Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

How good was Tarik Glenn


Dark Superman

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Matabix said:

Lead the line in false starts but besides maybe Saturday I think he gave up less sacks. It was a shame he never made 1 pro bowl. He kept the leftside of the line cleared for years.

Often times the refs blew those calls. Glenn was one of the fastest ever at the snap. His reaction time was amazing 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Matabix said:

Lead the line in false starts but besides maybe Saturday I think he gave up less sacks. It was a shame he never made 1 pro bowl. He kept the leftside of the line cleared for years.

He made a lot of false starts, sometimes at the worst of times.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Him retiring was the beginning of the downward trend for us on the oline.

 

Ugoh and Charlie Johnson weren't going to fill in for Tarik's loss. Then we had some arena league reject playing RG for a while (no idea what his name was). Peyton really did make chicken salad out of chicken % his last few years.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tarik Glenn made at least one Pro-Bowl, I was there for the 2007 Pro-Bowl, our Super Bowl winning year 2006 season, Super Bowl and Pro-Bowl in 2007.  We had Manning, M. Harrison, R. Wayne, J. Saturday, and Tarik.  Interestingly, DE's D. Freeney, and R. Mathis didn't make it that year but I remember they both made at the same time in another year.  

 

Edgerrin James was not a Colt anymore, replaced by Addai and Rhodes at RB.  M. Harrison barely played, caught a couple passes in the Pro-Bowl warm-up, he must have been injured.  Reggie caught a long TD pass.   

 

It was cool to have those Colt players introduced last with the announcer saying "From the Super Bowl Champions Indianapolis Colts", those 5 Colt plays walked on side by side onto the field. Too bad no defensive player was represented but if you remember, our run defense sucked in the 2006 season, but became formidable during the playoff run.  Some things are just explainable?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glenn was very underrated. Manning even begged him to not retire after the SB win. Besides false starts he was exceptional. Saturday to me during those years was probably the 4th best. You had guys like Jake Scott, Lijia and Diem on the line. I remember hearing a Mic’d Up with Saturday arguing with another player. The guy was yelling that he sucked. Manning masked a lot of deficiencies with his quick release. Every team knew it as well. The anchor was Tarik. After he left it was the end of an era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2019 at 8:05 AM, IinD said:

Him retiring was the beginning of the downward trend for us on the oline.

 

Ugoh and Charlie Johnson weren't going to fill in for Tarik's loss. Then we had some arena league reject playing RG for a while (no idea what his name was). Peyton really did make chicken salad out of chicken % his last few years.

 

 

 

Mike Pollack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tarik was a devastating run blocker.  His ability to crash down the line at take out the DT at the snap was THE single biggest reason why the stretch play and PAP off the stretch play was so effective.  But Glenn struggled with speed rushers his entire career, until the Colts drafted Freeney.  Facing Freeney in practice, greatly improved his ability to handle speed rushers and that was why he went to 2 probowls and a third as an alternate in the latter part of his career.

 

As a run blocker, if Glenn got his hands on a guy it was over, he would drive the guy wherever Glenn wanted to take him.

 

As a pass blocker, he was technically sound, stayed flat footed, good extension on his arms and had surprisingly quick feet and good lower body agility.  

 

Most don't remember, in 2006, Glenn was held out of training camp because he came in overweight (there were rumors that he was pushing 380).  I think the same thing happened the following year, he was overweight and didn't have it in him anymore to lose the weight so he retired (again that is speculation on my part based on some comments I heard from a couple of the coaches).  It's too bad, he probably had a good 2-3 more years in him if he could have kept his weight under control.

 

So how good was Glenn?  He was not hall of fame worthy or anything like that and from 1997 to 2002 he was a very good, but not elite LT (about on par with what AC has been providing every year), from 2003 to 2006 he was an elite LT, easily a top 5 in the NFL during that time and perhaps even a top 2.  

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2019 at 10:54 PM, DarkSuperman said:

Guys like Manning, Harrison, James, got all the credit back then. I would hear people talk about Jeff Saturday more than Tarik.

 

Saturday was a good C, but he got a lot of credit because of Peyton.  Peyton changed the game with how he changed the offense at the line of scrimmage.  Saturday, IMO, got a lot of very positive publicity because he was considered a very cerebral C playing with arguably the most cerebral QB who has ever played in the NFL.  Physically, I think Saturday was a pretty average C .. but he was able to keep up with Peyton's audibles at the line and he looked very active in doing it.

 

I could be wrong, but I think Tarik was a more critical piece of that line in protecting Peyton's blind-side for so long.

 

 

On 2/16/2019 at 3:48 PM, a06cc said:

Glenn was very underrated. Manning even begged him to not retire after the SB win. Besides false starts he was exceptional. Saturday to me during those years was probably the 4th best. You had guys like Jake Scott, Lijia and Diem on the line. I remember hearing a Mic’d Up with Saturday arguing with another player. The guy was yelling that he sucked. Manning masked a lot of deficiencies with his quick release. Every team knew it as well. The anchor was Tarik. After he left it was the end of an era. 

 

I tend to agree with most of this... though, I think Saturday was probably better than Scott and Lilja.  Again, I think he was just an average physical center (in terms of being big and strong and athletic), but he was able to mask a lot of that by being able to keep on the same page with Peyton (which in turn masked a lot of deficiencies on our entire offense).

 

I will say the one thing that was also very impressive about Saturday was his ability to stay healthy.  In 12 years as a Colts starter, there were only 2 seasons where he didn't start all 16 games (2004 he started 14/16 and 2008 he started 12/16).  

 

I think Ryan Kelly is a far superior physical specimen and overall C than Saturday, but in just 3 seasons in the NFL, he's missed more games than Saturday and Tarik Glenn did in their combined 22 seasons as starters for the Colts (Kelly has missed a total of 13 -- 16 games as a rookie, 7 in year 2, and 12 in year 3  -- after Saturday became a full-time starter he and Glenn both only missed 6 games each in their 12 and 10 year spans as Colts starting OLs).

 

To Tarik's credit, even though he had some weight/motivational issues late in his career, he started all 16 games in 9 of his 10 seasons in the NFL, with only one season where he missed time and played 10 games (2003).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History has been kind to him it seems.  I remember how fans used to pummel him because of his false starts and that led to some unfair criticisms and that diminished him in many Colts fans eyes imo.  I'm glad he seems more appreciated now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CurBeatElite said:

 

Saturday was a good C, but he got a lot of credit because of Peyton.  Peyton changed the game with how he changed the offense at the line of scrimmage.  Saturday, IMO, got a lot of very positive publicity because he was considered a very cerebral C playing with arguably the most cerebral QB who has ever played in the NFL.  Physically, I think Saturday was a pretty average C .. but he was able to keep up with Peyton's audibles at the line and he looked very active in doing it.

 

I could be wrong, but I think Tarik was a more critical piece of that line in protecting Peyton's blind-side for so long.

 

 

 

I tend to agree with most of this... though, I think Saturday was probably better than Scott and Lilja.  Again, I think he was just an average physical center (in terms of being big and strong and athletic), but he was able to mask a lot of that by being able to keep on the same page with Peyton (which in turn masked a lot of deficiencies on our entire offense).

 

I will say the one thing that was also very impressive about Saturday was his ability to stay healthy.  In 12 years as a Colts starter, there were only 2 seasons where he didn't start all 16 games (2004 he started 14/16 and 2008 he started 12/16).  

 

I think Ryan Kelly is a far superior physical specimen and overall C than Saturday, but in just 3 seasons in the NFL, he's missed more games than Saturday and Tarik Glenn did in their combined 22 seasons as starters for the Colts (Kelly has missed a total of 13 -- 16 games as a rookie, 7 in year 2, and 12 in year 3  -- after Saturday became a full-time starter he and Glenn both only missed 6 games each in their 12 and 10 year spans as Colts starting OLs).

 

To Tarik's credit, even though he had some weight/motivational issues late in his career, he started all 16 games in 9 of his 10 seasons in the NFL, with only one season where he missed time and played 10 games (2003).

I’ll agree with you Saturday was always available. Kelly is starting to worry me though. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, a06cc said:

I’ll agree with you Saturday was always available. Kelly is starting to worry me though. 

 

Yes... in terms of football skills and being a good player, I think he's the best C I have seen on the Colts since I started following in 1994.

 

However, we need him on the field full-time for him to reach his potential and become considered a great player for the team.  We are lucky some of the back-ups were able to step in last year and not miss too much, but IMO our o-line was way better with a healthy Kelly than with Boehm or Andrews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think u r missing my point. Pick a player that fits and excels in your scheme. Guys like Nabers and MJH are freaks and r not scheme dependant. Think of the Rams. Kupp is good, but they dipped into the draft and amazingly draft another stud because he fits their scheme and does not have elite triats. It is similar to the way they draft corners. They r typical zone corners. U can let one-way if they want to much as u can go back into the draft and hopefully get another in the 2nd. That is my point.
    • Thanks for trying to get it back on topic.   People just can't resist trying to turn every other thread into a Ballard grievance thread.       I thought the same thing on Georgia Defensive players   Lassiter and Bullard would be the (2) I would suspect we're most likely, if any.   I agree though, don't fit Ballard's profile too well.     Probably just used them as a good example, as they do have a great defensive coach and have put a lot of players in the league.
    • Lmao.  Yeah.   I know you think you are this great evaluation guy.  Look at the numbers.  
    • Having Ballard as your GM is liking living through the cycke of abuse lol He can't really move up because we have to many holes to fill because of his lack luster drafting.  So, he prefers to move back to accumulate more pics, hoping he has more of a chance of those pics turning out. Quality over quality. Now that philosophy really isn't worked. So here we are again having holes to fill and unable to move up because we have to move back to correct his erros, which will go on and on lol. 
    • Ballard praised Georgia defensive players and their knowledge of the game.   Georgia defensive players in this year's draft, per Scouts Inc (ESPN): Kamari Lassiter, CB, #45 (doesn't fit Ballard's profile for DBs) Javon Bullard, S, #49 (doesn't fit Ballard's profile for safeties) Tykee Smith, S, #97 (not a great fit for Ballard's profile for safeties) Zion Logue, DT, #222 (long, big, not a standout athlete) Jontrey Hunter, LB, #316 (not a great fit from a size standpoint, didn't run)
  • Members

    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,541

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,570

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,758

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 7,039

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts89

      colts89 1,019

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,379

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,910

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 284

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,104

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shaolin06

      Shaolin06 28

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...