chad72

Cardinals and Browns interested in Pagano as DC

Recommended Posts

He should be fighting for the Bears job.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, BOTT said:

He should be fighting for the Bears job.


I imagine him as a lumberjack chopping wood while hugging bears.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, BOTT said:

He should be fighting for the Bears job.

 

True. and I've also heard the bears are 'keenly interested' in him as their DC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for Chuck. I'm interested to see how he does returning to the NFL. As many have stated, he would provide some well needed experience to the younger fresh head coaches. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just surprised Steve Wilks is not getting much interest. 

 

I heard Gregg Williams is in play for the Jets, and I am not sure how Pats fans feel about Bountygate Gregg in their division. 

3 hours ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

True. and I've also heard the bears are 'keenly interested' in him as their DC.

 

Bowles is deciding between the Bears and Bucs now. I think it is his job to lose with the Bears, more than anyone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, chad72 said:

I am just surprised Steve Wilks is not getting much interest. 

 

I heard Gregg Williams is in play for the Jets, and I am not sure how Pats fans feel about Bountygate Gregg in their division. 

 

Bowles is deciding between the Bears and Bucs now. I think it is his job to lose with the Bears, more than anyone else.

 

7 hours ago, chad72 said:

I am just surprised Steve Wilks is not getting much interest. 

 

I heard Gregg Williams is in play for the Jets, and I am not sure how Pats fans feel about Bountygate Gregg in their division. 

 

Bowles is deciding between the Bears and Bucs now. I think it is his job to lose with the Bears, more than anyone else.

Where did you hear about bowles being interested in the Bears? I thought it was a done deal he was going to Tampa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, chad72 said:

I am just surprised Steve Wilks is not getting much interest. 

 

I heard Gregg Williams is in play for the Jets, and I am not sure how Pats fans feel about Bountygate Gregg in their division. 

 

Bowles is deciding between the Bears and Bucs now. I think it is his job to lose with the Bears, more than anyone else.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001009763/article/cleveland-browns-working-to-hire-steve-wilks-as-dc

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe Denver or Washington due to cap space. I'm hoping we get a player in return if he ends up going anywhere. I wouldn't complain about getting a pick either.    I can get behind this but not just for DeAndre Baker maybe a pass rusher or interior D-line will fall. 
    • If DeAndre Baker falls past Denver, I wouldn't mind trading pick #26 and Brissett to the Dolphins in order to acquire him. That would be a deal both teams might agree to if the Dolphins are indeed interested.
    • He's my favorite FA or even early round pickup at WR this offseason 
    • I laughed when seeing "QB" listed as a team need on OnTheClock 2019.  That being said, I have to wonder if it's worth taking a flyer on a QB like Kyle Shurmur and either deal him or Brissett going forward.
    • Having faith without knowing why is "blind faith". At least when I supported certain picks that Grigson chose (like Dorsett), it was because I thought they were good and I was wrong. It wasn't because Grigson was our GM and I felt an obligation that I had to "follow" his every move. He did have 3 straight winning years and advanced further each time, but it became apparent by the end of 2014 that his drafting and FA signings were poor (besides the early part of the 2012 draft), and Luck was carrying the team. Luck got hurt afterward, but it's not like Grigson's drafting or FA signings got better. We were a team carried by Luck and the previous regimes players from 2012-2016. I didn't notice it completely until after the Pats AFC Championship game where we were completely outmatched, but I did notice poor patterns before that (especially missing on 1st round picks).   I'm just saying that the people who say that Ballard knows more than other "armchair GM's" would also say the same about Grigson, so they were merely guessing and were right on Ballard just like they were wrong about Grigson with "blind faith". I don't know, that line just bugs me a lot. Most people who say that also don't predict ahead of time who is good and who isn't, they are extremists in an either positive or negative way, and both are poor viewpoints IMO. Ok, rant over! 
  • Members

    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 4,735

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BOTT

      BOTT 11,774

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DarkSuperman

      DarkSuperman 3,463

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • esmort

      esmort 1,496

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 1,484

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 319

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rock8591

      rock8591 885

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BluHorzhu

      BluHorzhu 12

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 6,951

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 3,654

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: