Jump to content

Recommended Posts

name a player 

next poster predicts where they go

then names new player

 

LeVeon Bell 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

name a player 

next poster predicts where they go

then names new player

 

LeVeon Bell 

49ers

 

Adsm Humphries 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, boo2202 said:

Bell=jets

 

tyrell williams?

I must have buzzed in on Bell a split second before you. 

 

Willuams- Packers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, FirsTime said:

ZaDarius Smith - Raiders

 

Bryce Callahan

 

 

Bryce Callahan - Broncos

 

Frank Clark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, FirsTime said:

Frank Clark - Seahawks

 

Jordan Hicks

Hicks - Bengals

 

Sheldon Richardson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, ColtsGermany said:

Bridgewater = Redskins

 

Grady Jarret

 

Grady Jarret - Colts (gotta give us somebody right lol?)

 

Landon Collins 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, AZColt11 said:

I'm going Colts.  Shoulda been here years ago.

 

Brandon Graham

Brandon Graham = Titans

 

Golden Tate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, ColtsGermany said:

Brandon Graham = Titans

 

Golden Tate

Tate - Oakland

 

Clayton Geathers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. Up until that neck injury I don’t think manning missed a snap his entire career here.
    • Andrew has had 3 maybe 4 injuries since the beginning of his career, manning only missed one season here. So no worries the bad luck was all Bob's. 
    • that guy is too short, has no wheels, and has to take a time out after every 6 attempts. will never make it.. nice jugs though
    • The facts.. a hung jury (twice) mistrial with most voters having sided for the alleged accuser/victim... both times.     She (prosecution) didn't drop the charges, the school (judge/jury) did.  She wanted round 3.  She wanted a full yes or no vote (4-1 or 5-0) either way, not we're split 3-2 so we'll just call it against the majority vote and designate as "Not Responsible" because it isn't 4 or more votes either way. - 'Case closed'.     There were questions (and other items) from the accuser that were never allowed in or asked in follow up questioning.  I think one of the changes to the Stanford Title IX hearing rules is to also allow an attorney to be not only in attendance but to also perform all duties of representation.  And an outside group determines what is admissible as questions/evidence, follow questions, etc...     At some level, it did, and many things at Stanford were changed after. At the  minimum, it was a mistrial x2, with no conclusive verdict either way. Then school (not prosecution) drops the case.   So she really needed to report this to both the school, and also the Police.  But with what evidence does she have to convince the LEO?  Guess the gals need some hidden body cam w/audio these days, like many folks do with dash cams (like me and my wife's cars...) and be their own TMZ...   Video, apparently the only way things get rectified anymore...     No worries, at least we know each others positions.  All is good.     Except to have (at some level) differing story from a another high achieving Stanford student about another high achieving Stanford student-   https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/california/stanford-university/admission/     We don't even know for certain they ever got the FULL story, but articles I've read suggest that the Stanford Panel repressed/disallowed many/most of her interrogating questions and supplemental follow up inquiries to be asked of the accused.  Unless someone directly asks her directly, how could you answer as to whether her whole story was even heard or not?   If you are not truly interested to fully know those answers, then you don't ask.  At least, that's my perspective.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...