Jump to content
dw49

Weather Forecast for Saturday's Game Does a 360

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

This is going to be a really crappy game and boring.

If we win then it will be the game of the week as far as I’m concerned. I just care about advancing.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Coltsman1788 said:

If we win then it will be the game of the week as far as I’m concerned. I just care about advancing.

Heck yeah!! Bore me away with a big fat W!!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

This is going to be a really crappy game and boring.

 

Some of you never played football in the snow as a kid, and it shows.  :(

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many times have we witnessed our Manning era Colts crumble under similar conditions in the playoffs?  Now we have a team that is better equipped to deal with these conditions and some fans are worried about it affecting both offenses and the quality of the game.  You guys can miss me with all that.  I’m looking for the Colts to take this stage and show the world that this is a new era of Colts football...one where we can play and win in any style necessary.  In these Chiefs...we are playing a virtual replica of our past playoff selves. Colts...Let’s show the world just how far you have come. Pumped for this. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm kinda new on here. But i'm not too nervous at all. I think the weather and conditions favor us. I'm not concerned about our running game at all. I think Mack may reach 200 rushing yards today.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely snow accumulation over night.  Currently a gentle whiteout!  Perfect conditions for the Colts in their all-white uniforms.  Go Colts!

 

2C007B6C-E7F7-4B78-A1A7-54CCD0F31203.jpeg

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Coltsman1788 said:

How many times have we witnessed our Manning era Colts crumble under similar conditions in the playoffs?  Now we have a team that is better equipped to deal with these conditions and some fans are worried about it affecting both offenses and the quality of the game.  You guys can miss me with all that.  I’m looking for the Colts to take this stage and show the world that this is a new era of Colts football...one where we can play and win in any style necessarily.  In these Chiefs...we are playing a virtual replica of our past playoff selves. Colts...Let’s show the world just how far you have come. Pumped for this. 

We haven’t proved we will play well in the snow or cold. It’s just guessing and until they show they can I will be skeptical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, rockywoj said:

Definitely snow accumulation over night.  Currently a gentle whiteout!  Perfect conditions for the Colts in their all-white uniforms.  Go Colts!

 

2C007B6C-E7F7-4B78-A1A7-54CCD0F31203.jpeg

 

Is it actually snowing right now?.....a little?   a lot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

We haven’t proved we will play well in the snow or cold. It’s just guessing and until they show they can I will be skeptical.

Fair enough.  Our players wanted this judging from some of their enthusiastic responses on social media.  I think they are looking forward to the opportunity to convince their doubters. They believe they are prepared for this.  I think this Colts team is cut different from what we are used to.  We will find out soon. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, egg said:

 

Is it actually snowing right now?.....a little?   a lot?

Yup. Coming down pretty good. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Virtuoso80 said:

looks like the field is clear.  https://www.kansascity.com/news/article224346960.html  image attached of the field.

KCM_ChiefsColts00841-12-19J.jpg

for now.....  hell, it's even heated, so doubt it gets much actual coverage..... but the 2-3 hours it's uncovered for warmups, it COULD get pretty wet.....  any wind could also be a factor added to wet surface, mud, wet balls, etc.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, oldunclemark said:

Wish we had a big fullback...I dont think KC does either

How about the A-Train Mike Alstott (purdue / tampa bay) !!!!

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, oldunclemark said:

Wish we had a big fullback...I dont think KC does either

 

We have Hewitt, but he would probably be considered more of a receiving-FB than a running-FB.  Decent blocker though.

 

I can see Wilkins using his vision to have a decent day running the ball.

 

Just no fumbles!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, chrisfarley said:

How about the A-Train Mike Alstott (purdue / tampa bay) !!!!

One of my favs!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, egg said:

 

Is it actually snowing right now?.....a little?   a lot?

Yes.....this is after clearing it off 5 mins ago 

 

 

3E522ABF-B9FB-4367-9472-7A57B8A4B40C.jpeg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

We have Hewitt, but he would probably be considered more of a receiving-FB than a running-FB.  Decent blocker though.

 

I can see Wilkins using his vision to have a decent day running the ball.

 

Just no fumbles!

 

It's not like they are going to be playing in a foot of snow.

 

Bob Sacamano told me there probably won't be much, if any accumulated snow on the field when they are playing. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mahomes arm is so strong i don’t think this weather will hurt them at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, deadman said:

Tarps are coming off.

 

 

They’re taking it off kind of early. That field is going to be white by game time.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

They’re taking it off kind of early. That field is going to be white by game time.

I was thinking the same thing. Still 3 hours until kickoff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

This is going to be a really crappy game and boring.

:spit:

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

They’re taking it off kind of early. That field is going to be white by game time.

I'd think some player's pregame routines start before too long. Need to get things setup before that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Mahomes arm is so strong i don’t think this weather will hurt them at all.

 

You mean versatile?

 

Lucks' arm is just as strong, he just doesn't throw all those crazy side-arm, left-handed, and no-look passes.

 

Either way, the weather affects the passing game for both teams.  There won't be as much snow, but remember the snow-game in Buffalo last year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys calm down. According to the chiefs fans the field is heated and weather won't be an issue.  I guess matter changing states is an anomaly at arrowhead stadium and melting snow acts differently there.  Where normally it goes snow -> water -> water vapor, at arrowhead it must go snow -> butterfly kisses -> chiefs easy victory.  I appeatly should just watch reruns of murder she wrote on the hallmark channel instead.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Some of you never played football in the snow as a kid, and it shows.  :(

Football was never meant to be played in a snowstorm

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, our_dbs_rock said:

Guys calm down. According to the chiefs fans the field is heated and weather won't be an issue.  I guess matter changing states is an anomaly at arrowhead stadium and melting snow acts differently there.  Where normally it goes snow -> water -> water vapor, at arrowhead it must go snow -> butterfly kisses -> chiefs easy victory.  I appeatly should just watch reruns of murder she wrote on the hallmark channel instead.

Doesn't matter if the field is heated

Its going to snow throughout the game, according to the forecast.

 

That's going to limit what both offenses can do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

Football was never meant to be played in a snowstorm

 

Says who?

 

There was no forward pass when the game was invented.

 

It was basically rugby-scrums.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Mahomes arm is so strong i don’t think this weather will hurt them at all.

But then what?

I know the throwers can throw..

..but its the receivers catching the ball and holding it in the snow that's the problem

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, deadman said:

 

If it is that slick I think that does slow Hill down. Probably slows TY down also. This very well may come down to a pound it out short passing game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Doesn't matter if the field is heated

Its going to snow throughout the game, according to the forecast.

 

That's going to limit what both offenses can do.

Limits the Chiefs passing game? That'd give the Colts a pretty obvious path to victory- in my opinion. This doesn't bother me so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Says who?

 

There was no forward pass when the game was invented.

 

It was basically rugby-scrums.

Says history.

Football was orginally played in the fall.....Nobody played after the first week of November

I know you know that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Fish said:

Limits the Chiefs passing game? That'd give the Colts a pretty obvious path to victory- in my opinion. This doesn't bother me so much.

It worries me. It limits our passing game, too..

Both sides can bring 7 or 8 men into the box because nobody's throwing long

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

If it is that slick I think that does slow Hill down. Probably slows TY down also. This very well may come down to a pound it out short passing game.

 

I start liking our chances if that’s the case.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

If it is that slick I think that does slow Hill down. Probably slows TY down also. This very well may come down to a pound it out short passing game.

I think you may see a few designed runs by Andrew.  

safest play is a QB run…..and they wont expect it because we haven't don't it all year

 

Could be a lot of running and sliding:banana:

 I also like our placekicker kicker in bad conditions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

Says history.

Football was orginally played in the fall.....Nobody played after the first week of November

I know you know that.

 

Ok, so the people that invented football in the 1800s told you the game was "never meant to be played in a snowstorm"...

 

Because it never snowed in November in New Jersey?

 

Got it.  haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good point.  I think this has serious merit 
    • My take   1. We overachieved last season. Period 2. We played at KC 3. TY limited the offense because he was so injured.  4. We played a very very good coach with time to prepare and his guys got some rest too and time to scout the team. Remember, Reich is well known to Reid as well by now.  5. Not having Hooker really mattered 6. Play calling was a bit blah 7. How does Vinny automatic miss those kicks? 8. A strip sack for us turns into a strip sack for them a few plays later, that hurt.  9. A young team who wasn’t supposed to be in the playoffs, let alone a second game in the playoffs had some factor here.  10. KC had a pretty good team   my concern from that game would be how poorly our run game was going forward. Kelly better play better than he did this season or I don’t see a 15 million/yr contract coming his way in Indy. I think with a healthy TY, the additions of DF and Cain and Paris and others should really boost that offense. An offense with TY, Paris, Doyle, EE and Mack, now that’s gonna be a tough group to match up with and defend. Run or pass, heck coach, idk what they are doing lol.    Gonna be fun to see this team evolve and have better back ups coming off the bench. I just hope we have enough beef in the middle to stop the run and I just hope that Kelly was hobbled in that KC game because it was one of his worst games that year. 
    • This again boils down to you hanging on to 'this is how it's always been done.' And you don't get that I don't care about that rationale. I think it can be done better. Which is why, in my first post in this thread, I said "to me, it's a no brainer." To me. It should be obvious that this is my stated preference, not me saying that teams that don't do it this way are stupid.   There should be nothing more that I have to say about that, except you continue to rely on that appeal to authority, and I'm telling you that 'how it's always been done' isn't legitimate reason for not examining potential alternatives. Not just in this area, but in everything.      You're missing an important detail, and I think it's because you've put my argument in a box and are unwilling to actually examine it on its merits.   As I said initially, and have said since, my argument is to make this change six months sooner, not six months later. "Imagine if we had fired Grigson in June 2016 instead of January 2017." Did you miss that part, again? What about "if the Texans had waited until January 2020 to fire Gaine..."?    I want him in asap. You want him asap, but not until January.   My statement about it being just one draft is referencing the worst case scenario, which is 'we just blew a draft cycle by letting a lame duck GM stay,' to which I say 'get over it, I'm okay with that if that's what it takes to get the guy I want in the building, with the staff he wants.' And that's where my argument about it potentially being easier to interview candidates in the down season after the draft is critical. The Jets wanted Joe Douglas; he evidently didn't want to entertain a move during draft season, but jumped at it in May/June. (There's the matter of moving his family during the school year, etc.) In theory, this approach could make it easier to interview good candidates. Whether you agree with that or not, whether it's important to you or not, this is mostly an aside. As I said, this was my response to the alarmist reaction of 'they just blew a draft!' Which I think is overstated, especially in the Texans' case.     Not at all. Again, if Ballard started in June 2016, he theoretically could have changed coaches a year sooner.      This is a hindsight fallacy. Go back to the Texans wanting to hire Caserio. I'm not arguing that he's going to be a great GM, I'm arguing that he's the guy they want to hire, and he's available in June. Same for the Jets and Douglas. The Chiefs and Veach.    We know that every person hired doesn't succeed. I never argued that they do. That's true of whoever you rush to hire in January. The point is that there is always a pool of qualified candidates from which to choose. I won't be retracting that, I firmly believe it, and I said it when the Colts were interviewing coaches in 2012, when they interviewed GMs in 2017, and when they interviewed coaches in 2018. You choosing to reject that is pretty ridiculous, to be honest. There are always qualified candidates. Choosing the right one is a different story.   And again, if there's one guy you really, desperately want, why wait until January to get him?     You could give me the benefit of the doubt and assume that if I'm saying it, I mean it. Especially this far into the discussion...    And going back to what I said earlier, this is and always has been my opinion. I'm not offering studies and conclusive evidence to support this opinion because it's a personal preference, it's what I think would be best (although I have offered evidence and rationale to support my opinion, you've just chosen to reject, for reasons I don't agree with).    I'm okay with the disagreement. What I find personally off-putting is the insistence that, because you don't understand my angle, it means I either haven't actually thought it through, or I don't actually believe it. As I said earlier, I understand that general consensus disagrees with my viewpoint, but that doesn't mean I'm just going to conform. The fact that I'm presenting an argument in earnest should be enough.
    • I'm an Iowa fan but I'd kind of like to see Michigan win that game so that it can maybe move back towards the appearance of a real rivalry.     That is unless an Ohio State victory would somehow help Iowa, in that situation I would root for the Buckeyes. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...