Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts ran for 200 yards


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Anyone think Tom Rathman is one of the reasons why?

Don't b surprised if Ballard uses another high pick on the O line. The efficiency of the O line this year just proves how important it is to the success of the  offence and defence.

Prediction:   We’re going to keep Glowinski and we’re likely going to pay him more than you think we should.   And he’ll be worth the money.    We have the money and he’s earned it

... and yet threw on 2nd and 3rd down when we should have been eating clock and trying to get the killer first downs on the ground. We have our back in Mack (like that phrase?) This offense just needs to stay consistent. We will need it next week in KC for sure. 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, CR91 said:

Mack is incredible. He can grind yards like a young frank gore, but has the speed, vision, and cut of LT

Just lacks the power in his legs to push a pile.  I loved his long run to the left side.  Really good moves and vision!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Shafty138 said:

I believe Glowinski is a free agent.  If he wants to much kick Smith in at guard and draft a tackle.  Or keep Smith at tackle and draft a guard.  Depends on best player available in the draft. Lots of options. I am not going  to pay Glowinski a lot of money even though we have a lot of cap.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, ar1888 said:

Any one else surprised nyheim hines didn’t get a touch all day?  I don’t remember him even seeing the field. 

Not really. Everything is game specific. Will probably get him more looks against KC.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

I believe Glowinski is a free agent.  If he wants to much kick Smith in at guard and draft a tackle.  Or keep Smith at tackle and draft a guard.  Depends on best player available in the draft. Lots of options. I am not going  to pay Glowinski a lot of money even though we have a lot of cap.

Glow will be back because we give him a fair deal. Do you listen to Ballard when he talks about building the team? I wouldn't be shocked if we added to the OL anyway. 

 

11 minutes ago, ar1888 said:

Any one else surprised nyheim hines didn’t get a touch all day?  I don’t remember him even seeing the field. 

It was Mack all day  Wilkins had 2 carries and Pascal got one. I was a little surprised but I'm fine with it. Mack is our best RB so let him eat. When we go committee I'd rather see Wilkins touches and use Hines in passing situations. Again I think Macks the most dangerous so no issue feeding him 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

I believe Glowinski is a free agent.  If he wants to much kick Smith in at guard and draft a tackle.  Or keep Smith at tackle and draft a guard.  Depends on best player available in the draft. Lots of options. I am not going  to pay Glowinski a lot of money even though we have a lot of cap.

Smith looked excellent tonight at RT

 

We need Glowinski, and though he doesnt deserve top money, I would hate to see them break up the continuity

 

I do hope we draft a OT to develop for later

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Don't b surprised if Ballard uses another high pick on the O line. The efficiency of the O line this year just proves how important it is to the success of the  offence and defence.

Preferably a center that has guard experience. Limiting the drop off from Kelly if he goes down would do wonders for our consistency.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

I believe Glowinski is a free agent.  If he wants to much kick Smith in at guard and draft a tackle.  Or keep Smith at tackle and draft a guard.  Depends on best player available in the draft. Lots of options. I am not going  to pay Glowinski a lot of money even though we have a lot of cap.

 

Prediction:

 

We’re going to keep Glowinski and we’re likely going to pay him more than you think we should.   And he’ll be worth the money. 

 

We have the money and he’s earned it.

  • Like 9
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, CheezyColt said:

Preferably a center that has guard experience. Limiting the drop off from Kelly if he goes down would do wonders for our consistency.

 

We already have that exact player that you described....    his name is Evan Boehm.   A center with guard experience who played well in Kelly’s absence...

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

I believe Glowinski is a free agent.  If he wants to much kick Smith in at guard and draft a tackle.  Or keep Smith at tackle and draft a guard.  Depends on best player available in the draft. Lots of options. I am not going  to pay Glowinski a lot of money even though we have a lot of cap.

 

Would like to see a Tackle with the potential to replace Castonzo in near future. Anthony isn't getting younger...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

We already have that exact player that you described....    his name is Evan Boehm.   A center with guard experience who played well in Kelly’s absence...

I had no idea we had him. Thanks for informing me!

 

Boehm did fine, but the difference, especially when watching our run game, was glaring when he had to go in. We could do much worse than Boehm to be sure... But we could do better as well.  That would be my preference. Not that controversial.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, ar1888 said:

Any one else surprised nyheim hines didn’t get a touch all day?  I don’t remember him even seeing the field. 

 

Hines had averaged almost 10 touches per game and was 3rd on the team with 46 first downs. I was very surprised.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah 200 yards but but some was late in garbage time. Mack got opportunity to pad to his already 100 yard game which I liked lol. Overall we ran well when game was not over.

 

As far Bell, I'd like to seee another #1 type back to join Mack. It doesn't have to be Bell.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...