TomDiggs

Colts extend RG Mark Glowinski [Merge]

Recommended Posts

I am dying to see the numbers

 

Based on projections, good offensive linemen this off-season can expect $8M-$10M a year annually if they are solid.

 

Bobby Massie just got $8M a year.

 

There are suggestions that Juwan James could command $9M a year or more.

 

And yes they are OTs, but the gap between a good OT and a good OG has narrowed in recent years.

 

If Ryan Jensen is a $10.5M a year guy, then I will be curious to see what Glow signed for.

 

He played easily as a top-20 OG, so anything in the $8.0- $8.5M a year range or less would be a good deal.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great move. Was an absolute no brainer to get him back.

 

1 minute ago, TomDiggs said:

I am dying to see the numbers

 

Based on projections, good offensive linemen this off-season can expect $8M-$10M a year annually if they are solid.

 

Bobby Massie just got $8M a year.

 

There are suggestions that Juwan James could command $9M a year or more.

 

And yes they are OTs, but the gap between a good OT and a good OG has narrowed in recent years.

 

If Ryan Jensen is a $10.5M a year guy, then I will be curious to see what Glow signed for.

 

He played easily as a top-20 OG, so anything in the $8.0- $8.5M a year range or less would be a good deal.

 

3 years $18M.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And there you have it. 

 

Braden Smith stays at RT and the Colts will look at other positions as priorities in FA and the draft.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, pgt_rob said:

Great move. Was an absolute no brainer to get him back.

 

3 years $18M.

Thanks man

 

If so, that is actually one heck of a value.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TomDiggs said:

Thanks man

 

If so, that is actually one heck of a value.

 

Yes we did for sure. Steal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not gonna lie, I am surprised we got to keep him for such a small investment.

 

The latest says not only just 3 years and $18M but that only $4.2M in a signing bonus.

 

Crazy good value.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s a good deal. He played well but I also don’t think he was worth 8-10 million per year. This is a win for both sides. Looks like the OL is set. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's about what I thought he would get. Good for him.

 

Hopefully he still has some upside to him and can play consistently throughout the season. And we're still waiting on an OL coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DougDew said:

And there you have it. 

 

Braden Smith stays at RT and the Colts will look at other positions as priorities in FA and the draft.

I'm not 100% sure Smith is our starting RT.  In his recent interviews Ballard still seemed unconvinced that he was a RT.  The money Glowinski received seemed like what you would pay a quality backup like Reitz.  I still have a feeling we might be looking for another RT maybe in FA.    

  • Like 1
  • Confused 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said 5 year 30 mil so I got the amount right, but the length wrong haha 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard has talked alot about rewarding those that earn it on the field and locker room. Great deal for both sides. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I'm not 100% sure Smith is our starting RT.  In his recent interviews Ballard still seemed unconvinced that he was a RT.  The money Glowinski received seemed like what you would pay a quality backup like Reitz.  I still have a feeling we might be looking for another RT maybe in FA.    

 

At first Ballard wasn't convinced, but hes come out and said he was wrong. As for Glow, that is not backup money. Backups make league min or close to it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

9 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I'm not 100% sure Smith is our starting RT.  In his recent interviews Ballard still seemed unconvinced that he was a RT.  The money Glowinski received seemed like what you would pay a quality backup like Reitz.  I still have a feeling we might be looking for another RT maybe in FA.    

 

Smith only gets better in 2019. Yep, he had a bad game in the playoffs, but played well against Watt earlier in the season. 

 

Ballard will certainly add depth to the OL, but I think the starting five are already there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, DougDew said:

And there you have it. 

 

Braden Smith stays at RT and the Colts will look at other positions as priorities in FA and the draft.

 

It's probably the smart/neccessary thing to do. I'd prefer him as good depth not a starter. I wpuld prefer a upgrade at RT and move Smithy at RG. Venturi also said that but he also said a T is more expensive than a G.

I think we can use a good C to backup often injured Kelley and also depth at G.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Superman said:

 

Sometimes I wonder what world you live in. What team is paying backup OL $6m/year? Especially interior OL? 

 

We signed Slauson to be guard competition last year, a potential veteran starter. He got $2.5m. Glowinski will be the 26th highest paid veteran guard in the NFL; that's firmly starter territory.

 

 

That would be one way to use the cap up without improving the team much I guess ? From that Ballard interview , it appears they like Smith a lot at RT. However IMO it doesn't rule out using a second day pick on a tackle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, dw49 said:

 

 

That would be one way to use the cap up without improving the team much I guess ? From that Ballard interview , it appears they like Smith a lot at RT. However IMO it doesn't rule out using a second day pick on a tackle. 

 

If they used a second day pick on a T, this forum will riot. We need depth not a new starter. Talent is not the only thing a oline needs, it also needs cohesion and you only get that by playing together for a long time. This will be the first time in Luck's career he will have the same 5 linemen, barring any injuries, to start from the prior year and I would rather not mess that up. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dw49 said:

 

 

That would be one way to use the cap up without improving the team much I guess ? From that Ballard interview , it appears they like Smith a lot at RT. However IMO it doesn't rule out using a second day pick on a tackle. 

 

It doesn't rule out anything in the draft. You can draft a LT prospect who can compete at RT, for instance. But this projects Glowinski as the starting RG, and pencils Smith in at RT.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW! I guess Ballard really does believe in Glowinski. Good for him, he had a good season. I guess it also show trust in Smith as a RT. Our starting O-line is set for next year. I still think we need reinforcements but oh well... we will wait and see what happens. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Woohoo!  we’re keeping the band together, and kind of a bargain.  I’d try to keep Desir before FA, then I’m so on the fence on Geathers.  He’s the only leader in the secondary, but his injury past is very poor.  I’d like to bring him back, most likely on a one-year prove-it, due to health.  But that certainly means letting him test FA...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

It doesn't rule out anything in the draft. You can draft a LT prospect who can compete at RT, for instance. But this projects Glowinski as the starting RG, and pencils Smith in at RT.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

If they used a second day pick on a T, this forum will riot. We need depth not a new starter. Talent is not the only thing a oline needs, it also needs cohesion and you only get that by playing together for a long time. This will be the first time in Luck's career he will have the same 5 linemen barring any injuries, to start from the prior year and I would rather not mess that up. 

 

I think the bolded only applies to the clueless.

 

It is perfectly reasonable to use a draft pick early in 2019 that may not see the field much until 2020.  Castonzo is a FA after this season and will be 31 at the start of next season.  If they find a tackle they think could fill in on occasion in 19 and then take over in 2020, that is not a bad plan at all.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm happy we're keeping the same OL.  I still would like to have decent backup that can play across the line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

 

I think the bolded only applies to the clueless.

 

It is perfectly reasonable to use a draft pick early in 2019 that may not see the field much until 2020.  Castonzo is a FA after this season and will be 31 at the start of next season.  If they find a tackle they think could fill in on occasion in 19 and then take over in 2020, that is not a bad plan at all.

 

You want to use a early pick on a player that won't play for a few years and be nothing, but depth? AC still has a good 4 years. We can look for his replacement in a couple of years, for now we need to deal with our more pressing needs like the interior and exterior pass rush and getting more weapons for our offense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So it shall be written. So it shall be done.   Yul Brynner.... The Ten Commandments.    
    • That would mean to me none have a 1st rd grade based on his way of grading them which would be based on his long experience of doing so.
       Because projecting what a receiver will turn out to be in 2-3 years is so difficult, his estimate then is if so many are so equal, it would be wise to pick from another position that has less depth, and to get a needed WR later.  See Braden Smith
       Ballard basics IMO.
    • Wide Receiver rankings from Chris Landry (no details scouting reports posted yet)   These are just talent rankings by a pro scout, and NFL and college consultant.  One would need interviews, medical info, scheme assessment to prioritize a better team fit order (or if a player gets taken off)   7.4 – 7.0 = Superstar Ability   (0)
      7.4 = 1st Pick Value
      None
      7.0 = Definite Top 5 Pick
      None
      6.9 – 6.5 = Immediate Starter  (2)
      6.9 = Early 1st Round
      None
      6.5 = Mid to Late 1st Round Value (2) 1. MARQUISE BROWN–OKLAHOMA
      2. D.K. METCALF–OLE MISS   6.4 – 6.0 = Potential Starter  (8)
      6.4 = Early 2nd Round Value  (4)
      3. RILEY RIDLEY–GEORGIA
      4. AJ BROWN–OLE MISS
      5. N’KEAL HARRY–ARIZONA STATE
      6. DEEBO SAMUEL–SOUTH CAROLINA   6.0 = Mid to Late 2nd Round Value  (4)
      7. PARRIS CAMPBELL–OHIO STATE
      8. KELVIN HARMON–NORTH CAROLINA STATE
      9. JJ ARCEGA WHITESIDE–STANFORD
      10. HAKEEM BUTLER–IOWA STATE   5.9 – 5.5 = Has a chance to make and Contribute (22)
      5.9 = 3rd Round Value  (8)
      11. PENNY HART–GEORGIA SOUTHERN (SL)
      12. TERRY MCLAURIN–OHIO STATE
      13. EMMANUEL HALL–MISSOURI
      14. KEELAN DOSS–CAL DAVIS
      15. ANTHONY JOHNSON–BUFFALO
      16. JALEN HURD–BAYLOR
      17. ANDY ISABELLA–UMASS (SL)
      18. TERRY GODWIN–GEORGIA   5.5 = 4th Round Value (14)
      19. LIL JORDAN HUMPHREY–TEXAS
      20. JABOBI MEYERS–NORTH CAROLINA STATE
      21. MILES BOYKIN–NOTRE DAME
      22. DAVID SILLS–WEST VIRGINIA
      23. ANTOINE WESLEY–TEXAS TECH
      24. DARIUS SLAYTON–AUBURN
      25. MECOLE HARDMAN–GEORGIA
      26. DAMARKUS LODGE–OLE MISS
      27. KEESEAN JOHNSON–FRESNO STATE
      28. ANTHONY RATLIFF-WILLIAMS—NORTH CAROLINA
      29. ANTOINE WESLEY–TEXAS TECH
      30. JAZZ FERGUSON–NORTHWESTERN ST-LA
      31. DILLON MITCHELL–OREGON
      32. STANLEY MORGAN JR–NEBRASKA   5.4 – 5.0 = Potential back up Contributor/Roster Player  (39)
      5.4 = 5th to 6th Round Value   (13)
      33. TYRE BRADY–MARSHALL
      34. JAMAL CUSTIS–SYRACUSE
      35. TRAVIS FULGHAM–OLD DOMINION
      36. HUNTER RENFROW–CLEMSON
      37. CODY THOMPSON–TOLEDO
      38. GARY JENNINGS JR–WEST VIRGINIA
      39. GREG DORTCH–WAKE FOREST
      40. PRESTON WILLIAMS–COLORADO STATE
      41. DIONTAE JOHNSON–TOLEDO
      42. OLAMIDE ZACCHEAUS–VIRGINIA
      43. FELTON DAVIS III–MICHIGAN STATE
      44. NYQWAN MURRAY–FLORIDA STATE
      45. PRESTON WILLIAMS–COLORADO STATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm only showing to round 6
       
    • A late round sleeper pick would be Ulysees Grant III out of Akron.    Per Terry Bowden (his coach) he compares him favorably to Takeo Spikes (whom he also coached).    Sideline-to-sideline speed and can cover tightends and running backs.
    • I don't see how you concluded that I concluded anything from what I wrote.    I wrote 4 sentences.   The first sentence said "If....true", and ended with a question mark.   The second sentence contained " I think", "unlikely", and "possibly".   The third sentences contained "might", and "assuming".   And the fourth sentence contained "possibly" again.   I chose not to write about the RB.  I don't care about the RBs.  
  • Members

    • 21isSuperman

      21isSuperman 13,278

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 581

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsBlueFL

      ColtsBlueFL 5,137

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheMiz

      TheMiz 46

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 449

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 2,926

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DerekDiggler

      DerekDiggler 82

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blindside

      Blindside 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chloe6124

      Chloe6124 1,056

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewEra

      NewEra 3,450

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: