage but hes not good enough to be playing deep he is also a better box safety than geathers we would prolly just play Odom deep in our 3 safety sets 

 

Id feel better with Collins in coverage then Odum. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, csmopar said:

im just waiting for this all to start.  its gonna be an intense off season, rumored FAs, signings, re-signings, the draft!  YAY WE ARE RELEVANT AGAIN!!!

hey, i'm glad it won't be boring least.... I'm sure there's going to be a lot of nonsense as there always is but it'll hold my attention. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

Id feel better with Collins in coverage then Odum. 

I just see no way Ballard signs one of the best SS and plays him deep instead of where he excels in the box 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I just see no way Ballard signs one of the best SS and plays him deep instead of where he excels in the box 

 

Same way we played Mike Mitchell and Farley. Geathers is basically another LB out there. Collins can still roam the field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

Same way we played Mike Mitchell and Farley. Geathers is basically another LB out there. Collins can still roam the field.

We'll see but I bet he's playing in the box over everyone on our roster 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

We'll see but I bet he's playing in the box over everyone on our roster 

 

I don't see this as an issue. It fits perfectly with what we do with our safeties. Even guys like Odum and Wilcox were on the field at the same time as geathers and hooker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

I don't see this as an issue. It fits perfectly with what we do with our safeties. Even guys like Odum and Wilcox were on the field at the same time as geathers and hooker.

Well playing a S that's not that good in deep coverage deep is kinda dumb. why wouldn't we just go after one of the safties who are better deep that are prolly cheaper. Paying the most likely most expensive S then moving him out of position is pointless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Colts_Fan12 said:

Well playing a S that's not that good in deep coverage deep is kinda dumb. why wouldn't we just go after one of the safties who are better deep that are prolly cheaper.

 

Mitchell and Farley were not playing deep coverage. More mid-zone with the ability to roam.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I just see no way Ballard signs one of the best SS and plays him deep instead of where he excels in the box 

 

Collins may not excel in deep coverage the way Hooker does, but Collins does excel in covering TEs one on one, and the ability to roam the mid zone area. Geathers does not to my understanding. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BProland85 said:

 

Collins may not excel in deep coverage the way Hooker does, but Collins does excel in covering TEs one on one. Geathers does not to my understanding. 

Exactly that's why I dont get this idea to play him deep when he is great at covering underneath and playing the run D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

We play a lot of three safety looks. We can sign Collins and Geathers with Collins playing coverage and Geathers in the box

 

Yep..."big nickel" is (and should be) the staple of this defense. 

 

The Colts need three legit Ss to run it...plus some depth. Ideally, two of those are high level players. This is why I really wanted Derwin James. But Collins and Hooker could be that pairing...with a draft pick playing the nickel position. 

 

I honestly wouldn't be surprised to see Ballard sign a couple Ss in FA and draft one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something to also consider...if the Colts transition to more Cover 3 concepts...Collins wouldn't really be a deep S.

 

If they make a play for a legit CB who can man cover...this might be a good indication of where this defense is headed.

 

If they are sticking with the Cover 2, I think I might like Mathieu better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, shastamasta said:

Something to also consider...if the Colts transition to more Cover 3 concepts...Collins wouldn't really be a deep S.

 

If they make a play for a legit CB who can man cover...this might be a good indication of where this defense is headed.

 

If they are sticking with the Cover 2, I think I might like Mathieu better.

 

Draft Amani Oruwariye 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, stitches said:

 

 

At this point, most high end FAs with big salary demands seem to be angling at our capspace. It's kind of hilarious in a way, but oh well... I thought it was at least interesting to post. 

 

On the article... I think at this point most of what Colts media is putting out is pure conjecture and nothing concrete as sourced information. It's almost entirely "I think the Colts SHOULD pursue him" rather than information about actual interest. 

I'm confused by what's circled?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, twfish said:

I'm confused by what's circled?

 

Hooker commented

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, twfish said:

I'm confused by what's circled?

Collins' last liked comment is of a post by Malik Hooker:

 

Dz5UKmUX0AAE57f.jpg

 

This comment with a video in it:

 

 

Also, worth pointing out that Collins is not liberal with his 'likes'. He has 3 liked tweets since the beginning of the year and the only one football related is the one by Hooker. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you imagine if we would have just drafted in instead of dorsett :rollseyes: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also might be worth pointing out Hooker and Collins have the same agent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hate to admit it but I haven't watched Landon Collins play much if any. Didn't he struggle big time his first 2 years? How would he fit into our defense? Is he to replace Geathers or?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Reidm said:

Also might be worth pointing out Hooker and Collins have the same agent.

Going to happen if he gets free.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest update says the Giants want to work out a long term deal with Collins. If they can’t work it out, then expect him to be tagged. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, pgt_rob said:

Hate to admit it but I haven't watched Landon Collins play much if any. Didn't he struggle big time his first 2 years? How would he fit into our defense? Is he to replace Geathers or?

 

Struggled on his first year. Dropped weight, was allowed to play exclusively SS and took of his second year and has been one of the best safeties since. He's better the closer he is to LOS. Not a typical deep cover 2 S.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, stitches said:

 

 

OK, lets go get him. 

I agree. He's a rare talent at a position of genuine need. Give me a free agency haul of Collins and Flowers and Humphries and this team is substantially stronger. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Boiler_Colt said:

This place will go nuts when he signs elsewhere.

 

This place will be nuts over the next 2-3 weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Superman said:

 

This place will be nuts over the next 2-3 weeks.

Absolutely. Especially with all the misinformation that is always spread around in the FA frenzy. The last two years should teach us that we shouldn't always believe reports linking the Colts to anybody.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hoose said:

I agree. He's a rare talent at a position of genuine need. Give me a free agency haul of Collins and Flowers and Humphries and this team is substantially stronger. 

You are going to be lucky to take one of those let alone all 3 of them. I am not sure I want to spend my one big cap dollar in FA on a safety unless he is tops at coverage and the run, is he both of those things?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like there is going to be a big market for him. Which means he will get a overpriced contract. The colts might be interested but I doubt they will be willing to overpay him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s probably going to be the best FA of this class. With all the player tags getting handed out today, he’ll get a rich deal somewhere.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Boiler_Colt said:

This place will go nuts when he signs elsewhere.

 

After last year, I think Ballard will get the benefit of the doubt, regardless... at least for one year.  

 

That said, Collins makes a lot of sense, and you have the dough to pay a premium price for at least one player.  I have a feeling he'll be a Colt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

This place will be nuts over the next 2-3 weeks.

More like over the next 2 months before the draft. And then it will go nuts over the draft for the following 2 months before camp... and then it's going nuts for 2 more months about the roster cuts, etc... :D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, stitches said:

 

 

OK, lets go get him. 

I really hope so that will free up a pick for another position! I just really hope Geathers isn't starting next to Hooker next year 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He tried to rip off Garrett's helmet when they were on the ground and then kept coming toward him as well after that but Garrett deserves 6 games = the brunt of the punishment.
    • I didn't blame Mack for the run game...I am talking about the talent level. For this season, I think it's the lack of light front carries moreso than stacked boxes. The average defenders in the box is about the same as last year...and he is on pace to only see 4-5 more stacked box carries vs. last year. But the light front carries are down and that's where his production came from last year.   A big part of the decrease is on the QB...and I am sure the last two games with Hoyer has only increased the base front and stacked front carries. But Mack is also part of it. He's not a pass-catching threat...and he's running the ball on half the plays he's in...so it makes the offense a bit more predictable.    So I don't want a RB2...I want a more well-rounded RB1a. Give me a Nick Chubb or an Aaron Jones type.   And Hines is alright...but he's not really an APB...because he can't run the ball. They just do that to keep the defense honest and it's typically a wasted play. But even if we call him an APB...he's fairly average. He has gotten better at making plays after the catch for sure...but still not that dynamic.   If I can't have that well-rounded RB1a...then I want a dynamite APB...ala James White or Duke Johnson...or Miles Sanders.   Ideally, I can have both...but it's rare to have that setup...like NO the past couple of years. Right now, I just feel like the Colts are missing parts to the RB game...and I think some investment could be made.
    • People keep saying that about Rudolph but I'm just not seeing it from the videos I've seen
    • Yes...I agree JB is the big reason the offensive numbers are down. I think you are confusing my post as an excuse for JB. I am just looking at the skill position talent objectively...and it's not overwhelming.   Doyle's best year was with JB...so I don't really get this argument about JB holding him back. But that Pro Bowl year (two years ago) was a byproduct of volume as the checkdown option in a bad offense (his yards/catch was <9). Now those checkdowns get spread round (Campbell, Pascal, Hines). I like Doyle just fine though...but he's a solid complimentary piece...and he's also going to turn 30.    I liked Ebron as well when they signed him. But he's a pass-catching TE...who drops passes...he's not some special talent. The Colts need long-term improvements at TE...they can't just keep re-investing more money in the same two guys. So I hope they explore the trade market...or maybe one of these free agent-to-be TEs becomes available.        
    • No butthurt here. Just trying to shine a light in the fog you live in. 
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 23,849

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 2,661

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 8,532

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 991

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 9,137

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • adubb84

      adubb84 251

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • runthepost

      runthepost 778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 11,873

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 10,187

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jchandler7

      jchandler7 256

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...