Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Brady's Two playoff INTs And They Lose Now What Would Be Said?


King Colt

Recommended Posts

If the Chiefs had won the game with Brady throwing two interceptions what would the narratives be then? Brady is old? Time to retire? He and Brees need to throw in the towel? You know this type of talk would pop up on every show for months. Take a look at the talk now about the coin flip. Colin Cowherd said on his show the team winning that flip has won 52% of the time so what is the issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, dodsworth said:

He could throw 5 or more interceptions and the refs would

still keep Lord Brady close enough to win the game. 

Not in that game, outside of the one bad Roughing the passer call they were allowing the Chiefs D get away with anything.. especially illegal contact and PI.. and they sure didn’t let the Pats get away with PI..  2 scores because of it and 1 TO negated by them.. if anything the refs were keeping the Chiefs in the game by calling it ONE WAY.. (not saying were bad calls just they missed just as blatant PI etc the other way)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady has thrown 2 INTs before and won a playoff game, Peyton has as well. It does not matter whatsoever, as long as the team wins and the QBs make the plays when they count.

 

If the Patriots had lost, it would have been more about how good Mahomes was than how bad Brady was, IMO.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, JimJaime said:

Not in that game, outside of the one bad Roughing the passer call they were allowing the Chiefs D get away with anything.. especially illegal contact and PI.. and they sure didn’t let the Pats get away with PI..  2 scores because of it and 1 TO negated by them.. if anything the refs were keeping the Chiefs in the game by calling it ONE WAY.. (not saying were bad calls just they missed just as blatant PI etc the other way)

I will take your word for it. I haven't watched a Patriot game in over 

two years, regardless of who they are playing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think the first INT may have changed the narrative a bit. That was 100% on Brady. Not sure what he was thinking there. Looked like he was impersonating Big Ben or something. 

 

The 2nd INT (and what would have been the 3rd had the Patriots not been fortunate to get that offsides call) was really on Edelman. Throw was a bit high but certainly catchable. Seems like there were a lot of those this year, not just for NE, but other QBs as well. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JimJaime said:

Not in that game, outside of the one bad Roughing the passer call they were allowing the Chiefs D get away with anything.. especially illegal contact and PI.. and they sure didn’t let the Pats get away with PI..  2 scores because of it and 1 TO negated by them.. if anything the refs were keeping the Chiefs in the game by calling it ONE WAY.. (not saying were bad calls just they missed just as blatant PI etc the other way)

 

Finally re-watched the game. The long completion from Mahomes to Watkins on the Chiefs' final TD drive --- the play where Romo pointed out the illegal pick --- was completely ridiculous. Especially since they called Dorsett for offensive PI on an earlier play where it wasn't as blatant as the Watkins reception. 

 

So the Patriots had a very fortunate roughing the passer call on a 2nd-and-7, while the Chiefs got away with one on a 2nd-and-10, both on 4th quarter drives. I'd say that basically evens out. 

 

The other SMH penalty was the PI call on JC Jackson, also on Watkins, on the throw down the right sideline. I can understand why they called him on the play where Kelce fumbled (that would have basically ended the game right there), but the call on the throw to Watkins was really marginal at best. 

 

I also noticed while re-watching that Kelce also basically pushes off on every route. I know most TEs (including Gronk) do that, but some of his were really blatant. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JimJaime said:

Not in that game, outside of the one bad Roughing the passer call they were allowing the Chiefs D get away with anything.. especially illegal contact and PI.. and they sure didn’t let the Pats get away with PI..  2 scores because of it and 1 TO negated by them.. if anything the refs were keeping the Chiefs in the game by calling it ONE WAY.. (not saying were bad calls just they missed just as blatant PI etc the other way)

Hardly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, chad72 said:

Brady has thrown 2 INTs before and won a playoff game, Peyton has as well. It does not matter whatsoever, as long as the team wins and the QBs make the plays when they count.

 

If the Patriots had lost, it would have been more about how good Mahomes was than how bad Brady was, IMO.

 

Peyton gets completely roasted for making the slightest mistake in the playoffs, even if he makes up for it later (the 2010 one-and-done vs. the Jets get blamed squarely on him for example, and not on the special teams giving up a return to midfield and then the defense getting carved up by Sanchez to setup the chipshot FG after Peyton drove them to a go-ahead FG with 50 seconds left, for example). He also gets roasted for other players on his team screwing up.

 

Brady's mistakes in the playoffs normally get brushed off and overlooked.

 

If Peyton was in Brady's shoes in Super Bowl 49 for example, you'd hear a lot about the two interceptions that were thrown (one was in the end zone and took points off the board for the Patriots, the other interception was in Patriots territory and led to a Seahawks TD) and less about the comeback.

 

Peyton's 06 run for example is discredited by screaming 3 TD/7 INT with no context behind it. His statline in the AFCCG was only 1 TD/1 INT as the Colts ran it in each time they got down to the goal line. He led the team down the length of the field on each drive but the 1 TD/1 INT line doesn't reflect that. He had to go into Baltimore who arguably had the best defense in the league that season and grinded out a win there (anybody expecting a light-it-up performance against that team that year was crazy).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, chad72 said:

Brady has thrown 2 INTs before and won a playoff game, Peyton has as well. It does not matter whatsoever, as long as the team wins and the QBs make the plays when they count.

 

If the Patriots had lost, it would have been more about how good Mahomes was than how bad Brady was, IMO.

Not in that game, Kermit was very average, until late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I Respectfully disagree.  I do agree that Shane is trying to win games.   What I don’t agree on is that he’s using AR to his full advantage to do so.  It may be injury concern, or that he feels AR isn’t quite back to 100% from surgery.  But he’s not using him like he did last season.    I’m not saying it’s wrong, and I hope it’s for the best.  But I think ARs development is more important to the franchise than winning right now.   I gave the example of Daniels.  They’re letting him run, it definitely helps them to stay in games.  That may not be a smart strategy if he ends up like RGknee, but you can see they’re trying to win now.  
    • To use an off season surgery as an excuse is bollocks....    He needs to step up his game and start performing. In many ways he honestly looks like one of the 5 worst QB´s in the league and again, to use a shoulder surgery as an excuse is just pure bollocks.   There simply is no development in his game, and his huge upside is what? tell me?    I don´t think one second that we will ever come close to winning anything with him as our QB.   and to make things worse read this: https://www.espn.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2176813
    • And yet, PFF didn't grade him all that high last year.  My response to this is that the scheme is designed for the MLB and the SS to make most of the tackles.  And they do. But last year, Franklin allowed a 77% completion rate with 10.2 yards per completion, and 7.9 yards per target.  In summary, he makes a lot of tackles by scheme, but he also allows a lot of completions. I don't think of him a Great.  Or even Good.  He's Fair.   https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FranZa00.htm  
    • Probably still won’t shut people up lol. But that is interesting  We are 3 games in after a shoulder surgery. What are you talking about.
    • Every bottom feeder team has a good player or two. Are the colts a bottom feeder? At times they play like it.    the “forum GMs” as you call them, don’t dislike when a player does well. They just hate when the team sucks. There’s nothing wrong with that. And no one here says some of the Colts players aren’t good players.    the Colts stunk it up pretty bad in the first two weeks, lost game one again a stat that we have held for over a decade. In must win games, the colts perform exceptionally awful with a mind boggling level of consistency under this regime.    the good players that the Colts have tend to also not show up in those games and make any game changing plays.    ok so Franklin can tackle. So what? Yeah the forum GMs are shaking with rage because of that!   
  • Members

    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,634

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 22,114

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ADnum1

      ADnum1 3,395

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheEdgeis1

      TheEdgeis1 90

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jblastick

      jblastick 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,921

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Reboot

      Reboot 46

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyJoe

      IndyJoe 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...