Jump to content
oldunclemark

New England (+3) at Kansas City (1-20-19)

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, esmort said:

 

What a difference a a whole season of tape makes.

 

Guaranteed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RollerColt said:

That someone was me... And let's face it. He looked like a God against us.

 

But tonight? He's just another number of victims claimed by the damn Patriots. 

 

Face it. You were an *!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MPStack said:

 

I believe someone here called him a god! lol

Colts defense and Andrew Luck (by comparison) made him look like close to a football one. But yeah that was some ridculously high praise. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Granted KC can score at any moment, that NE time of possession is going to kill that D when they need a stop in the 4th.

 

Of course they'll have last possession. 

That D is starting to die already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RollerColt said:

That someone was me... And let's face it. He looked like a God against us.

 

But tonight? He's just another number of victims claimed by the damn Patriots. 

 

Even against us he didnt look god like ... the Colts just looked horrible so he looked good by comparison.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's still another half folks.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MPStack said:

 

Face it. You were an *!

It blocked what you were saying. But sure. I was an asterisk (insert-any-insult-you-want). 

 

I hope we get some quality pass rushers. The Kansas o-line is failing miserably so far. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank needs to be taking some notes. As much as we hate McDaniels, he schemes & calls a great game.  I wonder if Frank would have done the same had we sustained that first drive?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Belichick is the top head coach in the game.  Perfect game plan for attacking the Chiefs defense.  Exactly what the Colts should have been doing.  It’s sickening how good that man is.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a solid season KC. Maybe when Tommy retires you'll go on a run.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Coltsman1788 said:

Colts defense and Andrew Luck (by comparison) made him look like close to a football one. But yeah that was some ridculously high praise. 

No argument here. I was pretty ridiculous, stupid, etc... I was also upset that our innovative offense could do nothing against this defense. 

 

And oh look. Philip Dorsett just caught a TD pass in the championship game. 

 

And we could do nothing until that TY catch... 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Most teams throw a screen pass it goes for 5-7 yards at best, when Tom throws one it goes for 30 yards lmao 

When we throw one it goes for 1.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Most teams throw a screen pass it goes for 5-7 yards at best, when Tom throws one it goes for 30 yards lmao 

James White is so hard to control...he fakes the block and he's open for good yards every time

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shows that defense is better then offense in January.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found what the announcer said interesting: New England developed an offensive game plan that would minimize the loud crowd noise in Arrowhead. That's what the Colts needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just how can this KC team be so dominant against us last week and then roll over to get their bellies rubbed? I don’t get how this Pats team looks like this and Mahomes can’t even squeak out a fart. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, Coltsman1788 said:

Belichick is the top head coach in the game.  Perfect game plan for attacking the Chiefs defense.  Exactly what the Colts should have been doing.  It’s sickening how good that man is.  

 

Did anyone think that BB would lose to Mahomes? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys chill lol, Frank is a first year course. Its not fair to compare him to Belichick. Give him a season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RollerColt said:

No argument here. I was pretty ridiculous, stupid, etc... I was also upset that our innovative offense could do nothing against this defense. 

 

And oh look. Philip Dorsett just caught a TD pass in the championship game. 

 

And we could do nothing until that TY catch... 

You weren’t the only one frustrated. You were in good company last week.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The truth is: KC holding NE to 14 at the half...is pretty good for them.

Getting shut out is the problem..

 

Mahimes isn't nearly as confident as he was against us (and everybody else)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Patriots defense just limited the #1 offense in the nation to just over 30 yards of offense. Jesus...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol..I hate them, but they're the % when it comes to matching up with anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Dorsett stinks for us, he's Lynn Swann for the Pats. 14-0 game over.

Isnt that something?

 

But it s not over yet..Rams were in the tank today too..down 13-0..but they had a secret weapon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jdubu said:

Just how can this KC team be so dominant against us last week and then roll over to get their bellies rubbed? I don’t get how this Pats team looks like this and Mahomes can’t even squeak out a fart. 

Bottom line we aren’t as bad as we looked against the chiefs and the pats aren’t that much better against the chiefs. It’s all game planning with the best coach in the league.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MPStack said:

 

 

Did anyone think that BB would lose to Mahomes? :lol:

He lost to Foles

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a pattern in the AFC. We shut out the Texans in the first half. KC shut us out last week. KC gets shut out in the first half. If NE goes to win this will the get shut out by LA next week? Interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

Bottom line we aren’t as bad as we looked against the chiefs and the pats aren’t that much better against the chiefs. It’s all game planning with the best coach in the league.

As others have said in this thread..

 

This is exactly how we should have played them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. Up until that neck injury I don’t think manning missed a snap his entire career here.
    • Andrew has had 3 maybe 4 injuries since the beginning of his career, manning only missed one season here. So no worries the bad luck was all Bob's. 
    • that guy is too short, has no wheels, and has to take a time out after every 6 attempts. will never make it.. nice jugs though
    • The facts.. a hung jury (twice) mistrial with most voters having sided for the alleged accuser/victim... both times.     She (prosecution) didn't drop the charges, the school (judge/jury) did.  She wanted round 3.  She wanted a full yes or no vote (4-1 or 5-0) either way, not we're split 3-2 so we'll just call it against the majority vote and designate as "Not Responsible" because it isn't 4 or more votes either way. - 'Case closed'.     There were questions (and other items) from the accuser that were never allowed in or asked in follow up questioning.  I think one of the changes to the Stanford Title IX hearing rules is to also allow an attorney to be not only in attendance but to also perform all duties of representation.  And an outside group determines what is admissible as questions/evidence, follow questions, etc...     At some level, it did, and many things at Stanford were changed after. At the  minimum, it was a mistrial x2, with no conclusive verdict either way. Then school (not prosecution) drops the case.   So she really needed to report this to both the school, and also the Police.  But with what evidence does she have to convince the LEO?  Guess the gals need some hidden body cam w/audio these days, like many folks do with dash cams (like me and my wife's cars...) and be their own TMZ...   Video, apparently the only way things get rectified anymore...     No worries, at least we know each others positions.  All is good.     Except to have (at some level) differing story from a another high achieving Stanford student about another high achieving Stanford student-   https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/california/stanford-university/admission/     We don't even know for certain they ever got the FULL story, but articles I've read suggest that the Stanford Panel repressed/disallowed many/most of her interrogating questions and supplemental follow up inquiries to be asked of the accused.  Unless someone directly asks her directly, how could you answer as to whether her whole story was even heard or not?   If you are not truly interested to fully know those answers, then you don't ask.  At least, that's my perspective.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...