Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Mel Kiper's Hair

Fangio new Broncos HC

Recommended Posts

So far, the only D minded head coach hire.  But I hear he'll give Elway large leverage in coach staff ( IE: Gary Kubiak as OC ? ) hiring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good hire!!! We will see how much Kubiak wants to get back on the sidelines as OC i.e. health permitting. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Was Fangio our DC under Mora?

Yes

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

I remembered something but wasn't sure. Mora was upset about colts management wanting to fire DC Fangio. I remember Mora saying something like " he's a good coach. There are things that people don't know".  

So I did a little research and found this:

 

https://www.nola.com/sports/index.ssf/2017/07/still_bitter_over_firing_jim_m.html

 

""I didn't walk away, though, I got fired," he said. "It was either fire Vic or fire me. I was asked by Bill Polian -- I was told by Bill Polian -- he wanted me to fire Vic Fangio. I said, well, he doesn't deserve to be fired. He's an outstanding coach, was then and he still is. So we had talks with Jim Irsay, it came down and I wouldn't do it."

 

Bill Polian has confirmed this.  He did ask Mora to fire Fangio (because his defense was going to end up too expensive and required smart veterans {and $$} to run, and with Peyton they needed cap space for offensive weapons). Mora refused, so Bill fired them both.

 

Polian wanted to move to a Tampa 2 defense, and Tony Dungy (father, along with Monte Kiffin, of it) just happened to become available too.

 

Mora fired Jan 8, Dungy fired (Bucs) Jan 14, Dungy hired (Colts) Jan 22.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, BOTT said:

Yes

And didn't Manning used to own him when he was with Houston?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, 18to87 said:

And didn't Manning used to own him when he was with Houston?

 

Well yes, but Peyton owned pretty much everyone.. And pretty much everyone owned those Texans Ds. Expansion team + bad GM = bad defense.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great move for the Broncos. Fangio and those defenisve players will be a near-perfect match

 

..and they then decide that re-hiring Gary Kubiak as the offensive coordinator was not a good idea....which is probably also for the best

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, oldunclemark said:

This is a great move for the Broncos. Fangio and those defenisve players will be a near-perfect match

 

..and they then decide that re-hiring Gary Kubiak as the offensive coordinator was not a good idea....which is probably also for the best

Why was not hiring kubiak a good idea? I thought that was great match.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, BOTT said:

Why was not hiring kubiak a good idea? I thought that was great match.

Because Kubiak conservative offense that works, in my opinion, when you have superior talent at most positions.

   Denver's offense is behind the times.....but they have good skill players..

they need someone who can install a less predictable attack..

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, oldunclemark said:

Because Kubiak conservative offense that works, in my opinion, when you have superior talent at most positions.

   Denver's offense is behind the times.....but they have good skill players..

they need someone who can install a less predictable attack..

 

That is the direction they are going, not going with Kubiak.

 

https://www.9news.com/article/sports/nfl/denver-broncos/gary-kubiak-and-broncos-break-up/73-39058de7-7441-4df9-b01b-b17dc0a51369

 

So much for denying Kubiak the chance to interview with other teams for OC. I am glad Fangio is not surrounding himself with "Elway approved" guys. If not for Wade Philips' D, that 2015 Broncos' O was not going to be stellar, even with a 2013 Peyton, due to all the changes implemented that gave all the veterans issues. 

 

I do think a guy like Todd Monken would make a good OC for the Broncos, just my opinion of course. When he took over as play caller for Dirk Koetter in Tampa, the offense was more stable and balanced. 

 

Broncos may look to Mike Munchak as new offensive line coach and might make a play for Antonio Brown, now that DT is gone and Sanders would be coming back from season ending surgery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, chad72 said:

Broncos may look to Mike Munchak as new offensive line coach

 

Is Mike Munchak gone in Pittsburgh? I was hoping the Vikes would sign him as OC. I would be thrilled if he was our OL coach.

 

But why would Munchak want to leave Pitt if he is not getting a promotion elsewhere? The OL there is top 5. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

Is Mike Munchak gone in Pittsburgh? I was hoping the Vikes would sign him as OC. I would be thrilled if he was our OL coach.

 

But why would Munchak want to leave Pitt if he is not getting a promotion elsewhere? The OL there is top 5. 

 

I found it. Munchak is no longer under contract with the Steelers.

 

Munchak May Join Broncos

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

I found it. Munchak is no longer under contract with the Steelers.

 

Munchak May Join Broncos

I sure hope he does.

His expertise is the O-line and that's the Broncos No 1 weakness.

 

I would be surprised if a former head coach likle Munchak would 'go back' to being a line coach but apparently he has family in the Denver area and would simply like to live there.

 

there is also the thought that Vic Fangio simply wants to coach the defense and would be a 'figurehead' as head coach.

he would like the offense to be in experienced hands and take care of itself.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

Is Mike Munchak gone in Pittsburgh? I was hoping the Vikes would sign him as OC. I would be thrilled if he was our OL coach.

 

But why would Munchak want to leave Pitt if he is not getting a promotion elsewhere? The OL there is top 5. 

 

He has grandkids in the Denver area. That is always a selling point!!! :) 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how head coaches feel after they are fired and move on to lesser positions.

I wonder if its a relief that they can specify..

...or if they chafe at not being able to make the big decisions?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

I sure hope he does.

His expertise is the O-line and that's the Broncos No 1 weakness.

 

I would be surprised if a former head coach likle Munchak would 'go back' to being a line coach but apparently he has family in the Denver area and would simply like to live there.

 

there is also the thought that Vic Fangio simply wants to coach the defense and would be a 'figurehead' as head coach.

he would like the offense to be in experienced hands and take care of itself.

 

When Vikes fans were naming their favorites for offensive coordinator, I named Mike Munchak, not even realizing that he was no longer under contract with Pitt. I was the only one who wanted him. Some wanted Gase, McCarthy, Kevin Stefanski (who we eventually retained as OC) and others. I wanted Munchak because of his work with the Pitt OL. We should have gone hard after him, maybe make him Assistant Head Coach. :(

 

Good luck getting him. I am pleased to see Denver and Tampa give "non-McVay" coaches a chance. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NFLfan said:

 

When Vikes fans were naming their favorites for offensive coordinator, I named Mike Munchak, not even realizing that he was no longer under contract with Pitt. I was the only one who wanted him. Some wanted Gase, McCarthy, Kevin Stefanski (who we eventually retained as OC) and others. I wanted Munchak because of his work with the Pitt OL. We should have gone hard after him, maybe make him Assistant Head Coach. :(

 

Good luck getting him. I am pleased to see Denver and Tampa give "non-McVay" coaches a chance. 

Me too.

I watch the Rams, Bears and KC and they do new things on offense. No knock

But I still think (hope) you can win by maximizing your defense and with strong conventional leadership on offense.

 A guy like Munchak seems strong enough to instruct in ways he knows will work based on decades of experience.

 

I'm guessing that MM may not want to be the OC, just the line coach.

To be OC or play caller is such a lightning rod position. I guess I dont have to tell you that.

I guess OC doesn't have to be the play caller but then a trusted, experienced 3rd party has to enter the mix

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Me too.

I watch the Rams, Bears and KC and they do new things on offense. No knock

But I still think (hope) you can win by maximizing your defense and with strong conventional leadership on offense.

 A guy like Munchak seems strong enough to instruct in ways he knows will work based on decades of experience.

 

I'm guessing that MM may not want to be the OC, just the line coach.

To be OC or play caller is such a lightning rod position. I guess I dont have to tell you that.

I guess OC doesn't have to be the play caller but then a trusted, experienced 3rd party has to enter the mix

 

All we need him for is OL, now that we retained Stefanski as OC.  However, I don't see him picking us over Denver if he has family in Denver. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of OL coaches, what did Colts fans think of what Philbin did with the OL? He was reported to be interviewing for our OL coaching vacancy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/11/2019 at 10:12 PM, oldunclemark said:

This is a great move for the Broncos. Fangio and those defenisve players will be a near-perfect match

 

..and they then decide that re-hiring Gary Kubiak as the offensive coordinator was not a good idea....which is probably also for the best

 

I like what they did with their coaching staff. They hired a lot of young minds (as opposed to the Vikings going with Dennison, Kubiak, etc.). I read that they hired the grandson of legendary Colorado Buffaloes head coach Bill McCartney as the QB coach.

 

I recall a story from, say 25 to 30 years ago when the Colorado QB was dying of cancer. His girlfriend was the coach's daughter and she gave birth to this child the same year that the QB died. This child T. C. McCartney is the new Broncos QB coach. How time has flown! It seemed that it was 10 years ago. He was an offensive assistant with Shanahan and the 49ers last year and previously coached at LSU. They also hired a few other young coaches. The Broncos have a good mixture of veteran coaches and young coaches that can bring in fresh ideas.

 

I don't like the Joe Flacco move. But I am rooting for the Broncos to have a good year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing Elway fall on his face puts a bigger smile on my face than seeing the Steelers crumbling down.

As a very long Colt fan I never had any love for Elway.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You live your life like the Coyote chasing the Road Runner....    and you keep running into the mountain side,  or running off the cliff....     OK....    you're not going to change....   So, I'll take apart your nonsense --- again.    This will be the longest post I've ever made,  trying to answer all your nonsense.    Doubt you'll read it.    But here it comes....     Of course we know if Luck's injury, whatever it is,  ISN'T minor.   What minor injury do you know lasts four months?    He barely participated in any off-season program.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    The Colts have NEVER, EVER called it minor.   Not once.  The only thing they've said is he hopes to be back by certain deadlines,  and he's missed almost every one.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    This paragraph may confuse you.   It's full of common sense and logic.   I don't know how you got the nerve to try to argue that no one knows.   Unbelieveable!   Nope.   No Tantrum from me.   Just pointing ot what should be obvious,  but apparently the obvious isn't obvious to you.     By the way,  while you were giving me a sad on my post to my friend CBE,   do you know who was giving me a "like"?    CBE.    I criticized his post and he still gave me a like.    He know while we may not agree,  he knows I'm not trying to pound him.   I'm  trying to be as honest and factual as I can.    No wonder you can't see for yourself.   What triggered me, was your latest attempt to sound like you know what you're talking about.   You judged Willis on half of the first pre-season game.    That's all you've got.    That's it.   Doesn't even occur to you that that is.....   NOTHING!    Hello?    And you present it like it should be taken seriously,  when it should be laughed at.    Goodness gracious, you want to go back to the media draft comparison?    I was hoping for your sake that you wouldn't.    But since you insist.     Did you ever really look at that poll?   Seriously,  did you look at the four category breakdown?    Did you see what was actually involved?    If you did,  you shouldn't have been crowing about it.    First,  what I care about from guys like Kiper and McShay and Jeremiah and others isn't just the first round.   My  momma can do a decent job on the first round, and she's been dead for nearly 30 years!    I care about their view on ALL ROUNDS.   And your survey was only about the first round.   That's it.   There were four categories.    In three of them,  the leader got no more than 50%.   That's it.   The best person in three of the four categories scored no more than 50 percent.   When the top guy is scoring no more than 50 percent and everyone else is close behind,  then no one really knows anything.    And the one category that the winner did well in --- one category --- he scored in the 90's.   And everyone else was right behind him.    So, most everyone did well in ONE OUT OF THE FOUR categories.   Big stinking deal.    I tried to tell you this silly survey didn't support what you believed but you wouldn't listen.   No surprise there.  All you cared about the results.   The fatal flaw.     Finally,  without a single fact,  you offered this opinion in that post.    I remember it like it was yesterday,  that your new age guys were doing a better job than the more traditional scouts.   Based on one poll.   One poll of one round.    And you said the older guys like Kiper and company were resting on their laurels and not working as hard.   Nope, the old guys were covering all seven rounds.    Most of your guys,  covering one round.   You have no facts to support that, but that's your view.    When logic and common sense would tell you that the guys I prefer make a ton more money and have their reputation at stake.    They have more to lose.    There's no way they're resting on anything.    But you'll say ANYTHING to try and prove a point.   There's no argument you won't twist to try to win an argument, no matter how foolish the argument is.   I've told you publicly and privately,  you're not interested in honest debate.   You're the least honest poster here.  You're only interested in winning and you'll do anything, say anything to do that.      As to the WR study.    You got crushed.   I'm talking about a bank safe fell on you and your response was to talk about cherry picking stats.    Either English is a second language or you don't know the meaning of the words.     I made two links for you.    One was almost identical to yours.    Yours covered 25 years dating back to a time when passing rules were dramatically different so comparing a receiver from 1990 to one from 2018 was silly.   We're playig a different game now.    My first link covered 20 years from 1995 to 2014 .   There was great over-lap in the two studies.  But the conclusions were entirely different.   The only reason I used it was your post said roughly 60% percent of 1st Round WR's were successes.    Mine said roughly 40%.   Guess which one you preferred?    Surprise!   Then the second link was one of my own making.    I listed every 1st round WR since Luck came into the league in 2012.  That's 7 years.   The last 7 years.   I put into bold each 1st Round WR who was clearly a success.   It came to 41%.   It also showed how few WR's have been taken in the last few drafts.   That's the NFL talking, in case you weren't paying attention.    You didn't dispute one WR.    Not one.   But you called it cherry picking.   Clearly you don't know how to use that expression correctly.    And now you throw out a list of criteria as if you're making the rules here.   Here's another free tip.   You're not.   Never have.   I'm not surprised you don't recognize the facts I put into posts.   You don't use them.   You're all about the opinion.   Most posters here are.   Because that means every single poster can simply say.....    "I'm entitled to my opinion."    Yes, they are.   Everyone is,  even you, who has no need for facts.    But what you're not entitled to is your own facts.    Just like you stated Funchess was a terrible signing based on your facts,  and it never even occured to you that Ballard and Reich had other facts that showed DF could be useful to us.    You actually thought you knew more than they did?!?    Again, unbelieveable.   You had no facts to support your nonsense about Reich being a poor play caller.   You had one game.   And I called you on it.   You've been doing a very bad back-peddle ever since,  but that's your view, with no facts to support it.   In fact all the facts support the exact opposite view.   Yet, you still try to claim victory.   It's so intellectually dishonest that it's nauseating.   And so I observed,  that with almost nothing to base it on,  you thought Willis has inconsistancies.    Thanks, Capt. Obvious.    Tomorrow will likely be sunny during the day,  turning to widely scattered darkness at night.    Anymore obvious insights?   Funny, how you now publicly call for me to ignore your posts,  when a few days ago,  in a thread I was barely even in,  you took a completely uncalled for shot at me.    Or does the phrase "legend in his own mind" not mean anything to you?      Bottom line....    you can dish it out,  especially when you think no one is looking.....   but you can't take it.   Glass ego.   I call a fraud a fraud.   
    • During the Browns game, Venturi said S was one our strongest positions.  Not saying i agree, but i dont lose sleep over it either.
    • “...when he gets the locker room strong enough”.   That still  means drafting lots of high character guys. That’s our default. 
    • A backup to Castonzo who is his eventual replacement. 
  • Members

    • cbear

      cbear 735

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • strt182

      strt182 292

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Irish YJ

      Irish YJ 1,009

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColtsGo5150

      GoColtsGo5150 225

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 4,986

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,795

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Melancholie

      Melancholie 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indyagent17

      indyagent17 1,193

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 19,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...