Jump to content
oldunclemark

New England (+3) at Kansas City (1-20-19)

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, esmort said:

 

What a difference a a whole season of tape makes.

 

Guaranteed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RollerColt said:

That someone was me... And let's face it. He looked like a God against us.

 

But tonight? He's just another number of victims claimed by the damn Patriots. 

 

Face it. You were an *!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MPStack said:

 

I believe someone here called him a god! lol

Colts defense and Andrew Luck (by comparison) made him look like close to a football one. But yeah that was some ridculously high praise. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Granted KC can score at any moment, that NE time of possession is going to kill that D when they need a stop in the 4th.

 

Of course they'll have last possession. 

That D is starting to die already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RollerColt said:

That someone was me... And let's face it. He looked like a God against us.

 

But tonight? He's just another number of victims claimed by the damn Patriots. 

 

Even against us he didnt look god like ... the Colts just looked horrible so he looked good by comparison.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's still another half folks.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MPStack said:

 

Face it. You were an *!

It blocked what you were saying. But sure. I was an asterisk (insert-any-insult-you-want). 

 

I hope we get some quality pass rushers. The Kansas o-line is failing miserably so far. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank needs to be taking some notes. As much as we hate McDaniels, he schemes & calls a great game.  I wonder if Frank would have done the same had we sustained that first drive?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Belichick is the top head coach in the game.  Perfect game plan for attacking the Chiefs defense.  Exactly what the Colts should have been doing.  It’s sickening how good that man is.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a solid season KC. Maybe when Tommy retires you'll go on a run.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Coltsman1788 said:

Colts defense and Andrew Luck (by comparison) made him look like close to a football one. But yeah that was some ridculously high praise. 

No argument here. I was pretty ridiculous, stupid, etc... I was also upset that our innovative offense could do nothing against this defense. 

 

And oh look. Philip Dorsett just caught a TD pass in the championship game. 

 

And we could do nothing until that TY catch... 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Most teams throw a screen pass it goes for 5-7 yards at best, when Tom throws one it goes for 30 yards lmao 

When we throw one it goes for 1.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Most teams throw a screen pass it goes for 5-7 yards at best, when Tom throws one it goes for 30 yards lmao 

James White is so hard to control...he fakes the block and he's open for good yards every time

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shows that defense is better then offense in January.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found what the announcer said interesting: New England developed an offensive game plan that would minimize the loud crowd noise in Arrowhead. That's what the Colts needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just how can this KC team be so dominant against us last week and then roll over to get their bellies rubbed? I don’t get how this Pats team looks like this and Mahomes can’t even squeak out a fart. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, Coltsman1788 said:

Belichick is the top head coach in the game.  Perfect game plan for attacking the Chiefs defense.  Exactly what the Colts should have been doing.  It’s sickening how good that man is.  

 

Did anyone think that BB would lose to Mahomes? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys chill lol, Frank is a first year course. Its not fair to compare him to Belichick. Give him a season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RollerColt said:

No argument here. I was pretty ridiculous, stupid, etc... I was also upset that our innovative offense could do nothing against this defense. 

 

And oh look. Philip Dorsett just caught a TD pass in the championship game. 

 

And we could do nothing until that TY catch... 

You weren’t the only one frustrated. You were in good company last week.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The truth is: KC holding NE to 14 at the half...is pretty good for them.

Getting shut out is the problem..

 

Mahimes isn't nearly as confident as he was against us (and everybody else)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Patriots defense just limited the #1 offense in the nation to just over 30 yards of offense. Jesus...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol..I hate them, but they're the % when it comes to matching up with anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Dorsett stinks for us, he's Lynn Swann for the Pats. 14-0 game over.

Isnt that something?

 

But it s not over yet..Rams were in the tank today too..down 13-0..but they had a secret weapon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jdubu said:

Just how can this KC team be so dominant against us last week and then roll over to get their bellies rubbed? I don’t get how this Pats team looks like this and Mahomes can’t even squeak out a fart. 

Bottom line we aren’t as bad as we looked against the chiefs and the pats aren’t that much better against the chiefs. It’s all game planning with the best coach in the league.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MPStack said:

 

 

Did anyone think that BB would lose to Mahomes? :lol:

He lost to Foles

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a pattern in the AFC. We shut out the Texans in the first half. KC shut us out last week. KC gets shut out in the first half. If NE goes to win this will the get shut out by LA next week? Interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

Bottom line we aren’t as bad as we looked against the chiefs and the pats aren’t that much better against the chiefs. It’s all game planning with the best coach in the league.

As others have said in this thread..

 

This is exactly how we should have played them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
    • I had us 9-7 just based on guessing/hoping/predicting Luck would be healthy and play great. I was right but a lucky guess, I guess  . I thought that would get us a 6th seed. We won 10 games which got us in.
    • For the first time in a while, I am impressed with the Colts development of players. If this current trend continues, a lot of opinions will change. 
  • Members

    • Nate!

      Nate! 44

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,110

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfanej

      coltsfanej 159

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 369

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...