Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Chiefs 2019 AFC Divisional Round Playoff Game Thread


LucasOilStadium

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Caffrey said:

If Vinny did not miss the FG and extra point, it would only be a one score ball game which would be amazing considering how bad we played.

 

That was not good version of an onside, not chance, unless it hit a player and bounded off. 

Actually, it is a good version with 5 minutes to go. If you don't recover you're not giving them the ball at midfield.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, Malakai432 said:

Colts had ALL the opportunities to play in this game.  Big time failure by the coaching staff, Luck and Vinny.  That being said the Colts have a lot to look forward next year.  Ballard needs to bring in some talent with that cap, and nail the draft again and they should be pretty tough. 

i really dont believe luck can win in big games at all only wild card week like the texans .  we would need the broncos defense to have a shot

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

This is actually a good loss for this young team They have to learn how to win playoff games. Getting their butts kicked should set them up well for the future. 

Agree.  They'll have all off-season to chew on this loss.  it won't taste good in their mouth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys the Colts offense hasn't shown up today but the refs are doing some blatant calls. And non calls. having said that. The Colts offense shows up today and this game is a lot close and Colts even could be leading right now. Horrible effort by the offense.  it's hard to watch the refs not call a fair game here. You can tell these guys are rooting for KC today. Having said that if the offense shows up today this game... If only. If only.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

Stop the nonsense about the refs. Our Offense was garbage and missed points opportunities.

Our offense had 3 drives stalled because of bad calls by the officiating. Those 3 drives could have made the difference, so it isn't quite nonsense when they aren't pulling it out their butts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

..and we end up 11-7...good year....you always want to play in the playoffs when you have young players.

 

…..We may need to shore up the right side of the O-line and the WRs
..defensively. we need an edge rusher clearly..

 

…..but I think we'll playing next January

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

Stop the nonsense about the refs. Our Offense was garbage and missed points opportunities.

Yes our offense was off. PI in the endzone cost us points, giving them first downs that should have been false starts, mahomes shaking his hands like Michael J. Fox back there. Holds where we should have had a tackle, non-pi call that puts us within 10 yards. It should have been a game. Running into the kicker that wasn't gifts them another set of downs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Flash7 said:

We've run the ball more in the 4th quarter than the first three quarters combined. The play calling has been really odd this game.

 

 

Agreed. I dont get it. They must have  thought they could exploit the secondary big time. But why have that mentality tonight? Control the clock and the sticks. We should have been in this things and we never really were.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, coming on strong said:

i really dont believe luck can win in big games at all only wild card week like the texans .  we would need the broncos defense to have a shot

 

Dude went into Denver and beat Manning at Denver.  He can win big games.  The Patriots have been their nemesis now the Chiefs will be unless Ballard does something about it.  Luck and co can do it if they build the team right.  

 

Frank got out coached as well, badly.  There was no comparison.  Their D played phenomenal.  

 

Keep in mind this team wasn't even supposed to make the playoffs.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sometimes you lose one you shouldn't. Sometimes you win one you shouldn't. It usually evens out.
    • There’s got to be something in the water in Indianapolis. Year in year out. Can’t make this stuff up.   Next man up! 
    • I know many might not agree but why not bring in Dak Prescott? In my opinion, if the Cowboys wanted to sign him long term they would've this past offseason. Ballard will have the cap space to sign him to a long term deal. The question is how much? I know many of people suggested Stafford or Wentz. But don't guys haven't stayed on the field recently. His playoff record is a small sample size and that 1-2 record could've been because of a multitude of things. I'm not going to put it all on Dak. Here are my reasons for Ballard to consider signing him.      1. He stays on the field: He's started all 16 games in his career      2. He wins: 41-25 career record since he came into the league.      3. A career 65% completion percentage. Working with Frank and this coaching staff that number would go up to 70%     4. He is mobile: We're seeing a transition in the Quarterback position. Most of the great Quarterbacks in this league Mahomes, Watson, Lamar, etc are mobile. Dak is very mobile, gets out of the pocket, and throws on the run.     
    • Glad we kept an extra LBer on roster.   Wonder who fills the roster spot?
    • I know many might not agree but why not bring in Dak Prescott? In my opinion, if the Cowboys wanted to sign him long term they would've this past offseason. Ballard will have the cap space to sign him to a long term deal. The question is how much? I know many of people suggested Stafford or Wentz. But don't guys haven't stayed on the field recently. His playoff record is a small sample size and that 1-2 record could've been because of a multitude of things. I'm not going to put it all on Dak. Here are my reasons for Ballard to consider signing him.      1. He stays on the field: He's started all 16 games in his career      2. He wins: 41-25 career record since he came into the league.      3. A career 65% completion percentage. Working with Frank and this coaching staff that number would go up to 70%     4. He is mobile: We're seeing a transition in the Quarterback position. Most of the great Quarterbacks in this league Mahomes, Watson, Lamar, etc are mobile. Dak is very mobile, gets out of the pocket, and throws on the run.      Ballard has to consider this.        https://www.nflanalysis.net/2021-nfl-free-agency-3-reasons-dak-prescott-to-the-colts-makes-perfect-sense/
  • Members

    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 72

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 10,054

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • compuls1v3

      compuls1v3 360

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsBlueFL

      ColtsBlueFL 7,545

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 507

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DarkSuperman

      DarkSuperman 3,789

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Orioles22

      Orioles22 160

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 9,450

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NelsonLeonard

      NelsonLeonard 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 4,151

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...