Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

oldunclemark

Los Angeles (+3) at New Orleans (1-20-19)

Recommended Posts

3:05 EST    Joe Buck, Troy Aikman and Erin Andrews (The 'A' Team) on FOX

the NFC final game. Over-under at 57 inside the old Louisiana SuperDome

 

QB Jared Goff (364 of 561, 4,688 yards, 32 TDs, 12 INTs) has to be happy to get anther shot at the Saints, who beat L.A. 45-35 in week nine.

The Rams have top receivers in Robert Woods (86 catches, 1,219 yards) and Brandin Cooks (80 catches, 1,204 yards) but last week they got over 100 yards rushing out of speedy Todd Gurley and hard running reject CJ Anderson.

   The Rams (14-3) scored 30 or more points 13 times in regular season 16 games.  They were No. 2 in the NFL in total yards with 6,738 in 16 games and No. 1 in first downs (401) .  But this will be the first time in 18 games this year that the Rams are not favored. The Saints have allowed just 1,283 yards rushing (80 yards rushing) in the regular season.

 

NOLA QB Drew (King Creole) Brees (364 of 489, 3,992 yards,. 32 TDs, 5 INTs) led the NFL in completion percentage (74.4%) and he fond a way to rally the saints from a 14-0 deficit to beat Philadelphia last week.

If the Saints' offense has seem lame in recent weeks that's not your imagination. New Orleans has scored 115 points (17.5 ) in their last six games.  

Still, all-NFL WR Michael Thomas (125 catches, 1,405 yards) and RV Alvin Komara (18 TDs) are ready to roll against a Rams' defense that game up an uncomfortable 2,000 yards rushing in 16 games.

 

   In the 45-35 game, the Saints' Michael Thomas gained a career-high 211 yards on 12 catches and his matchup with Rams CB Aqib Talib (who did not play in that game) is the feature matchup here. .The Rams have 18 pass interceptions but nobody picks off Brees.  They have 42 sacks (Aaron Donald has 20) 1/2) but nobody sacks Brees either. The Rams paid a lot of money for a lot of veterans with the thought that they'd be in this game.  On the other hand, Drew Brees is older than dirt and this is likely the last time he'll be in a conference championship game. 

 

     Here's a delayed Christmas gift. The over-under is 57..and somebody's smokin' something . Take the 'under' The Saints simply haven't scored a lot of points lately and they are facing a defensive line that will cause them problems. I dont see Goff rolling up big yards on the road against the New Orleans defense that has 44 sacks and has allowed 72 rushing first downs in 16 games.

 

    To be honest, while these two teams deserve to be here and either would make a worthy Super Bowl team, both of the are as boring as C-Span. Unless Talib starts snatching chains or Ndamukong Suh steps on somebody, you may have to go out and shovel snow at halftime to stay awake.  

Take the under, turn down the sound and 'binge watch' Law and Order.   

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, oldunclemark said:

3:05 EST    Joe Buck, Troy Aikman and Erin Andrews (The 'A' Team) on FOX

the NFC final game. Over-under at 57 inside the old Louisiana SuperDome

 

QB Jared Goff (364 of 561, 4,688 yards, 32 TDs, 12 INTs) has to be happy to get anther shot at the Saints, who beat L.A. 45-35 in week nine.

The Rams have top receivers in Robert Woods (86 catches, 1,219 yards) and Brandin Cooks (80 catches, 1,204 yards) but last week they got over 100 yards rushing out of speedy Todd Gurley and hard running reject CJ Anderson.

   The Rams (14-3) scored 30 or more points 13 times in regular season 16 games.  They were No. 2 in the NFL in total yards with 6,738 in 16 games and No. 1 in first downs (401) .  But this will be the first time in 18 games this year that the Rams are not favored. The Saints have allowed just 1,283 yards rushing (80 yards rushing) in the regular season.

 

NOLA QB Drew (King Creole) Brees (364 of 489, 3,992 yards,. 32 TDs, 5 INTs) led the NFL in completion percentage (74.4%) and he fond a way to rally the saints from a 14-0 deficit to beat Philadelphia last week.

If the Saints' offense has seem lame in recent weeks that's not your imagination. New Orleans has scored 115 points (17.5 ) in their last six games.  

Still, all-NFL WR Michael Thomas (125 catches, 1,405 yards) and RV Alvin Komara (18 TDs) are ready to roll against a Rams' defense that game up an uncomfortable 2,000 yards rushing in 16 games.

 

   In the 45-35 game, the Saints' Michael Thomas gained a career-high 211 yards on 12 catches and his matchup with Rams CB Aqib Talib (who did not play in that game) is the feature matchup here. .The Rams have 18 pass interceptions but nobody picks off Brees.  They have 42 sacks (Aaron Donald has 20) 1/2) but nobody sacks Brees either. The Rams paid a lot of money for a lot of veterans with the thought that they'd be in this game.  On the other hand, Drew Brees is older than dirt and this is likely the last time he'll be in a conference championship game. 

 

     Here's a delayed Christmas gift. The over-under is 57..and somebody's smokin' something . Take the 'under' The Saints simply haven't scored a lot of points lately and they are facing a defensive line that will cause them problems. I dont see Goff rolling up big yards on the road against the New Orleans defense that has 44 sacks and has allowed 72 rushing first downs in 16 games.

 

    To be honest, while these two teams deserve to be here and either would make a worthy Super Bowl team, both of the are as boring as C-Span. Unless Talib starts snatching chains or Ndamukong Suh steps on somebody, you may have to go out and shovel snow at halftime to stay awake.  

Take the under, turn down the sound and 'binge watch' Law and Order.   

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic,   but the saints and rams are certainly not boring.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far, it's been a defensive matchup. Rams had a costly interception and their offense isn't looking too hot to start. Saints O is being held up in the redzone. 

 

Definitely an interesting start to the game. Saints could really open stuff up with a score. 

 

6-0 Saints up for those not able to watch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, this week they don't call running into the kicker? Because it's "playoff football"? So, why did they call it against us last week when it legitimately could have been ruled incidental contact? Always interesting to see which teams get preferential treatment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mr. Irrelevant said:

Rams are getting killed here...

Yep. Wade's defense is looking undisciplined, which is uncharacteristic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband just reminded me that early on this season I said it was Drew's year :lombardi:  Could be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is so loud there. I think even the announcers are having trouble!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jvan1973 said:

Feels a lot like the colts chiefs game last week

I just said the same thing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Homefield advantage is huge in this game. 

 

Makes me wonder how loud the Chiefs fans will be tonight. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Goff is playing like the moment is too big for him but that fake Punt saved the Rams. Trickery lmao 

Definitely jumpstarted the Rams offense. They're gettin' some momentum back.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

FG's aren't going to cut it against Brees in his dome. Still 13-3.

Fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ColtsSouljah said:

How was that not defensive holding?!

Is it me or have they allowed a little more defensive holding in the secondary in the post-season..?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, oldunclemark said:

Is it me or have they allowed a little more defensive holding in the secondary in the post-season..?

Chiefs got away with it vs us :funny:, so it is not just you :thmup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, oldunclemark said:

Is it me or have they allowed a little more defensive holding in the secondary in the post-season..?

They always do.    It's pretty dumb.   If it's a penalty in the regular season, it should be in the post season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We got a ball game! 

 

Saints up 13-10 after a fast scoring drive by Goff, Cooks and Gurley. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both teams playing good defense but in the playoffs only complete teams win the SB. Even in 2006 our defense played well in the playoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shakedownstreet said:

The Saints would man whoop the Patriots. Not sure about the Rams though

Hopefully the Chiefs will 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, shakedownstreet said:

The Saints would man whoop the Patriots. Not sure about the Rams though

That is one reason why I want the Saints to win, just in case the Pats do win. I don't believe the Rams will beat the Pats, I trust Brees much more than Goff. I can't see the Pats losing 2 SB's in a row to Foles than Goff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought it was going to be a blowout for a while.....nice to see a good competitive game so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rams TD pass to TE Higbee at the 3 yardline. He was wide open. But the threat of handing off to RB's don't help the passing game?.haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They judged from training camp throughout preseason.  I don't think it was a mistake because clearly he was making plays.  I'm not sure how much room they had to anticipate he wouldn't be ready during the live games.  His case happened a bit different from Fountain, but they both when all the smoke cleared needed to sit and learn on the PS a little bit. 
    • Fromm is basically an upgraded Jacoby Brissett, a high-end game manager that won't turn the ball over and makes enough plays to win you some games. I'd take Fromm over JB.    I'd say take a guy like Jordan Love or Jacob Eason with the Redskins pick and develop them for a year under JB. End of next year, stick with whichever guy you're more confident will take you where you wanna go. 
    • Once Funchess hits the field either this week or next and assuming he gives us solid production throughout could we not just rework the contract if we want to bring him back?  I don't see this as a total waste with the 1 year contract he received. 
    • If, both Funchess and Campbell were healthy, I don’t think The WR position would look like a major need going into 2020. Fortunately, 2020 is loaded at WR and I wouldn’t be against taking one in Round #1.    The only FA WR I’d consider is A. Cooper, which won’t happen.   DT, CB, TE and possibly QB should the main positions addressed early in 2020.    
    • Are there true "Kelly fans"? Or did you put that in semi-quotes because it's a euphemism for something else?   I disagree with some of your characterizations of Kelly and Hoyer, but what I really disagree with is your characterization of the situation and the calculus of the staff. And I guess part of that goes back to your evaluation of Kelly.   Just think about his situation. We know he has physical tools, he had some good performances in college, and he hasn't been in trouble recently. Yet, he was the last player picked in his draft class, the Broncos didn't keep him despite having a terrible QB situation, he sat on the market until May, played well in preseason, but still cleared waivers in mid-September despite several teams having bad QB situations (Steelers, Jaguars, Washington, Eagles, Panthers, just a sample of teams that had early season QB injuries), then signed back to our practice squad. And he sat on our practice squad for two months without being plucked away (and yes, we're paying him active roster money, but another team could match that and give him a three week automatic spot on the active roster).   Now, you and other "Kelly fans" might think highly of his prospects, but you at least have to admit that he's not highly coveted by the rest of the NFL. It's entirely possible that the only reason he's even on an NFL team is because of his connection with Frank Reich. Other teams might feel like he's a talented project who needs to develop, but they might not have been convinced that he would put in the work and stay out of trouble. Reich felt like he could check both of those boxes, but that doesn't mean Kelly isn't still a project. That's my read on the reason Kelly was signed, cleared waivers, and stuck on our practice squad. I could be wrong, but I'm just connecting the dots.    If that's close to accurate, it doesn't really matter whether he's more talented than Hoyer. (There's another free agent QB who is way more talented and proven than Hoyer, and his initials are also "CK," but there are other reasons he's not on an NFL roster. Whether it's right or wrong, roster decisions don't just come down to talent, especially with QBs.) This is not a simple black/white evaluation of whether he's stable enough to be on the roster, in which case he should play over Hoyer, or if not, he shouldn't be on the roster at all. That's a gross oversimplification.   To the bolded, I especially disagree with that. I assume that Kelly stays on the active roster the rest of the season, barring a significant series of events that makes his roster spot absolutely critical. I don't think JB will be 100% for the rest of the season, so I think they'll carry three QBs as long as they can. I could be wrong.   And as it relates to Hoyer, I think these recent evaluations of him are overly harsh. I'm not and never have been excited about him as a QB, but he's done what a typical backup QB does throughout his career. He's not going to carry your team to victory, but he can run the offense. He's had a bunch of turnovers the last two games, but that's not typical of him. Before the Miami game, he hadn't had a multiple INT game in his last 21 starts, going back to 2014. He's a 60% passer who had a .500 record prior to a bunch of starts for a dreadful Niners team in 2017.   I'm thinking the reason he looked so bad against Miami is that our receivers were hurt, the OL didn't play well, and he made a couple bad decisions. (I also think Frank Reich left two thirds of his playbook in Kansas City, but that's a topic for another thread.) I don't think he's useless, I think he's a reasonable backup that was thrown out there in a terrible situation, and I don't think he got the help he needed from the rest of the offense. You say Hoyer weakens the team relative to Kelly, but that's heavily based on your bullish projection of Kelly. It's certainly not based on anything Kelly has done in the NFL.   Perhaps Kelly would have played better, but make a realistic assessment of the situation, and think about whether it would have been ideal to put him out there under those circumstances for his first real NFL game.    Hoyer vs Kelly isn't really a compelling argument for me. Right now, I'd rather have Hoyer play, but I think Kelly has way more upside. Overall, I hope JB is ready to go for the rest of the season (and I hope he starts giving his receivers more chances to make plays down the field), because he's better than both of them right now. If that's the case, we're arguing about which backup QB dresses but doesn't play on Sundays. Again, not compelling, IMO.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...