Jump to content
stitches

[Garafolo] Howard Mudd back from retirement to be Frank Reich's assistant

Recommended Posts

Wow, this could be one of the better off season moves made.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a pleasant surprise! Other posters mentioned bringing Mudd back, mostly jokingly as far as I could tell, but I never thought he might actually re-join the staff. This is great news!

 

Promoting Marcus Brady was kind of an obvious move, telegraphed from last season. I wonder if they'll bring in or promote another assistant to the spot he had last year...

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

remember when Dante Scarnecchia retired and New England's O line went to crap? Then returned a year later and turned them into world beaters. 

 

This could have a similar effect. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reich values what the offensive line brings to an offense so much. Breath of fresh air. No doubt in my mind that Mudd brings a plethora of knowledge and value to this team. Give this line a good offseason to get healthy and build upon their success and strengths... will be a fun unit to watch dominate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So now things make more sense regarding our OL coaching. I would assume Mudd will have some input there which could take our OL to new heights. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS is killer news, glad to have Howard back, I used to work with, and hang with some of his family, met Howard several times..... all I can say is this is, as everyone already knows, nothing but a positive move....  Howard is a very good friend of Tom Moore, and I have no doubt he brings some of Moore's philosophies with him as an "Offensive Assisstant".

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just think we have a line and offense great enough to bring a great out of retirement. Man this is an amazing signing!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What does it mean?  Likely that he'll be involved in some O-line game planning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news!

 

Funny how Irsay cleaned house in 2012, and brought in outsiders to a successful, and stable franchise, just to turn around bring back people from that old regime. 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mudd's probably pretty excited to work with them himself.  In Indy, he never had this type of nasty O-line, this type of run blocking O-line.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love Chris Ballard and Frank Reich! If we nail this Draft and just get 1 or 2 impactful free agents we are going to be hell on wheels in 2019!  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, #12. said:

Mudd's probably pretty excited to work with them himself.  He never had this type of nasty O-line, this type of run blocking O-line.

 

I’m not sure that’s actually true. Those 02-06 lines had a lot of good pieces on them. 

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, John Waylon said:

 

I’m not sure that’s actually true. Those 02-06 lines had a lot of good pieces on them. 

 

They never mauled people in the run game.  They passed to set up the run.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting. I'm just hoping there is no under-minding Chris Strausser 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, #12. said:

 

They never mauled people in the run game.  They passed to set up the run.

True, but that was also by design, not necessity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, CR91 said:

Very interesting. I'm just hoping there is no under-minding Chris Strausser 

 

It is sort of an interesting. I am not sure where "senior offensive assistant" ranks in the pecking order. My guess would be that Mudd won't be nearly as hands on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, shastamasta said:

 

It is sort of an interesting. I am not sure where "senior offensive assistant" ranks in the pecking order. My guess would be that Mudd won't be nearly as hands on.

 

Im assuming its a consulting role

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome news! Our O-Line should be just as good, if not better next year. If we hit on FA and the draft, we can be SB contenders! Very excited with this hire!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm cool with it as long as we get the old Indy lines.   He wasn't as good in Philly but that could be a number of things I suppose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, krunk said:

I'm cool with it as long as we get the old Indy lines.   He wasn't as good in Philly but that could be a number of things I suppose.

wonder if this was when Peters got hurt 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not too sure.  I would have felt better about this if he was brought back as offensive line coach period.  But since we just hired one....too many chefs in the kitchen and all that.  Trust Reich will work it all out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, waka waka said:

wonder if this was when Peters got hurt 

I don't know but that line in Philly when he was there was pretty bad.   I trust him though in the role they hired him for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, waka waka said:

wonder if this was when Peters got hurt 

 

2 minutes ago, krunk said:

I don't know but that line in Philly when he was there was pretty bad.   I trust him though in the role they hired him for.

 

The OL had a ton of injuries in 2012. Herremans, Peters, Kelce, etc.

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/phi/2012_injuries.htm

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, PeterBowman said:

remember when Dante Scarnecchia retired and New England's O line went to crap? Then returned a year later and turned them into world beaters. 

 

This could have a similar effect. 

 

Colts OL was crap last year?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, MacDee1975 said:

 

Colts OL was crap last year?

nope, but he could give them that kind of improvement...take them to the next level. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, cbear said:

I'm not too sure.  I would have felt better about this if he was brought back as offensive line coach period.  But since we just hired one....too many chefs in the kitchen and all that.  Trust Reich will work it all out. 

 

 

Don't overlook the fact that Mudd will be77  years old this Sunday.

 

So I don't worry at all about any kind of "power play" issues. I would be more concerned that his mind is still sharp and he's attune to how the game may have changed a bit in the last 5 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he will have a position that he will stay in the background BUT if he notice things being done incorrectly (from his point of view ) then he open his mouth....…. What I am seeing here that I love is that this organization is placing a HIGH PRIORITY on protecting Andrew...…...Go Colts !!!!!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, dw49 said:

 

 

Don't overlook the fact that Mudd will be77  years old this Sunday.

 

So I don't worry at all about any kind of "power play" issues. I would be more concerned that his mind is still sharp and he's attune to how the game may have changed a bit in the last 5 years.

Good offensive line play hasn't changed at all in the last 5 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m shocked about this honestly. He bounced on us to go to Philly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That might always be the case, but when it's a DII guy who wasn't at the Combine, it's hard to imagine there was a ton of interest in him. Of course, all it takes is one team being in love with him. I'm sure there was another team expecting him to be a UDFA, mad because the Colts took him in the fifth. Get your guy, that's the most important thing.
    • Good point.  I think this has serious merit 
    • My take   1. We overachieved last season. Period 2. We played at KC 3. TY limited the offense because he was so injured.  4. We played a very very good coach with time to prepare and his guys got some rest too and time to scout the team. Remember, Reich is well known to Reid as well by now.  5. Not having Hooker really mattered 6. Play calling was a bit blah 7. How does Vinny automatic miss those kicks? 8. A strip sack for us turns into a strip sack for them a few plays later, that hurt.  9. A young team who wasn’t supposed to be in the playoffs, let alone a second game in the playoffs had some factor here.  10. KC had a pretty good team   my concern from that game would be how poorly our run game was going forward. Kelly better play better than he did this season or I don’t see a 15 million/yr contract coming his way in Indy. I think with a healthy TY, the additions of DF and Cain and Paris and others should really boost that offense. An offense with TY, Paris, Doyle, EE and Mack, now that’s gonna be a tough group to match up with and defend. Run or pass, heck coach, idk what they are doing lol.    Gonna be fun to see this team evolve and have better back ups coming off the bench. I just hope we have enough beef in the middle to stop the run and I just hope that Kelly was hobbled in that KC game because it was one of his worst games that year. 
    • This again boils down to you hanging on to 'this is how it's always been done.' And you don't get that I don't care about that rationale. I think it can be done better. Which is why, in my first post in this thread, I said "to me, it's a no brainer." To me. It should be obvious that this is my stated preference, not me saying that teams that don't do it this way are stupid.   There should be nothing more that I have to say about that, except you continue to rely on that appeal to authority, and I'm telling you that 'how it's always been done' isn't legitimate reason for not examining potential alternatives. Not just in this area, but in everything.      You're missing an important detail, and I think it's because you've put my argument in a box and are unwilling to actually examine it on its merits.   As I said initially, and have said since, my argument is to make this change six months sooner, not six months later. "Imagine if we had fired Grigson in June 2016 instead of January 2017." Did you miss that part, again? What about "if the Texans had waited until January 2020 to fire Gaine..."?    I want him in asap. You want him asap, but not until January.   My statement about it being just one draft is referencing the worst case scenario, which is 'we just blew a draft cycle by letting a lame duck GM stay,' to which I say 'get over it, I'm okay with that if that's what it takes to get the guy I want in the building, with the staff he wants.' And that's where my argument about it potentially being easier to interview candidates in the down season after the draft is critical. The Jets wanted Joe Douglas; he evidently didn't want to entertain a move during draft season, but jumped at it in May/June. (There's the matter of moving his family during the school year, etc.) In theory, this approach could make it easier to interview good candidates. Whether you agree with that or not, whether it's important to you or not, this is mostly an aside. As I said, this was my response to the alarmist reaction of 'they just blew a draft!' Which I think is overstated, especially in the Texans' case.     Not at all. Again, if Ballard started in June 2016, he theoretically could have changed coaches a year sooner.      This is a hindsight fallacy. Go back to the Texans wanting to hire Caserio. I'm not arguing that he's going to be a great GM, I'm arguing that he's the guy they want to hire, and he's available in June. Same for the Jets and Douglas. The Chiefs and Veach.    We know that every person hired doesn't succeed. I never argued that they do. That's true of whoever you rush to hire in January. The point is that there is always a pool of qualified candidates from which to choose. I won't be retracting that, I firmly believe it, and I said it when the Colts were interviewing coaches in 2012, when they interviewed GMs in 2017, and when they interviewed coaches in 2018. You choosing to reject that is pretty ridiculous, to be honest. There are always qualified candidates. Choosing the right one is a different story.   And again, if there's one guy you really, desperately want, why wait until January to get him?     You could give me the benefit of the doubt and assume that if I'm saying it, I mean it. Especially this far into the discussion...    And going back to what I said earlier, this is and always has been my opinion. I'm not offering studies and conclusive evidence to support this opinion because it's a personal preference, it's what I think would be best (although I have offered evidence and rationale to support my opinion, you've just chosen to reject, for reasons I don't agree with).    I'm okay with the disagreement. What I find personally off-putting is the insistence that, because you don't understand my angle, it means I either haven't actually thought it through, or I don't actually believe it. As I said earlier, I understand that general consensus disagrees with my viewpoint, but that doesn't mean I'm just going to conform. The fact that I'm presenting an argument in earnest should be enough.
  • Members

    • egg

      egg 601

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SilentHill

      SilentHill 2,803

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nulled

      Nulled 19

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Surge89

      Surge89 965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 804

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 34,180

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lucky Colts Fan

      Lucky Colts Fan 4,696

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 110

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtMan

      ColtMan 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chloe6124

      Chloe6124 1,793

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...