Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

backshoulderfade

Interesting Chiefs stat

Recommended Posts

When a D is that bad Luck just walks up and down the field on them.  That's how it was in the Raiders game and the Chiefs are supposed to be worse than them. Plus they are going to be without Eric Berry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, krunk said:

When a D is that bad Luck just walks up and down the field on them.  That's how it was in the Raiders game and the Chiefs are supposed to be worse than them. Plus they are going to be without Eric Berry.

The large question still looms. Can we stop them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the “MAGIC” number is 3 defensive stops. We do that then play ground and pound to burn some clock we will walk away winners! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ball security will be HUGE in this game. Mahomes doesn't need any

extra possessions and chances to score.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

The large question still looms. Can we stop them?

 

I say if we keep them under 25 points, we'll have a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

I say if we keep them under 25 points, we'll have a chance.

Agreed. Have a feeling the weather will play a part in keep them under 25. Back to the original point, we’ll be tough to scheme against either way you slice it. Have our mauling oiline beat you, or make Andrew throw the ball. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

Agreed. Have a feeling the weather will play a part in keep them under 25. Back to the original point, we’ll be tough to scheme against either way you slice it. Have our mauling oiline beat you, or make Andrew throw the ball. 

A pick your poison offense that is equally good running and passing. And whichever you choose, the OL is gonma put the hurt on you. I can't believe we are seeing this out of the Colts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, krunk said:

When a D is that bad Luck just walks up and down the field on them.  That's how it was in the Raiders game and the Chiefs are supposed to be worse than them. Plus they are going to be without Eric Berry.

 

12-2 without him, 0-2 with him. He has not been a factor this year having played only a few games.

 

Malik Hooker for us missing the game will be a bigger factor. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

The large question still looms. Can we stop them?

Why are you worrying about that if we cant be stopped?  I think the better defensive team will make enough plays to help win the game.  Period!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, backshoulderfade said:

A pick your poison offense that is equally good running and passing. And whichever you choose, the OL is gonma put the hurt on you. I can't believe we are seeing this out of the Colts.

AMAZING feeling right?! Who would have thunk we develop into a balanced team that can beat you in multiple ways. Dome or no dome we are dangerous. Scary part is we are just beginning 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, krunk said:

Why are you worrying about that if we cant be stopped?  I think the better defensive team will make enough plays to help win the game.  Period!

Lol. Love your tenacity. “Crush the throat” “Curb stomp these fools”. It was more of a rhetorical question than a worry. Well he ready either way!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

AMAZING feeling right?! Who would have thunk we develop into a balanced team that can beat you in multiple ways. Dome or no dome we are dangerous. Scary part is we are just beginning 

We're now the team we dreaded going up against when Peyton was at the helm,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

I say if we keep them under 25 points, we'll have a chance.

 

In 16 regular season games, no defense could do that.

 

The team that got closest was the Cardinals who held the Chiefs to 26 points.

Interestingly,  Arizona led the league in rushing Tackles For Loss with 99.

 

2nd best defense in Tackles For Loss was the Colts with 91.

 

The Chiefs haven't played any other teams this year that are more disruptive at the LOS than the Cardinals and Colts.

 

Unfortunately, if Hooker can't play, it probably won't matter.......

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, egg said:

 

In 16 regular season games, no defense could do that.

 

The team that got closest was the Cardinals who held the Chiefs to 26 points.

Interestingly,  Arizona led the league in rushing Tackles For Loss with 99.

 

2nd best defense in Tackles For Loss was the Colts with 91.

 

The Chiefs haven't played any other teams this year that are more disruptive at the LOS.

 

Unfortunately, if Hooker can't play, it probably won't matter.......

 

 

 

 

Ravens held them to 24 before it went to OT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

Ravens held them to 24 before it went to OT

 

Yah, I personally think the Colts can do it. I don't think it's a given that the Chiefs score 40, or even 30.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

I say if we keep them under 25 points, we'll have a chance.

 

According to some posters on their forum, they will beat that in the 1st quarter.  Mahommes will have 7+ TDs for the game and will break all the passing records. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, our_dbs_rock said:

 

According to some posters on their forum, they will beat that in the 1st quarter.  Mahommes will have 7+ TDs for the game and will break all the passing records. :)

 

well according to chief fans and most of the media, mahomes is a god so that won't be surprising haha 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

well according to chief fans and most of the media, mahomes is a god so that won't be surprising haha 

 

Wait til you see him part the snow for extra points.  It's similar to what happens in New England, except he uses his divine abilities and they use a snow plow.  He will also perform the first ever 4 point conversion!

 

 

Now I'm thinking about the first baseball game bit that was popular on Bob and Tom years ago...

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

Ravens held them to 24 before it went to OT

Just the fact that it went to OT has me licking my chops because Lamar doesn't know what the hell he's doing in the pocket and they are heavily reliant on running. And they still scored enough on that D to take it to OT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

I say if we keep them under 25 points, we'll have a chance.

I think they will score at at least 5 times. The key is to make two of those FG's. That would be 27pts. If they score 6 times, that will likely be 34. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

12-2 without him, 0-2 with him. He has not been a factor this year having played only a few games.

 

Malik Hooker for us missing the game will be a bigger factor. 

Except it looks like Hooker will be fine, from his own opinion on his blog at least.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

I say if we keep them under 25 points, we'll have a chance.

You won't keep them under 25 points but if you keep them under 30 you'll have a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jachba said:

You won't keep them under 25 points but if you keep them under 30 you'll have a chance.

 

Said if didn't I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Said if didn't I

You did. I like your chances of winning this either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jachba said:

You did. I like your chances of winning this either way.

 

You guys think you can beat the pats?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, I'm the thread deflater. 

 

But wouldn't opposing teams be throwing and scoring a lot if KC took a big lead, which wouldn't really be a measure of defensive prowess in games when it mattered?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/10/2019 at 6:49 PM, CR91 said:

 

You guys think you can beat the pats?

Let's see. Chargers are 9-0 outside of of L.A., they're the only team to beat the Chiefs this year at Arrowhead, the only AFC team to beat the Seahawks in Seattle in the last 13 games at CenturyLink Field, the only team to ever come back from a 16 point deficit to beat the Steelers in Pittsburgh, the only team to cause a John Harbaugh coached team to be one and done in the playoffs, the only team to be a top 10 team in total and scoring offense and defense and oh, by the way, our All-Pro TE Hunter Henry is likely to play Sunday after being out all year.

I believe we have a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, jachba said:

Let's see. Chargers are 9-0 outside of of L.A., they're the only team to beat the Chiefs this year at Arrowhead, the only AFC team to beat the Seahawks in Seattle in the last 13 games at CenturyLink Field, the only team to ever come back from a 16 point deficit to beat the Steelers in Pittsburgh, the only team to cause a John Harbaugh coached team to be one and done in the playoffs, the only team to be a top 10 team in total and scoring offense and defense and oh, by the way, our All-Pro TE Hunter Henry is likely to play Sunday after being out all year.

I believe we have a chance.

 

Sure dont lack confidence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/10/2019 at 7:04 PM, DougDew said:

Of course, I'm the thread deflater.

 

So YOU'RE the one in Tom Bradys' phone doing his dirty work... will you be handling Toms' balls tomorrow?

 

giphy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Sure dont lack confidence

Having said all that, it would not surprise me at all to see the game be a close, hard-fought contest that could very well be decided in the last minute or in overtime. I don't think that too many people on our message board are seriously thinking that the Chargers are going to go into Foxboro and blow out the Patriots. 

On the other hand, here's what former Pats linebacker Jerod Mayo said to his former teammates as a warning: "If you go out there and average 3 yards a carry, this game will be over by halftime."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You live your life like the Coyote chasing the Road Runner....    and you keep running into the mountain side,  or running off the cliff....     OK....    you're not going to change....   So, I'll take apart your nonsense --- again.    This will be the longest post I've ever made,  trying to answer all your nonsense.    Doubt you'll read it.    But here it comes....     Of course we know if Luck's injury, whatever it is,  ISN'T minor.   What minor injury do you know lasts four months?    He barely participated in any off-season program.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    The Colts have NEVER, EVER called it minor.   Not once.  The only thing they've said is he hopes to be back by certain deadlines,  and he's missed almost every one.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    This paragraph may confuse you.   It's full of common sense and logic.   I don't know how you got the nerve to try to argue that no one knows.   Unbelieveable!   Nope.   No Tantrum from me.   Just pointing ot what should be obvious,  but apparently the obvious isn't obvious to you.     By the way,  while you were giving me a sad on my post to my friend CBE,   do you know who was giving me a "like"?    CBE.    I criticized his post and he still gave me a like.    He know while we may not agree,  he knows I'm not trying to pound him.   I'm  trying to be as honest and factual as I can.    No wonder you can't see for yourself.   What triggered me, was your latest attempt to sound like you know what you're talking about.   You judged Willis on half of the first pre-season game.    That's all you've got.    That's it.   Doesn't even occur to you that that is.....   NOTHING!    Hello?    And you present it like it should be taken seriously,  when it should be laughed at.    Goodness gracious, you want to go back to the media draft comparison?    I was hoping for your sake that you wouldn't.    But since you insist.     Did you ever really look at that poll?   Seriously,  did you look at the four category breakdown?    Did you see what was actually involved?    If you did,  you shouldn't have been crowing about it.    First,  what I care about from guys like Kiper and McShay and Jeremiah and others isn't just the first round.   My  momma can do a decent job on the first round, and she's been dead for nearly 30 years!    I care about their view on ALL ROUNDS.   And your survey was only about the first round.   That's it.   There were four categories.    In three of them,  the leader got no more than 50%.   That's it.   The best person in three of the four categories scored no more than 50 percent.   When the top guy is scoring no more than 50 percent and everyone else is close behind,  then no one really knows anything.    And the one category that the winner did well in --- one category --- he scored in the 90's.   And everyone else was right behind him.    So, most everyone did well in ONE OUT OF THE FOUR categories.   Big stinking deal.    I tried to tell you this silly survey didn't support what you believed but you wouldn't listen.   No surprise there.  All you cared about the results.   The fatal flaw.     Finally,  without a single fact,  you offered this opinion in that post.    I remember it like it was yesterday,  that your new age guys were doing a better job than the more traditional scouts.   Based on one poll.   One poll of one round.    And you said the older guys like Kiper and company were resting on their laurels and not working as hard.   Nope, the old guys were covering all seven rounds.    Most of your guys,  covering one round.   You have no facts to support that, but that's your view.    When logic and common sense would tell you that the guys I prefer make a ton more money and have their reputation at stake.    They have more to lose.    There's no way they're resting on anything.    But you'll say ANYTHING to try and prove a point.   There's no argument you won't twist to try to win an argument, no matter how foolish the argument is.   I've told you publicly and privately,  you're not interested in honest debate.   You're the least honest poster here.  You're only interested in winning and you'll do anything, say anything to do that.      As to the WR study.    You got crushed.   I'm talking about a bank safe fell on you and your response was to talk about cherry picking stats.    Either English is a second language or you don't know the meaning of the words.     I made two links for you.    One was almost identical to yours.    Yours covered 25 years dating back to a time when passing rules were dramatically different so comparing a receiver from 1990 to one from 2018 was silly.   We're playig a different game now.    My first link covered 20 years from 1995 to 2014 .   There was great over-lap in the two studies.  But the conclusions were entirely different.   The only reason I used it was your post said roughly 60% percent of 1st Round WR's were successes.    Mine said roughly 40%.   Guess which one you preferred?    Surprise!   Then the second link was one of my own making.    I listed every 1st round WR since Luck came into the league in 2012.  That's 7 years.   The last 7 years.   I put into bold each 1st Round WR who was clearly a success.   It came to 41%.   It also showed how few WR's have been taken in the last few drafts.   That's the NFL talking, in case you weren't paying attention.    You didn't dispute one WR.    Not one.   But you called it cherry picking.   Clearly you don't know how to use that expression correctly.    And now you throw out a list of criteria as if you're making the rules here.   Here's another free tip.   You're not.   Never have.   I'm not surprised you don't recognize the facts I put into posts.   You don't use them.   You're all about the opinion.   Most posters here are.   Because that means every single poster can simply say.....    "I'm entitled to my opinion."    Yes, they are.   Everyone is,  even you, who has no need for facts.    But what you're not entitled to is your own facts.    Just like you stated Funchess was a terrible signing based on your facts,  and it never even occured to you that Ballard and Reich had other facts that showed DF could be useful to us.    You actually thought you knew more than they did?!?    Again, unbelieveable.   You had no facts to support your nonsense about Reich being a poor play caller.   You had one game.   And I called you on it.   You've been doing a very bad back-peddle ever since,  but that's your view, with no facts to support it.   In fact all the facts support the exact opposite view.   Yet, you still try to claim victory.   It's so intellectually dishonest that it's nauseating.   And so I observed,  that with almost nothing to base it on,  you thought Willis has inconsistancies.    Thanks, Capt. Obvious.    Tomorrow will likely be sunny during the day,  turning to widely scattered darkness at night.    Anymore obvious insights?   Funny, how you now publicly call for me to ignore your posts,  when a few days ago,  in a thread I was barely even in,  you took a completely uncalled for shot at me.    Or does the phrase "legend in his own mind" not mean anything to you?      Bottom line....    you can dish it out,  especially when you think no one is looking.....   but you can't take it.   Glass ego.   I call a fraud a fraud.   
    • During the Browns game, Venturi said S was one our strongest positions.  Not saying i agree, but i dont lose sleep over it either.
    • “...when he gets the locker room strong enough”.   That still  means drafting lots of high character guys. That’s our default. 
    • A backup to Castonzo who is his eventual replacement. 
  • Members

    • strt182

      strt182 292

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,795

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Melancholie

      Melancholie 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indyagent17

      indyagent17 1,193

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 4,986

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 19,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chrisfarley

      chrisfarley 1,048

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • scousecolt

      scousecolt 90

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...