stitches

[Garafolo] Howard Mudd back from retirement to be Frank Reich's assistant

Recommended Posts

What a pleasant surprise! Other posters mentioned bringing Mudd back, mostly jokingly as far as I could tell, but I never thought he might actually re-join the staff. This is great news!

 

Promoting Marcus Brady was kind of an obvious move, telegraphed from last season. I wonder if they'll bring in or promote another assistant to the spot he had last year...

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

remember when Dante Scarnecchia retired and New England's O line went to crap? Then returned a year later and turned them into world beaters. 

 

This could have a similar effect. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reich values what the offensive line brings to an offense so much. Breath of fresh air. No doubt in my mind that Mudd brings a plethora of knowledge and value to this team. Give this line a good offseason to get healthy and build upon their success and strengths... will be a fun unit to watch dominate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So now things make more sense regarding our OL coaching. I would assume Mudd will have some input there which could take our OL to new heights. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS is killer news, glad to have Howard back, I used to work with, and hang with some of his family, met Howard several times..... all I can say is this is, as everyone already knows, nothing but a positive move....  Howard is a very good friend of Tom Moore, and I have no doubt he brings some of Moore's philosophies with him as an "Offensive Assisstant".

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just think we have a line and offense great enough to bring a great out of retirement. Man this is an amazing signing!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What does it mean?  Likely that he'll be involved in some O-line game planning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news!

 

Funny how Irsay cleaned house in 2012, and brought in outsiders to a successful, and stable franchise, just to turn around bring back people from that old regime. 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mudd's probably pretty excited to work with them himself.  In Indy, he never had this type of nasty O-line, this type of run blocking O-line.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love Chris Ballard and Frank Reich! If we nail this Draft and just get 1 or 2 impactful free agents we are going to be hell on wheels in 2019!  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, #12. said:

Mudd's probably pretty excited to work with them himself.  He never had this type of nasty O-line, this type of run blocking O-line.

 

I’m not sure that’s actually true. Those 02-06 lines had a lot of good pieces on them. 

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, John Waylon said:

 

I’m not sure that’s actually true. Those 02-06 lines had a lot of good pieces on them. 

 

They never mauled people in the run game.  They passed to set up the run.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting. I'm just hoping there is no under-minding Chris Strausser 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, #12. said:

 

They never mauled people in the run game.  They passed to set up the run.

True, but that was also by design, not necessity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, CR91 said:

Very interesting. I'm just hoping there is no under-minding Chris Strausser 

 

It is sort of an interesting. I am not sure where "senior offensive assistant" ranks in the pecking order. My guess would be that Mudd won't be nearly as hands on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, shastamasta said:

 

It is sort of an interesting. I am not sure where "senior offensive assistant" ranks in the pecking order. My guess would be that Mudd won't be nearly as hands on.

 

Im assuming its a consulting role

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome news! Our O-Line should be just as good, if not better next year. If we hit on FA and the draft, we can be SB contenders! Very excited with this hire!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm cool with it as long as we get the old Indy lines.   He wasn't as good in Philly but that could be a number of things I suppose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, krunk said:

I'm cool with it as long as we get the old Indy lines.   He wasn't as good in Philly but that could be a number of things I suppose.

wonder if this was when Peters got hurt 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not too sure.  I would have felt better about this if he was brought back as offensive line coach period.  But since we just hired one....too many chefs in the kitchen and all that.  Trust Reich will work it all out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, waka waka said:

wonder if this was when Peters got hurt 

I don't know but that line in Philly when he was there was pretty bad.   I trust him though in the role they hired him for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, waka waka said:

wonder if this was when Peters got hurt 

 

2 minutes ago, krunk said:

I don't know but that line in Philly when he was there was pretty bad.   I trust him though in the role they hired him for.

 

The OL had a ton of injuries in 2012. Herremans, Peters, Kelce, etc.

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/phi/2012_injuries.htm

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, PeterBowman said:

remember when Dante Scarnecchia retired and New England's O line went to crap? Then returned a year later and turned them into world beaters. 

 

This could have a similar effect. 

 

Colts OL was crap last year?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, MacDee1975 said:

 

Colts OL was crap last year?

nope, but he could give them that kind of improvement...take them to the next level. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, cbear said:

I'm not too sure.  I would have felt better about this if he was brought back as offensive line coach period.  But since we just hired one....too many chefs in the kitchen and all that.  Trust Reich will work it all out. 

 

 

Don't overlook the fact that Mudd will be77  years old this Sunday.

 

So I don't worry at all about any kind of "power play" issues. I would be more concerned that his mind is still sharp and he's attune to how the game may have changed a bit in the last 5 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he will have a position that he will stay in the background BUT if he notice things being done incorrectly (from his point of view ) then he open his mouth....…. What I am seeing here that I love is that this organization is placing a HIGH PRIORITY on protecting Andrew...…...Go Colts !!!!!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, dw49 said:

 

 

Don't overlook the fact that Mudd will be77  years old this Sunday.

 

So I don't worry at all about any kind of "power play" issues. I would be more concerned that his mind is still sharp and he's attune to how the game may have changed a bit in the last 5 years.

Good offensive line play hasn't changed at all in the last 5 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m shocked about this honestly. He bounced on us to go to Philly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe Denver or Washington due to cap space. I'm hoping we get a player in return if he ends up going anywhere. I wouldn't complain about getting a pick either.    I can get behind this but not just for DeAndre Baker maybe a pass rusher or interior D-line will fall. 
    • If DeAndre Baker falls past Denver, I wouldn't mind trading pick #26 and Brissett to the Dolphins in order to acquire him. That would be a deal both teams might agree to if the Dolphins are indeed interested.
    • He's my favorite FA or even early round pickup at WR this offseason 
    • I laughed when seeing "QB" listed as a team need on OnTheClock 2019.  That being said, I have to wonder if it's worth taking a flyer on a QB like Kyle Shurmur and either deal him or Brissett going forward.
    • Having faith without knowing why is "blind faith". At least when I supported certain picks that Grigson chose (like Dorsett), it was because I thought they were good and I was wrong. It wasn't because Grigson was our GM and I felt an obligation that I had to "follow" his every move. He did have 3 straight winning years and advanced further each time, but it became apparent by the end of 2014 that his drafting and FA signings were poor (besides the early part of the 2012 draft), and Luck was carrying the team. Luck got hurt afterward, but it's not like Grigson's drafting or FA signings got better. We were a team carried by Luck and the previous regimes players from 2012-2016. I didn't notice it completely until after the Pats AFC Championship game where we were completely outmatched, but I did notice poor patterns before that (especially missing on 1st round picks).   I'm just saying that the people who say that Ballard knows more than other "armchair GM's" would also say the same about Grigson, so they were merely guessing and were right on Ballard just like they were wrong about Grigson with "blind faith". I don't know, that line just bugs me a lot. Most people who say that also don't predict ahead of time who is good and who isn't, they are extremists in an either positive or negative way, and both are poor viewpoints IMO. Ok, rant over! 
  • Members

    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 4,735

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BOTT

      BOTT 11,774

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DarkSuperman

      DarkSuperman 3,463

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • esmort

      esmort 1,496

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 1,484

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 319

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rock8591

      rock8591 885

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BluHorzhu

      BluHorzhu 12

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 6,951

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 3,654

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: