Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Pro Football Reference AV for 2018


shasta519

Recommended Posts

I didn't see a post for this, so please feel free to merge if this is a duplicate. 

 

I was looking at Pro Football Reference...and I noticed that the AV (Approximate Value) for each player has been calculated. If you want to skip the pukage of words below, here are the links:

 

NFL leaderboard: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2018/leaders.htm

AV Calculation: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/index2905.html?p=466

 

I am not expert...but for those not familiar, AV is calculated from a formula that assigns a point total to an offense or defense, based on multiple factors like team success and production relative to an average team. The better you are...the more points you have to assign...and vice versa. That point total is then divided up across position groups based on percentages (same for all teams I believe)...and then those available points for each group are given to each individual players based on production and individual awards (if applicable). 

 

It's far from a perfect system and definitely not the best...because it focuses on being a good offense or defense. It doesn't really account for the value someone provided to his own team (if that team is bad) or just how valuable he was despite being on a bad team. This can be egregious in some cases. It also places a lot of emphasis on Games Played (and not snap %), so that gives backups more AV than they should probably have (which means less for starters in some cases).

 

Ultimately, it will tend to overvalue players and positions...because of the formula for assigning points. But it seeks to assign a value to each player...so I find it interesting.

 

But I thought this year's numbers were especially interesting...and definitely relevant, given the matchup coming up. If you look at the rankings, you will see a lot of familiar names playing at Arrowhead this weekend. 

 

Some highlights:

 

Darius Leonard comes in with an 18...tied for 2nd in the NFL. Just a truly incredible season for DaROY (yes he is going to win...I am fully onboard the train). Remember how Polian compared him to Derrick Brooks...well that's what that AV looks like. LBs get a lot of love in AV, but Leonard's AV is commensurate with his on-field value.

 

Nelson comes in with a 15, which is also incredible. Though it somewhat came at the expense of other OL players, as they are curiously much lower in AV in comparision, despite having good seasons. Here is the rest of the OL:

 

AC - 5

Kelly - 6

Glow - 4

Smith - 6

 

Some of that has to do with Games Played I think, as Nelson didn't miss any...and many of the backup OL players got points by virtue of games played...so there was less to go around to the "starters." But also note that players who are named to AP or PB teams are assigned multipliers to their points. So when you are on a good OL (more points available), but are the only one to make one of those teams (you get a multiplier that no one else does), you are likely to get a much larger share of AV. That's not to say Nelson wasn't awesome, it just seems like something is wrong with the OL AVs overall. I think Nelson should probably be a couple points lower and each of those guys a couple points higher. But oh well.

 

Luck comes in at 15. In no universe is Luck tied as the second-most valuable player on the Colts, so you can see how AV can undervalue players. Mahomes is so high because his offense got so many points to use. I guess AV didn't love the Colts offense after all, as the available points reflect a slightly above above average team on offense (which we know really wasn't the case).

 

TY was the next one in line with 11. Seems a bit low...but WR1s and WR2s, unless they are on a great offensive team, tend to get undevalued. Case in point, Davante Adams somehow gets an 10, while Michael Thomas gets a 17.

 

But a big shout out to Leonard and Nelson. I am sure their agents love seeing these numbers as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I knew I had a favorite last year, but I thought I would be good with whoever the Colts picked... and this was until the odds for the Colts picking Levis hit -4000 or something of the sort about half an hour before the draft and my heart completely dropped. In a way I'm happy the odds-makers completely missed on this one... it showed me how I really felt about those players and made me even more appreciative for us drafting Richardson an hour later.    So... you would be good with any of them... but who do you REALLY want?    On your question... if I had to guess, most Colts fans haven't watched this QB draft extensively. I know I haven't. So his statistical profile doesn't scream 1st rounder so... possibly why not many people really like him. Also keep in mind that this is compared to the other 3. 2 of them have been crowned as the next big thing for a while now and the third one won the Heismann with some exceptional performaces throughout the year. 
    • My sleepers: (meaning, the kind of players coaches would like to have, more than what consensus big board gives credit to them. Some of them might need couple of years to attain their high potential, if drafted into suitable coaching environment, so a lot depends on that. Some of them have injury concerns too).   Most of them are high IQ players or high-effort, high-motor players - two traits I look for from the Drafted players, list is long but I like these guys.. gonna be interesting to see where they land and how it works out for them in long run.    Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest Kiran Amegadjie, OT, Yale Maason Smith, IDL, LSU Christian Mahogany, OG, Boston College Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Zak Zinter, OG, Michigan Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Khyree Jackson, CB Oregon Dylan McMahon, C, NC State (good fit for Browns)  Tykee Smith, SAF, Georgia Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Michael Barrett, LB Michigan Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky Beaux Limmer, IOL, Arkansas   Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami McKinnley Jackson, IDL, Texas A&M Kalen King, CB, Penn State Justin Eboigbe, IDL, Alabama    Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Beau Brade, SAF, Maryland Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Jalyx Hunt, EDGE, Houston Christian (I'm hoping for day 3 Vikings pickup, as Flores could work wonders with him)  Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State Brennan Jackson, EDGE, Washington State  Delmar Glaze, OT, Maryland Myles Cole, EDGE, Texas Tech Kristian Boyd, DT, Northern Iowa Javontae Jean-Baptiste, DL, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, LB, Temple Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota Jalen Green, EDGE, James Madison (UDFA Target prospect)  Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (UDFA prospect) Eyabi Okie-Anoma, EDGE, Charlotte Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto  Sundiata Anderson, EDGE, Grambling State  Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (Special Teams, Returner)  Emani Bailey, RB, TCU   As for Vikings, I don't wanna rush to draft QB if the team isn't confident in the guys they could move up in draft range, and I'd like to just draft impact players that build the roster at this point.   Build the team, draft a franchise QB at right time, don't rush and ruin years trying to make someone work out in the NFL. 
    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
  • Members

    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,584

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TrueBlue4ever

      TrueBlue4ever 323

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,313

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • midmoColtsfan

      midmoColtsfan 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,816

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,191

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pkbrux

      pkbrux 104

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...