Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CR91

Colts away schedule is brutal

Recommended Posts

We have to play the chiefs, chargers, saints, and steelers at their place. That doesn't even count the division. The last away game is vs the bucs, but the last time we played a bruce arains led team, we got killed. We're gonna have to be really good at home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are going to have to improve a ton to end up back in the playoffs with the schedule next year. There is no room for error at home or against teams we should beat.  It will be interesting to see when these games are scheduled. Hopefully those road games are stretched out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And ????? …………. My buddy (Giants fan ) ALWAYS complains after his Giants go to the playoffs and then gets a tougher schedule the following season …...Well hey just like the team with the worst record gets the first pick in the draft ( which is proper ) it is also proper that we get a tough schedule next season …..WHY ? …….Because we made the playoffs . So I guess we can't complain .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You never know who is going to be good and who will take a step back until the season unfolds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Boiler_Colt said:

You never know who is going to be good and who will take a step back until the season unfolds.

 

True, but the chiefs, chargers, saints, and steelers are consistently good every year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ben doesn’t scare me like he used to...Rivers will be another year older...I agree it looks tough, but who knows...injuries, trades, and free agency changes a lot of things

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

True, but the chiefs, chargers, saints, and steelers are consistently good every year.

i can see us beating the chiefs next year so issue there. chargers have no sproles (the only person that pretty much was a threat to us) so there's no issue there and the steeler's wont have AB or Bell so again no issue there. Id say the saints would be our only test next year but other than that all those games are winnable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shadow_Creek said:

i can see us beating the chiefs next year so issue there. chargers have no sproles (the only person that pretty much was a threat to us) so there's no issue there and the steeler's wont have AB or Bell so again no issue there. Id say the saints would be our only test next year but other than that all those games are winnable

 

Gordon is a top 5 RB and Allen is no slouch. Connor and Juju are really good too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only 2 games are impacted by how you finish - Dolphins and Steelers in our case. Rest are predetermined.

 

Our main issues will be limiting good QBs with zone coverages, Matt Ryan is no slouch either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Gordon is a top 5 RB and Allen is no slouch. Connor and Juju are really good too. 

doesn't matter because other than the chiefs game we shut down every good pass catcher and RB so as i said i like our chances a lot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After another Draft and Free Agency (if Ballard nails both) I can't see us being worse than 11-5 now. I say 4-4 on the road and 7-1 at home if Luck stays healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

We have to play the chiefs, chargers, saints, and steelers at their place. That doesn't even count the division. The last away game is vs the bucs, but the last time we played a bruce arains led team, we got killed. We're gonna have to be really good at home.

If we can win some of those games it will better prepare this team for if they do get back to the postseason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This colts team upset some pretty good teams this year if Ballard fixes what hurt us this year with better players this team will be fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

True, but the chiefs, chargers, saints, and steelers are consistently good every year.

 

This is true, but Pittsburgh is in a lot of turmoil and really the Chargers are just "good," not world beaters (and we should be able to beat good teams). K.C. and N.O. are annoying because they have two of the best homefield advantages in the league and you'd rather not deal with multiple of those in the same year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good, the tougher the better. You don’t see the Pats worrying about their strength of schedule on the road.

 

Train and plan accordingly and if you are as good as you think you then you will win more than you lose.

 

We need big games to prepare for the play offs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear football gods, please have the Colts beat the Steelers next season. 

 

We beat them and we are definitely trending towards championship level football. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, jameszeigler834 said:

This colts team upset some pretty good teams this year if Ballard fixes what hurt us this year with better players this team will be fine.

The Colts played five playoff teams all year counting playoffs, Texans, Eagles, Pats, Cowboys, and Chiefs.  They were 3-4 in those games.  Next year they will have four games on the road with playoff teams this year including having to go to the Saints and Chiefs each conferences number one seed.  Add in a road trip to the Steelers a place where they don’t historically play well and two division games the easiest game on the road will be the Bucs.  That’s a brutal scheudle and a big step up from what they faced this year on the road, at least on paper right now.

 

I am not going to sit here and say the Colts can’t have success next year but they are going to have to take care of business at home.  That’s more manageable with the three division games, Miami, Raiders, Broncos, Falcons and, Panthers coming to town.  They can’t afford to go worse than 6-2 at home next year IMO to have any kind of shot at the playoffs.  

 

I hope the Colts take a step forward but it’s not going to be easy.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

The Colts played five playoff teams all year counting playoffs, Texans, Eagles, Pats, Cowboys, and Chiefs.  They were 3-4 in those games.  Next year they will have four games on the road with playoff teams this year including having to go to the Saints and Chiefs each conferences number one seed.  Add in a road trip to the Steelers a place where they don’t historically play well and two division games the easiest game on the road will be the Bucs.  That’s a brutal scheudle and a big step up from what they faced this year on the road, at least on paper right now.

 

I am not going to sit here and say the Colts can’t have success next year but they are going to have to take care of business at home.  That’s more manageable with the three division games, Miami, Raiders, Broncos, Falcons and, Panthers coming to town.  They can’t afford to go worse than 6-2 at home next year IMO to have any kind of shot at the playoffs.  

 

I hope the Colts take a step forward but it’s not going to be easy.  

Well this team showed a lot of improvement will more added talent this team can very well be a force next year steelers are overrated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

The Colts played five playoff teams all year counting playoffs, Texans, Eagles, Pats, Cowboys, and Chiefs.  They were 3-4 in those games.  Next year they will have four games on the road with playoff teams this year including having to go to the Saints and Chiefs each conferences number one seed.  Add in a road trip to the Steelers a place where they don’t historically play well and two division games the easiest game on the road will be the Bucs.  That’s a brutal scheudle and a big step up from what they faced this year on the road, at least on paper right now.

 

I am not going to sit here and say the Colts can’t have success next year but they are going to have to take care of business at home.  That’s more manageable with the three division games, Miami, Raiders, Broncos, Falcons and, Panthers coming to town.  They can’t afford to go worse than 6-2 at home next year IMO to have any kind of shot at the playoffs.  

 

I hope the Colts take a step forward but it’s not going to be easy.  

I think they are going to have to go 8-0 at home or maybe 7-1. This team is going to have to fill holes this off season to compete in some of these games next year if KC is any indication how we are against elite teams. We are going to have to be very much improved or there will be no playoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, HOF19 said:

And ????? …………. My buddy (Giants fan ) ALWAYS complains after his Giants go to the playoffs and then gets a tougher schedule the following season …...Well hey just like the team with the worst record gets the first pick in the draft ( which is proper ) it is also proper that we get a tough schedule next season …..WHY ? …….Because we made the playoffs . So I guess we can't complain .

I think op is saying it is crazy how the away schedule is so much harder than who we get at home. MIA, CAR, ATL, DEN, Raiders. for non division. The likely hood of us getting none of the toughest teams at home is the what the brutal part. If it was split more it be not as crazy tough for just the road. That is my reading of op take

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, jameszeigler834 said:

Well this team showed a lot of improvement will more added talent this team can very well be a force next year steelers are overrated.

Maybe they will.  I am just pointing out it’s a big step up in competition from this year.  However asking any team in the NFL to play a road scheudle like that is brutal.  Not just the Colts.  I do hope the Colts are a force next year.  However, I am not going to panic and over react if they take a step backwards.  I hope they don’t but if they go 8-8 or something next year I wouldn’t be overly shocked.  I also wouldnt be shocked if they pull off 11-5 or 10-6 and are back in the playoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s the same for Texans. Away vs Saints, Chargers, Chiefs, and Ravens instead of Steelers. 

 

The Titans get Chargers, Saints and Chiefs at home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

next season is a whole new year, i see us being improved next year and those games should be winnable 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, coltsva said:

It’s the same for Texans. Away vs Saints, Chargers, Chiefs, and Ravens instead of Steelers. 

 

The Titans get Chargers, Saints and Chiefs at home.

Because the NFL likes the Titans...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, John Hammonds said:

If you want to be the best, you have to beat the best.  Here.  There.  Anywhere.

 

Nice paraphrasing of the Nature Boy!  Love that phrase and always sticks with me.

 

"To be the man, you've got to BEAT the man"

 

giphy.gif

 

Seriously though, I think we are not just about next year.  Although the schedule is tough, we need to test our young team against the best and that will only make us better for the years to come. 

 

I also include Reich going up against the best coaches in this scenario.  I think he will have a fire in his belly after Reid out-coached him (Reich's own words) and so he will relish that challenge next year and make him all the better for pushing towards that Dynasty we are all chasing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With how things ended in Kansas City, I am more than happy with our schedule. Wanna be in the top echelon? Prove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

i can see us beating the chiefs next year so issue there. chargers have no sproles (the only person that pretty much was a threat to us) so there's no issue there and the steeler's wont have AB or Bell so again no issue there. Id say the saints would be our only test next year but other than that all those games are winnable

Got allot of that confidence on Sat. did ya?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

True, but the chiefs, chargers, saints, and steelers are consistently good every year.

 

The Saints are more hot & cold than Indiana weather

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, HOF19 said:

And ????? …………. My buddy (Giants fan ) ALWAYS complains after his Giants go to the playoffs and then gets a tougher schedule the following season …...Well hey just like the team with the worst record gets the first pick in the draft ( which is proper ) it is also proper that we get a tough schedule next season …..WHY ? …….Because we made the playoffs . So I guess we can't complain .

Where you finish only affects 2 games

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

True, but the chiefs, chargers, saints, and steelers are consistently good every year.

The chiefs have won their first home playoff game for the first time in what... 24 years and the are consistently good?

 

Let's not get carried away, yes they are good this season, but consistency is 4-5 years in a row. 

 

Mahomes got hit against the colts, and we have seen players like him at QB pop up once in a while, but their longevity havn't been good outside of Russell Wilson.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, John Hammonds said:

If you want to be the best, you have to beat the best.  Here.  There.  Anywhere.

 

Thought I was reading a Dr. Seuss rhyme for a sec :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Where you finish only affects 2 games

Yep, it gave us Miami and Pit.   Had we lost to the Titans we would have had Cleveland and Buffalo.  

It's just a tough draw on the divisions we have to face in 2019.

KC, San Diego, Oak, Denver, Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans and Tampa.  5/8 on the road.  

The 2019 schedule will be much tougher than the 2018.   However, the team will be stronger as well. 

 

image.thumb.png.7a72439f9431620647f5b29eddd3ad95.png

 

image.thumb.png.7a7db6e8c09efebf972356cadc7fd8f9.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I rewatched the game as I thought this would be pretty strange as well.  He did not play in the fourth except for his usual special teams slot.     I was confused as well by those who say he had a bad game.  He gave up one completion where he got turned around.  Other than that he was glued to his man as usual.    I think he's still having trouble living down his reputation from his rookie year. 
    • depth wise, S, OL, and iDL are my biggest concerns. if folks were grading positions ( starters and depth), i'd be surprised if many graded safety in the top half.  outside of Hooker, lots of questions, at least to me. i definitely don't agree with Venturi. ESPN doesn't either. Hopefully the starters stay healthy, and Willis grows into a stud.
    • lol... you wrote a novel. while i didn't read it all, i did skim. the mock draft stuff, it wasn't a poll. it was a well defined systemic grading. if you're mom can do well on the 1st round, why didn't your favorite guys? lol. on the wide receiver study, it was laughable. no defined parameters, no comparative cross position stats, etc.. not even Busch league stuff.  like i said, legend in your own mind.   in terms of who can dish it out, but can't take it, look at your reaction above to a "sad".... what a rant/tantrum.....  self awareness is obviously not your strongest trait. feel free to "crush" me anytime... gives me a good laugh.
    • very astute observations!!
    • You live your life like the Coyote chasing the Road Runner....    and you keep running into the mountain side,  or running off the cliff....     OK....    you're not going to change....   So, I'll take apart your nonsense --- again.    This will be the longest post I've ever made,  trying to answer all your nonsense.    Doubt you'll read it.    But here it comes....     Of course we know if Luck's injury, whatever it is,  ISN'T minor.   What minor injury do you know lasts four months?    He barely participated in any off-season program.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    The Colts have NEVER, EVER called it minor.   Not once.  The only thing they've said is he hopes to be back by certain deadlines,  and he's missed almost every one.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    This paragraph may confuse you.   It's full of common sense and logic.   I don't know how you got the nerve to try to argue that no one knows.   Unbelieveable!   Nope.   No Tantrum from me.   Just pointing ot what should be obvious,  but apparently the obvious isn't obvious to you.     By the way,  while you were giving me a sad on my post to my friend CBE,   do you know who was giving me a "like"?    CBE.    I criticized his post and he still gave me a like.    He know while we may not agree,  he knows I'm not trying to pound him.   I'm  trying to be as honest and factual as I can.    No wonder you can't see for yourself.   What triggered me, was your latest attempt to sound like you know what you're talking about.   You judged Willis on half of the first pre-season game.    That's all you've got.    That's it.   Doesn't even occur to you that that is.....   NOTHING!    Hello?    And you present it like it should be taken seriously,  when it should be laughed at.    Goodness gracious, you want to go back to the media draft comparison?    I was hoping for your sake that you wouldn't.    But since you insist.     Did you ever really look at that poll?   Seriously,  did you look at the four category breakdown?    Did you see what was actually involved?    If you did,  you shouldn't have been crowing about it.    First,  what I care about from guys like Kiper and McShay and Jeremiah and others isn't just the first round.   My  momma can do a decent job on the first round, and she's been dead for nearly 30 years!    I care about their view on ALL ROUNDS.   And your survey was only about the first round.   That's it.   There were four categories.    In three of them,  the leader got no more than 50%.   That's it.   The best person in three of the four categories scored no more than 50 percent.   When the top guy is scoring no more than 50 percent and everyone else is close behind,  then no one really knows anything.    And the one category that the winner did well in --- one category --- he scored in the 90's.   And everyone else was right behind him.    So, most everyone did well in ONE OUT OF THE FOUR categories.   Big stinking deal.    I tried to tell you this silly survey didn't support what you believed but you wouldn't listen.   No surprise there.  All you cared about the results.   The fatal flaw.     Finally,  without a single fact,  you offered this opinion in that post.    I remember it like it was yesterday,  that your new age guys were doing a better job than the more traditional scouts.   Based on one poll.   One poll of one round.    And you said the older guys like Kiper and company were resting on their laurels and not working as hard.   Nope, the old guys were covering all seven rounds.    Most of your guys,  covering one round.   You have no facts to support that, but that's your view.    When logic and common sense would tell you that the guys I prefer make a ton more money and have their reputation at stake.    They have more to lose.    There's no way they're resting on anything.    But you'll say ANYTHING to try and prove a point.   There's no argument you won't twist to try to win an argument, no matter how foolish the argument is.   I've told you publicly and privately,  you're not interested in honest debate.   You're the least honest poster here.  You're only interested in winning and you'll do anything, say anything to do that.      As to the WR study.    You got crushed.   I'm talking about a bank safe fell on you and your response was to talk about cherry picking stats.    Either English is a second language or you don't know the meaning of the words.     I made two links for you.    One was almost identical to yours.    Yours covered 25 years dating back to a time when passing rules were dramatically different so comparing a receiver from 1990 to one from 2018 was silly.   We're playig a different game now.    My first link covered 20 years from 1995 to 2014 .   There was great over-lap in the two studies.  But the conclusions were entirely different.   The only reason I used it was your post said roughly 60% percent of 1st Round WR's were successes.    Mine said roughly 40%.   Guess which one you preferred?    Surprise!   Then the second link was one of my own making.    I listed every 1st round WR since Luck came into the league in 2012.  That's 7 years.   The last 7 years.   I put into bold each 1st Round WR who was clearly a success.   It came to 41%.   It also showed how few WR's have been taken in the last few drafts.   That's the NFL talking, in case you weren't paying attention.    You didn't dispute one WR.    Not one.   But you called it cherry picking.   Clearly you don't know how to use that expression correctly.    And now you throw out a list of criteria as if you're making the rules here.   Here's another free tip.   You're not.   Never have.   I'm not surprised you don't recognize the facts I put into posts.   You don't use them.   You're all about the opinion.   Most posters here are.   Because that means every single poster can simply say.....    "I'm entitled to my opinion."    Yes, they are.   Everyone is,  even you, who has no need for facts.    But what you're not entitled to is your own facts.    Just like you stated Funchess was a terrible signing based on your facts,  and it never even occured to you that Ballard and Reich had other facts that showed DF could be useful to us.    You actually thought you knew more than they did?!?    Again, unbelieveable.   You had no facts to support your nonsense about Reich being a poor play caller.   You had one game.   And I called you on it.   You've been doing a very bad back-peddle ever since,  but that's your view, with no facts to support it.   In fact all the facts support the exact opposite view.   Yet, you still try to claim victory.   It's so intellectually dishonest that it's nauseating.   And so I observed,  that with almost nothing to base it on,  you thought Willis has inconsistancies.    Thanks, Capt. Obvious.    Tomorrow will likely be sunny during the day,  turning to widely scattered darkness at night.    Anymore obvious insights?   Funny, how you now publicly call for me to ignore your posts,  when a few days ago,  in a thread I was barely even in,  you took a completely uncalled for shot at me.    Or does the phrase "legend in his own mind" not mean anything to you?      Bottom line....    you can dish it out,  especially when you think no one is looking.....   but you can't take it.   Glass ego.   I call a fraud a fraud.   
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...